Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title mol­ecule, C14H10N2O, an intra­molecular O—H...N hydrogen bond contributes to the essential coplanarity of the two benzene rings, which form a dihedral angle of 6.04 (18)°.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536808005242/cv2384sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536808005242/cv2384Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 675130

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.005 Å
  • R factor = 0.056
  • wR factor = 0.122
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 8.4

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.90 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.812 1.000 Tmin(prime) and Tmax expected: 0.981 0.996 RR(prime) = 0.824 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. RINTA01_ALERT_3_C The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 Rint given 0.116 PLAT020_ALERT_3_C The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 ......... 0.12 PLAT061_ALERT_3_C Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.82 PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 5 PLAT371_ALERT_2_C Long C(sp2)-C(sp1) Bond C10 - C14 ... 1.44 Ang.
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.996 Tmax scaled 0.996 Tmin scaled 0.809 REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 27.48 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1339 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1340 Completeness (_total/calc) 99.93% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 0 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.000 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present no PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 2
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 6 ALERT level C = Check and explain 5 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 7 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Schiff base compounds have attracted great attention for many years. These compounds play an important role in the development of coordination chemistry related to catalysis and enzymatic reactions, magnetism, photochromism and thermochromism. Here, we report the crystal structure of the title compound.

In the title compound (Fig. 1), all bond lengths are within normal ranges. The C7=N1 bond length of 1.277 (4)Å is a typical double bond, similar to the corresponding bond lengths in 4-methoxy-2-[(4-nitrophenyl)iminomethyl]phenol (Kosar et al., 2005). The molecule is almost planar and displays a trans configuration with respect to the C7=N1 double bond. The dihedral angle between the benzene rings is 6.04 (18)°. Strong intramolecular O—H···N hydrogen-bond interaction (Talbe I), similar to the reported earlier (Cheng et al., 2005, 2006), is observed in the molecule.

Related literature top

For related crystal structures, see: Kosar et al. (2005); Cheng et al. (2005, 2006).

Experimental top

3-Aminobenzonitrile and salicylaldehyde were available commercially and were used without further purification. 3-Aminobenzonitrile (1.18 g, 10 mmol) and salicylaldehyde (1.22 g, 10 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (20 ml). The mixture was heated to reflux for 4 h, then cooled to room temperature overnight and large amounts of a yellow precipitate were formed. Yellow crystals were obtained by recrystallization from ethyl alcohol (yield: 82%). For the X-ray diffraction analysis, suitable single crystals were obtained after one week by slow evaporation from an ethyl alcohol solution.

Refinement top

C-bound H atoms were geometrically positioned (C—H 0.93 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H)= 1.2Ueq(C). Atom H1B was located on a difference map and refined isotropically with bon restraint O1—H1B = 0.82 (2) Å. In the absence of significant anomalous scatterers, 1124 Friedel pairs were merged.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with atomic numbering and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.
3-(2-Hydroxybenzylideneamino)benzonitrile top
Crystal data top
C14H10N2OF(000) = 464
Mr = 222.24Dx = 1.324 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pca21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2acCell parameters from 8294 reflections
a = 26.397 (5) Åθ = 3.0–27.6°
b = 3.9211 (8) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 10.773 (2) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1115.1 (4) Å3Stick, yellow
Z = 40.22 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
1339 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube901 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.116
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = 3434
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 55
Tmin = 0.812, Tmax = 1.00l = 1313
9995 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.121H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0413P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1339 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
160 parametersΔρmax = 0.15 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
Crystal data top
C14H10N2OV = 1115.1 (4) Å3
Mr = 222.24Z = 4
Orthorhombic, Pca21Mo Kα radiation
a = 26.397 (5) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 3.9211 (8) ÅT = 293 K
c = 10.773 (2) Å0.22 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
1339 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
901 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.812, Tmax = 1.00Rint = 0.116
9995 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0562 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.121H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.15 e Å3
1339 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
160 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.45687 (11)0.2218 (7)0.2697 (3)0.0473 (8)
C10.54425 (12)0.2407 (8)0.3273 (3)0.0427 (8)
C90.37076 (12)0.2616 (9)0.2071 (3)0.0457 (9)
H9A0.38230.37180.13600.055*
C60.57995 (14)0.1614 (9)0.4188 (3)0.0559 (10)
H6A0.56940.06020.49240.067*
C80.40534 (12)0.1480 (8)0.2952 (3)0.0451 (8)
C70.49124 (12)0.1608 (8)0.3501 (3)0.0460 (9)
H7A0.48210.06240.42540.055*
C30.61133 (14)0.4649 (10)0.2017 (3)0.0570 (11)
H3A0.62230.57150.12940.068*
C20.56072 (13)0.3894 (9)0.2167 (3)0.0468 (9)
C120.33597 (14)0.0682 (10)0.4162 (4)0.0601 (10)
H12A0.32450.18000.48690.072*
C100.31905 (13)0.2118 (9)0.2243 (3)0.0510 (10)
C110.30193 (13)0.0476 (9)0.3297 (3)0.0572 (11)
H11A0.26740.01570.34210.069*
C140.28378 (13)0.3427 (10)0.1343 (4)0.0585 (10)
O10.52789 (11)0.4688 (8)0.1250 (3)0.0683 (8)
C50.63050 (14)0.2312 (10)0.4013 (4)0.0629 (11)
H5A0.65400.17560.46220.076*
C40.64585 (14)0.3839 (10)0.2928 (4)0.0632 (11)
H4A0.68000.43310.28080.076*
C130.38733 (13)0.0193 (10)0.3986 (3)0.0542 (10)
H13A0.41010.10060.45750.065*
N20.25591 (14)0.4542 (10)0.0648 (4)0.0896 (13)
H1B0.4999 (10)0.396 (12)0.145 (7)0.13 (2)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0426 (18)0.0517 (18)0.0474 (16)0.0006 (13)0.0038 (14)0.0007 (13)
C10.038 (2)0.0449 (17)0.045 (2)0.0021 (14)0.0015 (17)0.0035 (16)
C90.042 (2)0.048 (2)0.046 (2)0.0029 (16)0.0022 (17)0.0027 (17)
C60.053 (2)0.058 (2)0.057 (2)0.0006 (18)0.005 (2)0.0031 (19)
C80.0392 (19)0.0456 (19)0.051 (2)0.0018 (15)0.0032 (17)0.0088 (17)
C70.052 (2)0.0445 (19)0.042 (2)0.0000 (16)0.0045 (17)0.0015 (17)
C30.054 (3)0.061 (3)0.056 (2)0.0065 (18)0.0091 (19)0.0002 (19)
C20.047 (2)0.051 (2)0.042 (2)0.0009 (16)0.0012 (16)0.0012 (18)
C120.056 (2)0.065 (3)0.060 (2)0.0083 (19)0.006 (2)0.006 (2)
C100.042 (2)0.054 (2)0.057 (2)0.0035 (17)0.0024 (19)0.0148 (19)
C110.0399 (19)0.061 (2)0.071 (3)0.0074 (17)0.0068 (19)0.013 (2)
C140.044 (2)0.065 (3)0.067 (2)0.0038 (18)0.006 (2)0.011 (2)
O10.0590 (17)0.092 (2)0.0540 (15)0.0015 (16)0.0059 (17)0.0190 (16)
C50.049 (2)0.070 (3)0.070 (3)0.007 (2)0.011 (2)0.002 (2)
C40.047 (2)0.064 (2)0.079 (3)0.0066 (19)0.004 (2)0.008 (2)
C130.047 (2)0.060 (2)0.056 (2)0.0005 (17)0.0015 (18)0.007 (2)
N20.066 (2)0.097 (3)0.105 (3)0.012 (2)0.032 (2)0.004 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C71.277 (4)C3—H3A0.9300
N1—C81.418 (4)C2—O11.351 (4)
C1—C21.396 (4)C12—C111.372 (5)
C1—C61.398 (5)C12—C131.382 (5)
C1—C71.455 (4)C12—H12A0.9300
C9—C81.390 (4)C10—C111.381 (5)
C9—C101.391 (4)C10—C141.439 (5)
C9—H9A0.9300C11—H11A0.9300
C6—C51.375 (5)C14—N21.137 (5)
C6—H6A0.9300O1—H1B0.82 (2)
C8—C131.377 (5)C5—C41.374 (5)
C7—H7A0.9300C5—H5A0.9300
C3—C41.376 (5)C4—H4A0.9300
C3—C21.378 (4)C13—H13A0.9300
C7—N1—C8120.8 (3)C3—C2—C1119.5 (3)
C2—C1—C6119.0 (3)C11—C12—C13120.2 (3)
C2—C1—C7122.2 (3)C11—C12—H12A119.9
C6—C1—C7118.8 (3)C13—C12—H12A119.9
C8—C9—C10120.5 (3)C11—C10—C9119.8 (3)
C8—C9—H9A119.7C11—C10—C14120.6 (3)
C10—C9—H9A119.7C9—C10—C14119.6 (4)
C5—C6—C1120.9 (4)C12—C11—C10119.9 (3)
C5—C6—H6A119.6C12—C11—H11A120.1
C1—C6—H6A119.6C10—C11—H11A120.1
C13—C8—C9118.6 (3)N2—C14—C10178.2 (5)
C13—C8—N1125.8 (3)C2—O1—H1B108 (5)
C9—C8—N1115.6 (3)C4—C5—C6119.3 (4)
N1—C7—C1121.9 (3)C4—C5—H5A120.4
N1—C7—H7A119.0C6—C5—H5A120.4
C1—C7—H7A119.0C3—C4—C5120.8 (3)
C4—C3—C2120.5 (4)C3—C4—H4A119.6
C4—C3—H3A119.7C5—C4—H4A119.6
C2—C3—H3A119.7C12—C13—C8121.0 (3)
O1—C2—C3119.1 (3)C12—C13—H13A119.5
O1—C2—C1121.4 (3)C8—C13—H13A119.5
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1B···N10.82 (2)1.89 (4)2.623 (4)149 (7)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H10N2O
Mr222.24
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pca21
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)26.397 (5), 3.9211 (8), 10.773 (2)
V3)1115.1 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.22 × 0.05 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.812, 1.00
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9995, 1339, 901
Rint0.116
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.056, 0.121, 1.05
No. of reflections1339
No. of parameters160
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.15, 0.16

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1B···N10.82 (2)1.89 (4)2.623 (4)149 (7)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds