Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901402636X/fj2686sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901402636X/fj2686Isup2.hkl | |
MDL mol file https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901402636X/fj2686Isup3.mol | |
Chemical Markup Language (CML) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901402636X/fj2686Isup4.cml |
CCDC reference: 1036852
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 233 K
- Mean (N-C) = 0.005 Å
- R factor = 0.028
- wR factor = 0.065
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 10.7
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level B PLAT431_ALERT_2_B Short Inter HL..A Contact Br1 .. O1 .. 2.88 Ang.
Alert level C PLAT019_ALERT_1_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full/_max < 1.0 0.984 Report
Alert level G PLAT002_ALERT_2_G Number of Distance or Angle Restraints on AtSite 4 Note PLAT164_ALERT_4_G Nr. of Refined C-H H-Atoms in Heavy-Atom Struct. 3 Note PLAT172_ALERT_4_G The CIF-Embedded .res File Contains DFIX Records 2 Report PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Number of Least-Squares Restraints ............. 6 Note PLAT909_ALERT_3_G Percentage of Observed Data at Theta(Max) still 79 %
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 1 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 1 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 5 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
The title compound was obtained as a minor by-product in the synthesis of 4-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,2,4-triazolin-5-one by hydrolysis of 5-bromo-4-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,2,4-triazolium hexafluorophosphate (Schwärzler et al., 2009) in MeOH/H2O. It is assumed that the 5-bromo compound was contaminated with a trace of the corresponding 3,5-dibromo compound which resulted in the formation of the present 3-bromo-1,2,4-triazolin-5-one.
The H atoms were identified in a difference map and those of the C4 methyl group were idealized and included as rigid groups, allowed to rotate but not tip (C—H = 0.97 Å). The C3 methyl group was found to be disordered over two orientations related by mirror symmetry. Its H positions were refined with restrained C—H and H···H distances of 0.97 (1) Å and 1.58 (2) Å, respectively. The Uiso parameters of all H atoms were set to 1.5 Ueq(C) of the parent carbon atom.
Triazolinones are of relevance due to their wide range of pesticidal activities. The molecular structure of 3-bromo-4-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,2,4-triazolin-5-one is shown in Figure 1. The triazole rings are located in the crystallographic mirror plane (Figure 2), whereas the C4 methyl groups are situated out of this plane. The molecules are linked by short intermolecular C—Br···O=C contacts into infinite chains in the direction of the c axis (Figure 3). The Br···O distance of 2.877 (2) Å is significantly shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii. Theoretical calculations predicted negative ring and positive end cap domains of halogen atoms due to their polarizability (Awwadi et al., 2006). The almost linear C—Br···O angle of 174.6 (1)° indicates an interaction involving the positive end cap of the Br atom. Thus, the Br atom acts as an electron-acceptor (X-bond donor) in this case.
For synthesis of related 4-amino-1-methyl-1,2,4-triazolin-5-ones, see: Kröger et al. (1965). For related structures with Br···O═C interactions, see: 5-bromopyrimidin-2-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007); 3,5-dibromopyran-2-one (Reus et al., 2012); N-bromosaccharin (Dolenc & Modec, 2009); N-bromosuccinimide (Jabay et al., 1977); dibromantin (Kruszynski, 2007). For the theory of halogen interactions, see: Awwadi et al. (2006). For details of the synthesis, see: Schwärzler et al. (2009).
Data collection: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
C5H9BrN4O | F(000) = 440 |
Mr = 221.07 | Dx = 1.772 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 15.1993 (6) Å | Cell parameters from 3066 reflections |
b = 6.9377 (4) Å | θ = 1.0–25.0° |
c = 7.8771 (7) Å | µ = 4.91 mm−1 |
β = 93.869 (3)° | T = 233 K |
V = 828.73 (9) Å3 | Prism, colorless |
Z = 4 | 0.09 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 734 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.034 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.6° |
phi and ω scans | h = −13→18 |
2310 measured reflections | k = −8→8 |
806 independent reflections | l = −9→8 |
Refinement on F2 | 6 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.065 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.033P)2 + 0.5344P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
806 reflections | Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 |
75 parameters | Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3 |
C5H9BrN4O | V = 828.73 (9) Å3 |
Mr = 221.07 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 15.1993 (6) Å | µ = 4.91 mm−1 |
b = 6.9377 (4) Å | T = 233 K |
c = 7.8771 (7) Å | 0.09 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm |
β = 93.869 (3)° |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 734 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
2310 measured reflections | Rint = 0.034 |
806 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | 6 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.065 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.07 | Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 |
806 reflections | Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3 |
75 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Br1 | 0.22218 (3) | 0.0000 | 0.18788 (4) | 0.03459 (19) | |
O1 | 0.17449 (19) | 0.0000 | −0.4649 (3) | 0.0426 (8) | |
N1 | 0.3186 (2) | 0.0000 | −0.1029 (4) | 0.0319 (8) | |
N2 | 0.2997 (2) | 0.0000 | −0.2784 (4) | 0.0302 (8) | |
N3 | 0.1742 (2) | 0.0000 | −0.1669 (4) | 0.0282 (7) | |
N4 | 0.0841 (2) | 0.0000 | −0.1382 (4) | 0.0329 (8) | |
C1 | 0.2418 (3) | 0.0000 | −0.0415 (4) | 0.0269 (9) | |
C2 | 0.2125 (3) | 0.0000 | −0.3221 (4) | 0.0322 (10) | |
C3 | 0.3694 (3) | 0.0000 | −0.3938 (6) | 0.0445 (11) | |
H3A | 0.352 (3) | −0.069 (5) | −0.497 (4) | 0.067* | 0.5 |
H3B | 0.4248 (19) | −0.047 (6) | −0.343 (6) | 0.067* | 0.5 |
H3C | 0.375 (3) | 0.136 (2) | −0.420 (6) | 0.067* | 0.5 |
C4 | 0.04175 (19) | 0.1766 (5) | −0.2044 (4) | 0.0478 (8) | |
H4A | 0.0726 | 0.2877 | −0.1550 | 0.072* | |
H4B | −0.0192 | 0.1791 | −0.1750 | 0.072* | |
H4C | 0.0438 | 0.1801 | −0.3272 | 0.072* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br1 | 0.0454 (3) | 0.0368 (3) | 0.0211 (3) | 0.000 | −0.00047 (17) | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0429 (17) | 0.067 (2) | 0.0181 (14) | 0.000 | 0.0024 (12) | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.037 (2) | 0.0330 (19) | 0.0255 (17) | 0.000 | −0.0004 (14) | 0.000 |
N2 | 0.0279 (19) | 0.0367 (19) | 0.0261 (17) | 0.000 | 0.0020 (13) | 0.000 |
N3 | 0.0257 (17) | 0.0392 (19) | 0.0197 (16) | 0.000 | 0.0019 (12) | 0.000 |
N4 | 0.0290 (18) | 0.044 (2) | 0.0252 (17) | 0.000 | 0.0013 (13) | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.035 (2) | 0.027 (2) | 0.019 (2) | 0.000 | −0.0026 (16) | 0.000 |
C2 | 0.040 (3) | 0.032 (2) | 0.025 (2) | 0.000 | 0.0051 (18) | 0.000 |
C3 | 0.036 (3) | 0.063 (3) | 0.036 (2) | 0.000 | 0.0124 (19) | 0.000 |
C4 | 0.0402 (19) | 0.059 (2) | 0.0445 (18) | 0.0125 (15) | 0.0051 (14) | 0.0066 (17) |
Br1—C1 | 1.851 (4) | N4—C4 | 1.464 (4) |
O1—C2 | 1.230 (4) | N4—C4i | 1.464 (4) |
N1—C1 | 1.292 (5) | C3—H3A | 0.967 (10) |
N1—N2 | 1.392 (5) | C3—H3B | 0.965 (10) |
N2—C2 | 1.346 (5) | C3—H3C | 0.969 (10) |
N2—C3 | 1.442 (5) | C4—H4A | 0.9700 |
N3—C1 | 1.377 (4) | C4—H4B | 0.9700 |
N3—C2 | 1.389 (5) | C4—H4C | 0.9700 |
N3—N4 | 1.403 (4) | ||
Br1···O1ii | 2.876 (3) | ||
C1—N1—N2 | 103.9 (3) | O1—C2—N3 | 127.3 (4) |
C2—N2—N1 | 112.8 (3) | N2—C2—N3 | 103.8 (3) |
C2—N2—C3 | 126.2 (3) | N2—C3—H3A | 111 (4) |
N1—N2—C3 | 121.0 (3) | N2—C3—H3B | 113 (3) |
C1—N3—C2 | 107.1 (3) | H3A—C3—H3B | 111 (2) |
C1—N3—N4 | 125.0 (3) | N2—C3—H3C | 102 (4) |
C2—N3—N4 | 127.9 (3) | H3A—C3—H3C | 109 (2) |
N3—N4—C4 | 110.6 (2) | H3B—C3—H3C | 110 (2) |
N3—N4—C4i | 110.6 (2) | N4—C4—H4A | 109.5 |
C4—N4—C4i | 113.7 (3) | N4—C4—H4B | 109.5 |
N1—C1—N3 | 112.4 (3) | H4A—C4—H4B | 109.5 |
N1—C1—Br1 | 125.0 (3) | N4—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
N3—C1—Br1 | 122.6 (3) | H4A—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
O1—C2—N2 | 128.9 (4) | H4B—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y, z; (ii) x, y, z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C5H9BrN4O |
Mr | 221.07 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/m |
Temperature (K) | 233 |
a, b, c (Å) | 15.1993 (6), 6.9377 (4), 7.8771 (7) |
β (°) | 93.869 (3) |
V (Å3) | 828.73 (9) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 4.91 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.09 × 0.08 × 0.07 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2310, 806, 734 |
Rint | 0.034 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.596 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.028, 0.065, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 806 |
No. of parameters | 75 |
No. of restraints | 6 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.50, −0.44 |
Computer programs: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Triazolinones are of relevance due to their wide range of pesticidal activities. The molecular structure of 3-bromo-4-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,2,4-triazolin-5-one is shown in Figure 1. The triazole rings are located in the crystallographic mirror plane (Figure 2), whereas the C4 methyl groups are situated out of this plane. The molecules are linked by short intermolecular C—Br···O=C contacts into infinite chains in the direction of the c axis (Figure 3). The Br···O distance of 2.877 (2) Å is significantly shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii. Theoretical calculations predicted negative ring and positive end cap domains of halogen atoms due to their polarizability (Awwadi et al., 2006). The almost linear C—Br···O angle of 174.6 (1)° indicates an interaction involving the positive end cap of the Br atom. Thus, the Br atom acts as an electron-acceptor (X-bond donor) in this case.