Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104016130/dn1052sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104016130/dn1052Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 208720
Ethyl acetoacetate and ethylenediamine, in a molar ratio of 2:1, were mixed together and refluxed with stirring for 2 h. Crystals of (I) were formed by recrystallization of the resulting solid from ethanol, with a yield of approximately 65% based on ethyl-acetoacetate. Spectroscopic analysis: IR (KBr, ν, cm−1): 3297, 2984, 2953, 2898, 1604 (br), 1509, 1438, 1390, 1288, 1259, 1224, 1167 (br), 1115, 1092, 1067, 1021, 980, 784, 726, 566; 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ, p.p.m.): 8.64 (1H, NH), 4.48 (1H, s, C4—H), 4.07 (2H, q, C2—H2), 3.35 (2H, s, C6—H2), 1.90 (3H, s, C7—H3), 1.23 (3H, t, C1jaH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, δ, p.p.m.): 170.86 (C5), 161.55 (C3), 83.83 (C4), 58.72 (CH2), 44.07 (CH2), 19.49 (CH3), 14.85 (CH3).
All H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent atoms, with an N—H distance of 0.86 Å and C—H distances in the range 0.93–0.97 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms and 1.2Ueq(C,N) for others. Please check amended text.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
C14H24N2O4 | F(000) = 616 |
Mr = 284.35 | Dx = 1.220 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 850 reflections |
a = 11.734 (3) Å | θ = 2.7–20.2° |
b = 10.566 (2) Å | µ = 0.09 mm−1 |
c = 13.418 (3) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 111.44 (1)° | Prism, colourless |
V = 1548.5 (6) Å3 | 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART Apex CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1520 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 946 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.071 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.7° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) | h = −14→14 |
Tmin = 0.98, Tmax = 0.99 | k = −12→8 |
4031 measured reflections | l = −16→14 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.112 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.91 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0455P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1520 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
93 parameters | Δρmax = 0.11 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
C14H24N2O4 | V = 1548.5 (6) Å3 |
Mr = 284.35 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 11.734 (3) Å | µ = 0.09 mm−1 |
b = 10.566 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 13.418 (3) Å | 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm |
β = 111.44 (1)° |
Bruker SMART Apex CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1520 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) | 946 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.98, Tmax = 0.99 | Rint = 0.071 |
4031 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.112 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.91 | Δρmax = 0.11 e Å−3 |
1520 reflections | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
93 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.63346 (19) | 0.99298 (19) | 0.38556 (14) | 0.0799 (7) | |
H1A | 0.5979 | 1.0627 | 0.4098 | 0.120* | |
H1B | 0.6141 | 1.0003 | 0.3098 | 0.120* | |
H1C | 0.7207 | 0.9941 | 0.4220 | 0.120* | |
C2 | 0.58367 (19) | 0.87270 (18) | 0.40878 (14) | 0.0722 (6) | |
H2A | 0.4950 | 0.8730 | 0.3763 | 0.087* | |
H2B | 0.6143 | 0.8020 | 0.3798 | 0.087* | |
C3 | 0.59892 (15) | 0.74921 (19) | 0.56145 (14) | 0.0559 (5) | |
C4 | 0.64768 (14) | 0.74732 (17) | 0.67556 (13) | 0.0543 (5) | |
H4 | 0.6858 | 0.8204 | 0.7108 | 0.065* | |
C5 | 0.64255 (15) | 0.64664 (17) | 0.73649 (13) | 0.0516 (5) | |
C6 | 0.56509 (14) | 0.43002 (17) | 0.75074 (13) | 0.0531 (5) | |
H6A | 0.6219 | 0.4318 | 0.8244 | 0.064* | |
H6B | 0.5790 | 0.3522 | 0.7185 | 0.064* | |
C7 | 0.70155 (17) | 0.65551 (18) | 0.85594 (12) | 0.0661 (6) | |
H7A | 0.6397 | 0.6510 | 0.8869 | 0.099* | |
H7B | 0.7445 | 0.7345 | 0.8751 | 0.099* | |
H7C | 0.7581 | 0.5868 | 0.8823 | 0.099* | |
N | 0.58968 (12) | 0.53648 (14) | 0.69409 (10) | 0.0536 (4) | |
H | 0.5682 | 0.5285 | 0.6259 | 0.064* | |
O1 | 0.54318 (12) | 0.66427 (13) | 0.50176 (9) | 0.0680 (4) | |
O2 | 0.62179 (11) | 0.86080 (12) | 0.52292 (9) | 0.0667 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0989 (16) | 0.0766 (16) | 0.0645 (13) | −0.0110 (12) | 0.0303 (12) | 0.0107 (11) |
C2 | 0.0907 (14) | 0.0717 (15) | 0.0516 (12) | −0.0127 (11) | 0.0228 (10) | 0.0043 (10) |
C3 | 0.0626 (11) | 0.0541 (12) | 0.0554 (12) | −0.0057 (9) | 0.0265 (9) | −0.0007 (10) |
C4 | 0.0587 (11) | 0.0551 (12) | 0.0503 (10) | −0.0089 (9) | 0.0214 (8) | −0.0062 (9) |
C5 | 0.0536 (10) | 0.0556 (12) | 0.0486 (10) | −0.0050 (9) | 0.0223 (8) | −0.0066 (9) |
C6 | 0.0628 (10) | 0.0487 (11) | 0.0496 (10) | 0.0032 (8) | 0.0227 (8) | −0.0003 (8) |
C7 | 0.0736 (12) | 0.0700 (14) | 0.0492 (11) | −0.0074 (10) | 0.0158 (9) | −0.0031 (9) |
N | 0.0667 (9) | 0.0553 (10) | 0.0424 (8) | −0.0074 (7) | 0.0241 (7) | −0.0048 (7) |
O1 | 0.0880 (9) | 0.0632 (9) | 0.0513 (8) | −0.0215 (7) | 0.0237 (6) | −0.0062 (7) |
O2 | 0.0905 (9) | 0.0578 (9) | 0.0509 (8) | −0.0148 (7) | 0.0249 (6) | 0.0011 (6) |
C1—C2 | 1.479 (2) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
C1—H1A | 0.9600 | C5—N | 1.344 (2) |
C1—H1B | 0.9600 | C5—C7 | 1.499 (2) |
C1—H1C | 0.9600 | C6—N | 1.445 (2) |
C2—O2 | 1.436 (2) | C6—C6i | 1.520 (3) |
C2—H2A | 0.9700 | C6—H6A | 0.9700 |
C2—H2B | 0.9700 | C6—H6B | 0.9700 |
C3—O1 | 1.221 (2) | C7—H7A | 0.9600 |
C3—O2 | 1.353 (2) | C7—H7B | 0.9600 |
C3—C4 | 1.425 (2) | C7—H7C | 0.9600 |
C4—C5 | 1.356 (2) | N—H | 0.8600 |
C2—C1—H1A | 109.5 | N—C5—C7 | 117.93 (16) |
C2—C1—H1B | 109.5 | C4—C5—C7 | 119.38 (16) |
H1A—C1—H1B | 109.5 | N—C6—C6i | 112.71 (11) |
C2—C1—H1C | 109.5 | N—C6—H6A | 109.0 |
H1A—C1—H1C | 109.5 | C6i—C6—H6A | 109.0 |
H1B—C1—H1C | 109.5 | N—C6—H6B | 109.0 |
O2—C2—C1 | 107.88 (15) | C6i—C6—H6B | 109.0 |
O2—C2—H2A | 110.1 | H6A—C6—H6B | 107.8 |
C1—C2—H2A | 110.1 | C5—C7—H7A | 109.5 |
O2—C2—H2B | 110.1 | C5—C7—H7B | 109.5 |
C1—C2—H2B | 110.1 | H7A—C7—H7B | 109.5 |
H2A—C2—H2B | 108.4 | C5—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
O1—C3—O2 | 121.54 (16) | H7A—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
O1—C3—C4 | 127.05 (17) | H7B—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
O2—C3—C4 | 111.40 (16) | C5—N—C6 | 127.00 (14) |
C5—C4—C3 | 124.73 (17) | C5—N—H | 116.5 |
C5—C4—H4 | 117.6 | C6—N—H | 116.5 |
C3—C4—H4 | 117.6 | C3—O2—C2 | 117.13 (13) |
N—C5—C4 | 122.65 (15) | ||
O1—C3—C4—C5 | 2.2 (3) | C7—C5—N—C6 | 10.9 (2) |
O2—C3—C4—C5 | −177.66 (16) | C6i—C6—N—C5 | 96.2 (2) |
C3—C4—C5—N | −0.1 (3) | O1—C3—O2—C2 | −3.3 (3) |
C3—C4—C5—C7 | 177.78 (15) | C4—C3—O2—C2 | 176.53 (14) |
C4—C5—N—C6 | −171.27 (16) | C1—C2—O2—C3 | −171.74 (16) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H···O1 | 0.86 | 2.14 | 2.7841 (18) | 132 |
N—H···O1ii | 0.86 | 2.67 | 3.292 (2) | 130 |
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C14H24N2O4 |
Mr | 284.35 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 11.734 (3), 10.566 (2), 13.418 (3) |
β (°) | 111.44 (1) |
V (Å3) | 1548.5 (6) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.09 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART Apex CCD area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.98, 0.99 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4031, 1520, 946 |
Rint | 0.071 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.617 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.047, 0.112, 0.91 |
No. of reflections | 1520 |
No. of parameters | 93 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.11, −0.15 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2000), SMART, SAINT (Bruker, 2000), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000), SHELXTL, ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997).
C1—C2 | 1.479 (2) | C4—C5 | 1.356 (2) |
C2—O2 | 1.436 (2) | C5—N | 1.344 (2) |
C3—O1 | 1.221 (2) | C5—C7 | 1.499 (2) |
C3—O2 | 1.353 (2) | C6—N | 1.445 (2) |
C3—C4 | 1.425 (2) | C6—C6i | 1.520 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H···O1 | 0.86 | 2.14 | 2.7841 (18) | 132 |
N—H···O1ii | 0.86 | 2.67 | 3.292 (2) | 130 |
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
β-Enaminoesters represent an important class of functionalized synthetic blocks (Bartoli et al., 2004). Recently, the title compound, (I), has been synthesized for the first time in our laboratory. According to a model of synergetic mutual reinforcement of hydrogen bonding and π-delocalization within a heterodienic system (Gilli et al., 1989, 1993; Bertolasi et al., 1991), (I) may be regarded as containing both the ionic enolic and non-ionic keto forms (see scheme). The structure of (I) has been established by 1H and 13C NMR and IR spectroscopies, and has been fully confirmed by an X-ray structural analysis. \sch
As shown in Fig. 1, compound (I) is built up from two asymmetric units related through a twofold axis. The whole molecule is arranged in a cis conformation with respect to the C6—C6(1 − x, y, 3/2 − z) bond. The C3═O1 bond [1.221 (2) Å] is shorter than a normal single C—O bond (ca 1.40 Å; Reference?), but longer than the double C═O bonds found in some esters, such as in an Amadori compound [1.189 (5) Å; Kojić-Prodić et al., 1995], a benzoate [1.200 (4) Å; Huertas et al., 1997] and a glycine derivative [1.186 (2) Å; Zhao et al., 2002]. The N═C5 bond in (I) [1.344 (2) Å] is longer than a typical double C═N bond (ca 1.269 Å; Reference?) but shorter than the C—N single bond [N—C6 1.443 (4) Å]. The C3—C4 bond length [1.425 (2) Å] is intermediate between a single C—C bond (ca 1.50 Å; Reference?) and a C═C double bond (ca 1.34 Å; Reference?). These features of the bond lengths in (I) indicate that both the ionic enolic and the non-ionic keto forms make comparable contributions to the structure. Please provide a reference for the standard bond lengths used in the above comparisons.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra show the olefinic resonances of atom C4 and its attached H atom at noticeably higher magnetic fields, 4.93 and 83.83 p.p.m., respectively. This indicates the contribution of the non-ionic keto form, which undertakes π-delocalization. On the other hand, the NH signal appears at a much lower magnetic field (8.64 p.p.m.) in the 1HNMR spectrum and this is indicative of the contribution of the ionic enolic form. These two forms are also observed in the related compound with an ethylenediimine (Özkara et al., 2004), which shows almost the same deviations of the corresponding signals in the NMR spectra.
The IR spectroscopic data of (I) are consistent with the crystal structure. The absorption band centred at around 3297 cm−1 is readily ascribed to the NH group. The absorption band of C═O stretching at 1604 cm−1 appears to be lower than that for a typical C═O group (1712–1708 cm−1; Reference?) and is indicative of the ionic enolic form of the molecule.
The asymmetric unit of (I) is almost planar, with mean and maximum deviations of 0.0014 and 0.1330 Å, respectively, as the π-delocalization is reinforced by an N—H···O1 hydrogen bond. The sum of the angles around the N atom is close to 360°, indicating that the N atom is involved in the ionic enolic form. In the solid state, the two halves of (I) are skewed, with a dihedral angle of 46.3° between them. In the structure, an infinite zigzag chain of molecules of (I) running along the [001] direction (Fig. 2) is built up via an N—H···O1(1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) hydrogen bond. These intermolecular hydrogen bonds form a ring which may be described as graph set R22(4) (Etter, 1990). This ring is embedded in the chain. There are no hydrogen bonds between separate chains. Duplication of the chain forms layers of (I) parallel to the (010) plane.