research papers
2(PO4)3-type materials
solution and high-temperature in NaZraMaterials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Green St, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: kriven@illinois.edu
The NaZr2P3O12 family of materials have shown low and tailorable properties. In this study, SrZr4P6O24 (SrO·4ZrO2·3P2O5), CaZr4P6O24 (CaO·4ZrO2·3P2O5), MgZr4P6O24 (MgO·4ZrO2·3P2O5), NaTi2P3O12 [½(Na2O·4TiO2·3P2O5)], NaZr2P3O12 [½(Na2O·4ZrO2·3P2O5)], and related solid solutions were synthesized using the organic–inorganic steric entrapment method. The samples were characterized by in-situ high-temperature X-ray diffraction from 25 to 1500°C at the Advanced Photon Source and National Synchrotron Light Source II. The average linear of SrZr4P6O24 and CaZr4P6O24 was between −1 × 10−6 per °C and 6 × 10−6 per °C from 25 to 1500°C. The crystal structures of the high-temperature polymorphs of CaZr4P6O24 and SrZr4P6O24 with R3c symmetry were solved by Fourier difference mapping and This polymorph is present above ∼1250°C. This work measured coefficients to 1500°C for all samples and investigated the differences in mechanisms between polymorphs and between compositions.
1. Introduction
NaZr2P3O12 [`NZP' or ½(Na2O·4ZrO2·3P2O5)] and structurally related materials have been studied primarily for their (Lind, 2012; Shi et al., 2021; Evans, 1999; Barrera et al., 2005; Takenaka, 2018; Romao et al., 2013; Dove & Fang, 2016; Breval & Agrawal, 1995; Roy et al., 1989) and properties (Goodenough et al., 1976; Rao et al., 2021). The NZP structure was first solved by Hagman & Kierkegaard (1968). A study by Boilot et al. (1979) of the related Nal+xZr2SixP3–xO12 (where 0 < x < 3) showed low near x = 0, and high near x = 2. Since the 1980s, many cation substitutions in this NZP structure have been found and studied, leading to a class of materials called NZP-type materials (Breval & Agrawal, 1995; Limaye et al., 1987, 1991; Agrawal, 1996; Agrawal & Stubican, 1985; Pet'kov & Asabina, 2004; Govindan Kutty et al., 1998, 1994; Miyazaki et al., 2008).
NZP-type material properties have been explored for their low and tailorable et al., 1999). Additionally, there has been research into their use in energy storage/solid state electrolyte applications due to the high of certain compositions (Goodenough et al., 1976; Rao et al., 2021). For this reason, they have been called NaSiCON (Na super-ionic conductors) materials (Zhang et al., 2023; Li et al., 2022; Aono & Suginoto, 1996). The ability to incorporate a range of cations into the NZP framework structure and its high-temperature stability has led to its investigation for use as an actinide host material for the containment of spent fuel from nuclear reactors (Gregg et al., 2013; Krishnaiah et al., 2003). NZP-type materials have also been studied for their electrical and applications (Trice et al., 1999; Gregg et al., 2013; Krishnaiah et al., 2003; Liu et al., 1994) as well as for use in gas sensors (Dang & Guo, 2011; Kida et al., 2011).
including thermal shock resistance, substrates for optical applications, and thermal barrier coatings (TriceThe NZP ; Alamo, 1993; Breval et al., 2000; Breval & Agrawal, 1995). In NZP, the Na+ cation that resides on the M1 and M2 sites can have substitutions by most Group I or II elements, as well as many transition metals and rare earth elements. The Zr4+ cation on the R site can have substitutions by Ge4+, Sn4+, Ti4+, Hf4+ and Nb5+ cations as well as partial occupancy of several other elements. The P5+ cation that resides on the P-site can have substitutions with Si4+ and S6+. Having a wide range of substitutions while maintaining a similar allows for the opportunity to tailor the material property of interest. In the Na4Zr2(SiO4)3 structure there are four times as many Na+ sites as in NaZr2(PO4)3. In Na4Zr2(SiO4)3, instead of residing only between two ZrO6 octahedra, there are additional M sites between ZrO6 octahedra and SiO4 tetrahedra. A description of all the M sites can be found elsewhere (Qui et al., 1981) and some of these sites are shown in Fig. S1 (supporting information). This wide variation in number of cations and their valence charges in the NZP-type structure has resulted in numerous studies (Breval & Agrawal, 1995; Limaye et al., 1987, 1991; Agrawal, 1996; Agrawal & Stubican, 1985). These studies probed the changes in physical properties due to variations in the NZP lattice structure and its accommodation of different cations on each of the M, R and P sites.
can have many substitutions for each cation in its (Pet'kov & Orlova, 2003NZP-type materials form several different variations of the standard NZP R32, Pbcn, and P21/3 (Pet'kov & Orlova, 2003). There are many ways in which the symmetry elements are broken or added between these different space groups. Generally, these structural changes depend on whether there is an atom:
based on composition and synthesis methods, leading to crystallization in the following space groups: , ,(i) on the M1 site,
(ii) on M1, M2 or one of the other six common interstitial sites,
(iii) on none of the M sites,
(iv) partially occupying M and R sites with another element,
(v) if the R-site octahedron begins to rotate off the c unit-cell axis (for the monoclinic space groups), or
(vi) if there is a change in valence charge for the M, R and/or P sites (often changing the occupancy to satisfy charge balance).
In the past, there has been disagreement over the correct et al., 1989), which are sometimes differentiated by several relatively small XRD peaks.
for some NZP-type materials (SenbhagaramPast ). The melting point of these materials was shown to be between 1600 to 1900°C (Agrawal, 1996; Pet'kov & Asabina, 2004), suggesting the possibility that they may be used over a wide range of temperatures. However, use of NZP-type materials between 1000°C and their melting point would require substantial extrapolation of phase stability and from lower-temperature crystallographic data reported in the literature.
studies on NZP-type materials covered the temperature range of 25 to 500°C for most compositions. Few samples have been studied over 1000°C (Breval & Agrawal, 1995One of the variations on the NZP-type structure that was studied here is CaZr4P6O24 (CaO·4ZrO2·3P2O5 or `CaZP'), the of which at 25°C is depicted in Fig. 1. It consists of a network structure of corner-sharing PO4 tetrahedra and ZrO6 octahedra. Ca2+ occupies the site between two ZrO6 octahedra along the c axis and is six-coordinated. The P—O and Zr—O bonds are more rigid and have relatively minor increases in length with temperature, whereas the Ca—O bond is weaker and has more expansion with temperature (Khosrovani & Sleight, 1999; Hazen & Prewitt, 1977). For this reason, NZP-type materials have sometimes been studied by treating the PO4 tetrahedra and ZrO6 octahedra each as rigid units (Tao & Sleight, 2003; Khosrovani & Sleight, 1999). Coordinated vibrational movements of rigid polyhedra can be described in terms of the rigid-unit-modes (RUM) characteristic of their behavior (Tao & Sleight, 2003; Liang et al., 2008). In structures with corner-sharing polyhedra, the static structural distortions of metal–oxygen–metal (M–O–M) angles, or bridging-oxygen angles, are measured to describe the way in which sets of connected polyhedra rotate. The rotation of polyhedra relative to the unit-cell axes have also been measured to describe mechanisms in related systems (Alamo, 1993; Lenain et al., 1987). Unit-cell diagrams for NaZr2(PO4)3 and Na4Zr2(SiO4)3 illustrating the differences in interstitial site vacancy and polyhedron connectivity related to the P site can be found in Fig. S1.
The effect of M1-, M2- and R-site substitutions on unit-cell parameters is shown in Fig. 2 for the 25°C structures in the hexagonal setting for many NZP-type materials. Larger cations on the M1/M2 site cause the a and b unit-cell axes (which are equal in the hexagonal setting) to contract and the c unit-cell axis to expand. Larger cations on the R site cause both the a and c axes to expand. Examining the effect of cation substitutions at 25°C can begin to explain directions and modes by which the NZP-type network structure can accommodate changes. The data in Fig. 2 are from PDF card entries in the ICDD-PDF 4+ database (ICDD v. 2022, International Center for Diffraction data, Newton Square, PA, USA) (Kabekkodu et al., 2002) which are tabulated in Table S4.
In contrast to the unit-cell parameters at 25°C, ) described a trend in the NZP-type materials in which there is differing in the a unit-cell axis depending on crystal symmetry. It was shown that NZP-type materials which crystallize in exhibit negative of the a unit-cell axis on heating, whereas those which crystallize in show positive expansion. Both space groups exhibit expansion along the c axis on heating. However, CaZP does not follow this trend and crystallizes in and shows contraction along the a axis. Past studies of this material have not determined what causes this anomaly (Pet'kov et al., 2002; Woodcock et al., 1999a).
values do not always follow similar trends with cation substitutions. Alamo (1993Near room-temperature SrZr4P6O24 (SrZP) and CaZP exhibit low positive and low negative respectively (Limaye et al., 1987; Breval & Agrawal, 1995). This difference in is due to along the a axis having opposite signs. Several studies (Woodcock et al., 1999a; Rashmi & Shrivastava, 2011; Govindan Kutty et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2018; Pet'kov et al., 2002; Agrawal & Stubican, 1985; Limaye et al., 1987; Fischer et al., 2004; Chakraborty et al., 2005) have investigated the Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 to determine the range with approximately zero However, the x-value and temperature range is not agreed upon. The reason for this unexpected difference in along the a-axis has still not been determined, which is surprising given that these materials, each having two cations, Sr2+ and Ca2+, possess similar ionic radii and valence charges. A study (Woodcock et al., 1999a) investigated Ca0.5Sr0.5Zr4P6O24 by neutron powder diffraction from 25 to 800°C, including the unusual behavior of the a-axis expansion. It is unclear if there are compositions in the Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 that have near-zero at temperatures above 800°C. Past research has been unable to determine a difference in the mechanism explaining how crystal structures accommodate these different thermal expansions along the a axis.
NaTi2P3O12 (NaTP) has been studied for its promising properties and application as an anode material in Na-ion batteries (Wu et al., 2019). NaTP exhibits the usual for NZP-type materials that crystallize in . It has a negative value along the a axis and positive value along the c axis. However, a recent study (Ribero et al., 2016) shows that the a axis contraction appears to change direction near 1000°C. If this is indeed the case, NaTP could be a good candidate to understand the mechanism for the differing a-axis expansions in NZP-type materials.
The goal in this study was to measure the a-axis thermal expansions in SrZP and CaZP, and examine how the changes in high-temperature NaTP. The NZP-type material compositions studied here are SrZr4P6O24, CaZr4P6O24, NaTi2P3O12, NaZr2P3O12 and MgZr4P6O24 (MgZP).
values of several NZP-type materials from 25 to 1500°C, determine phase stability in this temperature range, solve the high-temperature crystal structures of SrZP and CaZP, probe the differences in mechanisms of between the opposite2. Experimental
2.1. Powder synthesis
Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 (where x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1), Na2Zr4P6O24, Na2Ti4P6O24 and MgZr4P6O24 powder samples were synthesized via the organic–inorganic steric entrapment method (Nguyen et al., 1999), as depicted in Fig. 3 for CaZP. Stoichiometric ratios of calcium nitrate, Ca(NO3)2·xH2O, and zirconium oxynitrate hydrate, ZrO(NO3)2·xH2O, were mixed in an aqueous solution. For NTP, titanium isopropoxide, Ti[OCH(CH3)2]4, in isopropanol was the R-site cation precursor source. For SrZP, CaZP, MgZP and NTP, strontium nitrate [Sr(NO3)2·xH2O] calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)2·xH2O] magnesium nitrate [Mg(NO3)2·xH2O] and sodium nitrate (NaNO3), respectively, were the precursor chemicals for the M-site cation. Then ammonium phosphate dibasic [(NH4)2HPO4] in aqueous solution was added to the solution, dropwise using a pipette. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), diluted to 5 wt% in deionized water, was added to achieve a PVA monomer to total cation valence charge ratio of four to one, with the total charge being +48 from the precursors in CaZP for the Ca2+, Zr4+ and P5+ cations. The concentrations of the resulting aqueous solution were not measured after being combined. The amounts of solvent used varied; an unmeasured amount was employed to cleanse the beakers while transferring. The amount of solvent was not measured due to its removal during the first heat treatment step. Additional details describing the steric entrapment method can be found in the following references: Nguyen et al. (1999), Gülgün et al. (1999, 2002), Ribero & Kriven (2015).
The solution was stirred for 4 h at 25°C, then heated to evaporate some of the isopropanol and water, leaving a viscous gel. This was followed by drying for 3 h at 200°C following a 5°C min−1 ramp rate of in a Carbolite box furnace to remove any remaining isopropanol and water. This porous mass was then ground with a mortar and pestle and calcined at 700°C for 16 h after a 5°C min−1 ramp rate. After the step the powder was again ground using a mortar and pestle and formed into ∼0.5-inch diameter pellets at a load of ∼60 MPa in a Carver press. These pellets were then set on platinum foil and covered with some sacrificial powder in an alumina crucible and crystallized at 1200°C for 24 h after a 5°C min−1 ramp rate.
2.2. Preliminary characterization
Successful synthesis of each sample was determined prior to in-situ synchrotron experiments by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and (XRF). The of the samples was determined by XRD with a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer, using Cu Kα radiation (1.5418 A, 40 kV, 30 mA). The crystalline phase was identified with reference to the International Centre for Diffraction Data PDF-4+ database (Kabekkodu et al., 2002) accessed through Jade 9.4.1 software (Materials Data Inc., Livermore, CA, USA). (XRF) determined the elemental composition of each sample on a Shimadzu EDX-7000 (Shimadzu America, Chicago, IL, USA) spectrometer by collecting a qualitative scan and a quantitative scan of the elements present.
2.3. High-temperature synchrotron powder XRD
In-situ XRD experiments were used to study these samples in an optical furnace in capillaries from 25°C to 1600°C. Experiments were conducted with optical furnaces: a Quadrupole Lamp Furnace (QLF) (Sarin et al., 2006) at beamline 17 BM-B, Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory or a Hexapole Lamp Furnace (HLF) at beamline 28-ID-2 (Shi et al., 2013), National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory. The QLF is composed of four halogen bulbs, whereas the HLF uses six bulbs, which were focused on to the point coincident with the X-ray and sample. Both the QLF and HLF were capable of temperatures up to 2000°C, though the maximum temperature achieved in these experiments was ∼1600°C. Two optical furnaces and beamlines were used due to beamtime availability. In preparation for optical furnace XRD experiments, each powder sample was mixed with ∼5 wt% Pt which served as an internal reference material and as a heat conductor, ensuring even heating. Pt peaks in the XRD patterns were used to calculate the temperature of each scan (Touloukian, 1975). Sample and Pt powder samples were mounted in sapphire (Crytur Co., Czech Republic) or fused-silica capillaries (Charles Supper Company) at the end of an alumina tube. Each sample was held in the goniometer head of the diffractometer.
Debye–Scherrer (transmission) geometry powder XRD experiments were conducted with a flat panel area detector. The X-ray wavelength at 17 BM-B at APS, was 0.24117 Å (65.554 keV), with a sample-detector distance of ∼1002 mm which was refined with an external CeO2 (SRM 647b NIST standard). Data were collected between 1.5 and 12.5° 2θ (d−1 0.217–1.795 Å−1) with a step size of 0.001°. The X-ray wavelength at 28 ID-2 at BNL was 0.1847 Å (67.12 keV), with a sample-detector distance of ∼1423 mm at BNL, which was refined with an internal Pt reference material.
2.4. Data processing and analysis
Synchrotron area detector image data were azimuthally integrated with the program GSAS-II (Toby & Von Dreele, 2013). Changes in the crystal structures were determined using (Rietveld, 1969; Loopstra & Rietveld, 1969) applied to XRD data. This analysis was performed with Bruker TOPAS v.5 (Bruker, 2007; Coelho, 2018). parameters included phase scale, background, atom positions, atomic displacement factors, and occupancy for certain atoms. A more detailed Rietveld procedure is given in supporting information. The high-temperature was solved using Fourier difference maps in TOPAS and changes in symmetry checked with PLATON (Spek, 2020, 2009). Structures and Fourier difference map iso-surfaces were plotted using VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2008).
2.5. calculation
The α, is a description of the three-dimensional crystallographic change as a function of temperature (Jones et al., 2013; Paufler & Weber, 1999). It is a second rank tensor, the components of which, denoted as αx, are called the coefficients of The linear and volumetric coefficients of are calculated from the temperature-dependent length or volume (at 25°C) as shown in equations (1) and (2) below.
tensor,The unit-cell parameters as a function of temperature were fit to second-order polynomials with the least-squares method. These quadratic polynomials [a(T) and c(T)] were then used to calculate the axial, linear value [αa(T) and αc(T)] via equation (1). A discussion of the functional forms used to fit the unit-cell parameters for a calculation is included in the supporting information Section S2.3. The linear α value can be converted to volumetric β value through the following equation for the hexagonal symmetry: β = 2αa+ αc (Taylor, 1998), where αa and αc describe the in the a and c unit-cell axis directions, respectively. The average linear value used here is β/3. Additional details describing α and its calculation can be found elsewhere (Taylor, 1998; Schlenker et al., 1975; Paufler & Weber, 1999; Touloukian, 1975; Jessen & Küppers, 1991).
3. Results and discussion
This section presents the thermal evolution of the crystal structures and .xye), (iii) TOPAS output file ( .out), and (iv) a crystallographic information format file (.cif) can be reached by the online repository at the hyperlink in the supporting information.
values for the CaZP, SrZP, NTP and NZP compositions. The CaZP and SrZP compositions also include a high-temperature structure solution and investigation into the mechanism. The of MgZP is also included in the supporting information. For each dataset, (i) tabulated unit-cell parameter values, (ii) a corresponding diffraction pattern file (3.1. CaZr4P6O24 and SrZr4P6O24
CaZP and SrZP were studied, including the in-situ XRD data were collected at beamline 17 BM-B at the APS.
solution of a high-temperature polymorph, phase transformation, values, and mechanism. The3.1.1. solution
In-situ synchrotron data were collected from 25 to 1500°C. The diffraction patterns showed the disappearance of several peaks on heating to 1262 (±4)°C for SrZP and 1268 (±2)°C for CaZP, indicating a phase transformation from the low-temperature (space group No. 148) to a higher symmetry one. These peaks reappeared on cooling. Fourier difference mapping in TOPAS (Bruker, 2007; Coelho, 2018) was used to determine the locations of missing and excess electron density in the Trial-and-error was involved in determining the correct choice of atoms to move to best describe the Adding a 0.5 occupancy Sr (or Ca for CaZP) atom to the (0,0,0) site worked best to account for the electron density movement in the high-temperature structure. Additional information can be found in the supporting information Section S2.2.
