view article
Figure 4
Structural comparison of the active-site entrances of TrBgl2 (PDB entry 3ahy chain B), G1NkBG (PDB entry 3vik ) and HiBG. The upper row shows the electrostatic surface, whereas the lower row highlights the residues that delineate the respective active-site entrances. Electrostatic potentials were calculated by PBEQ Solver (Jo, Vargyas et al., 2008BB1) using the CHARMM-GUI interface (Jo, Kim et al., 2008BB1). The residues Arg454 in G1NkBG and Tyr179 and Phe348 in HiBG that overlap the electronegative patch formed by Asp42 and Thr431 in TrBgl2 are indicated in the upper panels.

Journal logoBIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1399-0047
Volume 70| Part 6| May 2014| Pages 1631-1639
doi:10.1107/S1399004714006920
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS