Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803010006/ww6084sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803010006/ww6084Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 214830
Fine crystals of DABT were obtained in the manner reported by Erlenmeyer (1948). Single crystals of (I) were obtained from an aqueous solution, as a by-product, during the preparation of a BADT complex of MnII bridged by fumarate.
Amine H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and were included in the final cycles of refinement, with fixed positional parameters and Uiso of values of 0.04 Å2. Other H atoms were placed in calculated positions, with C—H = 0.93 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å, and included in the final cycles of refinement as riding, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq of the carrier atoms.
Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku Corporation, 1998); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC and Rigaku, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and XP (Siemens, 1994); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
C6H8N4S22+·C4H2O42− | F(000) = 324 |
Mr = 314.34 | Dx = 1.750 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.7107 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 3028 reflections |
a = 5.2834 (17) Å | θ = 3.2–26.5° |
b = 7.936 (3) Å | µ = 0.47 mm−1 |
c = 14.370 (5) Å | T = 298 K |
β = 98.164 (6)° | Prism, colorless |
V = 596.4 (4) Å3 | 0.32 × 0.28 × 0.20 mm |
Z = 2 |
Rigaku R-AXIS-RAPID diffractometer | 1359 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 874 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.095 |
Detector resolution: 10.00 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.9° |
ω scans | h = −5→6 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) | k = −10→9 |
Tmin = 0.86, Tmax = 0.91 | l = −18→18 |
3650 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.137 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.062P)2 + 0.0525P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1359 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
91 parameters | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.68 e Å−3 |
C6H8N4S22+·C4H2O42− | V = 596.4 (4) Å3 |
Mr = 314.34 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 5.2834 (17) Å | µ = 0.47 mm−1 |
b = 7.936 (3) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 14.370 (5) Å | 0.32 × 0.28 × 0.20 mm |
β = 98.164 (6)° |
Rigaku R-AXIS-RAPID diffractometer | 1359 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) | 874 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.86, Tmax = 0.91 | Rint = 0.095 |
3650 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.137 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
1359 reflections | Δρmin = −0.68 e Å−3 |
91 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
S1 | 0.99312 (15) | −0.11891 (9) | 0.21681 (5) | 0.0211 (3) | |
C7 | 0.0974 (6) | 0.4669 (4) | −0.0178 (2) | 0.0191 (7) | |
H7 | 0.1063 | 0.4840 | −0.0813 | 0.023* | |
C5 | 1.1150 (6) | −0.1190 (4) | 0.1112 (2) | 0.0190 (7) | |
H5 | 1.2537 | −0.1834 | 0.0990 | 0.023* | |
N2 | 0.6014 (5) | 0.0968 (3) | 0.22327 (17) | 0.0214 (6) | |
C2 | 0.7659 (6) | 0.0298 (3) | 0.1725 (2) | 0.0177 (7) | |
C4 | 0.9820 (6) | −0.0132 (4) | 0.04877 (19) | 0.0185 (7) | |
O1 | 0.4498 (4) | 0.2836 (3) | −0.00883 (15) | 0.0216 (5) | |
N3 | 0.7857 (5) | 0.0730 (3) | 0.08446 (16) | 0.0169 (6) | |
H3 | 0.6885 | 0.1461 | 0.0529 | 0.020* | |
C6 | 0.3048 (6) | 0.3654 (3) | 0.0386 (2) | 0.0181 (7) | |
O2 | 0.3233 (4) | 0.3637 (3) | 0.12609 (14) | 0.0229 (5) | |
H21 | 0.4960 | 0.1676 | 0.1995 | 0.040* | |
H22 | 0.5855 | 0.0593 | 0.2780 | 0.040* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
S1 | 0.0264 (5) | 0.0203 (4) | 0.0167 (4) | 0.0048 (3) | 0.0030 (3) | 0.0013 (3) |
C7 | 0.028 (2) | 0.0133 (14) | 0.0161 (14) | −0.0003 (12) | 0.0019 (13) | −0.0011 (11) |
C5 | 0.0217 (18) | 0.0178 (15) | 0.0182 (15) | 0.0029 (12) | 0.0055 (13) | −0.0022 (12) |
N2 | 0.0276 (16) | 0.0204 (13) | 0.0168 (12) | 0.0047 (11) | 0.0054 (11) | 0.0026 (10) |
C2 | 0.0210 (17) | 0.0133 (14) | 0.0177 (15) | −0.0008 (12) | −0.0010 (12) | −0.0015 (11) |
C4 | 0.0181 (16) | 0.0172 (15) | 0.0195 (15) | −0.0033 (12) | 0.0000 (13) | −0.0028 (12) |
O1 | 0.0218 (13) | 0.0212 (12) | 0.0219 (11) | 0.0045 (9) | 0.0040 (9) | −0.0020 (9) |
N3 | 0.0190 (15) | 0.0153 (13) | 0.0162 (12) | 0.0023 (10) | 0.0016 (11) | 0.0003 (9) |
C6 | 0.0244 (18) | 0.0118 (14) | 0.0188 (15) | −0.0035 (12) | 0.0054 (13) | −0.0012 (11) |
O2 | 0.0248 (13) | 0.0242 (12) | 0.0186 (11) | 0.0071 (9) | −0.0004 (9) | −0.0006 (9) |
S1—C5 | 1.731 (3) | N2—H21 | 0.829 |
S1—C2 | 1.738 (3) | N2—H22 | 0.856 |
C7—C7i | 1.322 (6) | C2—N3 | 1.330 (4) |
C7—C6 | 1.501 (4) | C4—N3 | 1.399 (4) |
C7—H7 | 0.930 | C4—C4ii | 1.456 (6) |
C5—C4 | 1.351 (4) | O1—C6 | 1.273 (4) |
C5—H5 | 0.930 | N3—H3 | 0.860 |
N2—C2 | 1.323 (4) | C6—O2 | 1.248 (3) |
C5—S1—C2 | 90.18 (14) | N2—C2—S1 | 123.0 (2) |
C7i—C7—C6 | 123.5 (3) | N3—C2—S1 | 112.3 (2) |
C7i—C7—H7 | 118.2 | C5—C4—N3 | 113.8 (3) |
C6—C7—H7 | 118.2 | C5—C4—C4ii | 127.0 (4) |
C4—C5—S1 | 111.0 (2) | N3—C4—C4ii | 119.2 (3) |
C4—C5—H5 | 124.5 | C2—N3—C4 | 112.7 (3) |
S1—C5—H5 | 124.5 | C2—N3—H3 | 123.7 |
C2—N2—H21 | 120.0 | C4—N3—H3 | 123.7 |
C2—N2—H22 | 121.6 | O2—C6—O1 | 124.5 (3) |
H21—N2—H22 | 117.8 | O2—C6—C7 | 119.8 (3) |
N2—C2—N3 | 124.6 (3) | O1—C6—C7 | 115.7 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z; (ii) −x+2, −y, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H21···O2 | 0.83 | 2.02 | 2.831 (3) | 164 |
N2—H22···O2iii | 0.86 | 2.09 | 2.832 (3) | 145 |
N3—H3···O1 | 0.86 | 1.80 | 2.658 (3) | 172 |
C5—H5···O1ii | 0.93 | 2.31 | 3.181 (4) | 155 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+2, −y, −z; (iii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C6H8N4S22+·C4H2O42− |
Mr | 314.34 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.2834 (17), 7.936 (3), 14.370 (5) |
β (°) | 98.164 (6) |
V (Å3) | 596.4 (4) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.47 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.32 × 0.28 × 0.20 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku R-AXIS-RAPID diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.86, 0.91 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3650, 1359, 874 |
Rint | 0.095 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.650 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.050, 0.137, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 1359 |
No. of parameters | 91 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.58, −0.68 |
Computer programs: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku Corporation, 1998), PROCESS-AUTO, CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC and Rigaku, 2002), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and XP (Siemens, 1994), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H21···O2 | 0.83 | 2.02 | 2.831 (3) | 164 |
N2—H22···O2i | 0.86 | 2.09 | 2.832 (3) | 145 |
N3—H3···O1 | 0.86 | 1.80 | 2.658 (3) | 172 |
C5—H5···O1ii | 0.93 | 2.31 | 3.181 (4) | 155 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+2, −y, −z. |
Transition metal complexes with 2,2'-diamine-4,4'-bithiazole (DABT) or its derivatives have shown interesting properties and potential application in any fields (Waring, 1981; Fisher et al., 1985). A series of metal complexes with BADT has been prepared in our laboratory (Liu et al., 2001). As a part of this investigation, the X-ray structure of the title BADT fumarate, (I), is presented here.
The structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1 and consists of a protonated DABT cation and a fumarate anion, both being located around an individual crystallographic inversion center. The DABT cation displays a planar trans configuration, which agrees with that found in 2,2'-diamino-4,4'-1,3-thiazolium dichloride (Liu et al., 2002), but differs from the cis configuration found in DABT metal complexes (Tian et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2001). The N3—C2 distance of 1.333 (4) Å within the DABT cation is identical to the values of 1.335 (6) and 1.322 (3) Å found in the dichloride (Liu et al., 2002) and the CuII complex (Liu et al., 2001), respectively, but significantly longer than the distance of 1.309 (2) Å in the neutral DABT molecule (Liu et al., 2003). The N2—C2 bond distance of 1.323 (4) Å suggests the existence of the electron delocalization between the thiazole ring and the amino group.
The carboxyl groups of the fumarate anion are coplanar with the carbon skeleton, the maximum atomic deviation from the mean plane defined by all atoms of the fumarate being 0.0806 (14) Å (O1). The fumarate anions link with DABT cations through classic hydrogen bonding between the carboxyl and amino groups and weak C—H···O hydrogen bonding between the carboxyl and thiazole ring, forming a three-dimensional supramolecular structure, as shown in Fig. 2.