Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, [Pd2Cl4(C8H6N4)]·C3H7NO, the two Pd2+ cations have a distorted square-planar coordination sphere and are bridged by a bis-bidentate 2,2′-bipyrimidine ligand. Two terminal chloride anions are also bonded to each of the Pd2+ cations. The dinuclear complex and the dimethylformamide solvate molecule lie on the inter­section of a twofold rotation axis and a mirror plane, with disorder present in the solvate mol­ecule. There is a slight distortion from the square-planar metal geometry, as indicated by the bite angles of 81.77 (13)° and 91.63 (5)°. The C and O atoms of the solvent mol­ecule are disordered over two sets of sites of equal occupancy.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812040779/gg2102sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812040779/gg2102Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 909735

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 100 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.005 Å
  • H-atom completeness 47%
  • Disorder in solvent or counterion
  • R factor = 0.028
  • wR factor = 0.059
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C CHEMW01_ALERT_1_C The ratio of given/expected molecular weight as calculated from the _chemical_formula_sum lies outside the range 0.99 <> 1.01 Calculated formula weight = 585.8686 Formula weight given = 578.8100 CHEMW01_ALERT_1_C The difference between the given and expected weight for compound is greater 1 mass unit. Check that all hydrogen atoms have been taken into account. PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported SumFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT244_ALERT_4_C Low 'Solvent' Ueq as Compared to Neighbors of N22 PLAT910_ALERT_3_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Below Th(Min) ..... 2
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_2_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C11 H13 Cl4 N5 O1 Pd2 Atom count from the _atom_site data: C11 H6 Cl4 N5 O1 Pd2 CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional? From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 2 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C11 H13 Cl4 N5 O Pd2 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff C 22.00 22.00 0.00 H 26.00 12.00 14.00 Cl 8.00 8.00 0.00 N 10.00 10.00 0.00 O 2.00 2.00 0.00 Pd 4.00 4.00 0.00 PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in CIF .... ? PLAT042_ALERT_1_G Calc. and Reported MoietyFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT302_ALERT_4_G Note: Anion/Solvent Disorder ................... 80 Perc. PLAT720_ALERT_4_G Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Labels .......... 1 PLAT764_ALERT_4_G Overcomplete CIF Bond List Detected (Rep/Expd) . 1.24 Ratio PLAT811_ALERT_5_G No ADDSYM Analysis: Too Many Excluded Atoms .... ! PLAT960_ALERT_3_G Number of Intensities with I .LT. - 2*sig(I) ... 1
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 0 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 5 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 10 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 6 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 4 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 2 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Although a wide variety of metals are used in catalysis today, the platinum group metals show the most promising catalytic properties (Van Leeuwen (2004). Unfortunately, knowledge surrounding the actual catalysis process on a molecular level is minimal. Various platinum group metals which find application in heterogeneous catalysis are dispersed onto supports with little control. Consequently, this study was undertaken to explore the possibility of using bridging ligands ensure that metals are well dispersed in a controllable fashion. The insight gained by exploring bridged platinum group metals could contribute to ongoing homogeneous catalyst models of the metal complex. (Meij et al. (2005), Otto et al. (2003) Steyn et al. (1997)).

The compound crystallizes in a monoclinic C2/m space group with Z = 2. Both palladium atoms are situated on a twofold rotation axis and three carbon atoms, namely C11, C13 and C22 lie on a mirror plane. O22 of the DMF solvate molecule is situated on a twofold rotation axis and N22 on both a mirror plane and a rotation axis, which essentially gives N22 an occupation of 25%. As a result of the symmetry in the molecule there are only twelve atoms, including the hydrogen atoms, in the asymmetric unit. The geometry of the palladium centers is slightly distorted from the square planar geometry. This is illustrated by the N1—Pd01—N1c and Cl11—Pd01—Cl11c angles which are 81.77 (13)° and 91.63 (5)° respectively. The bond lengths and angles for the title compound are comparable to those in literature (Inagaki et al. (2007), Maekawa et al. (1994)). The palladium-nitrogen bonds of 2.05 Å are marginally longer than the mono-coordinated palladium complex (Hudgens et al. (1997)) which has a bond length of 1.99 Å. The Pd—Pd intra-molecular bond distances of 5.47 Å, is slightly shorter than the 5.62 Å for the platinum counterpart (Kawakami et al. (2006)).

Related literature top

The title compound is structurally related to the mono-coordinated species reported by Hudgens et al. (1997). For background literature on homogenous catalytic catalyst models, see: Van Leeuwen (2004); Meij et al. (2005); Otto et al. (2003); Steyn et al. (1997). For related structures, see: Inagaki et al. (2007); Maekawa et al. (1994). The mono-coordinated platinum counterpart was reported by Kawakami et al. (2006). For the synthetic procedure, see: Boyle et al. (2004).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by the modification of the published procedure by Boyle et al. (2004). PdCl2 (0.200 g, 1,13 x 10 -3 mol) was dissolved in boiling acetonitrile. 2,2-Bipyrimidine (0.092 g, 5.71 x 10 -4 mol) was added to the solution. Upon addition a yellow precipitate formed. Yield: 0.244 g (85%). 1H NMR ((CD3)2SO): δ 7.9 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 9.3 (dd, J = 5.1 Hz, 4H). IR (ATR): 1589 (vC—H),1137 (vC—N), 813 (vAr—H).

Refinement top

The aromatic, methine, and methyl H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions (C—H = 0.93–0.98) and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with Uιso (H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for the aromatic protons. The highest residual electron density was located 0.55 Å from C13 and was essentially meaningless.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Diamond representation of the title compound, showing the numbering scheme and displacement ellipsoids (50% probability).
µ-(2,2'-Bipyrimidine)-bis[dichloridopalladium(II)] dimethylformamide monosolvate top
Crystal data top
[Pd2Cl4(C8H6N4)]·C3H7NOF(000) = 550
Mr = 578.81Dx = 2.231 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 1958 reflections
a = 10.7299 (6) Åθ = 2.9–27.8°
b = 14.2399 (7) ŵ = 2.71 mm1
c = 5.9381 (3) ÅT = 100 K
β = 108.229 (2)°Cuboid, red
V = 861.76 (8) Å30.09 × 0.09 × 0.08 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII
diffractometer
1108 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube975 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.041
phi and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
h = 1214
Tmin = 0.785, Tmax = 0.814k = 1818
6102 measured reflectionsl = 77
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.059H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0172P)2 + 2.5414P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1108 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
68 parametersΔρmax = 0.75 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.79 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Pd2Cl4(C8H6N4)]·C3H7NOV = 861.76 (8) Å3
Mr = 578.81Z = 2
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation
a = 10.7299 (6) ŵ = 2.71 mm1
b = 14.2399 (7) ÅT = 100 K
c = 5.9381 (3) Å0.09 × 0.09 × 0.08 mm
β = 108.229 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII
diffractometer
1108 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
975 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.785, Tmax = 0.814Rint = 0.041
6102 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.059H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.75 e Å3
1108 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.79 e Å3
68 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C110.50.4487 (3)0.50.0149 (8)
C120.5694 (3)0.3120 (2)0.6987 (6)0.0270 (8)
H120.61670.27930.83410.032*
C130.50.2637 (3)0.50.0370 (13)
H130.50.19840.50.044*
N10.5696 (2)0.40577 (17)0.6995 (4)0.0152 (5)
Cl110.72957 (8)0.61422 (6)1.23998 (14)0.0303 (2)
Pd010.65034 (3)0.50.96630 (6)0.01736 (12)
N220.5000.0288 (14)
O220.50.1536 (5)00.052 (2)0.5
C210.4476 (8)0.0853 (5)0.1298 (13)0.0356 (18)0.5
C220.4325 (11)00.2451 (19)0.053 (4)0.5
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C110.013 (2)0.015 (2)0.018 (2)00.0063 (17)0
C120.0231 (18)0.0158 (15)0.035 (2)0.0002 (13)0.0007 (15)0.0069 (13)
C130.034 (3)0.012 (2)0.051 (3)00.008 (3)0
N10.0112 (12)0.0180 (12)0.0155 (13)0.0008 (10)0.0027 (10)0.0040 (10)
Cl110.0220 (4)0.0488 (5)0.0189 (4)0.0109 (4)0.0045 (3)0.0137 (4)
Pd010.01263 (19)0.0256 (2)0.01300 (18)00.00278 (13)0
N220.052 (4)0.016 (3)0.026 (3)00.025 (3)0
O220.095 (7)0.019 (4)0.064 (6)00.058 (6)0
C210.037 (5)0.038 (4)0.041 (4)0.001 (3)0.025 (4)0.002 (4)
C220.015 (5)0.123 (12)0.018 (5)00.003 (4)0
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C11—N1i1.335 (3)N22—C221.408 (11)
C11—N11.335 (3)N22—C22iv1.408 (11)
C11—C11ii1.462 (8)N22—C21v1.454 (8)
C12—N11.336 (4)N22—C21vi1.454 (8)
C12—C131.368 (4)N22—C211.454 (8)
C12—H120.93N22—C21iv1.454 (8)
C13—C12i1.368 (4)O22—C211.258 (9)
C13—H130.93O22—C21v1.258 (9)
N1—Pd012.050 (2)C21—C221.379 (9)
Cl11—Pd012.2682 (8)C21—C21v1.598 (16)
Pd01—N1iii2.050 (2)C22—C21vi1.379 (9)
Pd01—Cl11iii2.2682 (8)
N1i—C11—N1125.5 (4)C22iv—N22—C21vi122.4 (3)
N1i—C11—C11ii117.24 (18)C21v—N22—C21vi180.0 (3)
N1—C11—C11ii117.24 (18)C22—N22—C2157.6 (3)
N1—C12—C13120.4 (3)C22iv—N22—C21122.4 (3)
N1—C12—H12119.8C21v—N22—C2166.7 (6)
C13—C12—H12119.8C21vi—N22—C21113.3 (6)
C12—C13—C12i119.6 (4)C22—N22—C21iv122.4 (3)
C12—C13—H13120.2C22iv—N22—C21iv57.6 (3)
C12i—C13—H13120.2C21v—N22—C21iv113.3 (6)
C11—N1—C12117.1 (3)C21vi—N22—C21iv66.7 (6)
C11—N1—Pd01111.7 (2)C21—N22—C21iv180.0 (6)
C12—N1—Pd01131.1 (2)C21—O22—C21v78.9 (8)
N1—Pd01—N1iii81.77 (13)O22—C21—C22160.9 (9)
N1—Pd01—Cl11174.98 (7)O22—C21—N22107.2 (6)
N1iii—Pd01—Cl1193.29 (7)C22—C21—N2259.5 (5)
N1—Pd01—Cl11iii93.29 (7)O22—C21—C21v50.6 (4)
N1iii—Pd01—Cl11iii174.98 (7)C22—C21—C21v114.6 (6)
Cl11—Pd01—Cl11iii91.63 (5)N22—C21—C21v56.7 (3)
C22—N22—C22iv180.0000 (10)C21—C22—C21vi123.5 (10)
C22—N22—C21v122.4 (3)C21—C22—N2262.9 (5)
C22iv—N22—C21v57.6 (3)C21vi—C22—N2262.9 (5)
C22—N22—C21vi57.6 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z+1; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x+1, y, z; (v) x+1, y, z; (vi) x, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Pd2Cl4(C8H6N4)]·C3H7NO
Mr578.81
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)10.7299 (6), 14.2399 (7), 5.9381 (3)
β (°) 108.229 (2)
V3)861.76 (8)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.71
Crystal size (mm)0.09 × 0.09 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
Tmin, Tmax0.785, 0.814
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6102, 1108, 975
Rint0.041
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.666
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.059, 1.11
No. of reflections1108
No. of parameters68
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.75, 0.79

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2008), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds