Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015024706/gk2650sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015024706/gk2650Isup2.hkl | |
Chemical Markup Language (CML) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015024706/gk2650Isup3.cml |
CCDC reference: 1444026
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 298 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.003 Å
- R factor = 0.053
- wR factor = 0.143
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.7
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT906_ALERT_3_C Large K value in the Analysis of Variance ...... 5.025 Check PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.600 19 Report
Alert level G PLAT007_ALERT_5_G Number of Unrefined Donor-H Atoms .............. 4 Report PLAT720_ALERT_4_G Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Labels .......... 2 Note PLAT870_ALERT_4_G ALERTS Related to Twinning Effects Suppressed .. ! Info PLAT910_ALERT_3_G Missing # of FCF Reflection(s) Below Th(Min) ... 3 Report PLAT961_ALERT_5_G Dataset Contains no Negative Intensities ....... Please Check
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 0 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 2 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 5 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 2 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Hydroxamic acids (HA) are weak organic acids with the general formula R—C(═O)—NH—OH. HA can exist as keto and imino(enol) tautomers with two isomers, E and Z, for each form, and in the zwitterionic form (see Scheme below). They have found broad application in coordination chemistry due to their diversity and comparatively facile synthesis (Świątek-Kozłowska et al., 2000; Dobosz et al., 1999). In addition, they exhibit biological activities related to their enzyme-inhibitory properties (Marmion et al., 2013). HA are widely used in coordination and supramolecular chemistry as scaffolds in the preparation of metallacrowns (Seda et al., 2007; Jankolovits et al., 2013; Safyanova et al., 2015) and as building blocks of coordination polymers (Gumienna-Kontecka et al., 2007; Golenya et al., 2014; Pavlishchuk et al., 2010, 2011).
N-Hydroxypicolinamide, known also as picoline-2-hydroxamic acid (o-PicHA), has been used extensively for the synthesis of polynuclear complexes, especially in the synthesis of diverse metallacrowns (Stemmler et al., 1999; Seda et al., 2007; Jankolovits et al., 2013; Golenya et al., 2012; Gumienna-Kontecka et al., 2013). Presently, the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014) contains more than 20 entries of coordination compounds based on N-hydroxypicolinamide.
Our interest in N-hydroxypicolinamide stems also from the fact that in the course of synthesis of the title and related compounds from 2-picolinic acid esters (Hynes, 1970), the products are frequently contaminated with impurities that result from hydrolysis of the ester or hydroxamic groups to the carboxylic group. Structural information about the title compound will be helpful in controlling the purity of the synthesized ligand by powder diffraction.
The molecular structure of the title compound is presented in Fig. 1. The crystal structure of the title compound consists of an N-hydroxypicolinamide molecule in the Z-keto tautomeric form and a water molecule. The N-hydroxypicolinamide molecule adopts a strongly flattened conformation and only the O—H group H atom deviates significantly from the molecular best plane. The maximum deviation from this plane for non-hydrogen atom is 0.083 (1) Å for O1 and the hydroxyl group H2 atom is displaced from the mean plane by 0.80 (1) Å in the direction of the water molecule. The dihedral angle between the hydroxamic group and the pyridine ring is 5.6 (2)°. The configuration about the hydroxamic group C—N bond is Z and that about the C—C bond between the pyridine and hydroxamic groups is E [torsion angles O2—N2—C6—O1 − 0.4 (3)°, N1—C1—C6—O1 175.6 (2)°].
The molecular components of the title compound are connected by O—H···O and N—H···N hydrogen bonds (Table 1) into a two-dimensional framework parallel to (100) (Fig. 2). The O—H···O interactions and π–π stacking interactions between the pyridine rings [centroid–centroid distance 3.427 (1) Å] organize the crystal components into columns extending along the b axis while the N—H···N hydrogen bonds link these columns into a two-dimensional framework parallel to (100) (Fig.2).
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.36, last update February 2015; Groom & Allen, 2014) reveals two crystal structures of isomeric pyridine hydroxamic acids and the crystal structure of 2,6-pyridinedihydroxamic acid (Golenya et al., 2007; Makhmudova et al., 2001; Griffith et al., 2008).
The title compound was obtained by the reaction of methyl 2-picolinate and hydroxylamine in methanol according to a reported procedure (Hynes, 1970). Colorless crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from a methanol solution by slow evaporation at room temperature (yield 79%).
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The crystal was refined as a non-merohedral twin with the volume ratio of two twin domains refined at 89:19. The C—H, N—H and O—H hydrogen atoms of the organic molecule were found from the difference Fourier maps but for further calculations they were positioned geometrically and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.93 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å, and with Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C,N) or Uiso = 1.5Ueq(O). The H atoms of the water molecule were located in the difference Fourier maps, the O—H distances standardized to 0.85 Å and refined in riding-model approximation with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).
Hydroxamic acids (HA) are weak organic acids with the general formula R—C(═O)—NH—OH. HA can exist as keto and imino(enol) tautomers with two isomers, E and Z, for each form, and in the zwitterionic form (see Scheme below). They have found broad application in coordination chemistry due to their diversity and comparatively facile synthesis (Świątek-Kozłowska et al., 2000; Dobosz et al., 1999). In addition, they exhibit biological activities related to their enzyme-inhibitory properties (Marmion et al., 2013). HA are widely used in coordination and supramolecular chemistry as scaffolds in the preparation of metallacrowns (Seda et al., 2007; Jankolovits et al., 2013; Safyanova et al., 2015) and as building blocks of coordination polymers (Gumienna-Kontecka et al., 2007; Golenya et al., 2014; Pavlishchuk et al., 2010, 2011).
N-Hydroxypicolinamide, known also as picoline-2-hydroxamic acid (o-PicHA), has been used extensively for the synthesis of polynuclear complexes, especially in the synthesis of diverse metallacrowns (Stemmler et al., 1999; Seda et al., 2007; Jankolovits et al., 2013; Golenya et al., 2012; Gumienna-Kontecka et al., 2013). Presently, the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014) contains more than 20 entries of coordination compounds based on N-hydroxypicolinamide.
Our interest in N-hydroxypicolinamide stems also from the fact that in the course of synthesis of the title and related compounds from 2-picolinic acid esters (Hynes, 1970), the products are frequently contaminated with impurities that result from hydrolysis of the ester or hydroxamic groups to the carboxylic group. Structural information about the title compound will be helpful in controlling the purity of the synthesized ligand by powder diffraction.
The molecular structure of the title compound is presented in Fig. 1. The crystal structure of the title compound consists of an N-hydroxypicolinamide molecule in the Z-keto tautomeric form and a water molecule. The N-hydroxypicolinamide molecule adopts a strongly flattened conformation and only the O—H group H atom deviates significantly from the molecular best plane. The maximum deviation from this plane for non-hydrogen atom is 0.083 (1) Å for O1 and the hydroxyl group H2 atom is displaced from the mean plane by 0.80 (1) Å in the direction of the water molecule. The dihedral angle between the hydroxamic group and the pyridine ring is 5.6 (2)°. The configuration about the hydroxamic group C—N bond is Z and that about the C—C bond between the pyridine and hydroxamic groups is E [torsion angles O2—N2—C6—O1 − 0.4 (3)°, N1—C1—C6—O1 175.6 (2)°].
The molecular components of the title compound are connected by O—H···O and N—H···N hydrogen bonds (Table 1) into a two-dimensional framework parallel to (100) (Fig. 2). The O—H···O interactions and π–π stacking interactions between the pyridine rings [centroid–centroid distance 3.427 (1) Å] organize the crystal components into columns extending along the b axis while the N—H···N hydrogen bonds link these columns into a two-dimensional framework parallel to (100) (Fig.2).
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.36, last update February 2015; Groom & Allen, 2014) reveals two crystal structures of isomeric pyridine hydroxamic acids and the crystal structure of 2,6-pyridinedihydroxamic acid (Golenya et al., 2007; Makhmudova et al., 2001; Griffith et al., 2008).
The title compound was obtained by the reaction of methyl 2-picolinate and hydroxylamine in methanol according to a reported procedure (Hynes, 1970). Colorless crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from a methanol solution by slow evaporation at room temperature (yield 79%).
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The crystal was refined as a non-merohedral twin with the volume ratio of two twin domains refined at 89:19. The C—H, N—H and O—H hydrogen atoms of the organic molecule were found from the difference Fourier maps but for further calculations they were positioned geometrically and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.93 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å, and with Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C,N) or Uiso = 1.5Ueq(O). The H atoms of the water molecule were located in the difference Fourier maps, the O—H distances standardized to 0.85 Å and refined in riding-model approximation with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).
Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).
C6H6N2O2·H2O | Dx = 1.441 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 156.14 | Melting point: 393 K |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 18.7471 (13) Å | Cell parameters from 893 reflections |
b = 3.8129 (4) Å | θ = 4.1–29.0° |
c = 20.4813 (17) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
β = 100.570 (7)° | T = 298 K |
V = 1439.2 (2) Å3 | Plate, clear colourless |
Z = 8 | 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.1 mm |
F(000) = 656 |
Agilent Xcalibur, Sapphire3 diffractometer | 1401 independent reflections |
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source | 1053 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.037 |
Detector resolution: 16.1827 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.3° |
ω scans | h = −22→22 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013) | k = −4→4 |
Tmin = 0.476, Tmax = 1.000 | l = −24→24 |
2491 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.143 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0751P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1401 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
102 parameters | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3 |
C6H6N2O2·H2O | V = 1439.2 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 156.14 | Z = 8 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 18.7471 (13) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
b = 3.8129 (4) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 20.4813 (17) Å | 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.1 mm |
β = 100.570 (7)° |
Agilent Xcalibur, Sapphire3 diffractometer | 1401 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013) | 1053 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.476, Tmax = 1.000 | Rint = 0.037 |
2491 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.143 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
1401 reflections | Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3 |
102 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.52649 (8) | 0.3700 (4) | 0.43254 (7) | 0.0468 (5) | |
O2 | 0.40179 (7) | 0.5190 (5) | 0.35109 (7) | 0.0506 (5) | |
H2 | 0.3916 | 0.6429 | 0.3808 | 0.076* | |
N1 | 0.59448 (9) | 0.8106 (5) | 0.30306 (8) | 0.0366 (5) | |
N2 | 0.46909 (9) | 0.6163 (5) | 0.33806 (8) | 0.0410 (5) | |
H2A | 0.4722 | 0.7305 | 0.3025 | 0.049* | |
C1 | 0.59810 (10) | 0.6575 (5) | 0.36271 (9) | 0.0323 (5) | |
C2 | 0.66231 (11) | 0.6152 (6) | 0.40743 (11) | 0.0428 (6) | |
H2B | 0.6628 | 0.5119 | 0.4487 | 0.051* | |
C3 | 0.72601 (11) | 0.7308 (6) | 0.38915 (13) | 0.0519 (7) | |
H3 | 0.7703 | 0.7030 | 0.4178 | 0.062* | |
C4 | 0.72296 (11) | 0.8863 (6) | 0.32857 (13) | 0.0482 (6) | |
H4 | 0.7650 | 0.9656 | 0.3154 | 0.058* | |
C5 | 0.65653 (12) | 0.9234 (6) | 0.28737 (11) | 0.0434 (6) | |
H5 | 0.6549 | 1.0327 | 0.2465 | 0.052* | |
C6 | 0.52864 (10) | 0.5321 (6) | 0.38079 (9) | 0.0332 (5) | |
O1W | 0.39862 (8) | 0.9488 (5) | 0.45255 (8) | 0.0501 (5) | |
H1WA | 0.4308 | 1.0938 | 0.4455 | 0.075* | |
H1WB | 0.4202 | 0.8351 | 0.4861 | 0.075* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0447 (8) | 0.0657 (11) | 0.0287 (8) | 0.0009 (7) | 0.0035 (6) | 0.0147 (7) |
O2 | 0.0332 (8) | 0.0832 (13) | 0.0350 (9) | −0.0121 (8) | 0.0051 (6) | 0.0062 (8) |
N1 | 0.0370 (9) | 0.0465 (11) | 0.0267 (9) | −0.0051 (8) | 0.0069 (7) | −0.0036 (8) |
N2 | 0.0307 (9) | 0.0670 (13) | 0.0252 (9) | −0.0038 (8) | 0.0048 (7) | 0.0107 (9) |
C1 | 0.0344 (10) | 0.0371 (11) | 0.0252 (10) | 0.0012 (8) | 0.0047 (8) | −0.0061 (8) |
C2 | 0.0369 (11) | 0.0543 (14) | 0.0347 (12) | 0.0052 (9) | 0.0000 (9) | −0.0030 (11) |
C3 | 0.0322 (11) | 0.0640 (17) | 0.0554 (16) | 0.0028 (11) | −0.0027 (10) | −0.0116 (13) |
C4 | 0.0351 (11) | 0.0569 (15) | 0.0552 (15) | −0.0091 (10) | 0.0156 (10) | −0.0148 (12) |
C5 | 0.0435 (12) | 0.0538 (15) | 0.0348 (12) | −0.0062 (11) | 0.0121 (9) | −0.0047 (11) |
C6 | 0.0359 (11) | 0.0409 (12) | 0.0224 (10) | −0.0012 (9) | 0.0043 (8) | −0.0013 (9) |
O1W | 0.0408 (8) | 0.0687 (11) | 0.0404 (9) | 0.0044 (8) | 0.0068 (7) | 0.0163 (8) |
O1—C6 | 1.234 (2) | C2—C3 | 1.387 (3) |
O2—N2 | 1.387 (2) | C2—H2B | 0.9300 |
O2—H2 | 0.8200 | C3—C4 | 1.367 (3) |
N1—C5 | 1.334 (3) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
N1—C1 | 1.344 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.378 (3) |
N2—C6 | 1.325 (2) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
N2—H2A | 0.8600 | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C1—C2 | 1.382 (3) | O1W—H1WA | 0.8503 |
C1—C6 | 1.496 (3) | O1W—H1WB | 0.8499 |
N2—O2—H2 | 109.5 | C4—C3—H3 | 120.4 |
C5—N1—C1 | 117.26 (17) | C2—C3—H3 | 120.4 |
C6—N2—O2 | 119.60 (16) | C3—C4—C5 | 118.9 (2) |
C6—N2—H2A | 120.2 | C3—C4—H4 | 120.6 |
O2—N2—H2A | 120.2 | C5—C4—H4 | 120.6 |
N1—C1—C2 | 123.08 (19) | N1—C5—C4 | 123.4 (2) |
N1—C1—C6 | 117.54 (16) | N1—C5—H5 | 118.3 |
C2—C1—C6 | 119.38 (18) | C4—C5—H5 | 118.3 |
C1—C2—C3 | 118.2 (2) | O1—C6—N2 | 122.15 (18) |
C1—C2—H2B | 120.9 | O1—C6—C1 | 122.66 (17) |
C3—C2—H2B | 120.9 | N2—C6—C1 | 115.17 (17) |
C4—C3—C2 | 119.2 (2) | H1WA—O1W—H1WB | 102.7 |
C5—N1—C1—C2 | 0.3 (3) | C3—C4—C5—N1 | −1.0 (4) |
C5—N1—C1—C6 | 179.67 (17) | O2—N2—C6—O1 | −0.4 (3) |
N1—C1—C2—C3 | −1.2 (3) | O2—N2—C6—C1 | −178.54 (17) |
C6—C1—C2—C3 | 179.4 (2) | N1—C1—C6—O1 | 175.6 (2) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 1.0 (3) | C2—C1—C6—O1 | −5.0 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 0.0 (4) | N1—C1—C6—N2 | −6.2 (3) |
C1—N1—C5—C4 | 0.8 (3) | C2—C1—C6—N2 | 173.20 (18) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H2···O1W | 0.82 | 1.86 | 2.656 (2) | 163 |
N2—H2A···N1i | 0.86 | 2.31 | 3.010 (2) | 139 |
O1W—H1WA···O1ii | 0.85 | 2.14 | 2.976 (2) | 168 |
O1W—H1WB···O1iii | 0.85 | 1.94 | 2.788 (2) | 173 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H2···O1W | 0.82 | 1.86 | 2.656 (2) | 162.5 |
N2—H2A···N1i | 0.86 | 2.31 | 3.010 (2) | 138.7 |
O1W—H1WA···O1ii | 0.85 | 2.14 | 2.976 (2) | 168.3 |
O1W—H1WB···O1iii | 0.85 | 1.94 | 2.788 (2) | 173.0 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C6H6N2O2·H2O |
Mr | 156.14 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 18.7471 (13), 3.8129 (4), 20.4813 (17) |
β (°) | 100.570 (7) |
V (Å3) | 1439.2 (2) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.12 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.1 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Agilent Xcalibur, Sapphire3 |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.476, 1.000 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2491, 1401, 1053 |
Rint | 0.037 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.617 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.053, 0.143, 0.99 |
No. of reflections | 1401 |
No. of parameters | 102 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.19, −0.25 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).