The ADDSYM function in PLATON (Spek, 2020, 2009) was used to determine changes in symmetry that could be present within a given It suggested that the new polymorph has (space group No. 167) symmetry. Powder XRD patterns and Rietveld refined structure of the high-temperature polymorphs, refined with this new structure for CaZP and SrZP, are displayed in Fig. 4. Crystallographic and Rietveld data are provided in Table 1. The same high-temperature polymorphs were found in both CaZP and SrZP. Impurities are present in both specimens, including ZrP2O7 due to off-stoichiometry synthesis, and Pt which was added as a reference material as described in Section 2.3.
‡Values are as defined in Bruker TOPAS software. |
The crystal structures of SrZP, including the low- and high-temperature polymorphs, are shown in Fig. 5 with parameters for the structure given in Table 1. Fig. 5 also shows how the Fourier difference map and misplaced electron density from the low-temperature structure was used to determine the location of missing Sr atoms within the at the (0, 0, 0) site (and the symmetry related locations) for the high-temperature polymorph. This shows that the Sr2+ cation goes from being ordered (only on the M1 sites) to being disordered (randomly distributed on the M1 and M2 sites). The solution method and resulting structure for the high-temperature CaZP polymorph are analogous to SrZP.
The change in XRD patterns with temperature is shown in Fig. 6 as SrZP undergoes the phase transformation. This transition is reversible and was measured on heating and cooling (though it is only shown on heating here). The systematic absence of peaks in this pattern can also be used to determine the new The phase transformation is associated with the loss of several peaks in the XRD pattern of the high-temperature phase, as shown in Fig. 6, including the peaks shown in Table 2. The systematic absence of certain peaks matched the reflection condition shown in Table 3 and corresponded to a c glide. This added symmetry came from the added Sr site at (0,0,0) with 0.5 occupancy found by Fourier difference mapping and the PLATON (Spek, 2020, 2009) search for symmetry. Using both the for the absent peaks and the Fourier difference maps were good self-consistency checks for this high-temperature A comparison with other CaZP studies is given in the supporting information section.
|
3.1.2. Unit-cell data and coefficients of thermal expansion
It was shown previously (Woodcock et al., 1999a; Alamo, 1993) that the thermal expansions between related NZP-type materials in each of these space groups tend to show positive in the a and c axis directions, whereas show negative in the a axis and positive expansion in the c axis. The phase transformation from to in the Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 presented an opportunity to understand the differences in a unit-cell axis expansion.
Additionally, CaZP and SrZP have markedly different thermal expansions within the phase. The a unit-cell axis contracts on heating for CaZP, whereas it expands for SrZP. The c unit-cell axis expands for both. Negative in the a and b unit-cell axes in CaZP is perhaps unique among the NZP-type materials that crystallize in the (Alamo, 1993). Most NZP-type materials in the show negative in the a axis. The a axis changes from positive to negative at a composition of x = 0.45 in Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24, as shown in supporting information.
This creates the opportunity to learn more about both the mechanism leading to the difference in anisotropy in the expansion of the a axis between Ca and Sr, as well as the changes in expansion through the phase transformation from to , while keeping cations on the other sites constant. Previous studies probing these differences in did so by examining different compositions of NZP-type materials with substitutions on the M1/M2 and R sites, which led to more possible differences between the materials (bond strength, cation size, electron orbitals) that could influence the thermal expansion.
All Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 samples were shown to be stable from 25 to 1500°C. The unit-cell parameters and volume for three representative samples are shown below in Fig. 7. The change in slope of the unit-cell parameters versus temperature shows the phase transformation temperature. Additional compositions in the Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 can be found in the supporting information.
The a and c axes, and average values are summarized in Fig. 8 for both low- and high-temperature phases. In the low-temperature phase, the a unit-cell parameter underwent negative for Ca-rich samples in the Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 system up to x = 0.45, after which the a axis had a positive The volumetric was also lowest for these samples from 25 up to ∼500°C, at which point the coefficient of continued to increase and at the upper range of temperatures it had the higher coefficient of The was almost isotropic for SrZP, with nearly overlapping a axis and c axis values. The Ca-rich end of the experienced greater anisotropy in with a larger positive c-axis and a negative a-axis This anisotropy between the c and a axes led to an overall very similar average throughout the CaZP–SrZP with average values between −1 and 4 × 10−6 per °C.
In the high-temperature phase, unit-cell parameters behaved similarly for both CaZP and SrZP. The a unit-cell parameter experienced negative whereas the c parameter underwent positive The average linear had values from 0.7 × 10−6 per °C to 2.5 × 10−6 per °C with the lower values measured at higher temperatures. This type of a and c axis is typical of NZP-type materials in the (Lenain et al., 1987; Alamo, 1993).
Ca0.5Sr0.5Zr4P6O24 was previously found to have an average linear of 0°C−1 (Limaye et al., 1991; Breval et al., 2000), however that was not observed here. Only CaZP underwent a negative average linear and only from 25 to 200°C (as seen in the supporting information for a specimen in which more data points were collected in the low-temperature range). At temperatures above 500°C it began to expand faster than the Sr-rich end of the Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24.
All compositions in this −6 per °C. The high-temperature phase also had low values, in fact the average value decreased for all compositions of Ca1–xSrxZr4P6O24 above the phase transformation temperature. SrZP had the lowest anisotropy in coefficients of between the a and c axis directions. While CaZP had a smaller value in the a axis than any other in this it also had the largest along the c axis. This large anisotropy in CaZP would likely lead to increased strain in polycrystalline solids. Studies of dilatometry-derived values of bulk NZP-type materials have sometimes differed from XRD-derived crystallographic values, which has been attributed to densification when sintering as well as strain between grains due to anisotropic values along the a- and c-axis directions (Evans, 2002).
had low average values of less than 4.5 × 103.1.3. mechanism
Investigation of the underlying atomistic mechanism leading to the observed for the and space groups; these atoms must be labeled separately because each generates different atomic positions/labels.
involves examining the changes in groupings of atoms such as interatomic distances and polyhedral angles. It is important to have the language to describe the different unique atomic sites within the A subset of the CaZP with atom labels is shown in Fig. 9Previously, several methods have been used to investigate the M—O—M angles) (Tao & Sleight, 2003; Evans et al., 1996) and the rotation of a polyhedron relative to the rest of the (Alamo, 1993). These methods are complementary and the benefits of using both have been demonstrated in related systems of materials (Woodcock et al., 1999a). Both methods were employed here to describe the underlying crystallographic changes that took place during the and phase transformation. There are several interatomic angles and distances that are related or describing part of the same interaction of atoms, so some covariance was expected.
behavior in low and negative materials, including interatomic distances, angles involving bridging oxygen atoms (Interatomic distances, cation-bridging oxygen angles and atomic displacement parameters. Fig. 10 tracks the atomic displacement parameters (ADPs), selected interatomic distances, and angles for both SrZP and CaZP. The ADPs in Figs. 10(b) and 10(c) increase with higher temperatures, as expected due to increased thermal motion. There is a discontinuity in the ADP at the transformation temperature, which is likely due to the way atoms are represented in each While they have the same number of atoms per the low-temperature in has twice as many atoms explicitly represented as does the structure in . The has more symmetry-generated atoms in the unit cell.
The M1 and M2 sites demonstrate some differences, relative to the atoms surrounding them, between SrZP and CaZP. The distance between Zr2–Sr1 of 3.52 Å is larger than the 3.34 Å between Zr2–Ca1. This also corresponds to a larger Zr–vacancy distance for SrZP than for CaZP. Zr–M1 cation and Zr–vacancy distances each converge just before the transformation in which there is disordering of Sr or Ca to M1 and M2 sites. There is a larger difference between the M1 site size (Zr2–Sr1) and the M2 vacancy size (Zr1–Vac) for SrZP than for CaZP.
Cation-bridging oxygen angles (M—O—M angles) are illustrated in Fig. 11 for both SrZP and CaZP, including the P1—O—Zr in the and phases. In , the P—Ox—Zrx angles in Figs. 11(a) and 11(b) indicate that the P1—O1—Zr1 angle appears to converge to the same value as P1—O4—Zr2, and P1—O2—Zr2 with P1—O3—Zr1 for SrZP just before the phase transformation temperature. This convergence to similar values of P1—Ox—Zrx angles is not seen in CaZP. For CaZP, there are large fluctuations in these P1—Ox—Zrx angles. It would be expected that an increase in P1—O1—Zr1 and P1—O2—Zr2 angles would correspond to an increase in the c axis, and an increase in P1—O3—Zr1 and P1—O4—Zr2 angles would correspond to an increase in the a axis. In , P1—O1—Zr1 and P1—O2—Zr1 have similar values near 150° and each increase in value for SrZP. For CaZP in the phase, the P1—O1—Zr1 and P1—O2—Zr1 are ∼152° and 148°, respectively, and stay approximately constant with temperature. While there are several differences in the behavior of these angles between CaZP and SrZP, it is hard to determine if these angles are useful in determining the differences in mechanism of between these materials.
The Zr—O—M angles in Fig. 11(e) experience a wide separation of 87 to 95°, then converging values near the phase transformation for SrZP. However, for CaZP these values are scattered near 91(±2)°C and do not show as clear a trend. This is consistent with the changes in the related bond distances given in Figs. 11(a), (b), S4(c) and S4(d), in which there are more clearly defined convergences of the Zr—M and M—O distances for SrZP than for CaZP. The difference seen between SrZP and CaZP appear to be due to the greater compression of the M2 site (vacancy) and expansion of the M1 site (Sr1) in SrZP, whereas the vacancy and Ca1 sites are more similar in size between the and phases for CaZP.
Polyhedral rotations. Two types of polyhedral rotations were examined, one in the ZrO6 octahedra and another in the PO4 tetrahedra. This type of examination of NZP-type materials is like those of Alamo (Alamo, 1993; Alamo & Rodrigo, 1992) and Woodcock (Woodcock et al., 1999a, 1998). The rotation and distortion of each polyhedron was measured using their projections on to the ab plane, which helped to probe the atomistic mechanism leading to differences in expansion in the a and b axes between SrZP and CaZP. The mechanism of positive in the c axis has already been explained in terms of interatomic distances and angles.
The angle φ measures how O1, O2, O3 and O4 in a ZrO6 octahedron rotate about the c axis as illustrated and summarized in Fig. 12, where a ZrO6 octahedron is drawn with atom labels in both the and space groups. Fig S3 also depicts the definition of φ. The difference between φ values in the has also been used to measure the distortion between the top and bottom layer of atoms within an octahedron(Alamo, 1993; Woodcock et al., 1999a). There is a larger range of φ values for the SrZP phase from about 0 to 33°, compared to −2 to 20° for CaZP. For both phases, there is a larger difference between φ angles for SrZP than for CaZP, which corresponds to a greater distortion (differing rotations of the top and bottom oxygen layers) of the ZrO6 octahedron in SrZP. The largest rotations for both CaZP and SrZP occur in the φ1 (φ for the O1 atom) in both phases, which corresponds to the oxygen atom that is bonded between Zr1 and P1, which is farther from the occupied M1 site.
The angle τ projects a PO4 tetrahedron on to the ab plane, then measures the angle of the P1—Ox vector relative to the a axis, as summarized in Fig. 13. Unlike the φ-angle, which gives a measurement relative to Zr1/Zr2, which lie on the c axis, P1 does not reside on any unit-cell axis, so differing P1—Ox values of τ cannot be compared directly. For both SrZP and CaZP, the τ angles have a discontinuity in their values at the transformation temperature from the (low temperature) to (high-temperature) phases. At the phase change, τ1, τ2, and τ4 all increase and τ3 decreases, describing a sudden rotation of PO4 tetrahedra relative to the a and b axes. The τ1 and τ2 values only for CaZP each increase by 20 to 30° between 300 and 700°C, but do not in SrZP, suggesting that a more distorted or rotated PO6 tetrahedron exists in this temperature range in CaZP. This temperature range also corresponds to the increase in distance of P1 from the c axis shown in Fig. 13(b). However, the uncertain and large error bars for both the φ and τ angles make comparison of the relatively minor changes in these angles difficult to determine differences that could cause significant changes in the between SrZP and CaZP.
There was a clear rotation of both ZrO6 and PO4 polyhedra during the to transformation, seen in both the CaZP and SrZP. In the structures, the for both CaZP and SrZP was similar to other NZP-type materials when the R site is filled with Zr4+. While the a axis contracts in both the and phases of CaZP, it is likely that they do so through different mechanisms because their a unit-cell parameters have different slopes (and different values). Both SrZP and CaZP show expansion along the c axis in and and contraction along the a axis in . The mechanism behind the opposite signs for these a-axis thermal expansions in the phase is still unclear. Previous studies have suggested that the reason could be due to opposite rotations of the polyhedra; however, that was not definitively seen here. There were several small differences between the rotations of ZrO6 octahedra and PO4 tetrahedra and small changes in M—O—M bonds, but there were no major differences in the direction of rotation for these polyhedra. What can be concluded, however, is that the M1/M2 site in SrZP went through larger variations in size than did the M1/M2 sites in CaZP, as measured by the M1/M2 to Zr distance. The vacancy on M2 in SrZP was larger than on the M2 site than CaZP and it went through larger changes in size than CaZP.
In the structures, no significant differences in value or rotation direction of the ZrO6 octahedra and PO4 tetrahedra between SrZP and CaZP were observed to explain the opposing thermal expansions along the a axis, in contrast to previous predictions. However, there is larger uncertainty in the angles and distance measurements that involve oxygen atoms than those only involving other atoms, which likely comes from the lower of oxygen than the other higher atoms in these materials (Henke et al., 1993). It is still possible that PO4–ZrO6 rotations are the mechanism leading to the differences in anisotropy along the a axes in CaZP and SrZP; however, that cannot be conclusively shown from this powder XRD data. The M1 cation size affects the size and compressibility of the M2 site vacancy, which is likely important for the differences in Future directions to investigate the positive and negative thermal expansions in the a axis of SrZP and CaZP include measurements that are sensitive to local changes in bonding, in addition to total scattering experiments to probe local order in addition to the average structure measured in diffraction experiments.
3.2. NaTi2(PO4)3 coefficients
NaTi2(PO4)3 (NTP) crystallizes in the and maintains this for the entire range studied from 25 to 1425°C. Above this temperature the specimen melted and/or reacted with the sapphire capillary. This extended the previous temperature range in a powder diffraction study by a few hundred degrees (Ribero et al., 2016). This higher temperature range is of interest due to the change in a-axis and the opportunity to examine the difference.
Unit-cell parameters and . While there was no phase change in the measured temperature range and the M1 and M2 sites were each fully occupied by the Na+ cations, there was still a change from negative to positive of the a axis of the above 1100°C. This is uncommon in the NZP-type materials in , as most show a contraction along the a axis for all temperatures (Alamo, 1993).
values are shown in Fig. 143.3. NaZr2(PO4)3 coefficients
NaZr2(PO4)3 (NZP) crystallizes in and maintains this for the entire range studied here from 25 to 1378 (±10)°C. The average linear values varied from 4.2 × 10−6 per °C at 25°C to 2.3 × 10−6 per °C at 1380°C. It exhibited a highly anisotropic behavior between the negative in the a axis and positive one in the c axis as displayed in Fig. 15. Because there were no phase changes or significant variations in coefficients, the mechanism was not explored further here.
4. Conclusion
CaZP, SrZP, NaTP, and NZP powders were synthesized and their in-situ, synchrotron diffraction. A high-temperature polymorph of CaZP and SrZP was solved with Fourier difference mapping and its is in the This phase is present above 1268 (±2)°C and 1262 (±4)°C for CaZP and SrZrP, respectively. The new phase shows disorder on the M1 and M2 sites where it has 0.5 occupancy of the cation Ca2+ or Sr2+ on each site. The low-temperature structure shows an ordering of the Ca2+ or Sr2+ on the M1 and M2 sites with an occupancy of 1 on the M1 site and 0 on the M2 site.
values, phase stability, and mechanisms measured from 25 to 1500°C viaThe linear 1–xSrxZr4P6O24 was measured as between −1 and 6 × 10−6 per °C in the phase and between 0 and 3 × 10−6 per °C in the high-temperature phase. The phase for both Ca and Sr showed negative of the a axis and positive of the c axis. CaZP showed the lowest from 25 to 200°C where it had a negative average value (between −1 and 0 × 10−6 per °C).
of the CaNegative and positive thermal expansions along the a axis of the phase of CaZP and SrZP, respectively, was investigated. The M1 (Ca) and M2 (vacancy) sites in CaZP were more similar in size than in SrZP in which the vacancy was more compressed at low temperatures. This suggests that the compressibility of each cation site is important to the difference in However, there was not a clear relation between the differences in a-axis and the inter-polyhedral angles or relative rotation of PO4 tetrahedra or ZrO6 octahedra, as was suggested previously (Woodcock et al., 1998, 1999b; Lenain et al., 1987; Alamo, 1993; Alamo & Rodrigo, 1992). This implies the need for additional measurements. Neutron total scattering (Dove et al., 2002) can combine long-range order, using Bragg peaks, with short-range order, derived from diffuse scattering. Total scattering experiments have been useful in examining rigid body rotations caused by low-frequency vibrational modes in other network structures (Tucker et al., 2005; Baise et al., 2018) and would be a good characterization technique to study the mechanism in SrZP and CaZP. Total scattering enabled the measurement of disordered structural materials in which local structural changes are different from the structural average described from diffraction experiments using Bragg peaks.
A combination of both X-ray pair distribution function (XPDF) and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) led to a study of the changes in a network structure (Cao et al., 2003; Bridges et al., 2014) that were caused by low-energy vibrational modes. A recent study that combined temperature-dependent solid-state NMR, neutron diffraction, and computation DFT (Morgan et al., 2022) examined Nal+xZr2SixP3–xO12. It could be useful to apply these techniques to understanding the differences in a-axis positive and negative expansions in the CaZP-SrZP system.
NaTP was shown to undergo a change in the a axis from negative to positive at 1100°C. Previously, only a negative in the a axis was reported. An investigation of the differences in the mechanism in the positive and negative expansion regions did not support changes in the rotation direction of the interconnected PO4 tetrahedra and TiO6 octahedra described previously. NaTP is another example illustrating that the trend that NZP-type materials in the undergo negative in the a axis and positive in the c axis is not valid for all temperatures ranges or compositions.
of its5. Related literature
The following references are cited in the supporting information: Chakraborty et al. (2005), Fischer et al. (2004), Gregg et al. (2013), Liu et al. (2018), Alamo & Rodrigo (1992), Momma & Izumi (2008), Hill (1992), Hill & Cranswick (1994), Bruker (2007), Coelho (2018), McCusker et al. (1999), Dinnebier et al. (2018), Toby & Von Dreele (2013), Hulbert & Kriven (2023), Hulbert et al. (2021), Allen (1974), Quan (1988), Montgomery et al. (2012), Deshpande & Mudholker (1961), Jones et al. (2013, 2012), Jones (2012), Langreiter & Kahlenberg (2015), Kempter & Elliott (1959), Weber et al. (1998), McCormack et al. (2018), Seymour et al. (2016, 2015), Knight et al. (1999, 1996), Ballirano & Melis (2009), Saxena & Shen (1992), Küppers (2013), Cline (2020), Brown (1988), Dean-Mo & Brown (1992, 1993), Kabekkodu et al. (2002).
Supporting information
Link http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8121948
Raw X-ray diffraction data (.XYE), TOPAS input (.INP) and output (.OUT) files for NZP materials, including SrZr4P6O24, CaZr4P6O24, NaTi2P3O12, and NaZr2P3O12
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520624001598/yh5031sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, SrZr4PO46, phase_1_R-3c_SrZr4PO46, pxrd_JB1008A_14_1400_maskSapphire.xye, CaZr4PO46, phase_1_R-3c_CaZr4PO46, pxrd_JB1007A_16_1400_maskSapphire.xye. DOI:Rietveld powder data: contains datablock pxrd_JB1007A_16_1400_maskSapphire.xye. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520624001598/yh5031phase_1_R-3c_CaZr4PO46sup2.rtv
Rietveld powder data: contains datablock pxrd_JB1008A_14_1400_maskSapphire.xye. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520624001598/yh5031phase_1_R-3c_SrZr4PO46sup3.rtv
Includes Figs S1-S11 and Tables S1- S16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520624001598/yh5031sup4.pdf
O12P3Sr0.50Zr2 | V = 1546.02 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 511.17 | Z = 6 |
Hexagonal, R3c | Dx = 3.294 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -R 3 2"c | Synchrotron radiation |
a = 8.72615 (7) Å | T = 1682 K |
c = 23.4444 (4) Å |
Synchrotron: APS 17 BM-B diffractometer | Scan method: step |
Radiation source: synchrotron, APS beamline 17 BM-B |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Sr1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 11.01 (17)* | 0.5 |
Zr2 | 0 | 0 | 0.14803 (5) | 2.14 (5)* | |
P4 | 0.2873 (4) | 0 | 0.25 | 2.99 (11)* | |
O6 | 0.0376 (7) | 0.8282 (6) | 0.6985 (2) | 4.64 (12)* | |
O7 | 0.2000 (5) | 0.1733 (6) | 0.0939 (2) | 4.64 (12)* |
Sr1—O7i | 2.746 (4) | O6—O7xvii | 2.429 (7) |
Sr1—O7ii | 2.746 (4) | O6—O7xviii | 2.465 (6) |
Sr1—O7iii | 2.746 (4) | O6—O6xix | 2.480 (10) |
Sr1—O7iv | 2.746 (4) | O6—O6xx | 2.922 (11) |
Sr1—O7v | 2.746 (4) | O6—O6xxi | 2.922 (11) |
Sr1—O7vi | 2.746 (4) | O6—O7xxii | 2.927 (7) |
Zr2—O6vii | 2.061 (6) | O6—O7xv | 3.001 (7) |
Zr2—O6viii | 2.061 (6) | O7—P4xiv | 1.509 (4) |
Zr2—O6ix | 2.061 (6) | O7—Zr2 | 2.075 (4) |
Zr2—O7 | 2.075 (4) | O7—O6xxiii | 2.429 (7) |
Zr2—O7x | 2.075 (4) | O7—O6xviii | 2.465 (6) |
Zr2—O7xi | 2.075 (4) | O7—O7xxiv | 2.470 (9) |
P4—O6xii | 1.500 (5) | O7—Sr1xxv | 2.746 (4) |
P4—O6viii | 1.500 (5) | O7—O7x | 2.843 (6) |
P4—O7xiii | 1.509 (4) | O7—O7xi | 2.843 (6) |
P4—O7xiv | 1.509 (4) | O7—O6ix | 2.927 (7) |
O6—P4xv | 1.500 (5) | O7—O6viii | 3.001 (7) |
O6—Zr2xvi | 2.061 (6) | ||
O7ii—Sr1—O7i | 180.000 | O7xxii—O6—O6xix | 155.72 (17) |
O7iii—Sr1—O7ii | 117.66 (13) | O7xxii—O6—O7xviii | 145.4 (3) |
O7iii—Sr1—O7i | 62.34 (13) | O7xxii—O6—O7xvii | 126.0 (2) |
O7iv—Sr1—O7iii | 180.0000 (1) | O7xxii—O6—Zr2xvi | 45.13 (12) |
O7iv—Sr1—O7ii | 62.34 (13) | O7xxii—O6—P4xv | 161.8 (4) |
O7iv—Sr1—O7i | 117.66 (13) | O7xv—O6—O7xxii | 57.29 (17) |
O7v—Sr1—O7iv | 62.34 (13) | O7xv—O6—O6xxi | 88.50 (15) |
O7v—Sr1—O7iii | 117.66 (13) | O7xv—O6—O6xx | 59.23 (18) |
O7v—Sr1—O7ii | 62.34 (13) | O7xv—O6—O6xix | 132.4 (3) |
O7v—Sr1—O7i | 117.66 (13) | O7xv—O6—O7xviii | 98.7 (2) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7v | 180.0000 (1) | O7xv—O6—O7xvii | 148.2 (2) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7iv | 117.66 (13) | O7xv—O6—Zr2xvi | 43.65 (13) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7iii | 62.34 (13) | O7xv—O6—P4xv | 133.1 (2) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7ii | 117.66 (13) | Zr2—O7—P4xiv | 151.7 (3) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7i | 62.34 (13) | O6xxiii—O7—Zr2 | 160.5 (3) |
O6viii—Zr2—O6vii | 90.3 (2) | O6xxiii—O7—P4xiv | 36.04 (18) |
O6ix—Zr2—O6viii | 90.3 (2) | O6xviii—O7—O6xxiii | 60.9 (3) |
O6ix—Zr2—O6vii | 90.3 (2) | O6xviii—O7—Zr2 | 118.4 (2) |
O7—Zr2—O6ix | 90.1 (2) | O6xviii—O7—P4xiv | 34.86 (16) |
O7—Zr2—O6viii | 93.06 (19) | O7xxiv—O7—O6xviii | 59.0 (2) |
O7—Zr2—O6vii | 176.6 (2) | O7xxiv—O7—O6xxiii | 60.42 (18) |
O7x—Zr2—O7 | 86.49 (18) | O7xxiv—O7—Zr2 | 137.8 (2) |
O7x—Zr2—O6ix | 176.6 (2) | O7xxiv—O7—P4xiv | 35.1 (3) |
O7x—Zr2—O6viii | 90.1 (2) | Sr1xxv—O7—O7xxiv | 107.8 (2) |
O7x—Zr2—O6vii | 93.06 (19) | Sr1xxv—O7—O6xviii | 148.3 (2) |
O7xi—Zr2—O7x | 86.49 (18) | Sr1xxv—O7—O6xxiii | 87.4 (2) |
O7xi—Zr2—O7 | 86.49 (18) | Sr1xxv—O7—Zr2 | 91.01 (13) |
O7xi—Zr2—O6ix | 93.06 (19) | Sr1xxv—O7—P4xiv | 117.2 (2) |
O7xi—Zr2—O6viii | 176.6 (2) | O7x—O7—Sr1xxv | 58.83 (7) |
O7xi—Zr2—O6vii | 90.1 (2) | O7x—O7—O7xxiv | 166.5 (2) |
O6viii—P4—O6xii | 111.5 (5) | O7x—O7—O6xviii | 133.4 (3) |
O7xiii—P4—O6viii | 107.7 (3) | O7x—O7—O6xxiii | 117.7 (3) |
O7xiii—P4—O6xii | 110.0 (2) | O7x—O7—Zr2 | 46.76 (9) |
O7xiv—P4—O7xiii | 109.9 (5) | O7x—O7—P4xiv | 150.1 (4) |
O7xiv—P4—O6viii | 110.0 (2) | O7xi—O7—O7x | 60.000 |
O7xiv—P4—O6xii | 107.7 (3) | O7xi—O7—Sr1xxv | 58.83 (7) |
Zr2xvi—O6—P4xv | 152.9 (4) | O7xi—O7—O7xxiv | 112.43 (19) |
O7xvii—O6—Zr2xvi | 164.8 (2) | O7xi—O7—O6xviii | 151.1 (3) |
O7xvii—O6—P4xv | 36.27 (19) | O7xi—O7—O6xxiii | 142.86 (18) |
O7xviii—O6—O7xvii | 60.6 (3) | O7xi—O7—Zr2 | 46.76 (9) |
O7xviii—O6—Zr2xvi | 134.4 (3) | O7xi—O7—P4xiv | 147.3 (4) |
O7xviii—O6—P4xv | 35.09 (15) | O6ix—O7—O7xi | 62.66 (16) |
O6xix—O6—O7xviii | 58.8 (2) | O6ix—O7—O7x | 91.50 (15) |
O6xix—O6—O7xvii | 60.28 (18) | O6ix—O7—Sr1xxv | 121.48 (18) |
O6xix—O6—Zr2xvi | 121.8 (2) | O6ix—O7—O7xxiv | 94.4 (2) |
O6xix—O6—P4xv | 34.3 (2) | O6ix—O7—O6xviii | 89.5 (2) |
O6xx—O6—O6xix | 81.59 (17) | O6ix—O7—O6xxiii | 147.69 (18) |
O6xx—O6—O7xviii | 98.5 (3) | O6ix—O7—Zr2 | 44.74 (16) |
O6xx—O6—O7xvii | 141.76 (19) | O6ix—O7—P4xiv | 111.8 (3) |
O6xx—O6—Zr2xvi | 44.85 (11) | O6viii—O7—O6ix | 59.0 (2) |
O6xx—O6—P4xv | 108.2 (3) | O6viii—O7—O7xi | 89.99 (12) |
O6xxi—O6—O6xx | 60.000 | O6viii—O7—O7x | 60.05 (14) |
O6xxi—O6—O6xix | 94.56 (4) | O6viii—O7—Sr1xxv | 118.88 (16) |
O6xxi—O6—O7xviii | 149.4 (2) | O6viii—O7—O7xxiv | 133.2 (3) |
O6xxi—O6—O7xvii | 121.9 (2) | O6viii—O7—O6xviii | 81.3 (2) |
O6xxi—O6—Zr2xvi | 44.85 (11) | O6viii—O7—O6xxiii | 122.3 (2) |
O6xxi—O6—P4xv | 126.4 (2) | O6viii—O7—Zr2 | 43.29 (13) |
O7xxii—O6—O6xxi | 61.74 (15) | O6viii—O7—P4xiv | 115.5 (3) |
O7xxii—O6—O6xx | 89.93 (12) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −y, −x, z+1/2; (ii) y, x, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+y, y, z+1/2; (iv) x−y, −y, −z+1/2; (v) −x, −x+y, −z+1/2; (vi) x, x−y, z+1/2; (vii) −x+y−1, y−1, z−1/2; (viii) −y+1, −x, z−1/2; (ix) x, x−y+1, z−1/2; (x) −x+y, −x, z; (xi) −y, x−y, z; (xii) x−y+1, x, −z+1; (xiii) −x+y+1/3, y−1/3, z+1/6; (xiv) −x+2/3, −y+1/3, −z+1/3; (xv) −y, −x+1, z+1/2; (xvi) −x+y, y+1, z+1/2; (xvii) −y+1/3, x−y+2/3, z+2/3; (xviii) y−1/3, x+1/3, −z+5/6; (xix) −x, −x+y, −z+3/2; (xx) −x+y−1, −x+1, z; (xxi) −y+1, x−y+2, z; (xxii) x, x−y+1, z+1/2; (xxiii) −x+y−1/3, −x+1/3, z−2/3; (xxiv) x−y+1/3, −y+2/3, −z+1/6; (xxv) −x+y, y, z−1/2. |
Ca0.50O12P3Zr2 | V = 1530.87 (4) Å3 |
Mr = 487.40 | Z = 6 |
Hexagonal, R3c | Dx = 3.172 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -R 3 2"c | Synchrotron radiation |
a = 8.76036 (8) Å | T = 1693 K |
c = 23.0337 (4) Å |
Synchrotron: APS 17 BM-B diffractometer | Scan method: step |
Radiation source: synchrotron, APS beamline 17 BM-B |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Sr1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 11.6 (4)* | 0.5 |
Zr2 | 0 | 0 | 0.14685 (6) | 1.97 (6)* | |
P4 | 0.2884 (4) | 0 | 0.25 | 2.99 (12)* | |
O6 | 0.0297 (7) | 0.8257 (6) | 0.6960 (2) | 5.36 (14)* | |
O7 | 0.1923 (6) | 0.1680 (6) | 0.0909 (2) | 5.36 (14)* |
Sr1—O7i | 2.628 (5) | O6—O7xvii | 2.493 (8) |
Sr1—O7ii | 2.628 (5) | O6—O6xviii | 2.527 (11) |
Sr1—O7iii | 2.628 (5) | O6—O7xix | 2.546 (6) |
Sr1—O7iv | 2.628 (5) | O6—O6xx | 2.897 (12) |
Sr1—O7v | 2.628 (5) | O6—O6xxi | 2.897 (12) |
Sr1—O7vi | 2.628 (5) | O6—O7xxii | 2.906 (7) |
Zr2—O6vii | 2.020 (6) | O6—O7xv | 2.936 (8) |
Zr2—O6viii | 2.020 (6) | O7—P4xiv | 1.556 (4) |
Zr2—O6ix | 2.020 (6) | O7—Zr2 | 2.046 (4) |
Zr2—O7 | 2.046 (4) | O7—O6xxiii | 2.493 (8) |
Zr2—O7x | 2.046 (4) | O7—O7xxiv | 2.532 (10) |
Zr2—O7xi | 2.046 (4) | O7—O6xix | 2.546 (6) |
P4—O6xii | 1.533 (6) | O7—Sr1xxv | 2.628 (5) |
P4—O6viii | 1.533 (6) | O7—O7x | 2.752 (7) |
P4—O7xiii | 1.556 (4) | O7—O7xi | 2.752 (7) |
P4—O7xiv | 1.556 (4) | O7—O6ix | 2.906 (7) |
O6—P4xv | 1.533 (6) | O7—O6viii | 2.936 (8) |
O6—Zr2xvi | 2.020 (6) | ||
O7ii—Sr1—O7i | 180.000 | O7xxii—O6—O7xix | 147.5 (3) |
O7iii—Sr1—O7ii | 63.16 (15) | O7xxii—O6—O6xviii | 153.6 (2) |
O7iii—Sr1—O7i | 116.84 (15) | O7xxii—O6—O7xvii | 123.4 (3) |
O7iv—Sr1—O7iii | 180.0000 (1) | O7xxii—O6—Zr2xvi | 44.75 (14) |
O7iv—Sr1—O7ii | 116.84 (15) | O7xxii—O6—P4xv | 159.8 (4) |
O7iv—Sr1—O7i | 63.16 (15) | O7xv—O6—O7xxii | 56.21 (18) |
O7v—Sr1—O7iv | 116.84 (15) | O7xv—O6—O6xxi | 88.29 (17) |
O7v—Sr1—O7iii | 63.16 (15) | O7xv—O6—O6xx | 59.8 (2) |
O7v—Sr1—O7ii | 63.16 (15) | O7xv—O6—O7xix | 102.6 (2) |
O7v—Sr1—O7i | 116.84 (15) | O7xv—O6—O6xviii | 136.1 (3) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7v | 180.000 | O7xv—O6—O7xvii | 148.4 (3) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7iv | 63.16 (15) | O7xv—O6—Zr2xvi | 44.14 (15) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7iii | 116.84 (15) | O7xv—O6—P4xv | 136.9 (3) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7ii | 116.84 (15) | Zr2—O7—P4xiv | 147.3 (3) |
O7vi—Sr1—O7i | 63.16 (15) | O6xxiii—O7—Zr2 | 160.9 (3) |
O6viii—Zr2—O6vii | 91.6 (2) | O6xxiii—O7—P4xiv | 35.91 (19) |
O6ix—Zr2—O6viii | 91.6 (2) | O7xxiv—O7—O6xxiii | 60.88 (19) |
O6ix—Zr2—O6vii | 91.6 (2) | O7xxiv—O7—Zr2 | 134.7 (3) |
O7—Zr2—O6ix | 91.2 (2) | O7xxiv—O7—P4xiv | 35.6 (3) |
O7—Zr2—O6viii | 92.4 (2) | O6xix—O7—O7xxiv | 58.8 (2) |
O7—Zr2—O6vii | 175.0 (2) | O6xix—O7—O6xxiii | 60.2 (3) |
O7x—Zr2—O7 | 84.5 (2) | O6xix—O7—Zr2 | 114.9 (3) |
O7x—Zr2—O6ix | 175.0 (2) | O6xix—O7—P4xiv | 34.23 (17) |
O7x—Zr2—O6viii | 91.2 (2) | Sr1xxv—O7—O6xix | 150.2 (3) |
O7x—Zr2—O6vii | 92.4 (2) | Sr1xxv—O7—O7xxiv | 111.8 (3) |
O7xi—Zr2—O7x | 84.5 (2) | Sr1xxv—O7—O6xxiii | 90.3 (2) |
O7xi—Zr2—O7 | 84.5 (2) | Sr1xxv—O7—Zr2 | 91.85 (14) |
O7xi—Zr2—O6ix | 92.4 (2) | Sr1xxv—O7—P4xiv | 120.8 (3) |
O7xi—Zr2—O6viii | 175.0 (2) | O7x—O7—Sr1xxv | 58.42 (7) |
O7xi—Zr2—O6vii | 91.2 (2) | O7x—O7—O6xix | 131.1 (3) |
O6viii—P4—O6xii | 110.9 (5) | O7x—O7—O7xxiv | 169.7 (2) |
O7xiii—P4—O6viii | 107.6 (3) | O7x—O7—O6xxiii | 119.5 (3) |
O7xiii—P4—O6xii | 111.0 (3) | O7x—O7—Zr2 | 47.74 (10) |
O7xiv—P4—O7xiii | 108.9 (5) | O7x—O7—P4xiv | 150.2 (5) |
O7xiv—P4—O6viii | 111.0 (3) | O7xi—O7—O7x | 60.000 |
O7xiv—P4—O6xii | 107.6 (3) | O7xi—O7—Sr1xxv | 58.42 (7) |
Zr2xvi—O6—P4xv | 154.6 (4) | O7xi—O7—O6xix | 150.5 (3) |
O7xvii—O6—Zr2xvi | 161.6 (3) | O7xi—O7—O7xxiv | 113.1 (2) |
O7xvii—O6—P4xv | 36.5 (2) | O7xi—O7—O6xxiii | 144.8 (2) |
O6xviii—O6—O7xvii | 60.95 (19) | O7xi—O7—Zr2 | 47.74 (10) |
O6xviii—O6—Zr2xvi | 122.1 (2) | O7xi—O7—P4xiv | 148.6 (5) |
O6xviii—O6—P4xv | 34.5 (3) | O6ix—O7—O7xi | 62.45 (18) |
O7xix—O6—O6xviii | 58.9 (2) | O6ix—O7—O7x | 91.73 (17) |
O7xix—O6—O7xvii | 60.3 (3) | O6ix—O7—Sr1xxv | 120.9 (2) |
O7xix—O6—Zr2xvi | 138.0 (3) | O6ix—O7—O6xix | 88.5 (2) |
O7xix—O6—P4xv | 34.81 (15) | O6ix—O7—O7xxiv | 91.2 (3) |
O6xx—O6—O7xix | 101.3 (3) | O6ix—O7—O6xxiii | 145.3 (2) |
O6xx—O6—O6xviii | 83.73 (18) | O6ix—O7—Zr2 | 44.02 (18) |
O6xx—O6—O7xvii | 144.6 (2) | O6ix—O7—P4xiv | 109.5 (3) |
O6xx—O6—Zr2xvi | 44.19 (12) | O6viii—O7—O6ix | 59.4 (3) |
O6xx—O6—P4xv | 111.0 (3) | O6viii—O7—O7xi | 91.09 (14) |
O6xxi—O6—O6xx | 60.000 | O6viii—O7—O7x | 61.34 (16) |
O6xxi—O6—O7xix | 149.9 (2) | O6viii—O7—Sr1xxv | 119.76 (18) |
O6xxi—O6—O6xviii | 93.87 (6) | O6viii—O7—O6xix | 77.4 (2) |
O6xxi—O6—O7xvii | 120.2 (2) | O6viii—O7—O7xxiv | 128.3 (3) |
O6xxi—O6—Zr2xvi | 44.19 (12) | O6viii—O7—O6xxiii | 120.5 (2) |
O6xxi—O6—P4xv | 125.5 (2) | O6viii—O7—Zr2 | 43.42 (15) |
O7xxii—O6—O6xxi | 60.79 (17) | O6viii—O7—P4xiv | 111.3 (3) |
O7xxii—O6—O6xx | 88.87 (13) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −y, −x, z+1/2; (ii) y, x, −z+1/2; (iii) x−y, −y, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+y, y, z+1/2; (v) −x, −x+y, −z+1/2; (vi) x, x−y, z+1/2; (vii) −x+y−1, y−1, z−1/2; (viii) −y+1, −x, z−1/2; (ix) x, x−y+1, z−1/2; (x) −x+y, −x, z; (xi) −y, x−y, z; (xii) x−y+1, x, −z+1; (xiii) −x+y+1/3, y−1/3, z+1/6; (xiv) −x+2/3, −y+1/3, −z+1/3; (xv) −y, −x+1, z+1/2; (xvi) −x+y, y+1, z+1/2; (xvii) −y+1/3, x−y+2/3, z+2/3; (xviii) −x, −x+y, −z+3/2; (xix) y−1/3, x+1/3, −z+5/6; (xx) −x+y−1, −x+1, z; (xxi) −y+1, x−y+2, z; (xxii) x, x−y+1, z+1/2; (xxiii) −x+y−1/3, −x+1/3, z−2/3; (xxiv) x−y+1/3, −y+2/3, −z+1/6; (xxv) −x+y, y, z−1/2. |
Acknowledgements
A portion of this work was carried out in the Center for Microanalysis of Materials in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The technical assistance of beamline scientists and staff, Dr Wenqian Xu and Dr Andrey Yakovenko at the APS, ANL, as well as Dr Sanjit Ghose, Dr Jian Min Bai, and John Trunk at NSLS II, BNL, is gratefully acknowledged. Additionally, the authors thank Kuo-Pin Tseng who assisted with the beamline experiments.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Materials Research (grant No. 1838595). Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 and was completed at beamline 17 BM-B. This research used resources of Beamline 28 ID-2 at the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract No. DE-SC0012704.
References
Agrawal, D. K. (1996). Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc. 55, 1–8. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Agrawal, D. K. & Stubican, V. S. (1985). Mater. Res. Bull. 20, 99–106. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Alamo, J. (1993). Solid State Ionics, 63–65, 547–561. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Alamo, J. & Rodrigo, J. L. (1992). Mater. Res. Bull. 27, 1091–1098. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Allen, D. M. (1974). Technometrics, 16, 125–127. CrossRef Google Scholar
Aono, H. & Suginoto, E. (1996). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2786–2788. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Baise, M., Maffettone, P. M., Trousselet, F., Funnell, N. P., Coudert, F. X. & Goodwin, A. L. (2018). Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 265501. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ballirano, P. & Melis, E. (2009). Phys. Chem. Miner. 36, 391–402. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Barrera, G. D., Bruno, J. A. O., Barron, T. H. K. & Allan, N. L. (2005). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 17, R217–R252. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Boilot, J. P., Salanié, J. P., Desplanches, G. & Le Potier, D. (1979). Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 1469–1477. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Breval, E. & Agrawal, D. K. (1995). Br. Ceram. Trans. 94, 27–32. CAS Google Scholar
Breval, E., Mckinstry, H. A. & Agrawal, D. K. (2000). J. Mater. Sci. 35, 3359–3364. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bridges, F., Keiber, T., Juhas, P., Billinge, S. J. L., Sutton, L., Wilde, J. & Kowach, G. R. (2014). Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 045505. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Brown, M. E. (1988). Introduction to Thermal Analysis, pp. 23–49. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar
Bruker (2007). TOPAS. Version 5. Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany. Google Scholar
Cao, D., Bridges, F., Kowach, G. R. & Ramirez, A. P. (2003). Phys. Rev. B, 68, 014303. CrossRef Google Scholar
Chakraborty, N., Basu, D. & Fischer, W. (2005). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25, 1885–1893. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cline, J. P. (2020). Industrial Applications of X-ray Diffraction, edited by F. H. Chung & D. K. Smith, pp. 921–936. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Google Scholar
Coelho, A. A. (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dang, H. Y. & Guo, X. M. (2011). Solid State Ionics, 201, 68–72. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Dean-Mo, L. & Brown, J. J. (1992). Mater. Chem. Phys. 32, 161–167. Google Scholar
Dean-Mo, L. & Brown, J. J. (1993). Mater. Chem. Phys. 33, 43–49. Google Scholar
Deshpande, V. T. & Mudholker, V. M. (1961). Indian J. Phys. 35, 434–436. CAS Google Scholar
Dinnebier, R. E., Leineweber, A. & Evans, J. S. O. (2018). Rietveld Refinement: Practical Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis using TOPAS. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar
Dove, M. T. & Fang, H. (2016). Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 066503. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Dove, M. T., Tucker, M. G. & Keen, D. A. (2002). Eur. J. Mineral. 14, 331–348. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. O. (1999). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3317–3326. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. O. (2002). Thermoresponsive Inorganic Materials. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. O., Mary, T. A., Vogt, T., Subramanian, M. A. & Sleight, A. W. (1996). Chem. Mater. 8, 2809–2823. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Fischer, W., Singheiser, L., Basu, D. & Dasgupta, A. (2004). Powder Diffr. 19, 153–156. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Goodenough, J. B., Hong, H. Y. P. & Kafalas, J. A. (1976). Mater. Res. Bull. 11, 203–220. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Govindan Kutty, K. V., Asuvathraman, R., Mathews, C. K. & Varadaraju, U. V. (1994). Mater. Res. Bull. 29, 1009–1016. CrossRef Google Scholar
Govindan Kutty, K. V. G., Asuvathraman, R. & Sridharan, R. (1998). J. Mater. Sci. 33, 4007–4013. Google Scholar
Gregg, D. J., Karatchevtseva, I., Triani, G., Lumpkin, G. R. & Vance, E. R. (2013). J. Nucl. Mater. 441, 203–210. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gülgün, M. A., Kriven, W. M. & Nguyen, M. H. (2002). US patent number 6482387. Google Scholar
Gülgün, M. A., Nguyen, M. H. & Kriven, W. M. (1999). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 556–560. Google Scholar
Hagman, L. & Kierkegaard, P. (1968). Acta Chem. Scand. 22, 1822–1832. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
International Tables for Crystallography (2021). Teaching Edition, Crystallographic Symmetry, edited by M. I. Aroyo, pp. 127–130. Chichester: Wiley. Google Scholar
Hazen, R. & Prewitt, C. (1977). Am. Mineral. 62, 309–312. CAS Google Scholar
Henke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M. & Davis, J. C. (1993). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 54, 181–342. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hill, R. J. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 589–610. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hill, R. J. & Cranswick, L. M. D. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 802–844. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hulbert, B. S. & Kriven, W. M. (2023). J. Appl. Cryst. 56, 160–166. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hulbert, B. S., McCormack, S. J., Tseng, K.-P. & Kriven, W. M. (2021). Acta Cryst. B77, 397–407. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jessen, S. M. & Küppers, H. (1991). J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 239–242. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jones, Z. A. (2012). MSc thesis, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA. Google Scholar
Jones, Z. A., Sarin, P., Haggerty, R. P. & Kriven, W. M. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 550–553. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kabekkodu, S. N., Faber, J. & Fawcett, T. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 333–337. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kempter, C. P. & Elliott, R. O. (1959). J. Chem. Phys. 30, 1524–1526. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Khosrovani, N. & Sleight, A. W. (1999). Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 1, 3–10. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kida, T., Seo, M. H., Kishi, S., Kanmura, Y. & Shimanoe, K. (2011). Anal. Methods, 3, 1887–1892. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Knight, K. S. (1996). Mineral. Mag. 60, 963–972. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Knight, K. S., Stretton, I. C. & Schofield, P. F. (1999). Phys. Chem. Miner. 26, 477–483. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Krishnaiah, M. V., Joseph, J., Seenivasan, G. & Govindan Kutty, K. V. (2003). J. Alloys Compd. 351, 212–216. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Küppers, H. (2013). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. D, Physical properties of crystals, pp. 100–105, Second online edition. Google Scholar
Langreiter, T. & Kahlenberg, V. (2015). Crystals, 5, 143–153. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lenain, G. E., McKinstry, H. A., Alamo, J. & Agrawal, D. K. (1987). J. Mater. Sci. 22, 17–22. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li, C., Li, R., Liu, K., Si, R., Zhang, Z. & Hu, Y.-S. (2022). Interdiscipl. Mater. 1, 396–416. CrossRef Google Scholar
Liang, E. J., Liang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, J. & Jiang, Y. (2008). J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 12582–12587. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Limaye, S. Y., Agrawal, D. K. & Mckinstry, H. A. (1987). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, C-232–C-236. Google Scholar
Limaye, S. Y., Agrawal, D. K., Roy, R. & Mehrotra, Y. (1991). J. Mater. Sci. 26, 93–98. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lind, C. (2012). Materials (Basel), 5, 1125–1154. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, D. M., Chen, C. J. & Lin, L. J. (1994). J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3765–3768. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Molokeev, M. S., Liu, Q. & Xia, Z. (2018). Inorg. Chem. Front. 5, 619–625. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Loopstra, B. O. & Rietveld, H. M. (1969). Acta Cryst. B25, 787–791. CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
McCormack, S. J., Weber, R. J. & Kriven, W. M. (2018). Acta Mater. 161, 127–137. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
McCusker, L. B., Von Dreele, R. B., Cox, D. E., Louër, D. & Scardi, P. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 36–50. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Miyazaki, H., Ushiroda, I., Itomura, D., Hirashita, T., Adachi, N. & Ota, T. (2008). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 7262–7265. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 653–658. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Montgomery, D., Peck, E. & Vining, G. (2012). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Morgan, E. E., Evans, H. A., Pilar, K., Brown, C. M., Clément, R. J., Maezono, R., Seshadri, R., Monserrat, B. & Cheetham, A. K. (2022). Chem. Mater. 34, 4029–4038. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. H., Lee, S. J. & Kriven, W. M. (1999). J. Mater. Res. 14, 3417–3426. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Paufler, P. & Weber, T. (1999). Eur. J. Mineral. 11, 721–730. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pet'kov, V. I. & Asabina, E. A. (2004). Glass Ceram. 61, 233–239. CAS Google Scholar
Pet'kov, V. I., Kurazhkovskaya, V. S., Orlova, A. I. & Spiridonova, M. L. (2002). Crystallogr. Rep. 47, 736–743. CAS Google Scholar
Pet'kov, V. I. & Orlova, A. I. (2003). Inorg. Mater. 39, 1013–1023. CAS Google Scholar
Quan, N. T. (1988). J. Business Econ. Stat. 6, 501–504. CrossRef Google Scholar
Qui, D. T., Capponi, J. J., Joubert, J. C. & Shannon, R. D. (1981). J. Solid State Chem. 39, 219–229. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rao, Y. B., Bharathi, K. K. & Patro, L. N. (2021). Solid State Ionics, 366–367, 115671. CrossRef Google Scholar
Rashmi, C. & Shrivastava, O. P. (2011). Solid State Sci. 13, 444–454. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ribero, D. & Kriven, W. M. (2015). J. Mater. Res. 30, 2133–2143. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ribero, D., Seymour, K. C. & Kriven, W. M. (2016). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 3586–3593. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1969). J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65–71. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Romao, C. P., Miller, K. J., Whitman, C. A., White, M. A. & Marinkovic, B. A. (2013). Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II: From Elements to Applications, Vol. 4, pp. 127–151. Elsevier. Google Scholar
Roy, R., Agrawal, D. K. & McKinstry, H. A. (1989). Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 19, 59–81. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sarin, P., Yoon, W., Jurkschat, K., Zschack, P. & Kriven, W. M. (2006). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 093906. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Saxena, S. K. & Shen, G. (1992). J. Geophys. Res. 97, 19813–19832. CrossRef Google Scholar
Schlenker, J. L., Gibbs, G. V. & Boisen, M. B. (1975). Am. Mineral. 60, 828–833. Google Scholar
Senbhagaram, S., Guru Row, T. N. & Umarji, A. M. (1989). Solid State Commun. 71, 609–611. CrossRef Google Scholar
Seymour, K. C., Hughes, R. W. & Kriven, W. M. (2015). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 4096–4101. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Seymour, K. C., Ribero, D., McCormack, S. J. & Kriven, W. M. (2016). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 3739–3744. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Shi, N., Song, Y., Xing, X. & Chen, J. (2021). Coord. Chem. Rev. 449, 214204. CrossRef Google Scholar
Shi, X., Ghose, S. & Dooryhee, E. (2013). J. Synchrotron Rad. 20, 234–242. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Takenaka, K. (2018). Front. Chem. 6, 267. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tao, J. Z. & Sleight, A. W. (2003). J. Solid State Chem. 173, 442–448. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1998). Thermal Expansion of Solids, CINDAS Data Series on Materials Properties. Materials Park, OH: ASM International. Google Scholar
Toby, B. H. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 544–549. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Touloukian, Y. S. (1975). Thermal Expansion: Metallic Elements and Alloys. Handbook. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corporation. Google Scholar
Trice, R. W., Su, Y. J., Faber, K. T., Wang, H. & Porter, W. (1999). Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 272, 284–291. CrossRef Google Scholar
Tucker, M. G., Goodwin, A. L., Dove, M. T., Keen, D. A., Wells, S. A. & Evans, J. S. O. (2005). Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 255501. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Song, Y. Y., Zhou, Y. Y., Yang, L. P. & Liu, F. T. (2018). Solid State Phenom. 281, 169–174. CrossRef Google Scholar
Weber, T., Harz, M., Wehner, B., Zahn, G. & Paufler, P. (1998). Z. Krist. 213, 210–216. CAS Google Scholar
Woodcock, D. A., Lightfoot, P. & Smith, R. I. (1999a). J. Mater. Chem. 9, 2631–2636. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Woodcock, D. A., Lightfoot, P., Woodcock, D. A. & Ritter, C. (1998). Chem. Commun. pp. 107–108. CrossRef Google Scholar
Woodcock, D., Lightfoot, P. & Smith, R. (1999b). Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL), Vol. 547, pp. 191–196. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Wu, M., Ni, W., Hu, J. & Ma, J. (2019). Nano-Micro Lett. 11, 44. PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Liu, Y., You, Y., Vinu, A. & Mai, L. (2023). Interdiscipl. Mater. 2, 91–110. CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.