Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536814014159/lh5716sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536814014159/lh5716Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 1008670
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 150 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.006 Å
- R factor = 0.042
- wR factor = 0.092
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.3
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.7 Note PLAT906_ALERT_3_C Large K value in the Analysis of Variance ...... 5.981 Check
Alert level G PLAT004_ALERT_5_G Polymeric Structure Found with Dimension ....... 1 Info PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in the CIF Please Do ! PLAT910_ALERT_3_G Missing # of FCF Reflections Below Th(Min) ..... 1 Why ?
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 0 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 2 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 3 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 2 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Benzothiazole (1 ml) and ethanol (1 ml) were added to a solution of MnCl2·4H2O (39.5 mg, 0.2 mmol) in water (10 ml). The mixture was then refluxed with stirring for 3 h and the resulting solution was left to stand at room temperature. After several days, single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained.
All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Approximate positions for all H atoms were first obtained from the difference electron density map. However, the H atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined in a riding-model approximation. The applied constraints were as follow: C—H = 0.93 Å and Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C).
In recent years, benzothiazole and its derivatives have attracted more attention because they exhibit interesting optical and biological activities (Petkova et al., 2000; Karisson et al., 2003; Khan et al. 2011). Related structural studies are partly focused on the fact that the benzothiazole ring contains N, S and O as potential donor atoms, which exhibit good coordination capacity, and so are propitious to build novel complexes (Roh et al. 2007, Popović et al. 2003, Maniukiewicz 2004). As part of our ongoing studies of benzothiazole-based coordination networks (Bouchareb et al. 2013), we report herein the structure of a coordination polymer of manganese and a benzothiazole ligand (I). The molecular geometry and the atom-numbering scheme are shown in Fig 1.
In the title compound, the MnII cation is located on the intersection of a twofold rotation axis and a mirror plane. The coordination sphere is defined by two mutually trans N atoms from two neutral monodentate benzothiazole ligands occupying the axial positions, and four Cl atoms lying in the equatorial plane. All Mn–Cl bond lengths are identical [2.5232 (10)] Å by symmetry and the Mn—N bond lengths are 2.307 (4) Å. In the coordination octahedron, all N—Mn—Cl and Cl—Mn—Cl bond angles are in the range of 89.40 (7) – 90.60 (7)°. The MnII ions are connected by two bridging Cl atoms, resulting in a chain of octahedra parallel to the c axis (Fig. 2). The crystal packing can be descibed as alterning layers parallel to (001) (Fig. 3). The crystal structure features two π–π stacking interactions: Cg1—Cg1 = 3.6029 (15) Å and Cg1—Cg2 = 4.048 (2) Å, Where, Cg1 is the centroid of the imidazole ring (N1/C7/S1/C6/C1) and Cg2 is the centroid of the fused benzene ring (C1/C2/C3/C4/C5/C6). No hydrogen bonds are observed in the structure.
For applications of benzothiazole and its derivatives, see: Petkova et al. (2000); Karisson et al. (2003); Khan et al. (2011). For related structures see: Bouchareb et al. (2013); Roh et al. (2007); Popović et al. (2003); Maniukiewicz (2004).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2011); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).
[MnCl2(C7H5NS)2] | Dx = 1.685 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 396.22 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, P42/mbc | Cell parameters from 1270 reflections |
Hall symbol: -P 4c 2ab | θ = 3.1–25.2° |
a = 14.761 (6) Å | µ = 1.45 mm−1 |
c = 7.170 (3) Å | T = 150 K |
V = 1562.3 (14) Å3 | Block, colorless |
Z = 4 | 0.19 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm |
F(000) = 796 |
Bruker APEXII diffractometer | 918 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed tube | 685 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.117 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | h = −18→18 |
Tmin = 0.674, Tmax = 0.746 | k = −18→18 |
15714 measured reflections | l = −9→9 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.092 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.14 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0376P)2 + 1.2805P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
918 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.007 |
64 parameters | Δρmax = 0.55 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
[MnCl2(C7H5NS)2] | Z = 4 |
Mr = 396.22 | Mo Kα radiation |
Tetragonal, P42/mbc | µ = 1.45 mm−1 |
a = 14.761 (6) Å | T = 150 K |
c = 7.170 (3) Å | 0.19 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm |
V = 1562.3 (14) Å3 |
Bruker APEXII diffractometer | 918 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | 685 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.674, Tmax = 0.746 | Rint = 0.117 |
15714 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.092 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.14 | Δρmax = 0.55 e Å−3 |
918 reflections | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
64 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.8908 (3) | 0.2962 (3) | 1 | 0.0160 (9) | |
C2 | 0.9693 (3) | 0.2427 (3) | 1 | 0.0242 (11) | |
H2 | 1.0264 | 0.2692 | 1 | 0.029* | |
C3 | 0.9597 (3) | 0.1501 (3) | 1 | 0.0337 (13) | |
H3 | 1.0112 | 0.1137 | 1 | 0.04* | |
C4 | 0.8742 (3) | 0.1096 (3) | 1 | 0.0423 (16) | |
H4 | 0.8697 | 0.0468 | 1 | 0.051* | |
C5 | 0.7963 (3) | 0.1612 (3) | 1 | 0.0398 (15) | |
H5 | 0.7395 | 0.134 | 1 | 0.048* | |
C6 | 0.8050 (3) | 0.2547 (3) | 1 | 0.0226 (10) | |
C7 | 0.8052 (3) | 0.4183 (3) | 1 | 0.0225 (11) | |
H7 | 0.7909 | 0.4796 | 1 | 0.027* | |
N1 | 0.8879 (2) | 0.3912 (2) | 1 | 0.0167 (7) | |
S1 | 0.72177 (8) | 0.33651 (9) | 1 | 0.0284 (3) | |
Cl1 | 0.91494 (5) | 0.58506 (5) | 0.75 | 0.0163 (2) | |
Mn1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.0135 (2) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.018 (2) | 0.012 (2) | 0.018 (2) | −0.0047 (18) | 0 | 0 |
C2 | 0.014 (2) | 0.018 (2) | 0.041 (3) | −0.0029 (18) | 0 | 0 |
C3 | 0.018 (2) | 0.016 (2) | 0.067 (4) | 0.002 (2) | 0 | 0 |
C4 | 0.026 (3) | 0.016 (3) | 0.084 (5) | −0.004 (2) | 0 | 0 |
C5 | 0.020 (3) | 0.023 (3) | 0.077 (4) | −0.012 (2) | 0 | 0 |
C6 | 0.018 (2) | 0.020 (2) | 0.030 (3) | −0.0039 (19) | 0 | 0 |
C7 | 0.019 (2) | 0.023 (3) | 0.026 (3) | −0.004 (2) | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 0.015 (2) | 0.016 (2) | 0.0192 (18) | −0.0017 (14) | 0 | 0 |
S1 | 0.0122 (6) | 0.0245 (7) | 0.0484 (8) | −0.0023 (5) | 0 | 0 |
Cl1 | 0.0161 (3) | 0.0161 (3) | 0.0167 (5) | 0.0030 (4) | 0.0004 (4) | 0.0004 (4) |
Mn1 | 0.0128 (5) | 0.0128 (5) | 0.0150 (4) | −0.0003 (3) | 0 | 0 |
C1—C2 | 1.402 (6) | C6—S1 | 1.723 (5) |
C1—N1 | 1.402 (5) | C7—N1 | 1.284 (6) |
C1—C6 | 1.406 (6) | C7—S1 | 1.724 (5) |
C2—C3 | 1.374 (6) | C7—H7 | 0.93 |
C2—H2 | 0.93 | N1—Mn1 | 2.307 (4) |
C3—C4 | 1.397 (7) | Cl1—Mn1i | 2.5232 (10) |
C3—H3 | 0.93 | Cl1—Mn1 | 2.5232 (10) |
C4—C5 | 1.379 (7) | Mn1—N1ii | 2.307 (4) |
C4—H4 | 0.93 | Mn1—Cl1iii | 2.5232 (10) |
C5—C6 | 1.386 (7) | Mn1—Cl1ii | 2.5232 (10) |
C5—H5 | 0.93 | Mn1—Cl1iv | 2.5232 (10) |
C2—C1—N1 | 126.1 (4) | C7—N1—C1 | 109.9 (4) |
C2—C1—C6 | 119.9 (4) | C7—N1—Mn1 | 117.7 (3) |
N1—C1—C6 | 114.1 (4) | C1—N1—Mn1 | 132.4 (3) |
C3—C2—C1 | 118.4 (4) | C6—S1—C7 | 88.9 (2) |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.8 | Mn1i—Cl1—Mn1 | 90.54 (4) |
C1—C2—H2 | 120.8 | N1ii—Mn1—N1 | 180 |
C2—C3—C4 | 121.2 (5) | N1ii—Mn1—Cl1iii | 89.40 (7) |
C2—C3—H3 | 119.4 | N1—Mn1—Cl1iii | 90.60 (7) |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.4 | N1ii—Mn1—Cl1ii | 89.40 (7) |
C5—C4—C3 | 121.1 (5) | N1—Mn1—Cl1ii | 90.60 (7) |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.4 | Cl1iii—Mn1—Cl1ii | 90.54 (4) |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.4 | N1ii—Mn1—Cl1 | 90.60 (7) |
C4—C5—C6 | 118.2 (5) | N1—Mn1—Cl1 | 89.40 (7) |
C4—C5—H5 | 120.9 | Cl1iii—Mn1—Cl1 | 89.46 (4) |
C6—C5—H5 | 120.9 | Cl1ii—Mn1—Cl1 | 180 |
C5—C6—C1 | 121.1 (4) | N1ii—Mn1—Cl1iv | 90.60 (7) |
C5—C6—S1 | 129.2 (4) | N1—Mn1—Cl1iv | 89.40 (7) |
C1—C6—S1 | 109.7 (3) | Cl1iii—Mn1—Cl1iv | 180 |
N1—C7—S1 | 117.4 (4) | Cl1ii—Mn1—Cl1iv | 89.46 (4) |
N1—C7—H7 | 121.3 | Cl1—Mn1—Cl1iv | 90.54 (4) |
S1—C7—H7 | 121.3 | ||
N1—C1—C2—C3 | 180 | C6—C1—N1—Mn1 | 180 |
C6—C1—C2—C3 | 0 | C5—C6—S1—C7 | 180 |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0 | C1—C6—S1—C7 | 0 |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 0 | N1—C7—S1—C6 | 0 |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0 | C7—N1—Mn1—Cl1iii | −134.72 (2) |
C4—C5—C6—C1 | 0 | C1—N1—Mn1—Cl1iii | 45.28 (2) |
C4—C5—C6—S1 | 180 | C7—N1—Mn1—Cl1ii | 134.72 (2) |
C2—C1—C6—C5 | 0 | C1—N1—Mn1—Cl1ii | −45.28 (2) |
N1—C1—C6—C5 | 180 | C7—N1—Mn1—Cl1 | −45.28 (2) |
C2—C1—C6—S1 | 180 | C1—N1—Mn1—Cl1 | 134.72 (2) |
N1—C1—C6—S1 | 0 | C7—N1—Mn1—Cl1iv | 45.28 (2) |
S1—C7—N1—C1 | 0 | C1—N1—Mn1—Cl1iv | −134.72 (2) |
S1—C7—N1—Mn1 | 180 | Mn1i—Cl1—Mn1—N1ii | 89.39 (7) |
C2—C1—N1—C7 | 180 | Mn1i—Cl1—Mn1—N1 | −90.61 (7) |
C6—C1—N1—C7 | 0 | Mn1i—Cl1—Mn1—Cl1iv | 180 |
C2—C1—N1—Mn1 | 0 |
Symmetry codes: (i) y+1/2, x−1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+2; (iii) −x+2, −y+1, z; (iv) x, y, −z+2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [MnCl2(C7H5NS)2] |
Mr | 396.22 |
Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, P42/mbc |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, c (Å) | 14.761 (6), 7.170 (3) |
V (Å3) | 1562.3 (14) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.45 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.19 × 0.14 × 0.12 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.674, 0.746 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 15714, 918, 685 |
Rint | 0.117 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.638 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.042, 0.092, 1.14 |
No. of reflections | 918 |
No. of parameters | 64 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.55, −0.46 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011), SAINT (Bruker, 2011), SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).
In recent years, benzothiazole and its derivatives have attracted more attention because they exhibit interesting optical and biological activities (Petkova et al., 2000; Karisson et al., 2003; Khan et al. 2011). Related structural studies are partly focused on the fact that the benzothiazole ring contains N, S and O as potential donor atoms, which exhibit good coordination capacity, and so are propitious to build novel complexes (Roh et al. 2007, Popović et al. 2003, Maniukiewicz 2004). As part of our ongoing studies of benzothiazole-based coordination networks (Bouchareb et al. 2013), we report herein the structure of a coordination polymer of manganese and a benzothiazole ligand (I). The molecular geometry and the atom-numbering scheme are shown in Fig 1.
In the title compound, the MnII cation is located on the intersection of a twofold rotation axis and a mirror plane. The coordination sphere is defined by two mutually trans N atoms from two neutral monodentate benzothiazole ligands occupying the axial positions, and four Cl atoms lying in the equatorial plane. All Mn–Cl bond lengths are identical [2.5232 (10)] Å by symmetry and the Mn—N bond lengths are 2.307 (4) Å. In the coordination octahedron, all N—Mn—Cl and Cl—Mn—Cl bond angles are in the range of 89.40 (7) – 90.60 (7)°. The MnII ions are connected by two bridging Cl atoms, resulting in a chain of octahedra parallel to the c axis (Fig. 2). The crystal packing can be descibed as alterning layers parallel to (001) (Fig. 3). The crystal structure features two π–π stacking interactions: Cg1—Cg1 = 3.6029 (15) Å and Cg1—Cg2 = 4.048 (2) Å, Where, Cg1 is the centroid of the imidazole ring (N1/C7/S1/C6/C1) and Cg2 is the centroid of the fused benzene ring (C1/C2/C3/C4/C5/C6). No hydrogen bonds are observed in the structure.