journal menu
![[Figure 9]](gin5002fig9mag.jpg)
|
|
Figure 9
Strategies and redundancies for a monoclinic crystal. Simulation parameters are as for Fig. 4 ![[link]](../../../../../../logos/arrows/d_arr.gif){kind=small} , except that the limit resolution is set to 1.22 Å, giving a maximum reflection angle 2θ of 24.2°. (a)–(d) Orthogonal views of the 14% lowest redundancy reflections for a basic strategy (a, b) and an advanced strategy (c, d). The strategies are: basic, 360° in one sweep at κ = 0°; advanced, 936° total with one 360° sweep at κ = 0° and three sweeps of 192° each with κ = 180°. Going from a basic to an advanced strategy increases the lowest redundancy from 25% to∼75%, due to averaging over multiple orientations. Note the concentric rings arising from reflections lost in the module gaps, and the trumpet-shaped images of the cusps. (e) Fraction of reflections per redundancy bin for a basic and advanced strategy simulation. The redundancy distribution is much more uniform for the advanced strategy. As the advanced strategy length is not an integer multiple of 180° the maximum redundancy has been set to 936°/360° times the maximum redundancy (8) for the basic strategy. This explains the value of slightly above 100% for the highest redundancy bin. |
![[Figure 9]](gin5002fig9.jpg)
 | STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY |
ISSN: 2059-7983
access
