view article

Figure 2
Comparisons of cross-validated estimates of map quality with actual map quality. Measures of map quality as shown in Fig. 1[link] were used in (7a)[link] and (8a)[link] to estimate overall map quality. The calculations were carried out one data set at a time. For each data set, joint probability distributions of each measure of quality and true quality [e.g. p(skew, r2MODEL)] were calculated excluding data from all solutions for that structure. These cross-validated joint probability distributions were used in (7a)[link] and (8a)[link] to estimate map quality using the measures of quality for each map associated with that data set. In each case, the true map quality (r2MODEL) is plotted as a function of the Bayesian estimates of map quality. (a) Estimates of map quality using the skewness of electron density in (7a)[link]. (b) Estimates using the correlation of local r.m.s. density in (7a)[link]. (c) Estimates using the skewness and correlation of local r.m.s. density in (8a)[link].

Journal logoBIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1399-0047
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds