scientific commentaries\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206

New insights into structural diversity of open-framework silicates inspired by the exploration of the Cs2O–CaO–SiO2 system

crossmark logo

aLaboratory of Arctic Mineralogy and Material Sciences, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 14 Fersman str., Apatity, 184209, Russian Federation, and bGeological Institute, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 14 Fersman str., Apatity, 184209, Russian Federation
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

The structural chemistry of silicates is extremely diverse because of many specific ways SiO4 tetrahedra can condense with the formation of different types of tetrahedral units (Liebau, 1985View full citation). Among them, the microporous framework silicates attract interest due to their unique structural topologies with many possible derivatives within the same stoichiometry, i.e. the large family of natural and synthetic zeolites with tetrahedral frameworks (Baerlocher & McCusker, 2007View full citation). This number of tetrahedral frameworks is enriched by open-framework silicates (Krivovichev, 2005View full citation), where the four- and three-connected silicate tetrahedra are simultaneously present (Day & Hawthorne, 2020View full citation). These materials exhibit unique structural features, such as partial connectivity of the tetrahedra, which introduces flexibility in their chemical composition and potential for novel properties.

The exploration of alkali and alkaline-earth silicates has historically focused on systems involving lighter cations (e.g. Na+, K+, Mg2+), driven by their abundance in natural minerals and industrial relevance (e.g. in glass and cement production) (Xu & Van Deventer, 2000View full citation; Richardson, 2008View full citation). In contrast, heavier alkali metals like caesium (Cs+) have received less attention, despite their potential to stabilize unconventional silicate frameworks due to their large ionic radii. In contrast to Na2O–CaO–SiO2 and K2O–CaO–SiO2 systems, the corresponding Cs2O–CaO–SiO2 system was unexplored and the synthesis and crystal structure of the first caesium calcium silicate, Cs2Ca4Si6O17, with the clinotobermorite-type structure recently published (Kahlenberg, 2025aView full citation).

The detailed analysis by Professor Kahlenberg of the phases in the Cs2O–CaO–SiO2 system led to the discovery of a new compound, Cs4Ca[Si8O19] (Kahlenberg, 2025bView full citation), which belongs to the group of interrupted framework silicates. This new compound, Cs4Ca[Si8O19], was synthesized from a mixture of Cs2CO3, CaCO3 and SiO2 (dried at 673 K) in a molar ratio of Cs2O: CaO: SiO2 = 4:1:10 heated from 294 K to 1373 K in a platinum container.

The crystal structure of the new compound, recently published in Acta Crystallographica Section B (Kahlenberg, 2025bView full citation), is unique and is based on the tetrahedral framework which can be described by the condensation of tetrahedral layers parallel to (010). These layers are characterized by the presence of three- and nine-membered rings and the net topology (Hawthorne, 2015View full citation; Blatov et al., 2010View full citation) can be denoted as (3.92)6(93)2, corresponding to hnb net type (O'Keeffe et al., 2008View full citation). The single crystallographically–independent calcium cation exhibits an octahedral coordination with only minor deviation from regularity and is inserted into the silicate tetrahedral framework forming the mixed octahedral–tetrahedral (heteropolyhedral) framework. The wide cavities are filled by the caesium cation balancing the negative charge of the heteropolyhedral framework. The topological features of the heteropolyhedral framework were analysed using ToposPro software (Blatov et al., 2014View full citation). It was found that the cation net contains two types of natural tiles, a very simple tile [43] (frequently observed in zeolites) and a complex one [34.46.62.78], which has not been observed before.

Within the family of silicates containing [Si8O19] anions, Cs4Ca[Si8O19] is the second member after Na12Th3[Si8O19]4·18H2O (Li et al., 2000View full citation) containing an interrupted framework. Comparing Cs4Ca[Si8O19] with related phases, helps identify the key factors governing framework interruption, including the presence of large cations, the size of tetrahedrally coordinated cations, and the presence of larger (molecular) clusters in the channels.

The work of Professor Kahlenberg not only expands the known structural diversity of interrupted silicates but also provides insights into the design principles for synthesizing analogous materials. In particular, the large family of alkaline microporous rare-earth silicates are also characterized by the silicate tetrahedral open frameworks, where the insertion of the additional octahedra filled by rare-earth cations result in formation of the heteropolyhedral frameworks of different topologies (Aksenov et al., 2013View full citation, 2019View full citation). New compound Cs4Ca[Si8O19] contributes to the broader understanding of structure–property relationships in open-framework silicates (as well as silicates with mixed octahedral–tetrahedral frameworks), with potential implications for ion-exchange, catalysis, and materials with tailored thermal expansion.

Moreover, the discovery of caesium calcium silicates raises the search for possible phosphors as Ca2+ can be easily substituted by rare-earth elements. Such caesium calcium silicate materials activated by rare-earth cations could potentially combine the structural stability of silicate hosts with efficient luminescence, making them promising candidates for solid-state lighting or radiation detection applications. The unique framework topology, with its tailored cavity sizes and mixed connectivity, may offer distinct crystal field environments that could enable fine-tuning of optical properties through selective rare-earth doping.

References

Return to citationAksenov, S. M., Mackley, S. A., Deyneko, D. V., Taroev, V. K., Tauson, V. L., Rastsvetaeva, R. K. & Burns, P. C. (2019). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 284, 25–35.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationAksenov, S. M., Rastsvetaeva, R. K., Rassylov, V. A., Bolotina, N. B., Taroev, V. K. & Tauson, V. L. (2013). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 182, 95–101.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBaerlocher, C. & McCusker, L. B. (2007). Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types. Elsevier.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBlatov, V. A., O'Keeffe, M. & Proserpio, D. M. (2010). CrystEngComm 12, 44–48.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBlatov, V. A., Shevchenko, A. P. & Proserpio, D. M. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 3576–3586.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDay, M. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2020). Mineral. Mag. 84, 165–244.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationHawthorne, F. C. (2015). Mineral. Mag. 79, 1675–1709.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKahlenberg, V. (2025a). Mineral. Petrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-025-00918-0.  Google Scholar
Return to citationKahlenberg, V. (2025b). Acta Cryst. B81, 325–336.   Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrivovichev, S. (2005). Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 57, 17–68.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLi, Y., Krivovichev, S. V. & Burns, P. C. (2000). Am. Mineral. 85, 1521–1525.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLiebau, F. (1985). Structural Chemistry of Silicates. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
Return to citationO'Keeffe, M., Peskov, M. A., Ramsden, S. J. & Yaghi, O. M. (2008). Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1782–1789.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRichardson, I. G. (2008). Cem. Concr. Res. 38, 137–158.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationXu, H. & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2000). Int. J. Miner. Process. 59, 247–266.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206
Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds