scientific commentaries\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206

Interaction frequencies as a means to design multicomponent forms

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemical and Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 17/A, Parma, 43124, Italy
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

The relationships between crystal structure and physical properties of molecular organic materials are of extreme importance across multiple industrial arenas (Bianchi et al., 2021View full citation; Bacchi & Mazzeo, 2021View full citation; Mazzeo et al., 2019View full citation; Birolo et al., 2022View full citation; Schultheiss et al., 2010View full citation; Karimi-Jafari et al., 2018View full citation; Trask, 2007View full citation; Shan & Zaworotko, 2008View full citation; Javoor et al., 2017View full citation; Jagadeesh Babu & Nangia, 2011View full citation; Almarsson et al., 2012View full citation). Key physical attributes, including melting point, solubility or hygroscopicity are intrinsically linked to the arrangement of molecules in the crystal structure and to the intermolecular interactions between them. These structure–property relationships are particularly important in the pharmaceutical industry, as the physical properties of drug compounds are central factors in how effective they are. These properties also influence the physical and chemical stability of pharmaceutical products, their mechanical behaviour, manufacturability, bioavailability and ultimately dosage requirements.

Although active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) often exhibit excellent therapeutic efficacy, the physical properties associated with the solid form in which the API exists may not always be ideal. Consequently, strategies for tailoring solid-state properties are of considerable interest. One such method that has attracted considerable interest in recent years is cocrystallization. Cocrystals are multicomponent single-phase crystalline materials made of different chemical entities (i.e. coformers) that crystallize in a stoichiometric ratio within the same crystal structure, held together by non-covalent intermolecular interactions (Karimi-Jafari et al., 2018View full citation; Bolla & Nangia, 2016View full citation; Berry & Steed, 2017View full citation; Mazzeo et al., 2022View full citation).

As the new intermolecular network drives the final physical properties of the molecular compound in its solid form, by appropriately selecting the molecular partner it is possible to tailor the API properties while mitigating undesirable behaviour (Guo et al., 2021View full citation; Montisci et al., 2022View full citation; Bacchi & Mazzeo, 2021View full citation; Montisci et al., 2024View full citation; Mazzeo et al., 2019View full citation; Parisi et al., 2025View full citation; Capucci et al., 2017View full citation).

The existence of a stable cocrystal depends on the ability of the two molecular components to assemble into a crystal structure with lower free energy than the pure individuals. The concept of crystal engineering (Desiraju, 2007View full citation), where `supramolecular synthons' (reliable interactions such as hydrogen and halogen bonds between particular functional groups) (Daolio et al., 2025View full citation; Mazzeo et al., 2020View full citation, 2021View full citation; Bacchi & Mazzeo, 2021View full citation; Desiraju, 1995View full citation; Feliciano et al., 2026View full citation; Braga et al., 2010View full citation) are used to design new solid forms, has long been used to rationalize cocrystal design and synthesis for several decades. Computational and informatics-based methods of identifying these synthons (Corpinot et al., 2016View full citation; Fornari et al., 2022View full citation; Musumeci et al., 2011View full citation; Etter & Frankenbach, 1989View full citation; Fukte et al., 2014View full citation; Grecu et al., 2014View full citation; Prandini et al., 2024View full citation; Prencipe et al., 2025View full citation; Issa et al., 2009View full citation) are particularly useful to reduce the number of experiments needed to ensure a successful outcome, and Stevens et al. (2026View full citation) demonstrate a new approach that makes use of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) (Groom et al., 2016View full citation) in order to identify likely functional group interactions.

The method proposed by Stevens et al.View full citation makes use of a knowledge base of hydrogen-bonding interactions derived from the CSD to identify particular functional groups that demonstrate an increased likelihood of interaction with the functional groups of a target molecule. The method can also provide suggestions for molecules that contain these functional groups and thereby increasing the likelihood of successful cocrystal formation.

For pairs of functional groups that are capable of hydrogen bonding with each other, all structures containing those moieties are identified, and then the number of structures that containing hydrogen bonds between the two groups are counted and used to calculate a frequency of occurrence. In their approach, Stevens et al.View full citation interpret this frequency of occurrence as an assessment of the strength of a particular interaction, given that stronger interactions are more likely to occur more frequently and can therefore be considered as structure directing. This approach therefore provides a statistical means to identify synthons for crystal engineering strategies.

The analysis of the dataset also highlights several observations that support established chemical intuition. Stevens et al.View full citation demonstrate the application of their method on literature data available for cocrystal screening of Paracetamol, Praziquantel, and Loratadine. The speed of the method and the resulting prioritization of functional groups and coformers based on experimental crystal structure data makes it a useful tool for cocrystal design. While the method is demonstrated for the identification of coformers, as the authors point out, it is extensible across a wide range of molecules. For example, using a library of common solvent molecules rather than potential coformers could similarly be used to assess the propensity for solvate formation.

The work by Stevens et al.View full citation highlights the benefit of large datasets of crystallographic data and how these can be used to design new solid forms. New crystal structures generated through these approaches further enrich those databases, providing an increasingly powerful foundation for future crystal engineering efforts. This creates a virtuous cycle in which experimental discoveries enrich structural databases, enabling better predictive tools that in turn accelerate further discoveries.

Acknowledgements

This work has benefited from the equipment and framework of the COMP-HUB and COMP-R Initiatives, funded by the "Departments of Excellence" program of the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR, 2018–2022 and MUR, 2023–2027). This works has also benefitted from the project "TRIS-MXLAB" Bando di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2025 – Azione B – UNIPR.

References

Return to citationAlmarsson, Ö., Peterson, M. L. & Zaworotko, M. (2012). Pharm. Pat. Anal. 1, 313–327.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBabu, N. J. & Nangia, A. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 2662–2679.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBacchi, A. & Mazzeo, P. P. (2021). Crystallogr. Rev. 27, 102–123.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBerry, D. J. & Steed, J. W. (2017). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 117, 3–24.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBianchi, F., Fornari, F., Riboni, N., Spadini, C., Cabassi, C. S., Iannarelli, M., Carraro, C., Mazzeo, P. P., Bacchi, A., Orlandini, S., Furlanetto, S. & Careri, M. (2021). Food Chem. 347, 129051.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBirolo, R., Bravetti, F., Bordignon, S., D'Abbrunzo, I., Mazzeo, P. P., Perissutti, B., Bacchi, A., Chierotti, M. R. & Gobetto, R. (2022). Pharmaceutics 14, 1754.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBolla, G. & Nangia, A. (2016). Chem. Commun. 52, 8342–8360.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBraga, D., Grepioni, F., Maini, L., Mazzeo, P. P. & Rubini, K. (2010). Thermochim. Acta 507–508, 1–8.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationCapucci, D., Balestri, D., Mazzeo, P. P., Pelagatti, P., Rubini, K. & Bacchi, A. (2017). Cryst. Growth Des. 17, 4958–4964.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationCorpinot, M. K., Stratford, S. A., Arhangelskis, M., Anka-Lufford, J., Halasz, I., Judaš, N., Jones, W. & Bučar, D. K. (2016). CrystEngComm 18, 5434–5439.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDaolio, A., Prencipe, M., Abodunrin, T., Pelagatti, P., Mazzeo, P. P. & Bacchi, A. (2025). Chem. A Eur. J. 31, e202500956.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationDesiraju, G. R. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 2311–2327.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationDesiraju, G. R. (2007). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8342–8356.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationEtter, M. C. & Frankenbach, G. M. (1989). Chem. Mater. 1, 10–12.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFeliciano, I. O., Bernardes, C. E. S., Piedade, M. F. M., Santos, M. S. C. S., Mazzeo, P. P., Blahut, J., Dračínský, M. & Minas da Piedade, M. E. (2026). Cryst. Growth Des. 26, 5618–5628.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationFornari, F., Montisci, F., Bianchi, F., Cocchi, M., Carraro, C., Cavaliere, F., Cozzini, P., Peccati, F., Mazzeo, P. P., Riboni, N., Careri, M. & Bacchi, A. (2022). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 226, 104580.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationFukte, S. R., Wagh, M. P. & Rawat, S. (2014). Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 6, 9–14.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGrecu, T., Hunter, C. A., Gardiner, E. J. & McCabe, J. F. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 165–171.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGuo, M., Sun, X., Chen, J. & Cai, T. (2021). Acta Pharm. Sin. B 11, 2537–2564.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationIssa, N., Karamertzanis, P. G., Welch, G. W. A. & Price, S. L. (2009). Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 442–453.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationJavoor, M., Mondal, P. & Chopra, D. (2017). Mater. Sci. Res. India 14, 09–18.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKarimi-Jafari, M., Padrela, L., Walker, G. M. & Croker, D. M. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 6370–6387.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMazzeo, P. P., Canossa, S., Carraro, C., Pelagatti, P. & Bacchi, A. (2020). CrystEngComm 22, 7341–7349.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMazzeo, P. P., Carraro, C., Monica, A., Capucci, D., Pelagatti, P., Bianchi, F., Agazzi, S., Careri, M., Raio, A., Carta, M., Menicucci, F., Belli, M., Michelozzi, M. & Bacchi, A. (2019). ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7, 17929–17940.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMazzeo, P. P., Pioli, M., Montisci, F., Bacchi, A. & Pelagatti, P. (2021). Cryst. Growth Des. 21, 5687–5696.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMazzeo, P. P., Prencipe, M., Feiler, T., Emmerling, F. & Bacchi, A. (2022). Cryst. Growth Des. 22, 4260–4267.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMontisci, F., Mazzeo, P. P., Carraro, C., Prencipe, M., Pelagatti, P., Fornari, F., Bianchi, F., Careri, M. & Bacchi, A. (2022). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10, 8388–8399.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMontisci, F., Menicucci, F., Carraro, C., Prencipe, M., Pelagatti, P., Ienco, A., Palagano, E., Raio, A., Michelozzi, M., Mazzeo, P. P. & Bacchi, A. (2024). Adv. Sustain. Syst. 8, 2400002.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationMusumeci, D., Hunter, C. A., Prohens, R., Scuderi, S. & McCabe, J. F. (2011). Chem. Sci. 2, 883.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationParisi, E., Del Duca, G., Prandini, E., Fraterrigo Garofalo, S., Rosso, C., Chierotti, M. R. & Simone, E. (2025). Chem. Mater. 37, 5593–5608.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationPrandini, E., Calì, E., Maloney, A. G. P., Parisi, E. & Simone, E. (2024). Powder Technol. 443, 119927.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationPrencipe, M., Mazzeo, P. P. & Bacchi, A. (2025). RSC Mechano­chemistry 2, 61–71.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSchultheiss, N., Bethune, S. & Henck, J. (2010). CrystEngComm 12, 2436–2442.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationShan, N. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2008). Drug Discovery Today 13, 440–446.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationStevens, J. S., Maloney, A. G. P. & Pidcock, E. (2026). Acta Cryst. B82, 391–398.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationTrask, A. V. (2007). Mol. Pharm. 4, 301–309.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206
Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds