view article

Figure 3
(a) Simulated autocorrelation curves for samples following a number-weighted normal distribution with a %CV of 10% (for example a mean of 2 nm and standard deviation of 0.2 nm). (b) Estimated hydrodynamic radius (Rh) (WHM, intensity-based) versus the mean Rh from the simulated number-based distributions. (c) Example curves of the generated samples following a number-weighted normal distribution with a mean of 6 nm and %CVs ranging from 5% to 100%. (d) Estimated Rh (WHM, intensity-based) versus the WHM and mean Rh from the simulated intensity-based and number-based distributions, respectively. In (b) and (d) the red line indicates a perfect fitting. To estimate the WHM an arbitrary α of 0.01 was used.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
BIOLOGY
ISSN: 2059-7983
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds