Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the crystal structure of the title compound, C5H8N2O3, the mol­ecules exist in the zwitterionic form. The pyrrolidine ring adopts an envelope conformation with the unsubstituted endocyclic C atom situated at the flap. The other four endocyclic atoms are coplanar with the exocyclic carbonyl O atom, with an r.m.s. deviation from the mean plane of 0.06 Å. The carboxyl­ate substituent is located axially, while the ammonium group occupies an equatorial position. In the crystal structure, the mol­ecules are linked through N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810004277/bt5187sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810004277/bt5187Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 774273

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.027
  • wR factor = 0.069
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 9.4

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B PLAT029_ALERT_3_B _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.95
Alert level C PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.600 15 PLAT912_ALERT_4_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 6
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 70.82 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1169 Count of symmetry unique reflns 742 Completeness (_total/calc) 157.55% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 427 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.575 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present no PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature 293 K PLAT791_ALERT_4_G The Model has Chirality at C3 (Verify) .... R PLAT791_ALERT_4_G The Model has Chirality at C5 (Verify) .... S
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 5 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 4 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

N-methyl amino acids and proline residues in the peptide chain may cause the cis-trans isomerisation of the amide bond and lead to conformational changes, which influence the molecular recognition (Dugave & Demange, 2003). Importance of the cis-amide bonds for the peptide bioactivity led to the construction of modified amino acids, which could lock a peptide bond in the cis-geometry (Dumy et al., 1997; Keller et al., 1998; Mutter et al., 1999; Tuchscherer & Mutter, 2001). In particular, Paul et al. (1992) designed mimetics of the cis-peptide bond based on the substitituted pyroglutamic acid residue. In contrast with a tetrazole replacement for the peptide bond, the pyroglutamic acid derivatives are more rigid (Zabrocki et al., 1988). Their carboxylic group could be either donor or acceptor of hydrogen bond without invloving the polypeptide main chain amide moieties (Kaczmarek et al., 2005).

The 4-aminopyroglutamic acid is a particularly useful residue for building the conformationally restricted peptide chains. Depending on the absolute configuration at both chiral centers it may be applied to construct the VIa or VIb β-turn mimetics.

The title compound may be obtained by two different methods elaborated by us, i.e. by electrophilic amination reaction of N-protected (S)-pyroglutamate ester, which gives separable 9:1 mixture of (2S,4R) and (2S,4S) diastereoisomers (Kaczmarek et al., 2001) or through Michael addition of dehydroalanine derivatives to sodium salt of N-benzyloxycarbonylaminomalonate ester, which gives after hydrolysis and decarboxylation mixture of all four possible stereomers. The details of the last reaction and resolution of stereoisomers will be described elsewhere (Kaczmarek, 2009).

A view of the title compound is given in Fig. 1. The molecule has two chiral centres viz. C3 and C5. Their absolute configurations follow from the synthetic procedure and are R and S, respectively.

The pyrrolidine ring adopts an envelope conformation with N1, C2, C3 and C5 almost coplanar and the C4 situated at the flap.

Additionally, the former four endocyclic atoms are coplanar with the exocyclic carbonyl oxygen, the average r.m.s. deviation from the mean plane is 0.06 Å.

The three lowest ring asymmetry parameters (Griffin et al., 1984) are: CS(C4) = 1.26 (14), C2(C2) = 11.92 (14), C2(N1) = 15.46 (14)°. The carboxylate substituent is located axially in conformation stabilized by the short N1···O2 contact [2.787 (2) Å], while the ammonium group occupies equatorial position.

In the crystal each molecule is linked through N—H ···O hydrogen bonds with eight adjacent molecules, their deatils are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2.

Related literature top

For molecular recognition in N-methyl amino acids and proline residues, see: Dugave & Demange (2003). For the construction of modified amino acids, see: Dumy et al. (1997); Keller et al. (1998); Mutter et al. (1999); Tuchscherer & Mutter (2001); Paul et al. (1992). For pyroglutamic acid derivatives, see: Zabrocki et al. (1988); Kaczmarek et al. (2005). For the preparation of the title compound, see: Kaczmarek et al. (2001); Kaczmarek (2009). For asymmetry parameters, see: Griffin et al. (1984).

Experimental top

An optically pure (ee>99%) N'-benzyloxycarbonyl protected precursor of the title compound was hydrogenated in methanol solution over 10% palladium on charcoal, which resulted in precipitation of the final product. After filtration of solids final product was washed out of the catalyst with the aim of water. The (2S,4R)-4-aminopyroglutamic acid crystals were grown from this water solution by slow evaporation.

Refinement top

All H atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and refined freely.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2003); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecule of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of hydrogen bonding in the crystal of the title compound. Symmetry codes: I (x, y, z); II (x + 1/2,-y+1/2,-z+1); III (-x + 2, y + 1/2,-z+3/2); IV (-x + 1, y + 1/2,-z+3/2); V (-x + 3/2,-y, z + 1/2).
(2S,4R)-4-Ammmonio-5-oxopyrrolidine-2-carboxylate top
Crystal data top
C5H8N2O3Dx = 1.502 Mg m3
Mr = 144.13Melting point: 423(2) K
Orthorhombic, P212121Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 7056 reflections
a = 5.9790 (3) Åθ = 6.1–70.8°
b = 9.3665 (4) ŵ = 1.08 mm1
c = 11.3809 (5) ÅT = 293 K
V = 637.36 (5) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.40 × 0.40 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 304
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX
diffractometer
1169 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1168 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
ω scansθmax = 70.8°, θmin = 6.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
h = 65
Tmin = 0.707, Tmax = 0.900k = 1111
7227 measured reflectionsl = 1313
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0468P)2 + 0.0681P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.069(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
1169 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
125 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.047 (3)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 461 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.1 (2)
Crystal data top
C5H8N2O3V = 637.36 (5) Å3
Mr = 144.13Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Cu Kα radiation
a = 5.9790 (3) ŵ = 1.08 mm1
b = 9.3665 (4) ÅT = 293 K
c = 11.3809 (5) Å0.40 × 0.40 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX
diffractometer
1169 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
1168 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.707, Tmax = 0.900Rint = 0.030
7227 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.069Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
S = 1.08Δρmin = 0.17 e Å3
1169 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 461 Friedel pairs
125 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.1 (2)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.85679 (17)0.10762 (9)0.57781 (8)0.0373 (3)
H20.838 (4)0.3509 (18)0.9130 (15)0.042 (4)*
O20.57914 (17)0.04638 (10)0.55325 (8)0.0383 (3)
O30.6519 (2)0.46234 (9)0.68254 (10)0.0469 (3)
N10.8566 (2)0.27436 (11)0.61237 (10)0.0353 (3)
H10.917 (4)0.3094 (19)0.5549 (17)0.054 (5)*
C10.7725 (2)0.01571 (13)0.58351 (10)0.0283 (3)
C50.9163 (2)0.12935 (13)0.64357 (11)0.0304 (3)
H511.078 (3)0.1140 (16)0.6258 (13)0.032 (4)*
C40.8646 (3)0.12504 (13)0.77672 (11)0.0340 (3)
H410.807 (3)0.0354 (17)0.8009 (15)0.045 (5)*
H420.995 (4)0.156 (2)0.8147 (18)0.056 (5)*
C30.6848 (2)0.23810 (12)0.79144 (11)0.0297 (3)
H310.541 (3)0.1976 (15)0.7877 (14)0.030 (4)*
N20.7038 (2)0.31400 (11)0.90532 (10)0.0310 (3)
H40.607 (3)0.3822 (18)0.9140 (14)0.036 (4)*
H30.695 (3)0.249 (2)0.9630 (14)0.042 (4)*
C20.7255 (2)0.34135 (13)0.68928 (11)0.0319 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0425 (6)0.0262 (4)0.0432 (5)0.0027 (4)0.0079 (4)0.0062 (4)
O20.0334 (6)0.0347 (5)0.0466 (5)0.0016 (4)0.0093 (4)0.0089 (4)
O30.0561 (7)0.0309 (5)0.0536 (6)0.0133 (5)0.0046 (5)0.0104 (4)
N10.0451 (7)0.0234 (5)0.0374 (6)0.0044 (5)0.0072 (5)0.0050 (4)
C10.0331 (7)0.0267 (6)0.0251 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0001 (5)0.0034 (4)
C50.0311 (7)0.0241 (6)0.0361 (6)0.0008 (5)0.0004 (5)0.0004 (5)
C40.0435 (8)0.0250 (6)0.0335 (6)0.0040 (5)0.0074 (6)0.0002 (5)
C30.0294 (7)0.0257 (5)0.0340 (6)0.0027 (5)0.0020 (4)0.0037 (5)
N20.0327 (7)0.0257 (5)0.0345 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0027 (4)0.0029 (4)
C20.0321 (7)0.0270 (6)0.0367 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0044 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.2621 (16)C4—C31.5187 (19)
O2—C11.2399 (17)C4—H410.949 (17)
O3—C21.2179 (16)C4—H420.94 (2)
N1—C21.3321 (17)C3—N21.4826 (16)
N1—C51.4485 (15)C3—C21.5318 (16)
N1—H10.82 (2)C3—H310.939 (17)
C1—C51.5295 (17)N2—H20.88 (2)
C5—C41.5470 (17)N2—H40.867 (18)
C5—H510.997 (17)N2—H30.898 (18)
C2—N1—C5115.19 (10)C3—C4—H41109.0 (11)
O3—C2—N1127.55 (12)C5—C4—H41112.3 (10)
O3—C2—C3125.30 (12)C3—C4—H42108.7 (13)
N1—C2—C3107.15 (11)C5—C4—H42106.1 (13)
N1—C5—C1113.86 (10)H41—C4—H42116.4 (17)
N1—C5—C4102.44 (10)N2—C3—C4112.11 (10)
C1—C5—C4107.90 (10)N2—C3—C2110.40 (10)
C3—C4—C5103.37 (10)N2—C3—H31107.7 (9)
C4—C3—C2104.12 (10)C4—C3—H31111.1 (9)
C2—N1—H1126.6 (13)C2—C3—H31111.5 (9)
C5—N1—H1117.8 (13)C3—N2—H2110.3 (11)
O2—C1—O1124.76 (12)C3—N2—H4113.6 (11)
O2—C1—C5119.14 (11)H2—N2—H4107.9 (16)
O1—C1—C5115.82 (11)C3—N2—H3108.0 (11)
N1—C5—H51108.9 (9)H2—N2—H3104.4 (16)
C1—C5—H51110.7 (9)H4—N2—H3112.3 (15)
C4—C5—H51112.9 (8)
N1—C5—C4—C326.38 (13)O2—C1—C5—N126.96 (16)
C5—C4—C3—C225.98 (13)O1—C1—C5—N1158.87 (11)
C5—N1—C2—O3179.48 (14)O2—C1—C5—C486.02 (13)
C5—N1—C2—C31.41 (16)O1—C1—C5—C488.15 (13)
C4—C3—C2—N116.23 (14)C1—C5—C4—C394.06 (11)
C4—C3—C2—O3162.91 (14)C5—C4—C3—N2145.33 (10)
C2—N1—C5—C417.99 (15)N2—C3—C2—O342.41 (18)
C2—N1—C5—C198.23 (14)N2—C3—C2—N1136.73 (12)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O2i0.82 (2)2.07 (2)2.8535 (15)161.2 (18)
N2—H2···O1ii0.88 (2)1.87 (2)2.7346 (16)168.5 (17)
N2—H3···O1iii0.897 (17)1.886 (17)2.7788 (14)173.4 (17)
N2—H4···O2iv0.868 (17)1.935 (17)2.7967 (15)172.3 (17)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ii) x+2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x+3/2, y, z+1/2; (iv) x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H8N2O3
Mr144.13
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)5.9790 (3), 9.3665 (4), 11.3809 (5)
V3)637.36 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)1.08
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.40 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.707, 0.900
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7227, 1169, 1168
Rint0.030
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.613
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.027, 0.069, 1.08
No. of reflections1169
No. of parameters125
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.13, 0.17
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 461 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.1 (2)

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2003), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2003), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O2i0.82 (2)2.07 (2)2.8535 (15)161.2 (18)
N2—H2···O1ii0.88 (2)1.87 (2)2.7346 (16)168.5 (17)
N2—H3···O1iii0.897 (17)1.886 (17)2.7788 (14)173.4 (17)
N2—H4···O2iv0.868 (17)1.935 (17)2.7967 (15)172.3 (17)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ii) x+2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x+3/2, y, z+1/2; (iv) x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds