addenda and errata
of protein structures using a combination of quantum-mechanical calculations with neutron and X-ray crystallographic data. Corrigendum
aDivision of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre, PO Box 124, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden, bDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Lund University, Chemical Centre, PO Box 124, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden, and cEuropean Spallation Source ESS ERIC, PO Box 176, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
*Correspondence e-mail: ulf.ryde@teokem.lu.se
Corrections are published for the article by Caldararu et al. [(2019), Acta Cryst. D75, 368–380].
In our previous article, Refinement of protein structures using a combination of quantum-mechanical calculations with neutron and X-ray crystallographic data (Caldararu, Manzoni et al., 2019), there was a small technical error in calculating the nuclear scattering-length density maps for Fig. 11 and Table 4.
Joint X-ray–neutron quantum ), with nuclear density maps calculated in the X-ray The RSZD (real-space difference-density Z) values used in weight determination for the LPMO quantum in the original article were also calculated from the maps in the wrong A corrected table with the maximum absolute RSZD of the residues of the active site is shown below (Table 1). It can be seen that the absolute values of the RSZD scores have changed somewhat (by up to 1.2), but the variation with the X-ray and neutron weight factors, wN and wX, does not change much. All RSZD scores are almost constant for wN = wX = 1–10, whereas RSZD increases if the weights are further decreased. Therefore, the selection of wN = wX = 1 as proper weights is still in accordance with the RSZD values estimated from maps calculated in the correct unit cell.
of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO) was conducted even though the unit-cell parameters of the X-ray crystal and of the neutron crystal are not exactly equal. The quantum calculations were performed in the X-ray but the nuclear density maps in Fig. 11 were calculated in the neutron We report below the corrected figure (Fig. 1
|
In the corrected version of the figure, there is no positive difference density at the deprotonated N-terminus at the 3.0σ level. However, there is still positive difference density around the N-terminus at the 2.8σ level as can be seen in the corrected Fig. 1(b). This level is still well above the noise level of the nuclear density maps in that area (∼2.3σ). Although the maps without the D2 atom at the N-terminus look more similar to the ones reported by Bacik et al. (Bacik et al., 2017), the structures with two deuterium atoms still fit better to the neutron data. Thus, our conclusions about the use of quantum in elucidating protonation states in metalloenzymes do not change.
Most importantly, the correction in no way affects the combined quantum mechanical and joint X-ray–neutron et al., 2019a), for which a more detailed correction has already been submitted (Caldararu, Oksanen et al., 2019b).
method, which was presented in the article. The LPMO quantum was included only as a second application of the method, taken from another publication (Caldararu, OksanenReferences
Bacik, J.-P., Mekasha, S., Forsberg, Z., Kovalevsky, A. Y., Vaaje-Kolstad, G., Eijsink, V. G. H., Nix, J. C., Coates, L., Cuneo, M. J., Unkefer, J. & Chen, J. C. (2017). Biochemistry, 56, 2529–2532. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Caldararu, O., Manzoni, F., Oksanen, E., Logan, D. T. & Ryde, U. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 368–380. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Caldararu, O., Oksanen, E., Ryde, U. & Hedegård, E. D. (2019a). Chem. Sci. 10, 576–586. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Caldararu, O., Oksanen, E., Ryde, U. & Hedegård, E. D. (2019b). Chem. Sci. 10, 8262–8263. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.