Figure 3
Performance of the DM algorithm as a function of its adjustable parameter β for test cases 4bsj and 4zqk. Violin plots (Hintze & Nelson, 1998) summarize the agreement (real-space correlation coefficient) of the individual replicates with the known solution at the final iterate. As in Fig. 2, the black dashed line indicates the self-weighted (Garcia, 2012) mean correlation coefficient calculated from the replicates. (a) Results for error-function circular variance V = 0.6 (mean absolute phase difference = 60°, starting map correlation coefficient ∼0.39). (b) Results for error-function circular variance V = 0.7 (mean absolute phase difference = 68°, starting map correlation coefficient ∼0.30). (c) Results for error-function circular variance V = 0.8 (mean absolute phase difference = 75°, starting map correlation coefficient ∼0.19). |