view article
Figure 5
Local map comparison of two regions. (a), (b) and (c) show maps around residues Ile9–Glu13, while (d), (e) and (f) show maps around residues Cys94–Arg98 calculated from a model of ammodytin L (R value 0.37, the same as used to prepare Fig. 4[link]). The final model is shown in stick representation. The maps in (a) and (d) represent UN maps, those in (b) and (e) represent ML maps and those in (c) and (f) represent AK maps. The maps were generated using data at 3.0 Å resolution and are all shown at a 1.0σ contour level.

Journal logoBIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1399-0047
Volume 65| Part 9| August 2009| Pages 921-931
doi:10.1107/S0907444909021933
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS