computer programs
TOMOMAN: a software package for large-scale cryo-electron tomography data preprocessing, community data sharing and collaborative computing
aMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany, bHuman Technopole, Milan, Italy, and cDepartment of Biochemistry, Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: william.wan@vanderbilt.edu
Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) and subtomogram averaging (STA) are becoming the preferred methodologies for investigating subcellular and macromolecular structures in native or near-native environments. Although cryo-ET is amenable to a wide range of biological problems, these problems often have data-processing requirements that need to be individually optimized, precluding the notion of a one-size-fits-all processing pipeline. Cryo-ET data processing is also becoming progressively more complex due to the increasing number of packages for each processing step. Though each package has its strengths and weaknesses, independent development and different data formats make them difficult to interface with one another. TOMOMAN (TOMOgram MANager) is an extensible package for streamlining the interoperability of packages, enabling users to develop project-specific processing workflows. TOMOMAN does this by maintaining an internal metadata format and wrapping external packages to manage and perform preprocessing, from raw tilt-series data to reconstructed tomograms. TOMOMAN can also export these metadata between various STA packages. TOMOMAN includes tools for archiving projects to data repositories, allowing subsequent users to download TOMOMAN projects and directly resume processing. By tracking essential metadata, TOMOMAN streamlines data sharing, which improves the reproducibility of published results, reduces computational costs by minimizing reprocessing, and enables the distribution of cryo-ET projects between multiple groups and institutions. TOMOMAN provides a way for users to test different software packages in order to develop processing workflows that meet the specific needs of their biological questions and to distribute their results to the broader scientific community.
Keywords: TOMOMAN; cryo-electron tomography; cryo-ET; structural biology; cryo-electron microscopy; cryo-EM; subtomogram averaging.
1. Introduction
Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) is emerging as the method of choice for determining the structures of biological macromolecules in situ, that is, within their native context inside cells or intact extracellular particles (Young & Villa, 2023; McCafferty et al., 2024). Unlike other cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) approaches such as single particle analysis (SPA), cryo-ET provides direct 3D reconstructions of specific fields of view, allowing one to resolve individual molecules in thick complex specimens that would otherwise be overlapping in 2D projections. In cryo-ET, the sample is physically tilted in the microscope and projections are acquired at discreet tilt angles, resulting in a tilt-series that contains multiple distinct views of the same region of interest; these tilt-series can then be used to reconstruct 3D tomographic volumes. Subsequent high-resolution can be performed using subtomogram averaging (STA), an approach analogous to SPA methods in cryo-EM, where repeating units in the tomographic data can be extracted, aligned, averaged and classified (Wan & Briggs, 2016; Pyle & Zanetti, 2021; Castaño-Díez & Zanetti, 2019).
Going from tilt-series data acquisition to reconstructing a tomogram involves a large number of image-processing tasks (Fig. 1). We refer to this part of the cryo-ET processing workflow as `preprocessing', which occurs prior to downstream analysis such as STA. Preprocessing starts with motion correction (Zheng et al., 2017; Brilot et al., 2012) followed by the assembly of the tilt-series in an ascending order of acquisition tilt angles (Hagen et al., 2017). Manual curation of this tilt-series is then performed to remove bad images such as those with poor tracking, drift or specimen charging. Curated tilt-series are then exposure filtered to reduce the high-resolution noise in later images (Schur et al., 2016; Grant & Grigorieff, 2015). These exposure-filtered tilt-series must be aligned using either fiducial-based (Mastronarde & Held, 2017) or fiducial-less approaches (Zheng et al., 2022; Mastronarde & Held, 2017). Prior to tomogram reconstruction, the contrast transfer function (CTF) needs to be estimated; this can occur directly after tilt-series curation (Rohou & Grigorieff, 2015) or after tilt-series alignment to make use of the alignment information (Khavnekar & Wan, 2024). Various tomographic reconstructions can then be generated, such as raw (Kremer et al., 1996), CTF-corrected (Turoňová et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2009) or denoised tomograms (Buchholz et al., 2019). The choice of which type of tomogram to reconstruct is determined by the use case; CTF-corrected tomograms provide high-resolution information for STA while denoised tomograms provide improved contrast, which can be useful for direct visual analysis.
Accurate preprocessing determines the success of all downstream analysis (Voortman et al., 2014), spurring an increasing number of new approaches for each of these preprocessing tasks. These packages are often developed by different groups with different design philosophies, and with different inputs, outputs and file formats (Watson & Bartesaghi, 2024). As such, combining various packages to tailor workflows for specific biological problems is often complex and requires significant user effort.
TOMOMAN (TOMOgram MANager) is an extensible MATLAB-based package developed to reduce the complexity of combining different packages in order to streamline the testing and development of cryo-ET preprocessing and STA workflows. TOMOMAN achieves this by maintaining the essential metadata in an HDF database file (MATLAB structure format) for each tilt-series in the dataset. These metadata include information such as file names and paths, data collection parameters, preprocessing parameters such as estimated defocus, and tilt-series alignment information. TOMOMAN mainly acts as a wrapper for external packages, storing relevant metadata in its internal format and managing the input, output and running of external packages. This includes managing resources for parallel processing in high-performance computing environments. As part of its design ethos, TOMOMAN is meant to be pipeline agnostic, where we make no assumption of an ideal or standard processing workflow. TOMOMAN is designed to help interface the various software packages used in each step or task of cryo-ET preprocessing so that users can test and determine the best workflow for their specific biological projects.
For subsequent STA, various pieces of preprocessing metadata are required, though the specific types and formatting of these metadata are different for each STA package. As with preprocessing, TOMOMAN facilitates the export of tilt-series data and preprocessing metadata in the correct format for each STA package, such as STOPGAP (Wan et al., 2024), RELION (Zivanov et al., 2022; Bharat & Scheres, 2016) and Warp/M (Tegunov & Cramer, 2019; Tegunov et al., 2021). Furthermore, TOMOMAN can also facilitate the transfer of projects between these STA packages to enable users to make use of their specific strengths.
As the cryo-ET field expands and an increasing amount of experimental data are collected, it is becoming virtually impossible for a single group to possess the requisite human effort, computational resources and biological expertise to fully analyze all the information within the data-rich tomograms. As such, there is a need for simultaneous collaborative efforts to fully leverage these data to yield novel biological insights; these efforts can take the form of inter-institutional collaborations or larger research consortia. However, such collaborative efforts are still unlikely be able to completely analyze all the biological information, making open data archiving a requirement. Current practices of depositing either raw frame data, partially processed data such as tilt-series or final reconstructed tomograms are not sufficient as they do not include all the necessary information to reproduce published results or provide consistency to others that perform additional preprocessing. Furthermore, repeating preprocessing tasks using the same methods becomes a significant waste of resources. Maintaining consistency between independent preprocessing efforts is paramount for building richly annotated, accessible data that provide biological insights to the broader community beyond structural biologists. Beyond streamlining cryo-ET workflows, TOMOMAN also enables reproducible data sharing and archiving. One example of such a distributed project is the recently released EMPIAR-11830 dataset (Khavnekar et al., 2023a; Waltz et al., 2024), which has been deposited as a TOMOMAN minimal project (see below). The well defined metadata structure of TOMOMAN has already proven useful as the CZII visualization portal was able to intake these data for further computation (https://cryoetdataportal.czscience.com/datasets/10302), having run automated membrane segmentation on the whole dataset (Lamm et al., 2024).
2. The TOMOMAN workflow
2.1. Overview of TOMOMAN
TOMOMAN is an open-source package written in MATLAB that can be run in three different ways. The first is as a MATLAB toolbox that can be sourced and directly used in MATLAB with a license. The second is a pre-compiled standalone package, which allows for interactive command-line use via the freely available MATLAB Compiler Runtime, similar to the Dynamo subtomogram averaging package (Castaño-Díez et al., 2012; Castaño-Díez, 2017). The third is a pre-compiled `parallel' executable, which can be used in high-performance parallel computing environments using workload managers such as SLURM (Yoo et al., 2003). In addition to managing metadata, the TOMOMAN parallel executable also transparently manages the computational resource usage of external packages.
At the core of TOMOMAN is the internal metadata format and a well defined directory structure (Fig. 2). Within the root directory of each project, a subdirectory is generated for each tilt-series in the dataset; all subsequent preprocessing tasks are performed within these subdirectories. Each tilt-series directory contains a subdirectory with the raw frames, the raw non-motion-corrected tilt stack (if available) and the corresponding SerialEM-formatted tilt-series acquisition metadata (i.e. the .mdoc file) (Mastronarde, 2005). For each preprocessing step, the intermediate input and output data are stored in a subdirectory named for the software package used. The relevant metadata generated by each preprocessing step are parsed and stored in an HDF-formatted file in the project root directory; this file is referred to as the `tomolist'. Reconstructed tomograms are not considered essential data, as they are often very large and can be readily reconstructed from the annotated metadata faster than they can be transmitted. As such, tomograms are stored in their own directories separate from the tilt-series directories.
Below are descriptions of each preprocessing task performed in TOMOMAN. Each of these tasks is configured using package-specific TOMOMAN parameter files, which are a set of plain-text files that include the parameters for each preprocessing step as name–value pairs. The parameters generally include several TOMOMAN-specific parameters and, for external packages, each input parameter for that package. TOMOMAN tasks are programmed as modules within the package, allowing for the addition of new software packages to accomplish pre-existing tasks or to develop new preprocessing tasks. Currently supported packages will be described in the documentation of each TOMOMAN release.
2.2. Importing microscope data
The first step in TOMOMAN preprocessing is importing raw microscope data and sorting them into subdirectories for each tilt-series. During this step, TOMOMAN scans a designated raw data directory for .mdoc files. For each one it finds, it generates a tilt-series directory. For new projects, TOMOMAN also initializes the tomolist; repeated importing will append the previous tomolist with new data, allowing for continuous TOMOMAN preprocessing during data acquisition.
2.3. Generating motion-corrected tilt-series
After raw microscope data have been imported, frames need to be motion-corrected and subsequent aligned images assembled into a tilt-series. TOMOMAN includes modules for performing motion correction using either MotionCor2 (Zheng et al., 2017) or using RELION's implementation of MotionCor2 (Zivanov et al., 2019). After motion correction, TOMOMAN assembles the summed frame-aligned images into tilt-series by tilt angle, accounting for the tilt acquisition scheme used (Hagen et al., 2017). TOMOMAN can also output odd and even frame stacks for later use in noise2noise-based denoising (Buchholz et al., 2019).
2.4. Curating and cleaning tilt-series data
After assembly of motion-corrected tilt-series, manual curation of tilt images is often necessary to remove `bad' images. Bad images include those where something blocks the field of view, such as a grid bar or ice crystal, or image quality is poor due to issues such as sample charging or drift. TOMOMAN facilitates this curation process using the clean_stacks task, which opens each tilt-series in IMOD's 3dmod program (Kremer et al., 1996), requests input on bad images and removes the bad images from tilt-series while annotating this in the tomolist. Tilt-series that are completely bad can also be noted in the tomolist, so that they can be removed from further preprocessing tasks.
2.5. Exposure filtering
Exposure filtering significantly improves the contrast, alignment quality and high-resolution signals of tilt-series and reconstructed tomograms (Schur et al., 2016; Wan & Briggs, 2016). TOMOMAN has a module for exposure filtering on a per-tilt or per-frame basis using the empirical values determined by Grant & Grigorieff (2015). Frame-based exposure filtering keeps track of cumulative electron exposure and uses a modified normalization filter; frame-based filtering also requires aligned frame stacks, which can be generated by MotionCor2.
2.6. Tilt-series alignment
The next step in the preprocessing workflow is to determine the tilt-series alignment parameters. There are two approaches to performing tilt-series alignment: fiducial-based alignment where distinct objects such as gold nanoparticles are applied to the specimen and tracked as points across the tilt-series, or fiducial-less approaches that make direct use of the image data. TOMOMAN includes modules for performing tilt-series alignment using either IMOD (Mastronarde & Held, 2017) or AreTomo (Zheng et al., 2022).
TOMOMAN's imod_preprocess module uses the IMOD etomo package to perform initial tasks of coarse alignment and generation of necessary files for various steps within IMOD tilt-series alignment workflow. Users can adopt either the fiducial-based or the fiducial-less (patch tracking) etomo approach. After initial steps are performed, IMOD's tilt-series alignment workflow requires manual curation steps, which are performed outside of TOMOMAN in the etomo graphical user interface.
For fully automated fiducial-less tilt-series alignment, a module for AreTomo is also included. TOMOMAN offers additional functionality on top of AreTomo by providing extra parameters, such as user-defined binning of tilt-series prior to alignment, the use of unfiltered or exposure-filtered tilt-series as inputs, and per-tomogram thickness values. We find that these additions can be helpful when tuning parameters for specific datasets. For example, in processing EMPIAR-11658 (see Section 4), we used exposure-filtered tilt-series that were binned 8× for alignment, as we found this enhanced signal-to-noise ratio visually improved the alignment quality and reduced computational cost. These parameters were set in the TOMOMAN AreTomo parameter file and TOMOMAN managed the correct tilt-series, Fourier binning via IMOD and appropriate rescaling of AreTomo's outputs to the unbinned pixel size.
2.7. CTF estimation
As with single-particle images, high-resolution STA requires estimation and correction of the CTF. For CTF estimation, TOMOMAN includes modules for CTFFIND4 (Rohou & Grigorieff, 2015), for which CTF estimation is independent of tilt-series alignment.
Additionally, TOMOMAN includes tiltCTF, an algorithm we developed that uses the determined tilt-series alignment parameters to generate power spectra that account for the tilt-dependent defocus gradient (Khavnekar & Wan, 2024). These power spectra are then supplied to CTFFIND4 for Thon ring fitting.
2.8. Tomogram reconstruction
After tilt-series alignment, TOMOMAN can use the determined alignment parameters to reconstruct tomograms using different algorithms (Fig. 3), depending on the needs of the user. Tomograms reconstructed using weighted back projection (WBP) without CTF correction are typically output by the tilt-series alignment software [Fig. 3(a)]; these can be useful for quick visualization or low-resolution STA, but are otherwise limited in use.
TOMOMAN can also reconstruct contrast-enhanced tomograms, which can be useful for visual analysis [Figs. 3(b) and 3(c)]. For denoising using noise2noise methods such as cryoCARE [Fig. 3(b)] (Buchholz et al., 2019), TOMOMAN can generate tomograms using odd and even sums of motion-corrected frames, which are necessary for these algorithms. Options for generating the required odd and even frame sums and corresponding tilt-series are included as parameters during the motion-correction task (see Section 2.3). Additionally, TOMOMAN can reconstruct tomograms in IMOD using WBP and the SIRT-like (simultaneous iterative reconstructive technique) filter [Fig. 3(c)]. After tilt-series alignment and CTF estimation, CTF-corrected tomograms can be reconstructed.
TOMOMAN also includes a module to generate 2D CTF-corrected tomograms using the IMOD tilt and ctfphaseflip programs (Xiong et al., 2009) as well as 3D CTF-correction using novaCTF (Turoňová et al., 2017) [Fig. 3(d)]. For novaCTF, TOMOMAN will generate the appropriate scripts as well as temporary and output directories for running novaCTF. After reconstruction, TOMOMAN will also perform any desired tomogram binning by Fourier cropping using the program Fourier3D (Turoňová, 2020). CTF-corrected tomograms can then be used for subsequent high-resolution STA.
2.9. Tomogram denoising
It is becoming a common practice to use machine-learning methods to enhance the contrast in tomograms through denoising. Contrast-enhanced or denoised tomograms allow for easier interpretation of molecular features by the human eye. TOMOMAN supports the generation of denoised tomograms using cryoCARE (Buchholz et al., 2019). TOMOMAN handles generating tomograms from odd and even frames (see above), and handles the generation of necessary training files and the execution of cryoCARE.
2.10. Automated pipelines
Although all the above tasks can be run individually, it is often convenient to run as many tasks as possible in an automated workflow, particularly when preprocessing large high-throughput datasets. TOMOMAN allows users to define the various tasks of their preprocessing workflows into a `pipeline' (i.e. a list of preprocessing tasks) which can then be run on high-performance computing clusters.
2.11. Interoperability with STA workflows
In addition to the core preprocessing workflow described in the previous section, TOMOMAN includes additional tools to export TOMOMAN metadata to other STA workflows. These include directly exporting to STOPGAP (Wan et al., 2024), Warp/RELION3/M (Tegunov & Cramer, 2019; Bharat & Scheres, 2016; Tegunov et al., 2021) and RELION4 (Zivanov et al., 2022) as well as moving between each of these workflows. For the Warp/RELION/M workflow, TOMOMAN also handles motion-corrected tilt images, while excluding those removed during curation, corresponding .mdoc files, tilt-series alignment files and the RELION3-formatted particle list. For the RELION4 tomography workflow, TOMOMAN handles curated tilt-series, tilt-series alignment and CTF estimation parameters, additional files with order of tilt-series acquisition, and the per-tomogram particle list in RELION4 tomography star file format. For STOPGAP, to generate required metadata files, such as wedge lists, functions are provided to export them directly from the tomolist. Additionally, TOMOMAN can convert particle metadata from the STOPGAP particle list into RELION star file format.
3. Archival and data sharing
3.1. Minimal projects for archiving
TOMOMAN includes an archival module to export the TOMOMAN project to a `minimal project' that can be deposited in repositories such as EMPIAR (Iudin et al., 2023). Minimal projects retain the TOMOMAN directory structure, the tomolist, and only the files necessary to revive the project at its current preprocessing state at a later time point or at another location, while cleaning up unnecessary intermediate files generated during preprocessing. The ability to revive a project in its exact state is key to reproducibility, as small changes in preprocessing can significantly affect downstream results. For example, slight differences in fiducial centering cause differences in tilt-series alignment and subsequent tomogram reconstruction; this affects the particle positions and orientations within tomograms as well as the resolution of STA structures. The TOMOMAN minimal project also minimizes the size of the project directory, as it is only necessary to keep the raw frames, the motion-corrected tilt stacks, and the metadata and parameter files, such as estimated CTF parameters and tilt-series alignment parameters. These 2D imaging data are typically only 2–3 Gb in size, whereas metadata and parameter files are on the order of kilobytes. These data are sufficient to reconstruct tomograms for subsequent STA workflows. This reduction in size makes it easier to share data, as large files such as tomograms, which can be hundreds of gigabytes, can often be reconstructed faster than they can be transmitted.
3.2. Community data sharing and distributed collaborative cryo-ET
TOMOMAN minimal projects allow users to effectively restore projects to their exact previous preprocessing states. In addition to being key to reproducibility and archiving, this enables distribution of preprocessed projects between collaborators for more complex downstream processing such as STA. This enables large-scale cellular cryo-ET projects, where different laboratories can focus on their specific molecules or subcellular structures of interest.
4. Conclusions
A major challenge in cryo-ET and STA is how to leverage the unique capabilities of the wide variety of packages available for each step of the image-processing workflow. This is typically due to the difficulty in managing the metadata between these packages, which typically have different file and parameter formats. TOMOMAN addresses these issues by establishing its own internal metadata format and providing extensible modules to interface with other software packages, allowing users to develop their own package-agnostic workflows that are best suited to their biological problems.
TOMOMAN, an open-source package written in MATLAB, is supplied as a standalone package that can be executed using the freely available MATLAB runtime. TOMOMAN is designed with high-performance computing in mind; it generates all the necessary scripts to launch external packages with defined computational resources, allowing users to seamlessly run custom workflows in parallel. Beyond the initial cryo-ET preprocessing tasks, the TOMOMAN metadata tracking enables the transfer of projects between different STA workflows including Warp/RELION3/M, RELION4 and STOPGAP.
Other cryo-ET packages such as IMOD (Kremer et al., 1996), Warp (Tegunov & Cramer, 2019), EMAN2 (Tang et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2019), ScipionTomo (Jiménez de la Morena et al., 2022), TomoBEAR (Balyschew et al., 2023) and RELION5 (Burt et al., 2024) also offer start-to-end workflows for tilt-series preprocessing. However, these packages generally aim to offer a simplified streamlined workflow that may not be suitable for each biological problem. IMOD, Warp and EMAN2 primarily use their own internal functions for preprocessing tasks and tomographic reconstruction, while RELION5 now includes a cryo-ET workflow that provides wrapper scripts for external packages to perform CTF estimation, tilt-series alignment and denoising and an internal tomogram reconstruction algorithm. ScipionTomo, on the other hand, offers a workflow manager where individual packages can be added as plugins. ScipionTomo integration occurs at a relatively low level within the package; this process can be time consuming as it requires expertise in ScipionTomo and the package to be integrated. This is distinct from TOMOMAN, which does not directly integrate packages, but instead generates scripts for running external packages and functions for capturing the outputs and storing the necessary metadata in its internal format. TomoBEAR is similar in functionality to TOMOMAN in that it wraps external packages and runs scripted workflows, but it is aimed at minimizing intermediate steps to deliver a streamlined linear STA workflow. TOMOMAN also streamlines the interoperability of various packages, but aims to facilitate the testing and use of different packages for each preprocessing step. This flexibility allows users to optimize workflows to their specific biological problems.
One unique feature of TOMOMAN is its archival functions, which streamline data deposition to community databases such as EMPIAR while also providing the necessary metadata for users to download datasets and restart projects. This enables the sharing of information-rich cryo-ET datasets without the need for downstream users to reprocess data, thereby reducing overall computational costs and ensuring reproducibility between laboratories. This aspect of reproducibility is particularly important, as subtle changes in preprocessing can significantly affect downstream results. We believe these archival functions will help enable large-scale consortium cryo-ET projects, while also opening the data to the wider biological community. TOMOMAN has already been used to manage a number of projects, including some that have been deposited in EMPIAR as TOMOMAN minimal projects such as EMPIAR-11830 (Khavnekar et al., 2023a), EMPIAR-11756 (Khavnekar et al., 2023a), EMPIAR-11658 (Wan et al., 2024; Rangan et al., 2023), EMPIAR-11398 (Khavnekar et al., 2022), EMPIAR-11325, EMPIAR-11324 and EMPIAR-11322 (Khavnekar et al., 2023b). In particular, the EMPIAR-11830 project was also processed as a multi-institutional multi-user collaborative TOMOMAN project. We envision that these TOMOMAN minimal project depositions together with well annotated metadata will be important for the development of large data approaches, such as novel AI-based image-processing tools.
Altogether, TOMOMAN offers a solution for developing comprehensive cryo-ET workflows that are accessible for both experienced and novice users. The software package is available at https://github.com/wan-lab-vanderbilt/TOMOMAN.
Acknowledgements
This work was conducted in part using the resources of the Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Some of this work was performed at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry with support from Wolfgang Baumeister, Juergen Plitzko and John Briggs for resources and infrastructure. We would also like to thank Max Planck Computing and Data Facility for the computational infrastructure.
Funding information
This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grant No. DP2GM146321 awarded to WW). WW is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences, supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts. SK would like to thank the Max Planck Society and the International Max Planck Research School for graduate school funding.
References
Balyschew, N., Yushkevich, A., Mikirtumov, V., Sanchez, R. M., Sprink, T. & Kudryashev, M. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 6543. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bharat, T. A. M. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2016). Nat. Protoc. 11, 2054–2065. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brilot, A. F., Chen, J. Z., Cheng, A., Pan, J., Harrison, S. C., Potter, C. S., Carragher, B., Henderson, R. & Grigorieff, N. (2012). J. Struct. Biol. 177, 630–637. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Buchholz, T.-O., Jordan, M., Pigino, G. & Jug, F. (2019). 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019), pp. 502–506. Piscataway: IEEE. Google Scholar
Burt, A., Toader, B., Warshamanage, R., von Kügelgen, A., Pyle, E., Zivanov, J., Kimanius, D., Bharat, T. A. M. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2024). FEBS Open Bio, 14, 1788–1804. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Castaño-Díez, D. (2017). Acta Cryst. D73, 478–487. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. (2012). J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Castaño-Díez, D. & Zanetti, G. (2019). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 58, 68–75. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, M., Bell, J. M., Shi, X., Sun, S. Y., Wang, Z. & Ludtke, S. J. (2019). Nat. Methods, 16, 1161–1168. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grant, T. & Grigorieff, N. (2015). eLife, 4, e06980. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. (2017). J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Iudin, A., Korir, P. K., Somasundharam, S., Weyand, S., Cattavitello, C., Fonseca, N., Salih, O., Kleywegt, G. J. & Patwardhan, A. (2023). Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1503–D1511. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Jiménez de la Morena, J., Conesa, P., Fonseca, Y. C., de Isidro-Gómez, F. P., Herreros, D., Fernández-Giménez, E., Strelak, D., Moebel, E., Buchholz, T. O., Jug, F., Martinez-Sanchez, A., Harastani, M., Jonic, S., Conesa, J. J., Cuervo, A., Losana, P., Sánchez, I., Iceta, M., del Cano, L., Gragera, M., Melero, R., Sharov, G., Castaño-Díez, D., Koster, A., Piccirillo, J. G., Vilas, J. L., Otón, J., Marabini, R., Sorzano, C. O. S. & Carazo, J. M. (2022). J. Struct. Biol. 214, 107872. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Khavnekar, S., Kelley, R., Waltz, F., Wietrzynski, W., Zhang, X., Obr, M., Tagiltsev, G., Beck, F., Wan, W., Briggs, J., Engel, B., Plitzko, J. & Kotecha, A. (2023a). Microsc. Microanal. 29, 961–963. CrossRef Google Scholar
Khavnekar, S., Vrbovská, V., Zaoralová, M., Kelley, R., Beck, F., Klumpe, S., Kotecha, A., Plitzko, J. & Erdmann, P. S. (2022). bioRxiv, 2022.06.16.496417. Google Scholar
Khavnekar, S. & Wan, W. (2024). bioRxiv, 2024.10.10.617684. Google Scholar
Khavnekar, S., Wan, W., Majumder, P., Wietrzynski, W., Erdmann, P. S. & Plitzko, J. M. (2023b). J. Struct. Biol. 215, 107911. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. (1996). J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Lamm, L., Zufferey, S., Righetto, R. D., Wietrzynski, W., Yamauchi, K. A., Burt, A., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Martinez-Sanchez, A., Ziegler, S., Isensee, F., Schnabel, J. A., Engel, B. D. & Peng, T. (2024). bioRxiv, 2024.01.05.574336. Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. (2005). J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. & Held, S. R. (2017). J. Struct. Biol. 197, 102–113. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
McCafferty, C. L., Klumpe, S., Amaro, R. E., Kukulski, W., Collinson, L. & Engel, B. D. (2024). Cell, 187, 563–584. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pyle, E. & Zanetti, G. (2021). Biochem. J. 478, 1827–1845. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rangan, R., Khavnekar, S., Lerer, A., Johnston, J., Kelley, R., Obr, M., Kotecha, A. & Zhong, E. D. (2023). bioRxiv, 2023.08.18.553799. Google Scholar
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. (2015). J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Schur, F. K. M., Obr, M., Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W., Jakobi, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. M., Sachse, C., Kräusslich, H.-G. & Briggs, J. A. G. (2016). Science, 353, 506–508. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tang, G., Peng, L., Baldwin, P. R., Mann, D. S., Jiang, W., Rees, I. & Ludtke, S. J. (2007). J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. (2019). Nat. Methods, 16, 1146–1152. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tegunov, D., Xue, L., Dienemann, C., Cramer, P. & Mahamid, J. (2021). Nat. Methods, 18, 186–193. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Turoňová, B. (2020). Fourier3D, https://github.com/turonova/Fourier3D. Google Scholar
Turoňová, B., Schur, F. K. M., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. (2017). J. Struct. Biol. 199, 187–195. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Voortman, L. M., Vulović, M., Maletta, M., Voigt, A., Franken, E. M., Simonetti, A., Peters, P. J., van Vliet, L. J. & Rieger, B. (2014). J. Struct. Biol. 187, 103–111. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Waltz, F., Righetto, R. D., Kelley, R., Zhang, X., Obr, M., Khavnekar, S., Kotecha, A. & Engel, B. D. (2024). bioRxiv, 2024.09.03.610704. Google Scholar
Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. (2016). Methods Enzymol. 579, 329–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wan, W., Khavnekar, S. & Wagner, J. (2024). Acta Cryst. D80, 336–349. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Watson, A. J. I. & Bartesaghi, A. (2024). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 87, 102861. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Xiong, Q., Morphew, M. K., Schwartz, C. L., Hoenger, A. H. & Mastronarde, D. N. (2009). J. Struct. Biol. 168, 378–387. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Yoo, A. B., Jette, M. A. & Grondona, M. (2003). Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, edited by D. Feitelson, L. Rudolph & U. Schwiegelshohn, pp. 44–60. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar
Young, L. N. & Villa, E. (2023). Annu. Rev. Biophys. 52, 573–595. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, S., Wolff, G., Greenan, G., Chen, Z., Faas, F. G. A., Bárcena, M., Koster, A. J., Cheng, Y. & Agard, D. A. (2022). J. Struct. Biol. X, 6, 100068. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, S. Q., Palovcak, E., Armache, J.-P., Verba, K. A., Cheng, Y. & Agard, D. A. (2017). Nat. Methods, 14, 331–332. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 5–17. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zivanov, J., Otón, J., Ke, Z., von Kügelgen, A., Pyle, E., Qu, K., Morado, D., Castaño-Díez, D., Zanetti, G., Bharat, T. A. M., Briggs, J. A. G. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2022). eLife, 11, e83724. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.