research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206
Volume 75| Part 5| October 2019| Pages 830-838
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520619010412

Pristine and hydrated fluoroapatite (0001)

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg
Xavier Torrelles,a* Immad M. Nadeem,b,c Anna Kupka,d Adrián Crespo-Villanueva,a Sandrina Meis,d Hermann Giesd and Oier Bikondoae,f*

aInstitute of Materials Science of Barcelona (ICMAB-CSIC), Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain, bLondon Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H OAJ, UK, cHarwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source Ltd, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, UK, dFaculty of Geosciences, Department of Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, Bochum 44780, Germany, eDepartment of Physics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK, and fXMaS, The UK-CRG Beamline, ESRF The European Synchrotron, CS40220, F-38043 Grenoble cedex 09, France
*Correspondence e-mail: torrelles@icmab.es, oier.bikondoa@esrf.fr

Edited by M. de Boissieu, SIMaP, France (Received 4 April 2019; accepted 22 July 2019; online 10 September 2019)

The surface structure of fluoro­apatite (0001) (FAp0001) under quasi-dry and humid conditions has been probed with surface X-ray diffraction (SXRD). Lateral and perpendicular atomic relaxations corresponding to the FAp0001 termination before and after H2O exposure and the location of the adsorbed water molecules have been determined from experimental analysis of the crystal truncation rod (CTR) intensities. The surface under dry conditions exhibits a bulk termination with relaxations in the outermost atomic layers. The hydrated surface is formed by a disordered partially occupied H2O layer containing one water molecule (33% surface coverage) adsorbed at each of the three surface Ca atoms, and is coupled with one OH group randomly bonded to each of the three topmost P atoms with a 33% surface coverage.

CCDC references: 1942347; 1942348

Similar articles

1. Introduction

Apatites represent a group of phosphate minerals that are very common in nature. Their generic chemical formula is Ca5(PO4)3X, where X corresponds to a monovalent anion such as F−, (OH)− etc. Structurally, apatites crystallize in the hexagonal space group P63/m (No. 176) where the hexagonal axis is normal to a symmetry plane (Bragg et al., 1965[Bragg, L., Claringbull, G. F. & Taylor, W. H. (1965). The Crystalline State, Vol. IV, Crystal Structures of Minerals. Cornell University Press.]). The apatite structure is built of unconnected [PO4] tetrahedra, with Ca2+ cations occupying the space between the tetrahedra, and the X− anions compensating the extra charge of the Ca2+ cations and located along the c axis (Calderín et al., 2003[Calderín, L., Stott, M. J. & Rubio, A. (2003). Phys. Rev. B, 67, 134106.]). Fluoro­apatite (calcium fluorophosphate, FAp) is a typical member of the apatite group with X = F. It contains 42 atoms per unit cell and has two formula units (Z = 2) per unit cell.

FAp is often found as an accessory mineral in igneous rocks, in the form of elongated prismatic needle-shaped crystal inclusions (Haldar & Tišljar, 2014[Haldar, S. K. & Tišljar, J. (2014). Introduction to Mineralogy and Petrology, ch. 2, Basic Mineralogy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.]). The substitution of small amounts (∼4 to 7 wt%) of PO43− by CO32− leads to carbon­ated FAp, which is an important sink in the marine phosphorus cycle (Ruttenberg & Berner, 1993[Ruttenberg, K. C. & Berner, R. A. (1993). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 57, 991-1007.]). Apatites are also used as a source of phosphate for fertilizer production. Apatitic structures are also very relevant in biomineralization (Combes et al., 2016[Combes, C., Cazalbou, S. & Rey, C. (2016). Minerals, 6, 34.]). Calcium hy­droxy­apatite is found in bones, and human enamel and dentine are composed of hy­droxy­apatite (HAp, X = OH). FAp may also be found, in varying proportions, in human enamel that has been exposed to F− ions, as FAp is chemically more stable than HAp. HAp and FAp are both used in regenerative medical techniques (Ben-Nissan, 2014[Ben-Nissan, B. (2014). Editor. Advances in Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials. Heidelberg: Springer.]). In some animal species (e.g. cartilaginous fish) instead of HAp enamel, the species have FAp enameloid, although the dentine is HAp (Lübke et al., 2015[Lübke, A., Enax, J., Loza, K., Prymak, O., Gaengler, P., Fabritius, H.-O., Raabe, D. & Epple, M. (2015). RSC Adv. 5, 61612-61622.]). Teeth with FAp dentine have been found in the fossil record, but the presence of FAp in the dentine is due to diagenesis and exchange between the hydroxyl group and fluoride ions (Renzi et al., 2016[Renzi, M. de, Manzanares, E., Marin-Monfort, M. D. & Botella, H. (2016). RSC Adv. 6, 74384-74388.]). The diagenetic transformation from HAp to FAp may depend on the microstructure of the original tissue (Lübke et al., 2017[Lübke, A., Loza, K., Patnaik, R., Enax, J., Raabe, D., Prymak, O., Fabritius, H.-O., Gaengler, P. & Epple, M. (2017). RSC Adv. 7, 6215-6222.]).

The mineral–water interface plays a fundamental role in the functions of apatite both in geochemistry and in medicine and biomineralization. Previously, we investigated the surface structure of orthorhombic FAp (100) (FAp100) under dry and humid conditions [relative humidity (RH) ∼75%] using data from surface X-ray diffraction experiments (SXRD). The interface in a humid atmosphere shows a well organized and periodically ordered monolayer of water arranged laterally, with atomic relaxations of the mineral surface structure smaller than those of the dry surface (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]). Here we extend this study to the hexagonal FAp (0001) (FAp0001) termination of a natural FAp single crystal under dry conditions (in an He-saturated environment) followed by exposure to a water-saturated environment at ambient temperatures.

2. Experimental and SXRD analysis details

A natural FAp single crystal from Durango, Mexico, with a (0001) termination was rinsed with ultrapure water (resistivity 18.2 MΩ cm), sonicated in ethanol (Sigma–Aldrich, purity >99.8%) and lastly mounted within a small Kapton tent in which He gas (Air Liquide, purity 5 N) was flowing continuously during the dry measurements. Next, water vapour was introduced into the tent by bubbling helium through an ultrapure water (resistivity 18.2 MΩ cm) reservoir and an ultrapure-water-soaked paper tissue was placed in the tent. The SXRD experiments were carried out on beamline BM28 (XMaS) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF). All measurements were performed in a vertical four-circle geometry at a constant incidence angle of 0.5° and photon energy of 15 keV (https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/xmas/). To follow surface geometry changes qualitatively, the intensity of the (−1, −1, 1.5) reflection was monitored. The index of this reflection, and all others hereafter, is expressed using Bravais–Miller indices (Hahn, 1996[Hahn, Th. (1996). Editor. International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. A, Space-group symmetry, 4th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer.]) and in terms of the reciprocal-lattice vectors h, k and l. These vectors are defined with reference to the real-space (1 × 1) unit cell of FAp0001 described by the lattice vectors a, b and c which are parallel to the [[2\,{\overline 1} \, {\overline 1} \, 0]], [[{\overline 1} \, 2\, {\overline 1} \, 0]] and [0001] directions, respectively. The magnitudes of these lattice vectors are a = b = 9.375 Å and c = 6.8870 Å and the angles are α = β = 90° and γ = 120° (Elliot, 1994[Elliot, J. C. (1994). Structure and Chemistry of the Apatites and Other Calcium Orthophosphates. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.]).

A total of 581 and 704 reflections were measured under dry and humid conditions, respectively, which reduced to 535 [dry, 14 crystal truncation rods (CTRs) + reflectivity] and 620 (humid, 16 CTRs + reflectivity) non-equivalent reflections, respectively. The structure of the surface was determined adopting the usual approach: theoretical SXRD data are generated for a potential structure and then the model structure is iteratively refined to find the best fit between the experimental and theoretical structure factors. A modified version of the ROD software – a modification that allows the user to form blocks of molecules and rotate them around a common origin – was used for this task (Vlieg, 2000[Vlieg, E. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 401-405.]; Torrelles et al., 2004[Torrelles, X., Barrena, E., Munuera, C., Rius, J., Ferrer, S. & Ocal, C. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 9396-9402.]). The goodness-of-fit was evaluated in terms of two commonly used parameters, χ2 ([\chi _n^2]) (Feidenhans'l, 1989[Feidenhans'l, R. (1989). Surf. Sci. Rep. 10, 105-188.]) and the R factor (Stout & Jensen, 1968[Stout, G. H. & Jensen, L. H. (1968). X-ray Structure Determination. New York: McMillan.]):

[\chi _n^2 = {1 \over {N - P}} \sum \limits_{i=1}^N {{\left ( \left | F_{i}^{\rm th}(hkl) \right | - \left | F_{i}^{\rm exp}(hkl) \right | \right )^2} \over {\sigma_{i}^{{\rm exp}^2}}} , \eqno(1)]

[R = {{\sum _{i=1}^n \left | \left | F_{i}^{\rm th}(hkl) \right | - \left | F_{i}^{\rm exp}(hkl) \right | \right |} \over {\sum _{i=1}^n \left | F_{i}^{\rm exp}(hkl) \right |}} , \eqno(2)]

where N is the number of measured structure factors, P is the number of parameters optimized during the fitting procedure, and Fiexp (hkl) and Fith (hkl) are the experimental and theoretically calculated structure factors, respectively. [\sigma_i^{\rm exp} (hkl)] is the uncertainty associated with Fiexp and was estimated by averaging equivalent reflections. [\chi _n^2] behaves such that a value of 1 indicates good agreement between the experimental and theoretically calculated structure factors. The quoted precision of each fitted parameter is determined by varying the parameter about its optimal values until [\chi _n^2] has increased by 1/(N − P) from its minimum value (Feidenhans'l, 1989[Feidenhans'l, R. (1989). Surf. Sci. Rep. 10, 105-188.]).

The structure refinement of the pristine FAp0001 surface under dry conditions was initiated from an ideal FAp0001 termination. Relaxations were allowed layer by layer, gradually, starting from the surface and going into the bulk. The most favourable surface-layer termination was inspected by refining initially the experimental data set (CTRs) with each surface termination and their respective atomic occupancies (Table 1[link]). Additional numbers of layers were considered, taking into account the progressive reduction with depth in the atomic distortions relative to their ideal positions. Fig. 1[link] shows the evolution of [\chi _n^2] and R factor with the number of layers in the model. From the fifth layer, the [\chi _n^2] value does not improve appreciably.

Table 1
The first line, for the dry case, indicates the weight evolution of each surface termination layer with (PO4) and without (PO3) the topmost O atom, and in the second line the weight of water and OH molecules in the refinement process is indicated

Dry 1st layer, O = 0 1st layer, O = 1 2nd layer 3rd/4th layer
[\chi _n^2] 1.2 2.2 6.1 2.5/2.8
Humid H2O = 0, OH = 0 H2O = 0, OH = [1\over 3] H2O = [1\over 3], OH = 0 H2O = [1\over 3], OH = [1\over 3]
[\chi _n^2] 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.16
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The evolution of [\chi _n^2] and R factor with the number of layers considered in the model.

The space group of FAp0001 is P63/m. Both the z mirror plane (m) and the symmetry translation along the z direction, i.e. z + ½ (P63 subgroup), were checked. However, the two space groups were dropped during the refinement because models constructed with P63/m and P63 symmetries could not adequately adjust the experimental data: their [\chi _n^2] goodness-of-fit factors were twice that of our best [\chi _n^2]. For this reason, the P3 symmetry of the 2D space group was selected to construct the final models used to adjust the data. The extra symmetry operations of P63/m and P63 [i.e. mirror plane or (z + ½) translation] reduce by almost a factor of two the number of (x, y, z) parameters with respect to the P3 symmetry: 36 parameters to define (x, y) coordinates (rotation angles and atomic shifts) plus 27 z parameters, a scale factor and a roughness factor (total = 65 parameters). Models considering the phosphate groups as rigid bodies can reduce the number of parameters by a factor of five (Torrelles et al., 2004[Torrelles, X., Barrena, E., Munuera, C., Rius, J., Ferrer, S. & Ocal, C. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 9396-9402.]). Considering the P3 symmetry only, the structure of the surface retains a three-fold axis on the surface that provides different rotation values for atoms that are not located on the same level (the atoms related to the three-fold axis have identical z coordinates). With this symmetry a total of 107 structural parameters for the dry surface were used, i.e. 60 (x, y) parameters, 45 (z) parameters, a scale factor and a roughness parameter. The humid surface model has six (x, y, z) parameters more than the dry model, plus two occupancy factors to determine the position and surface coverage of the H2O and OH species present at the surface/interface. Although the number of parameters is large, we introduced bond-length restraints for [PO4] as a structurally invariant subunit with maximum tolerances up to ±0.15 Å. These restraints allow us to compensate for the lower sensitivity of some O atoms of the model in phosphate groups located in layers 2-b, 3-a and 4-d with respect to the others bonded to the same group (the definition of these labels is given in Table 2[link]). The use of bond-length restraints facilitates the convergence of the fit towards a real structure while maintaining the P—O bond distances within a physical range with a maximum–minimum bond tolerance of 10% (Watkin, 1994[Watkin, D. (1994). Acta Cryst. A50, 411-437.]). Fig. 2[link] shows the two blocks of atoms forming the bulk unit cell.

Table 2
Atomic coordinates of the FAp0001 surface slab formed by two and a half bulk cells

The columns on the left show the ideal positions of the surface atoms in the bulk, (x, y, z)bulk. After refining the experimental data sets with dry and humid surfaces with their respective models, the atomic shifts with respect to the ideal positions are given as (Δx, Δy, Δz)dry and (Δx, Δy, Δz)humid, respectively. The error bars assigned to each shift are given by the corresponding subscript index (Torrelles et al., 2004[Torrelles, X., Barrena, E., Munuera, C., Rius, J., Ferrer, S. & Ocal, C. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 9396-9402.]). Atomic positions and shifts are given in crystallographic coordinates with respect to the hexagonal cell defined by the lattice parameters (9.375 Å, 9.375 Å, 6.887 Å, 90°, 90°, 120°). By adding or subtracting (according to the sign indicated in the table) the corresponding shifts to/from the ideal atomic positions, the position of the fitted atom in the unit cell is obtained. Dashes (–) denote that the atom does not exist in the model, and asterisks (*) denote that the corresponding coordinate was kept fixed during the refinement procedure due to symmetry restrictions (atoms placed on a ternary axis). Atomic coordinates marked with an asterisk also indicate that the corresponding atom was placed on a ternary axis. Cai-j denotes Ca atom j in a layer i. Pi-(a→e) denotes a P atom in a layer i. The additional labels a to e help to identify the four O atoms bonded tetrahedrally to each P atom: Oa-t (oxygen a, top), Oa-1 and Oa-2 are oxygens placed on the same z level as the P atom and Oa-b (oxygen a, bottom).
  Surface atomic coordinates
Atom label xbulk ybulk zbulk Δxdry Δydry Δzdry Δxhumid Δyhumid Δzhumid
O* 0.2419 0.9929 3.5292 – – – 0.052 0.032 0.031
F 0.0000 0.0000 3.2500 * * −0.0306 * * −0.0306
Ca1 0.2419 0.9929 3.2500 −0.0072 −0.0062 −0.0042 0.0022 0.0072 −0.0182
P1-a 0.3985 0.3690 3.2500 0.0055 0.0115 −0.0083 −0.0043 −0.0112 −0.0354
Oa-t 0.3411 0.2571 3.4292 – – – −0.032 −0.042 −0.051
Oa-1 0.3269 0.4844 3.2500 0.0075 0.0185 0.0045 0.0046 −0.0265 −0.0264
Oa-2 0.5876 0.4655 3.2500 −0.0115 −0.0325 −0.0254 0.0025 0.0274 −0.0075
Oa-b 0.3411 0.2571 3.0708 0.0185 0.0164 0.0173 0.0305 0.0024 −0.0264
Ca2-1 0.3333 0.6667 3.0011 * * 0.0273 * * 0.0143
Ca2-2 0.6667 0.3333 2.9989 * * −0.0033 * * 0.0193
F 0.0000 0.0000 2.750 * * −0.0057 * * 0.0256
Ca3 0.7581 0.0071 2.750 −0.0112 −0.0022 0.0092 −0.2 −0.0092 0.0102
P2-b 0.6016 0.6310 2.750 0.0093 −0.0073 −0.0073 −0.0153 −0.0023 0.0074
Ob-t 0.6589 0.7429 2.9292 0.0145 −0.0085 −0.0374 0.0066 0.0175 0.0154
Ob-1 0.6731 0.4844 2.7500 −0.0135 −0.0145 −0.0034 0.0186 0.0375 −0.0134
Ob-2 0.4124 0.5345 2.7500 0.0205 0.0155 −0.0034 −0.0135 −0.0214 −0.0285
Ob-b 0.6589 0.7429 2.5708 −0.0135 −0.0115 0.0283 −0.0085 0.0064 0.0244
Ca4-1 0.6667 0.3333 2.5011 * * 0.0162 * * 0.0052
Ca4-2 0.3333 0.6667 2.4989 * * 0.0102 * * 0.0012
F 0.0000 0.0000 2.2500 * * 0.0067 * * −0.0277
Ca5 0.2419 0.9929 2.2500 0.0062 −0.0012 −0.0002 0.0042 0.0072 0.0062
P3-c 0.3985 0.3690 2.2500 0.0063 −0.0012 −0.0123 0.0163 0.0012 −0.0173
Oc-t 0.3411 0.2571 2.4292 0.0145 −0.0034 −0.0203 0.0175 0.0394 −0.0084
Oc-1 0.3269 0.4844 2.2500 −0.0065 −0.0135 0.0313 0.0055 0.0035 0.0334
Oc-2 0.5876 0.4655 2.2500 0.0165 0.0075 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0125
Oc-b 0.3411 0.2571 2.0708 −0.0055 0.0075 0.0044 0.0206 0.0215 0.0004
Ca6-1 0.3333 0.6667 2.0011 * * 0.0103 * * 0.0033
Ca6-2 0.6667 0.3333 1.9989 * * −0.0083 * * −0.0063
F 0.0000 0.0000 1.7500 * * −0.0047 * * 0.0306
Ca7 0.7581 0.0071 1.7500 −0.0033 −0.0043 0.0081 −0.0062 −0.0062 0.0072
P4-d 0.6016 0.6310 1.7500 −0.0043 0.0012 −0.0033 −0.0052 0.0012 0.0152
Od-t 0.6589 0.7429 1.9292 0.0025 −0.0205 −0.0174 0.0096 0.0035 0.0145
Od-1 0.6731 0.4844 1.7500 0.0035 0.0085 −0.0124 0.0165 0.0374 −0.0104
Od-2 0.4124 0.5345 1.7500 −0.0095 −0.0065 0.0034 0.0085 −0.0084 −0.0154
Od-b 0.6589 0.7429 1.5708 −0.0145 −0.0144 0.0033 −0.0035 −0.0054 −0.0014
Ca8-1 0.6667 0.3333 1.5011 * * −0.0072 * * 0.0052
Ca8-2 0.3333 0.6667 1.4989 * * −0.0032 * * −0.0122
F 0.0000 0.0000 1.2500 * * 0.0086 * * −0.0276
Ca9 0.2419 0.9929 1.2500 −0.0022 −0.0032 0.0021 0.0062 0.0072 0.0052
P5-e 0.3985 0.3690 1.2500 0.0043 0.0012 −0.0073 0.0052 0.0022 −0.0042
Oe-t 0.3411 0.2571 1.4292 0.0144 −0.0064 −0.0153 0.0134 0.0194 −0.0104
Oe-1 0.3269 0.4844 1.2500 0.0115 −0.0035 0.0154 0.0055 0.0034 −0.0054
Oe-2 0.5876 0.4655 1.2500 0.0114 0.0085 −0.0064 −0.0094 −0.0034 0.0134
Oe-b 0.3411 0.2571 1.0708 0.0105 0.0094 0.0013 0.0145 0.0174 0.0094
Ca10-1 0.3333 0.6667 1.0011 * * 0.0002 * * 0.0062
Ca10-2 0.6667 0.3333 0.9989 * * 0.0062 * * −0.0012
O 0.6589 0.7429 0.9294 0.0024 −0.0104 −0.0093 −0.0015 −0.0054 −0.0034
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The FAp0001 bulk unit cell, viewed (top) from the top and (bottom) laterally. The cell shows the two block layers forming the cell. The groups of atoms belonging to each block are displayed separated by a plane.

In previous work, the FAp–H2O interface has been probed by X-ray reflectivity (XRR) and CTR investigations (SXRD) with different sensitivities to the geometry of the surface structure (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]; Park et al., 2004[Park, C., Fenter, P., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L. & Sturchio, N. C. (2004). Am. Mineral. 89, 1647-1654.]). XRR measurements only yield a projection of the 2D structure onto 1D, with good information on layer distances but without information on the lateral structural periodicity. CTRs provide information on the mineral surface and on possible layers of adsorbates, provided these have the same lateral periodicity as the mineral surface. XRR studies of the FAp–H2O interface on a fully hydrated surface by Park et al. (2004[Park, C., Fenter, P., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L. & Sturchio, N. C. (2004). Am. Mineral. 89, 1647-1654.]) showed adsorption of two water layers at out-of-surface plane distances of 2.64 (9) and 4.17 (5) Å from the mineral surface. In our earlier SXRD study, specular and non-specular CTRs of the FAp(100) (FAp100)–H2O interface disclosed the presence of one laterally ordered water layer in a humid environment at an out-of-surface plane distance of 1.8 (1) Å (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]), although specular X-ray reflectivity showed the presence of two water layers when fully hydrated (Park et al., 2004[Park, C., Fenter, P., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L. & Sturchio, N. C. (2004). Am. Mineral. 89, 1647-1654.]), giving a 1D representation of the surface electronic density along the normal direction. In later work, the lateral ordering of these two water layers was demonstrated from a 3D analysis of the hydrated FAp100–water interface placed at distances from the relaxed surface of 1.6 (1) and 3.18 (10) Å (Pareek et al., 2008[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2008). Langmuir, 24, 2459-2464.]). These refined surface models consider five surface blocks formed by ideal F—Ca—[PO4] {block = F(1)—Ca(5)—[PO4](3); the numbers in brackets indicate the number of elements of each type in a single block} as in the bulk. Each block contains two different Ca layers at different heights, and each bulk unit cell contains two of these blocks. Hence, each unit cell contains four layers with a spacing of one quarter of a unit cell (Δz = 0.25) between them. See Fig. 2[link] for more details.

3. Results and discussion

The starting model used to refine the data considers a surface slab with two and a half bulk unit cells. The initial positions of the atoms in the cell were the ideal bulk ones and the shifts from them follow P3 symmetry.

The surface termination under dry conditions was determined from a preliminary inspection of the evolution of [\chi _n^2] with each of the four possible termination layers (Table 1[link]). The lowest values are obtained for F—Ca—[PO4] terminated block layers, while those terminating in two Ca atoms show higher χ2 values.

The best refined surface model includes five F—Ca—[PO4] surface blocks (or ten atomic layers). Under dry conditions, the topmost layer is Ca—PO3 terminated where no O and/or OH adsorption is observed to complete the typical octahedral coordination of the Ca cation (presence of a phosphite PO3 anion). The influence of this O atom during the refinement is also shown in Table 1[link] in terms of χ2.

The surface resembles an ideal bulk termination with relaxations in the top surface layers. The surface roughness value obtained with ROD and using the approximate β model (Vlieg, 2000[Vlieg, E. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 401-405.]; Robinson, 1986[Robinson, I. K. (1986). Phys. Rev. B, 33, 3830-3836.], 1998[Robinson, I. K. (1998). Acta Cryst. A54, 772-778.] and references therein) was small, implying that the FAp0001 surface is mostly flat (β = 0.04 ± 0.01). The tilts of the [PO4] tetrahedron were fixed to the P3 symmetry given by the model. In ideal (bulk terminated) FAp0001, the Ca polyhedron can be considered as a CaO5F octahedron, but, in addition, a seventh weak bond to O exists, redefining the polyhedron as CaO5F(O) (Hughes et al., 1989[Hughes, J. M., Cameron, M. & Crowley, K. D. (1989). Am. Mineral. 74, 870-876.]). For the ideal truncated surface, this coordination reduces to four or five. Under dry conditions, the reduction in coordination causes a non-uniform charge distribution of the topmost Ca atoms, which introduces significant distortions in the atoms of the upper surface layers, as has already been observed in FAp100 (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]).

The exposure of FAp0001 to an H2O saturated atmosphere results in a relaxed surface where the atoms are displaced inwards, i.e. along the z direction, perpendicular to the surface. The surface in a humid atmosphere is covered with a partially occupied H2O layer (three water molecules placed on top of each of the Ca atoms with an occupancy of 33%). In addition, three OH groups also appear on top of the P atoms with an occupancy of 33% each, thus completing the P coordination. The weight of the water and hydroxyl molecules in this surface was also tested in terms of χ2, as indicated in Table 1[link]. Considering the symmetry of the apatite crystal structure and the morphology of naturally occurring apatites, the basal plane (100) is rarely developed, perhaps because of its comparatively fast growth kinetics. In order to keep the charge balanced and maintain the symmetry, a perfect cation or phosphate termination is not favoured and surface roughness is required to avoid charge separation. On the other hand, macroscopic adsorption experiments indicate that an equivalent of two monolayers of water are strongly adsorbed on microcrystalline apatite (Posner, 1985[Posner, A. S. (1985). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19, 241-250.]). The low water concentration detected at the (0001) surface is assigned to positional disorder, which could be the origin of this apparent small H2O/OH adsorption.

To ensure both (i) the possible loss or not of one O atom bonded to the topmost phosphate unit in the dry surface and (ii) the percentage of the surface water and hydroxyl coverages (100% or 33%) on the hydrated surface, we have analysed the reflectivity curves measured for both cases. Both dry (top) and humid (bottom) curves are shown in Fig. 3[link]. The dry reflectivity curve agrees with the results obtained from the analysis of the corresponding CTRs, confirming that one O atom bonded to the topmost phosphate unit is lost, thus forming a phosphite ion. The humid reflectivity curve indicates the presence of three water and three OH molecules per unit cell, well localized along the surface normal at 2.23 (1) Å above the topmost Ca layer. The red and blue curves in Fig. 3[link] (bottom) are obtained considering hydroxyl coverages of 100% or 33%, respectively. The red curve considering full coverage fits the experimental data slightly better. The corresponding CTRs measured for this case only detect one water and one OH molecule per unit cell, thus with an atomic occupancy of 0.33. As each molecule can be bonded to only one of the three Ca and P atoms forming part of the surface, the model places one molecule of each specimen with an occupancy factor of 1/3 on top of them. To reconcile this apparent discrepancy between CTRs and reflectivity, we performed an analysis of their corresponding temperature factors (Debye–Waller or DW, B = 8π2〈u2〉). The model was then refined using both data sets and considering a similar anisotropic dependence of the DW for H2O and OH mol­ecules (in-plane and out-of-plane DW components Bpar and Bperp, respectively). The refinement process yields (Bpar, Bperp) values of (15 ± 4 Å2, 1.2 ± 0.1 Å2) when considering occupancies of 1 for water and OH molecules. The value of B becomes isotropic (Biso = 1.5 ± 0.1 Å2) when the occupancies of the molecules are 1/3. This analysis indicates that the H2O and OH molecules are well defined along the z direction but they show positional in-plane disorder.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Reflectivity curves for the dry and humid cases. The curves have been refined together with the CTRs and a model considering two and a half bulk unit cells. The red and blue curves were obtained considering surface hydroxyl coverages of 100% or 33%, respectively. See text for more details.

The refinements of the structure for the dry and humid data sets are shown in Figs. 4[link] and 5[link], respectively. The figures show the experimental and calculated structure factors for both cases using the full data sets formed by CTRs and reflectivity curves. Fig. 5[link] shows two curves obtained using two different models. Red curves consider water and hydroxyl molecules at the surface with occupancy [1\over3] and Biso = 1.5 Å2. In the second model (blue dashed curves) the occupancy factor of each H2O/OH molecule is 1 with (Bpar, Bperp) values of (15 Å2, 1.2 Å2). As can be observed, the fit is slightly worse for reflections with high (h, k) values as a consequence of the absence of molecular disorder along the z direction, as detected from the analysis of the reflectivity measurements. From our best model (red curves), the Ca—H2O bond distances are about 2.28 (5) Å (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]; Wolthers et al., 2012[Wolthers, M., Di Tommaso, D., Du, Z. & de Leeuw, N. H. (2012). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 15145-15157.]; Kerisit et al., 2003[Kerisit, S., Parker, S. C. & Harding, H. C. (2003). J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 7676-7682.]) and the OH—P bond lengths are 1.65 (5) Å (Gamoke et al., 2009[Gamoke, B., Neff, D. & Simons, J. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 5677-5684.]) thus completing the P coordination. The single P—OH bond is slightly longer than P=O (1.5 Å). The ideal atomic positions in fractional coordinates and the atomic displacements obtained after the refining process (using the P3 symmetry) of the FAp0001 surface structure under dry and humid conditions are shown in Table 2[link]. Top and lateral views of the refined models are represented in Figs. 6[link] and 7[link]. The evolution of [\chi _n^2] and R-factor figures of merit with the number of layers considered in the model during the refinement procedure (five F—Ca—[PO4] surface blocks) is shown in Fig. 1[link].

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
A comparison between experimental (black symbols with error bars) and calculated (red continuous lines) structure factors for FAp0001 under dry conditions. A standard deviation error of 13% was estimated from averaging between equivalent reflections. This value was also similar to that obtained for the humid case.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
A comparison between experimental (black symbols with error bars) and calculated (red continuous lines) data for the humid FAp0001 surface using the water/humid model described in the main text.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
The surface structure of dry FAp0001. (Left) Ball-and-stick representations of (top) top and (bottom) lateral views. (Right) The same views in a polyhedral representation. Colours: P atoms are green, F violet, Ca blue and O red.
[Figure 7]
Figure 7
The surface structure of humid FAp0001. (Left) Ball-and-stick representations of (top) top and (bottom) lateral views. (Right) The same views in a polyhedral representation. Colours: P atoms are green, F violet, Ca blue, O red, H2O dark blue and OH light blue.

The atomic relaxations of the surface layers in Table 2[link] decrease when the depth increases. In the first two blocks, relaxation is dominated by the rotations of the phosphates around the c axis, as indicated in Table 3[link], which gives the rotation angles for each of the five [PO4] groups considered in our surface model for dry and water-saturated atmospheres. The average atomic shifts for the dry and water-saturated atmospheres relative to the ideal bulk positions are easily recognizable from the phosphorus tetrahedral rotation from the top (1) to the inner (5) surface layers (Table 3[link]). The average evolution of the angles of the [PO4] units with depth shows that the water-saturated surface is less distorted than the dry one (Table 4[link]). This behaviour is similar to that detected for FAp100 under dry and humid (RH ≃ 75%) conditions (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.], 2008[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2008). Langmuir, 24, 2459-2464.], 2009[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 1453-1458.]). From the analysis of the data it looks as if the distortion of the top [PO4] is relaxed as a function of surface depth to take up an almost regular tetrahedral shape again. Moreover, the dry surface shows oxygen-unsaturated phosphate units. The outermost surface P—O oxygen is lost, as determined from the structure refinement. The resulting [PO3]3− ion unit (phosphite ion) shows average O—P—O bond angles close to 120°, as would be expected for this entity. The phosphite ion becomes a regular tetrahedron under a humid environment by partial adsorption of hydroxyl groups (one third of an OH group per PO3 unit = 33%). The experimental P—OH bond length is 1.65 Å, compatible with a value reported elsewhere (Gamoke et al., 2009[Gamoke, B., Neff, D. & Simons, J. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 5677-5684.]).

Table 3
Average rotation angles for each of the PO4/PO3 tetrahedral/phosphite (dry case) units at the surface versus depth for dry and humid cases

The signs + and − indicate the anticlockwise or clockwise rotation direction, respectively. The labels indicate the positions of the phosphate groups in the cell according to Table 2[link]. The asterisk denotes the presence of a PO3− ion as obtained from the analysis. Error bars are obtained from a [\chi _n^2] analysis (Feidenhans'l, 1989[Feidenhans'l, R. (1989). Surf. Sci. Rep. 10, 105-188.]).
PO4 (PO4)1-a/(PO3)1-a (PO4)2-b (PO4)3-c (PO4)4-d (PO4)5-e
Dry (± 0.8°) (+) 1.1* (+) 1.1 (−) 1.3 (−) 1.8 (−) 0.3
Humid (± 0.8°) (+) 1.4 (−) 1.1 (−) 1.7 (−) 0.8 (−) 0.5

Table 4
Evolution of the average bond angles (°) and bond lengths (Å) for the three topmost surface phosphate units obtained from the atomic coordinates given in Table 2[link]

The phosphate unit of the topmost surface layer (PO3)1-a of the dry surface is formed by three P—O bonds (marked with an asterisk). The angle is close to that expected for the phosphite ion, PO33− (120°). For the humid case, the hydroxyl molecule has been considered to compute the average bond angle and bond length. The average bond angles and bond lengths of the bulk phosphate PO4 unit are 109.5° and 1.50 Å, respectively. Bond-angle and bond-length errors were calculated from Carpenter (1979[Carpenter, G. B. (1979). Acta Cryst. A35, 248-250.]).
PO4 (PO4)1-a/(PO3)1-a (PO4)2-b (PO4)3-c
Dry; angle, length (± 0.5°, ± 0.08 Å) 112.2, 1.48* 109.1, 1.46 109.1, 1.52
Humid; angle, length (± 0.5°: ± 0.08 Å) 109.5, 1.50 109.1, 1.60 108.7, 1.46

The atomic displacements reduce strongly for layers (4) and (5) in the same proportion as the rotation angles indicated in Table 3[link]. The evolution of [PO4] rotation angles with depth on the humid surface shows a smoother evolution towards the bulk structure than that of the dry surface, as expected.

A summary of these distortions is presented in Table 4[link], which shows the evolution of the average bond angle and bond length with depth for the three topmost surface tetrahedral [PO4] units. As observed, the average angles of the distorted tetrahedra are close to the bulk ones, except for the topmost surface layer of the dry case, where the distortion is rather large due to the absence of one P—O bond leading to a [PO3] unit, with an average O—P—O angle of 112° (Table 4[link]). On the humid surface, this situation is overcome by the partial adsorption of one hydroxyl molecule that stabilizes the charge distribution in the phosphate unit and reduces its distortion. The maximum/minimum bond-angle distortions for both cases are 123 and 94° (dry), and 121 and 100° (humid), which correspond to the topmost surface PO units.

Earlier X-ray diffraction studies of the FAp100–H2O interface on a fully hydrated surface show up to two layers of water molecules with (Park et al., 2004[Park, C., Fenter, P., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L. & Sturchio, N. C. (2004). Am. Mineral. 89, 1647-1654.]) and without (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.], 2008[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2008). Langmuir, 24, 2459-2464.], 2009[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 1453-1458.]) lateral order. A direct comparison between the structural results obtained from these experiments and the results obtained in the present study cannot be made due to the different structural surface terminations: orthorhombic for FAp100 and hexagonal for FAp0001. In our work, we obtain a hexagonal dry surface free of O atoms on the topmost surface layer. The topmost [PO4] tetrahedron is in fact a [PO3] unit where the apical O atom is missing. Average O—P—O bond angles indicate that this [PO3] unit could be similar to the phosphite ion which has an average bond angle of ∼112°. Moreover, the hydrated surface does not show a fully ordered layer of H2O or OH molecules on top of Ca and P, respectively, but rather partial occupancies. The adsorbed molecules show a rather large thermal vibration amplitude, as discussed previously, whose impact on the data is the attenuation of the intensity profiles of the CTRs when their atomic weight increases. This intensity attenuation smoothes the profile of the CTRs, reducing the amplitude of the oscillations or features coming from the overlay. Since the atomic weight of H2O/OH molecules is coupled with their corresponding DW values, the quantification of the water surface layer is difficult, which is equivalent to supposing a disordered presence of the topmost water or hydroxyl molecules around the Ca and P specimens.

In this case, the distance of the H2O monolayer from the relaxed surface is 2.23 Å, which is larger than that obtained by Pareek et al. (2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]) (1.8 Å) but much shorter than that obtained by Park et al. (2004[Park, C., Fenter, P., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L. & Sturchio, N. C. (2004). Am. Mineral. 89, 1647-1654.]) (2.64 Å) from reflectivity data. The presence of a second H2O layer was not detected, probably due to the presence of large areas of the surface where the molecules are mainly disordered. The effective ratio of disordered H2O:OH molecules per unit cell is 1:1. Comparing the differential heats of adsorption of water for FAp/HAp(0001) and pristine (010) surfaces they are very similar (Posner, 1985[Posner, A. S. (1985). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19, 241-250.]; Corno et al., 2009[Corno, M., Busco, C., Bolis, V., Tosoni, S. & Ugliengo, P. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 2188-2198.]). For both surfaces, the heat of vaporization for water (close to 10 kcal mol−1; 1 kcal mol−1 = 4.184 kJ mol−1) is reached when two water molecules per unit cell are adsorbed. For our experimental FAp(0001) case, we only detect a 33% water occupancy per Ca atom at the surface (and [1\over 3] OH molecule per [PO3] unit at the surface). Most likely, the apparent deficiency of water molecules reflected by the CTR data set on our FAp(0001) surface is due to positional disorder. The FAp(100) cell definition (Pareek et al., 2007[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.]), identical to the pristine (010) surface (Corno et al., 2009[Corno, M., Busco, C., Bolis, V., Tosoni, S. & Ugliengo, P. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 2188-2198.]), also shows two ordered water molecule layers at the surface, suggesting a value of heat of vaporization for water similar to those of pristine (010) and FAp/HAp(0001) surfaces.

4. Conclusions

The surface/interface structure of FAp0001 under dry (He environment) and humid (RH ≃ 100%) conditions has been probed with SXRD. The surface model built to simulate the dry and water exposed surfaces is formed by a slab of five blocks with the chemical formula Ca5(PO4)3F that forms a layered structure along the surface normal direction with a length of 2.5 times the c-axis value for Fap(0001). Under dry conditions, our findings indicate that the surface resembles an ideal bulk termination with relaxations in the top surface layers. This surface is compatible with a [PO3] phosphite ion termination where the P atom is neutral (one orbital is occupied by two electrons and each of the other three is bonded to one O atom that is negatively charged). When the surface is exposed to wet conditions, the analysis of reflections with h or k values differing from zero shows Ca and P atoms bonded to a partially occupied water or hydroxyl OH layer (33%), respectively. Analysis of the reflectivity data for the humid case shows a surface fully covered with water and hydroxyl molecules: three bonded to the Ca atoms (2.28 Å) and the other three to the P atoms (1.65 Å), respectively. Reflectivity data show that the mol­ecules are placed at well defined heights from the topmost surface layer with a small DW value (Bperp = 1.2 Å2). CTRs show similar positions for both molecules but with lower occupancies that we interpret as in-plane positional disorder. This positional disorder is compatible with a high molecular in-plane DW value (Bpar = 15 Å2) or a reduction of their respective occupancy weight by a factor of three.

In wet conditions the reaction of the hydroxyl OH ion with the phosphite [PO3] ion produces a phosphate [PO4] ion termination. The sensitivity of the data to other water molecules adsorbed on the wet surface, i.e. a second layer of water molecules, would be smaller than those already adsorbed on the topmost surface layer as a consequence of the high disorder already existing in this layer.

The significant difference between the structures of the FAp100 and FAp0001 surfaces is the explicit presence of dis­ordered adsorbed water and hydroxyl molecules on the outermost {0001} surface layer compared with the {[10{\overline 1}0]} surface of mineral specimens from the same locality. Also, the (0001) surface is very rare, whereas the ([10{\overline 1}0]) prism face is a common feature of the apatite morphology. The ratio of surface area reflects the growth rate and is also related to the surface energy. Based on our results, the (0001) face with its incomplete hydration obviously favours further growth. In addition, fast growth of the {0001} face of apatite leads to a pronounced development of the pyramidal faces {[10{\overline 1}1]}.

Our results are also in agreement with the observation that bone apatite fibres grow preferentially along [0001] while the {[10{\overline 1}0]} faces are inhibited, because the perfect surface interacts with collagen or non-collagenous protein inhibiting further growth, giving a means of controlling the size and morphology of apatite nanocrystals in bone (Xie & Nancollas, 2010[Xie, B. & Nancollas, G. H. (2010). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 22369-22370.]). In an experimental study of glycine/H2O at face ([10{\overline 1}0]) using grazing-incidence XRD structure analysis, charge matching of the amino acid with the Ca and phosphate ions has been shown to form a periodically ordered layer shielding the surface from the nutrient solution (Pareek et al., 2009[Pareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 1453-1458.]). Obviously, the molecular disorder of light molecules such as H2O and OH detected on the (0001)-surface is higher than that induced on the ([10{\overline 1}0]) surface by heavier organic molecules. This lower ordering could be consequence of their higher surface mobility under flowing vapor conditions as experimentally detected in the form of an anomalous increase of their in-plane Debye Waller.

Supporting information

CCDC references: 1942347; 1942348

Crystal structure: contains datablocks FAP0001_dry, FAP0001_humid. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520619010412/dq5039sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock FAP0001_dry. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520619010412/dq5039FAP0001_drysup2.hkl

Structure factors: contains datablock FAP0001_humid. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520619010412/dq5039FAP0001_humidsup3.hkl


Computing details top

(FAP0001_dry) top
Crystal data top
P1α = 90°
a = 9.375000 Åβ = 90°
b = 9.375000 Åγ = 120°
c = 6.887000 Å
Data collection top
h = →l = →
k = →
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzBiso*/Beq
F0.000000.000003.220001.00000*
Ca0.333330.666673.027921.00000*
Ca0.666670.333342.995681.00000*
F0.000000.000002.745501.00000*
Ca0.666670.333332.502721.00000*
Ca0.333330.666672.509181.00000*
F0.000000.000002.256301.00000*
Ca0.333330.666672.011021.00000*
Ca0.666670.333341.990981.00000*
F0.000000.000001.746201.00000*
Ca0.666670.333331.493721.00000*
Ca0.333330.666671.495981.00000*
F0.000000.000001.257601.00000*
Ca0.333330.666671.000221.00000*
Ca0.666670.333340.995081.00000*
Ca0.241180.992263.245701.00000*
Ca0.007740.248923.245701.00000*
Ca0.751080.758823.245701.00000*
O0.334160.502653.254201.00000*
O0.497350.831513.254201.00000*
O0.168490.665843.254201.00000*
P0.402950.379953.242101.00000*
P0.620050.023003.242101.00000*
P0.976990.597053.242101.00000*
O0.576800.433553.225501.00000*
O0.566440.143253.225501.00000*
O0.856750.423203.225501.00000*
O0.359160.273013.087761.00000*
O0.726990.086153.087761.00000*
O0.913850.640843.087761.00000*
O0.672940.734882.891841.00000*
O0.265120.938052.891841.00000*
O0.061950.327062.891841.00000*
Ca0.747780.004832.758901.00000*
Ca0.995170.742962.758901.00000*
Ca0.257040.252222.758901.00000*
O0.659890.470382.727301.00000*
O0.501510.158712.727301.00000*
O0.841290.342812.727301.00000*
P0.610760.624182.743201.00000*
P0.375820.986572.743201.00000*
P0.013430.389252.743201.00000*
O0.432270.549592.747001.00000*
O0.450410.882682.747001.00000*
O0.117320.567732.747001.00000*
O0.645720.731112.599061.00000*
O0.268890.914612.599061.00000*
O0.085390.354282.599061.00000*
O0.355400.254142.409541.00000*
O0.745860.101272.409541.00000*
O0.898730.644592.409541.00000*
Ca0.248020.991672.249801.00000*
Ca0.008330.256362.249801.00000*
Ca0.743640.751972.249801.00000*
O0.320580.471072.281601.00000*
O0.528930.849512.281601.00000*
O0.150490.679422.281601.00000*
P0.404520.368512.238101.00000*
P0.631490.036012.238101.00000*
P0.963990.595482.238101.00000*
O0.603710.472072.250101.00000*
O0.527930.131642.250101.00000*
O0.868360.396292.250101.00000*
O0.335750.264392.074761.00000*
O0.735610.071362.074761.00000*
O0.928640.664252.074761.00000*
O0.661250.723421.912641.00000*
O0.276580.937831.912641.00000*
O0.062170.338751.912641.00000*
Ca0.755540.003601.757801.00000*
Ca0.996400.751941.757801.00000*
Ca0.248060.244461.757801.00000*
O0.676040.491991.737601.00000*
O0.475310.151921.737601.00000*
O0.848080.323391.737601.00000*
P0.598060.631841.747001.00000*
P0.368160.966221.747001.00000*
P0.033780.401941.747001.00000*
O0.403230.528051.753301.00000*
O0.471950.875181.753301.00000*
O0.124820.596771.753301.00000*
O0.645030.729371.573861.00000*
O0.270620.915661.573861.00000*
O0.084340.354971.573861.00000*
O0.354710.251631.414241.00000*
O0.748370.103081.414241.00000*
O0.896920.645291.414241.00000*
Ca0.240120.990091.252401.00000*
Ca0.009910.250031.252401.00000*
Ca0.749970.759881.252401.00000*
O0.337980.481211.265001.00000*
O0.518790.856771.265001.00000*
O0.143230.662021.265001.00000*
P0.402000.370401.243201.00000*
P0.629600.031601.243201.00000*
P0.968400.598001.243201.00000*
O0.598240.473781.244501.00000*
O0.526220.124451.244501.00000*
O0.875550.401761.244501.00000*
O0.351270.265631.072061.00000*
O0.734370.085631.072061.00000*
O0.914370.648731.072061.00000*
O0.661030.733310.920241.00000*
O0.266690.927720.920241.00000*
O0.072280.338970.920241.00000*
(FAP0001_humid) top
Crystal data top
P1α = 90°
a = 9.375000 Åβ = 90°
b = 9.375000 Åγ = 120°
c = 6.887000 Å
Data collection top
h = →l = →
k = →
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzBiso*/Beq
F0.000000.000003.220001.00000*
Ca0.333330.666673.015321.00000*
Ca0.666670.333343.017781.00000*
F0.000000.000002.774601.00000*
Ca0.666670.333332.505821.00000*
Ca0.333330.666672.499881.00000*
F0.000000.000002.223201.00000*
Ca0.333330.666672.004021.00000*
Ca0.666670.333341.992581.00000*
F0.000000.000001.780001.00000*
Ca0.666670.333331.506321.00000*
Ca0.333330.666671.487181.00000*
F0.000000.000001.223001.00000*
Ca0.333330.666671.006921.00000*
Ca0.666670.333340.997681.00000*
O0.292411.019533.564441.00000*
O−0.019530.272883.564441.00000*
O0.727120.707593.564441.00000*
O0.315090.217093.384241.00000*
O0.782910.098003.384241.00000*
O0.902000.684913.384241.00000*
Ca0.244160.999463.231901.00000*
Ca0.000540.244703.231901.00000*
Ca0.755300.755843.231901.00000*
O0.331080.458063.223701.00000*
O0.541940.873023.223701.00000*
O0.126980.668923.223701.00000*
P0.394150.358253.215001.00000*
P0.641750.035903.215001.00000*
P0.964090.605853.215001.00000*
O0.589090.492563.256601.00000*
O0.507440.096533.256601.00000*
O0.903470.410913.256601.00000*
O0.373440.259203.044561.00000*
O0.740800.114243.044561.00000*
O0.885760.626563.044561.00000*
O0.665050.760232.944241.00000*
O0.239770.904822.944241.00000*
O0.095180.334952.944241.00000*
Ca0.74625−0.001602.759901.00000*
Ca1.001600.747852.759901.00000*
Ca0.252150.253752.759901.00000*
O0.690910.521822.737001.00000*
O0.439210.133602.737001.00000*
O0.866400.305602.737001.00000*
P0.586750.629382.756501.00000*
P0.370620.957372.756501.00000*
P0.042630.413252.756501.00000*
O0.399230.513562.721201.00000*
O0.486440.885672.721201.00000*
O0.114330.600772.721201.00000*
O0.651290.749022.594861.00000*
O0.250980.902272.594861.00000*
O0.097730.348712.594861.00000*
O0.357730.295662.421641.00000*
O0.704330.062072.421641.00000*
O0.937930.642262.421641.00000*
Ca0.245760.999612.256301.00000*
Ca0.000390.246152.256301.00000*
Ca0.753850.754242.256301.00000*
O0.332090.487742.282501.00000*
O0.512260.844352.282501.00000*
O0.155650.667912.282501.00000*
P0.414650.369582.232801.00000*
P0.630420.045082.232801.00000*
P0.954920.585342.232801.00000*
O0.587270.466032.262101.00000*
O0.533970.121232.262101.00000*
O0.878770.412732.262101.00000*
O0.360700.278522.071161.00000*
O0.721480.082182.071161.00000*
O0.917820.639302.071161.00000*
O0.668320.746141.942841.00000*
O0.253860.922181.942841.00000*
O0.077820.331681.942841.00000*
Ca0.751750.001511.757201.00000*
Ca0.998490.750241.757201.00000*
Ca0.249760.248251.757201.00000*
O0.688620.520901.740101.00000*
O0.440340.131961.740101.00000*
O0.868040.308381.740101.00000*
P0.596660.632071.765001.00000*
P0.367930.964591.765001.00000*
P0.035410.403341.765001.00000*
O0.419900.526681.735001.00000*
O0.473320.893221.735001.00000*
O0.106780.580101.735001.00000*
O0.655930.737561.569661.00000*
O0.262440.918361.569661.00000*
O0.081640.344071.569661.00000*
O0.354070.275921.419741.00000*
O0.724080.078151.419741.00000*
O0.921840.645931.419741.00000*
Ca0.244820.998931.255001.00000*
Ca0.001070.245891.255001.00000*
Ca0.754110.755181.255001.00000*
O0.331650.487481.245401.00000*
O0.512520.844161.245401.00000*
O0.155840.668351.245401.00000*
P0.404760.370461.246401.00000*
P0.629540.034301.246401.00000*
P0.965700.595241.246401.00000*
O0.578640.462441.262601.00000*
O0.537570.116211.262601.00000*
O0.883800.421361.262601.00000*
O0.354990.274071.079961.00000*
O0.725930.080921.079961.00000*
O0.919080.645011.079961.00000*
O0.658160.738150.926341.00000*
O0.261850.920010.926341.00000*
O0.079990.341840.926341.00000*
 

Acknowledgements

XMaS is a UK National Facility supported by the EPSRC. We are grateful to all the beamline team staff for their support.

Funding information

Funding for the XMaS facility has been generously provided by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Council and latterly through UKRI. This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [grant numbers: NS/A000018/1 & EP/S020845/1], the European Union Fund for Regional Development POCTEFA through Project EFA194/16/TNSI, and by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC) through a Severo Ochoa grant (No. SEV-2015-0496).

References

First citationBen-Nissan, B. (2014). Editor. Advances in Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials. Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
 First citationBragg, L., Claringbull, G. F. & Taylor, W. H. (1965). The Crystalline State, Vol. IV, Crystal Structures of Minerals. Cornell University Press.  Google Scholar
 First citationCalderín, L., Stott, M. J. & Rubio, A. (2003). Phys. Rev. B, 67, 134106.  Google Scholar
 First citationCarpenter, G. B. (1979). Acta Cryst. A35, 248–250.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationCombes, C., Cazalbou, S. & Rey, C. (2016). Minerals, 6, 34.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationCorno, M., Busco, C., Bolis, V., Tosoni, S. & Ugliengo, P. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 2188–2198.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationElliot, J. C. (1994). Structure and Chemistry of the Apatites and Other Calcium Orthophosphates. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.  Google Scholar
 First citationFeidenhans'l, R. (1989). Surf. Sci. Rep. 10, 105–188.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationGamoke, B., Neff, D. & Simons, J. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 5677–5684.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationHahn, Th. (1996). Editor. International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. A, Space-group symmetry, 4th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  Google Scholar
 First citationHaldar, S. K. & Tišljar, J. (2014). Introduction to Mineralogy and Petrology, ch. 2, Basic Mineralogy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.  Google Scholar
 First citationHughes, J. M., Cameron, M. & Crowley, K. D. (1989). Am. Mineral. 74, 870–876.  CAS Google Scholar
 First citationKerisit, S., Parker, S. C. & Harding, H. C. (2003). J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 7676–7682.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationLübke, A., Enax, J., Loza, K., Prymak, O., Gaengler, P., Fabritius, H.-O., Raabe, D. & Epple, M. (2015). RSC Adv. 5, 61612–61622.  Google Scholar
 First citationLübke, A., Loza, K., Patnaik, R., Enax, J., Raabe, D., Prymak, O., Fabritius, H.-O., Gaengler, P. & Epple, M. (2017). RSC Adv. 7, 6215–6222.  Google Scholar
 First citationPareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2008). Langmuir, 24, 2459–2464.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationPareek, A., Torrelles, X., Angermund, K., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2009). Langmuir, 25, 1453–1458.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationPareek, A., Torrelles, X., Rius, J., Magdans, U. & Gies, H. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035418.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationPark, C., Fenter, P., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L. & Sturchio, N. C. (2004). Am. Mineral. 89, 1647–1654.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationPosner, A. S. (1985). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19, 241–250.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationRenzi, M. de, Manzanares, E., Marin-Monfort, M. D. & Botella, H. (2016). RSC Adv. 6, 74384–74388.  Google Scholar
 First citationRobinson, I. K. (1986). Phys. Rev. B, 33, 3830–3836.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationRobinson, I. K. (1998). Acta Cryst. A54, 772–778.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationRuttenberg, K. C. & Berner, R. A. (1993). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 57, 991–1007.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationStout, G. H. & Jensen, L. H. (1968). X-ray Structure Determination. New York: McMillan.  Google Scholar
 First citationTorrelles, X., Barrena, E., Munuera, C., Rius, J., Ferrer, S. & Ocal, C. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 9396–9402.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationVlieg, E. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 401–405.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWatkin, D. (1994). Acta Cryst. A50, 411–437.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWolthers, M., Di Tommaso, D., Du, Z. & de Leeuw, N. H. (2012). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 15145–15157.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationXie, B. & Nancollas, G. H. (2010). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 22369–22370.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206
Volume 75| Part 5| October 2019| Pages 830-838
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520619010412
Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS