Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810044843/cv2787sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810044843/cv2787Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 803104
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 291 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.036
- wR factor = 0.105
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.7
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for N4 PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.595 4 PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported MoietyFormula Strings Differ ?
Alert level G PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 1 PLAT981_ALERT_1_G No non-zero f" Anomalous Scattering Values Found ?
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 3 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
The title compound (I) was prepared by the treatment of 4-aminopyridine (0.5 mmol, 0.041 g) and excess sodium azide (NaN3) in 20 ml methanol with a few drops of acetate acid (HOAc). Colourless single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction measurement were grown from its methanol solution after five days' slow evaporation at room temperature in air. Anal. Calcd. for C10H13N7: C, 51.94; H, 5.66; N, 42.40%. Found: C, 51.85; H, 5.81; N, 42.29%. FT–IR (KBr pellets, cm-1): 3447 (vs), 2057 (s), 1645 (s), 1463 (m), 1202 (w), 1202 (w), 840 (w), and 590 (w).
One restraint (DELU 0.001 C1 C2) was used to reduce the components of the anisotropic displacement parameters along chemical C—C bond. The H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and refined as riding, with C—H = 0.93 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å, Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N).
The crystal structure of 4-aminopyridine hemiperchlorate, has been previously reported (Teulon et al., 1985). In this paper, we report the X-ray single-crystal structure of 4-aminopyridinium azide 4-aminopyridine (I).
The molecular structure of (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1. All N atoms of the azide anions are situated on a twofold rotational axis, so 4-aminopyridinium cation and 4-aminopyridine molecule being related by symmetry occupy one position in the asymmetric unit. Intermolecular N—H···N hydrogen bonds (Table 1) generate a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network which consolidate the crystal packing.
For a related compound, see: Teulon et al. (1985).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. |
C5H7N2+·N3−·C5H6N2 | F(000) = 488 |
Mr = 231.27 | Dx = 1.242 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 1359 reflections |
a = 7.507 (3) Å | θ = 3.0–25.4° |
b = 12.247 (5) Å | µ = 0.08 mm−1 |
c = 13.634 (5) Å | T = 291 K |
β = 99.278 (5)° | Block, colourless |
V = 1237.0 (8) Å3 | 0.14 × 0.11 × 0.10 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1096 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 852 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.072 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.0° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) | h = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.988, Tmax = 0.992 | k = −12→14 |
3027 measured reflections | l = −16→15 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.105 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0493P)2 + 0.0478P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.08 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1096 reflections | Δρmax = 0.11 e Å−3 |
80 parameters | Δρmin = −0.11 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.042 (5) |
C5H7N2+·N3−·C5H6N2 | V = 1237.0 (8) Å3 |
Mr = 231.27 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.507 (3) Å | µ = 0.08 mm−1 |
b = 12.247 (5) Å | T = 291 K |
c = 13.634 (5) Å | 0.14 × 0.11 × 0.10 mm |
β = 99.278 (5)° |
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1096 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) | 852 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.988, Tmax = 0.992 | Rint = 0.072 |
3027 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | 1 restraint |
wR(F2) = 0.105 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.08 | Δρmax = 0.11 e Å−3 |
1096 reflections | Δρmin = −0.11 e Å−3 |
80 parameters |
Experimental. The structure was solved by direct methods (Bruker, 2000) and successive difference Fourier syntheses. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
C1 | 0.1721 (2) | 0.05406 (12) | −0.09812 (12) | 0.0879 (5) | |
H1 | 0.2321 | 0.0033 | −0.1316 | 0.106* | |
C2 | 0.22248 (18) | 0.06466 (10) | 0.00146 (11) | 0.0780 (4) | |
H2 | 0.3145 | 0.0214 | 0.0350 | 0.094* | |
C3 | 0.13523 (16) | 0.14103 (10) | 0.05345 (9) | 0.0699 (4) | |
C4 | −0.00162 (18) | 0.20282 (11) | −0.00180 (11) | 0.0791 (4) | |
H4 | −0.0635 | 0.2547 | 0.0294 | 0.095* | |
C5 | −0.0439 (2) | 0.18672 (13) | −0.10131 (12) | 0.0932 (5) | |
H5 | −0.1355 | 0.2286 | −0.1371 | 0.112* | |
N1 | 0.18164 (16) | 0.15416 (9) | 0.15211 (9) | 0.0858 (4) | |
H1A | 0.1265 | 0.2016 | 0.1828 | 0.103* | |
H1B | 0.2665 | 0.1151 | 0.1846 | 0.103* | |
N2 | 0.04055 (19) | 0.11306 (11) | −0.15027 (9) | 0.0948 (4) | |
H2A | 0.0108 | 0.1042 | −0.2134 | 0.114* | 0.50 |
N3 | 0.5000 | −0.02503 (17) | 0.7500 | 0.1009 (6) | |
N4 | 0.5000 | 0.07152 (17) | 0.7500 | 0.0760 (5) | |
N5 | 0.5000 | 0.16656 (17) | 0.7500 | 0.1062 (6) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0948 (10) | 0.0867 (9) | 0.0891 (8) | −0.0181 (8) | 0.0353 (8) | −0.0118 (8) |
C2 | 0.0744 (8) | 0.0752 (8) | 0.0879 (8) | −0.0108 (6) | 0.0231 (6) | −0.0057 (6) |
C3 | 0.0681 (7) | 0.0682 (7) | 0.0762 (9) | −0.0163 (6) | 0.0206 (6) | −0.0037 (6) |
C4 | 0.0765 (8) | 0.0799 (8) | 0.0834 (9) | −0.0071 (6) | 0.0205 (7) | −0.0009 (7) |
C5 | 0.0938 (10) | 0.1000 (11) | 0.0854 (11) | −0.0100 (8) | 0.0132 (8) | 0.0090 (8) |
N1 | 0.0900 (8) | 0.0873 (8) | 0.0803 (8) | 0.0016 (5) | 0.0144 (6) | −0.0086 (6) |
N2 | 0.1105 (10) | 0.1050 (9) | 0.0714 (8) | −0.0251 (7) | 0.0223 (7) | −0.0032 (7) |
N3 | 0.0964 (13) | 0.0868 (12) | 0.1185 (15) | 0.000 | 0.0141 (10) | 0.000 |
N4 | 0.0626 (9) | 0.0993 (13) | 0.0671 (9) | 0.000 | 0.0139 (6) | 0.000 |
N5 | 0.1123 (14) | 0.0918 (14) | 0.1242 (16) | 0.000 | 0.0488 (12) | 0.000 |
C1—N2 | 1.333 (2) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
C1—C2 | 1.356 (2) | C5—N2 | 1.341 (2) |
C1—H1 | 0.9300 | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C2—C3 | 1.3985 (18) | N1—H1A | 0.8600 |
C2—H2 | 0.9300 | N1—H1B | 0.8600 |
C3—N1 | 1.3437 (17) | N2—H2A | 0.8600 |
C3—C4 | 1.395 (2) | N3—N4 | 1.182 (3) |
C4—C5 | 1.357 (2) | N4—N5 | 1.164 (2) |
N2—C1—C2 | 123.06 (14) | C3—C4—H4 | 120.2 |
N2—C1—H1 | 118.5 | N2—C5—C4 | 122.83 (15) |
C2—C1—H1 | 118.5 | N2—C5—H5 | 118.6 |
C1—C2—C3 | 119.58 (14) | C4—C5—H5 | 118.6 |
C1—C2—H2 | 120.2 | C3—N1—H1A | 120.0 |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.2 | C3—N1—H1B | 120.0 |
N1—C3—C4 | 121.68 (12) | H1A—N1—H1B | 120.0 |
N1—C3—C2 | 121.36 (13) | C1—N2—C5 | 117.93 (13) |
C4—C3—C2 | 116.97 (13) | C1—N2—H2A | 121.0 |
C5—C4—C3 | 119.63 (14) | C5—N2—H2A | 121.0 |
C5—C4—H4 | 120.2 | N5—N4—N3 | 180.000 (1) |
N2—C1—C2—C3 | −0.5 (2) | C2—C3—C4—C5 | 0.10 (18) |
C1—C2—C3—N1 | −179.81 (11) | C3—C4—C5—N2 | 0.0 (2) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0.11 (17) | C2—C1—N2—C5 | 0.6 (2) |
N1—C3—C4—C5 | −179.98 (11) | C4—C5—N2—C1 | −0.3 (2) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···N5i | 0.86 | 2.15 | 3.008 (2) | 174 |
N1—H1B···N3ii | 0.86 | 2.14 | 2.9942 (18) | 172 |
N2—H2A···N2iii | 0.86 | 1.84 | 2.689 (3) | 169 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x, y, −z−1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C5H7N2+·N3−·C5H6N2 |
Mr | 231.27 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 291 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.507 (3), 12.247 (5), 13.634 (5) |
β (°) | 99.278 (5) |
V (Å3) | 1237.0 (8) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.08 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.14 × 0.11 × 0.10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.988, 0.992 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3027, 1096, 852 |
Rint | 0.072 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.595 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.036, 0.105, 1.08 |
No. of reflections | 1096 |
No. of parameters | 80 |
No. of restraints | 1 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.11, −0.11 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2000), SAINT (Bruker, 2000), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···N5i | 0.86 | 2.15 | 3.008 (2) | 173.8 |
N1—H1B···N3ii | 0.86 | 2.14 | 2.9942 (18) | 171.9 |
N2—H2A···N2iii | 0.86 | 1.84 | 2.689 (3) | 168.9 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x, y, −z−1/2. |
The crystal structure of 4-aminopyridine hemiperchlorate, has been previously reported (Teulon et al., 1985). In this paper, we report the X-ray single-crystal structure of 4-aminopyridinium azide 4-aminopyridine (I).
The molecular structure of (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1. All N atoms of the azide anions are situated on a twofold rotational axis, so 4-aminopyridinium cation and 4-aminopyridine molecule being related by symmetry occupy one position in the asymmetric unit. Intermolecular N—H···N hydrogen bonds (Table 1) generate a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network which consolidate the crystal packing.