scientific commentaries
Interaction frequencies as a means to design multicomponent forms
aDepartment of Chemical and Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 17/A, Parma, 43124, Italy
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: cocrystals; in silico screening; database; digital design.
The relationships between and physical properties of molecular organic materials are of extreme importance across multiple industrial arenas (Bianchi et al., 2021
; Bacchi & Mazzeo, 2021
; Mazzeo et al., 2019
; Birolo et al., 2022
; Schultheiss et al., 2010
; Karimi-Jafari et al., 2018
; Trask, 2007
; Shan & Zaworotko, 2008
; Javoor et al., 2017
; Jagadeesh Babu & Nangia, 2011
; Almarsson et al., 2012
). Key physical attributes, including melting point, solubility or hygroscopicity are intrinsically linked to the arrangement of molecules in the crystal structure and to the intermolecular interactions between them. These structure–property relationships are particularly important in the pharmaceutical industry, as the physical properties of drug compounds are central factors in how effective they are. These properties also influence the physical and chemical stability of pharmaceutical products, their mechanical behaviour, manufacturability, bioavailability and ultimately dosage requirements.
Although active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) often exhibit excellent therapeutic efficacy, the physical properties associated with the solid form in which the API exists may not always be ideal. Consequently, strategies for tailoring solid-state properties are of considerable interest. One such method that has attracted considerable interest in recent years is cocrystallization. Cocrystals are multicomponent single-phase crystalline materials made of different chemical entities (i.e. coformers) that crystallize in a stoichiometric ratio within the same held together by non-covalent intermolecular interactions (Karimi-Jafari et al., 2018
; Bolla & Nangia, 2016
; Berry & Steed, 2017
; Mazzeo et al., 2022
).
As the new intermolecular network drives the final physical properties of the molecular compound in its solid form, by appropriately selecting the molecular partner it is possible to tailor the API properties while mitigating undesirable behaviour (Guo et al., 2021
; Montisci et al., 2022
; Bacchi & Mazzeo, 2021
; Montisci et al., 2024
; Mazzeo et al., 2019
; Parisi et al., 2025
; Capucci et al., 2017
).
The existence of a stable cocrystal depends on the ability of the two molecular components to assemble into a crystal structure with lower free energy than the pure individuals. The concept of crystal engineering (Desiraju, 2007
), where `supramolecular synthons' (reliable interactions such as hydrogen and halogen bonds between particular functional groups) (Daolio et al., 2025
; Mazzeo et al., 2020
, 2021
; Bacchi & Mazzeo, 2021
; Desiraju, 1995
; Feliciano et al., 2026
; Braga et al., 2010
) are used to design new solid forms, has long been used to rationalize cocrystal design and synthesis for several decades. Computational and informatics-based methods of identifying these synthons (Corpinot et al., 2016
; Fornari et al., 2022
; Musumeci et al., 2011
; Etter & Frankenbach, 1989
; Fukte et al., 2014
; Grecu et al., 2014
; Prandini et al., 2024
; Prencipe et al., 2025
; Issa et al., 2009
) are particularly useful to reduce the number of experiments needed to ensure a successful outcome, and Stevens et al. (2026
) demonstrate a new approach that makes use of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) (Groom et al., 2016
) in order to identify likely functional group interactions.
The method proposed by Stevens et al.
makes use of a knowledge base of hydrogen-bonding interactions derived from the CSD to identify particular functional groups that demonstrate an increased likelihood of interaction with the functional groups of a target molecule. The method can also provide suggestions for molecules that contain these functional groups and thereby increasing the likelihood of successful cocrystal formation.
For pairs of functional groups that are capable of hydrogen bonding with each other, all structures containing those moieties are identified, and then the number of structures that containing hydrogen bonds between the two groups are counted and used to calculate a frequency of occurrence. In their approach, Stevens et al.
interpret this frequency of occurrence as an assessment of the strength of a particular interaction, given that stronger interactions are more likely to occur more frequently and can therefore be considered as structure directing. This approach therefore provides a statistical means to identify synthons for crystal engineering strategies.
The analysis of the dataset also highlights several observations that support established chemical intuition. Stevens et al.
demonstrate the application of their method on literature data available for cocrystal screening of Paracetamol, Praziquantel, and Loratadine. The speed of the method and the resulting prioritization of functional groups and coformers based on experimental data makes it a useful tool for cocrystal design. While the method is demonstrated for the identification of coformers, as the authors point out, it is extensible across a wide range of molecules. For example, using a library of common solvent molecules rather than potential coformers could similarly be used to assess the propensity for solvate formation.
The work by Stevens et al.
highlights the benefit of large datasets of crystallographic data and how these can be used to design new solid forms. New crystal structures generated through these approaches further enrich those databases, providing an increasingly powerful foundation for future crystal engineering efforts. This creates a virtuous cycle in which experimental discoveries enrich structural databases, enabling better predictive tools that in turn accelerate further discoveries.
Acknowledgements
This work has benefited from the equipment and framework of the COMP-HUB and COMP-R Initiatives, funded by the "Departments of Excellence" program of the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR, 2018–2022 and MUR, 2023–2027). This works has also benefitted from the project "TRIS-MXLAB" Bando di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2025 – Azione B – UNIPR.
References
Almarsson, Ö., Peterson, M. L. & Zaworotko, M. (2012). Pharm. Pat. Anal. 1, 313–327. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Babu, N. J. & Nangia, A. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 2662–2679. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bacchi, A. & Mazzeo, P. P. (2021). Crystallogr. Rev. 27, 102–123. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Berry, D. J. & Steed, J. W. (2017). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 117, 3–24. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bianchi, F., Fornari, F., Riboni, N., Spadini, C., Cabassi, C. S., Iannarelli, M., Carraro, C., Mazzeo, P. P., Bacchi, A., Orlandini, S., Furlanetto, S. & Careri, M. (2021). Food Chem. 347, 129051. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Birolo, R., Bravetti, F., Bordignon, S., D'Abbrunzo, I., Mazzeo, P. P., Perissutti, B., Bacchi, A., Chierotti, M. R. & Gobetto, R. (2022). Pharmaceutics 14, 1754. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bolla, G. & Nangia, A. (2016). Chem. Commun. 52, 8342–8360. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Braga, D., Grepioni, F., Maini, L., Mazzeo, P. P. & Rubini, K. (2010). Thermochim. Acta 507–508, 1–8. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Capucci, D., Balestri, D., Mazzeo, P. P., Pelagatti, P., Rubini, K. & Bacchi, A. (2017). Cryst. Growth Des. 17, 4958–4964. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Corpinot, M. K., Stratford, S. A., Arhangelskis, M., Anka-Lufford, J., Halasz, I., Judaš, N., Jones, W. & Bučar, D. K. (2016). CrystEngComm 18, 5434–5439. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Daolio, A., Prencipe, M., Abodunrin, T., Pelagatti, P., Mazzeo, P. P. & Bacchi, A. (2025). Chem. A Eur. J. 31, e202500956. CrossRef Google Scholar
Desiraju, G. R. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 2311–2327. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Desiraju, G. R. (2007). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8342–8356. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Etter, M. C. & Frankenbach, G. M. (1989). Chem. Mater. 1, 10–12. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Feliciano, I. O., Bernardes, C. E. S., Piedade, M. F. M., Santos, M. S. C. S., Mazzeo, P. P., Blahut, J., Dračínský, M. & Minas da Piedade, M. E. (2026). Cryst. Growth Des. 26, 5618–5628. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fornari, F., Montisci, F., Bianchi, F., Cocchi, M., Carraro, C., Cavaliere, F., Cozzini, P., Peccati, F., Mazzeo, P. P., Riboni, N., Careri, M. & Bacchi, A. (2022). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 226, 104580. CrossRef Google Scholar
Fukte, S. R., Wagh, M. P. & Rawat, S. (2014). Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 6, 9–14. CAS Google Scholar
Grecu, T., Hunter, C. A., Gardiner, E. J. & McCabe, J. F. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 165–171. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Guo, M., Sun, X., Chen, J. & Cai, T. (2021). Acta Pharm. Sin. B 11, 2537–2564. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Issa, N., Karamertzanis, P. G., Welch, G. W. A. & Price, S. L. (2009). Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 442–453. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Javoor, M., Mondal, P. & Chopra, D. (2017). Mater. Sci. Res. India 14, 09–18. CrossRef Google Scholar
Karimi-Jafari, M., Padrela, L., Walker, G. M. & Croker, D. M. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 6370–6387. CAS Google Scholar
Mazzeo, P. P., Canossa, S., Carraro, C., Pelagatti, P. & Bacchi, A. (2020). CrystEngComm 22, 7341–7349. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mazzeo, P. P., Carraro, C., Monica, A., Capucci, D., Pelagatti, P., Bianchi, F., Agazzi, S., Careri, M., Raio, A., Carta, M., Menicucci, F., Belli, M., Michelozzi, M. & Bacchi, A. (2019). ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7, 17929–17940. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mazzeo, P. P., Pioli, M., Montisci, F., Bacchi, A. & Pelagatti, P. (2021). Cryst. Growth Des. 21, 5687–5696. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mazzeo, P. P., Prencipe, M., Feiler, T., Emmerling, F. & Bacchi, A. (2022). Cryst. Growth Des. 22, 4260–4267. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Montisci, F., Mazzeo, P. P., Carraro, C., Prencipe, M., Pelagatti, P., Fornari, F., Bianchi, F., Careri, M. & Bacchi, A. (2022). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10, 8388–8399. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Montisci, F., Menicucci, F., Carraro, C., Prencipe, M., Pelagatti, P., Ienco, A., Palagano, E., Raio, A., Michelozzi, M., Mazzeo, P. P. & Bacchi, A. (2024). Adv. Sustain. Syst. 8, 2400002. CrossRef Google Scholar
Musumeci, D., Hunter, C. A., Prohens, R., Scuderi, S. & McCabe, J. F. (2011). Chem. Sci. 2, 883. CrossRef Google Scholar
Parisi, E., Del Duca, G., Prandini, E., Fraterrigo Garofalo, S., Rosso, C., Chierotti, M. R. & Simone, E. (2025). Chem. Mater. 37, 5593–5608. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Prandini, E., Calì, E., Maloney, A. G. P., Parisi, E. & Simone, E. (2024). Powder Technol. 443, 119927. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Prencipe, M., Mazzeo, P. P. & Bacchi, A. (2025). RSC Mechanochemistry 2, 61–71. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schultheiss, N., Bethune, S. & Henck, J. (2010). CrystEngComm 12, 2436–2442. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shan, N. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2008). Drug Discovery Today 13, 440–446. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Stevens, J. S., Maloney, A. G. P. & Pidcock, E. (2026). Acta Cryst. B82, 391–398. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Trask, A. V. (2007). Mol. Pharm. 4, 301–309. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

journal menu




