view article

Figure 3
Performance of the DM algorithm as a function of its adjustable parameter β for test cases 4bsj and 4zqk. Violin plots (Hintze & Nelson, 1998BB30) summarize the agreement (real-space correlation coefficient) of the individual replicates with the known solution at the final iterate. As in Fig. 2[link], the black dashed line indicates the self-weighted (Garcia, 2012BB19) mean correlation coefficient calculated from the replicates. (a) Results for error-function circular variance V = 0.6 (mean absolute phase difference [|{\overline {\Delta \varphi}}|] = 60°, starting map correlation coefficient ∼0.39). (b) Results for error-function circular variance V = 0.7 (mean absolute phase difference [|{\overline {\Delta \varphi}}|] = 68°, starting map correlation coefficient ∼0.30). (c) Results for error-function circular variance V = 0.8 (mean absolute phase difference [|{\overline {\Delta \varphi}}|] = 75°, starting map correlation coefficient ∼0.19).

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
BIOLOGY
ISSN: 2059-7983
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds