The Co atom of the title compound, (NH
4)
2[Co(SCN)
4]·4H
2O, is located on a special position of site symmetry
, whereas all atoms of the SCN ligand lie on general positions. As a result, the anions possess crystallographic
symmetry. The ammonium cations are located on a twofold rotation axis parallel to
c. The four water molecules occupy general positions.
Supporting information
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 100 K
- Mean (N-C) = 0.008 Å
- H-atom completeness 1%
- R factor = 0.054
- wR factor = 0.177
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 20.0
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level A
PLAT306_ALERT_2_A Isolated Oxygen Atom (H-atoms Missing ?) ....... O1
| Author Response: The H atoms could not be located.
|
Alert level B
PLAT430_ALERT_2_B Short Inter D...A Contact N2 .. N2 = 2.68 Ang.
PLAT430_ALERT_2_B Short Inter D...A Contact N2 .. N2 = 2.68 Ang.
Alert level C
CHEMW03_ALERT_2_C The ratio of given/expected molecular weight as
calculated from the _atom_site* data lies outside
the range 0.99 <> 1.01
From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 2
From the CIF: _chemical_formula_weight 391.33
TEST: Calculate formula weight from _atom_site_*
atom mass num sum
C 12.01 4.00 48.04
H 1.01 0.00 0.00
Co 58.93 1.00 58.93
N 14.01 6.00 84.04
O 16.00 4.00 64.00
S 32.07 4.00 128.26
Calculated formula weight 383.28
PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.99
PLAT040_ALERT_1_C No H-atoms in this Carbon Containing Compound .. ?
PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ?
PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ?
PLAT043_ALERT_1_C Check Reported Molecular Weight ................ 391.33
PLAT044_ALERT_1_C Calculated and Reported Dx Differ .............. ?
PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ?
PLAT094_ALERT_2_C Ratio of Maximum / Minimum Residual Density .... 2.60
Alert level G
FORMU01_ALERT_1_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the
_chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is
usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format.
Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: C4 H8 Co1 N6 O4 S4
Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:C4 H16 Co1 N6 O4 S4
FORMU01_ALERT_2_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the
_chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data.
Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C4 H8 Co1 N6 O4 S4
Atom count from the _atom_site data: C4 Co1 N6 O4 S4
CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected.
CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional?
From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 2
From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C4 H8 Co N6 O4 S4
TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data
atom Z*formula cif sites diff
C 8.00 8.00 0.00
H 16.00 0.00 16.00
Co 2.00 2.00 0.00
N 12.00 12.00 0.00
O 8.00 8.00 0.00
S 8.00 8.00 0.00
REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is
correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the
_publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF.
From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 27.22
From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 882
Count of symmetry unique reflns 536
Completeness (_total/calc) 164.55%
TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure
Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 346
Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.646
Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
1 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem
2 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem
9 ALERT level C = Check and explain
5 ALERT level G = General alerts; check
9 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
6 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 1991); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 1990).
Diammonium tetrathiocyanatocobaltate(II) tetrahydrate
top
Crystal data top
(NH4)2[Co(SCN)4]·4H2O | Dx = 1.628 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 391.33 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, P421c | Cell parameters from 6680 reflections |
Hall symbol: P -4 2n | θ = 3.7–27.0° |
a = 12.2050 (16) Å | µ = 1.61 mm−1 |
c = 5.3588 (7) Å | T = 100 K |
V = 798.26 (18) Å3 | Plate, blue |
Z = 2 | 0.37 × 0.13 × 0.04 mm |
F(000) = 394 | |
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS II two-circle diffractometer | 882 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 729 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.043 |
ω scans | θmax = 27.2°, θmin = 4.2° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995) | h = −15→13 |
Tmin = 0.587, Tmax = 0.938 | k = −15→15 |
5438 measured reflections | l = −6→6 |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | H-atom parameters not refined |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1367P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.177 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.04 | Δρmax = 0.95 e Å−3 |
882 reflections | Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 |
44 parameters | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 351 Friedel pairs |
0 restraints | Absolute structure parameter: 0.02 (7) |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
Co1 | 0.5000 | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0451 (4) | |
N1 | 0.5480 (4) | 0.3801 (4) | 0.2196 (9) | 0.0481 (11) | |
C1 | 0.5714 (5) | 0.3251 (5) | 0.3912 (12) | 0.0499 (13) | |
S1 | 0.60884 (16) | 0.24747 (17) | 0.6240 (3) | 0.0663 (6) | |
O1 | 0.7943 (3) | 0.3749 (3) | 0.9965 (10) | 0.0506 (9) | |
N2 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.961 (5) | 0.161 (9) | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
Co1 | 0.0540 (6) | 0.0540 (6) | 0.0273 (6) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.056 (3) | 0.054 (3) | 0.034 (2) | 0.006 (2) | −0.0010 (19) | 0.000 (2) |
C1 | 0.053 (3) | 0.058 (3) | 0.039 (3) | 0.007 (3) | 0.005 (3) | 0.000 (3) |
S1 | 0.0789 (11) | 0.0798 (12) | 0.0401 (8) | 0.0270 (9) | 0.0085 (8) | 0.0138 (8) |
O1 | 0.058 (2) | 0.0379 (17) | 0.056 (2) | 0.0095 (15) | −0.005 (2) | 0.001 (2) |
N2 | 0.093 (10) | 0.116 (12) | 0.27 (3) | 0.013 (7) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Co1—N1i | 1.967 (5) | Co1—N1 | 1.967 (5) |
Co1—N1ii | 1.967 (5) | N1—C1 | 1.174 (8) |
Co1—N1iii | 1.967 (5) | C1—S1 | 1.632 (7) |
| | | |
N1i—Co1—N1ii | 110.97 (15) | N1ii—Co1—N1 | 106.5 (3) |
N1i—Co1—N1iii | 106.5 (3) | N1iii—Co1—N1 | 110.97 (15) |
N1ii—Co1—N1iii | 110.97 (15) | C1—N1—Co1 | 165.1 (5) |
N1i—Co1—N1 | 110.97 (15) | N1—C1—S1 | 177.6 (6) |
Symmetry codes: (i) y, −x+1, −z; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, z; (iii) −y+1, x, −z. |