Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, C8H10N2, the cyclo­hexane ring adopts a chair conformation. he crystal structure of the previously reported monoclinic modification have intramolecular CN...CN and C—H...N interactions. These types of interaction are not present in this new modification whose crystal structure is built up by van der Waals interactions.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811023592/ng5170sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811023592/ng5170Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

cml

Chemical Markup Language (CML) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811023592/ng5170Isup3.cml
Supplementary material

CCDC reference: 834449

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 100 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.001 Å
  • R factor = 0.040
  • wR factor = 0.105
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 30.7

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B PLAT230_ALERT_2_B Hirshfeld Test Diff for C1 -- C7 .. 10.5 su PLAT230_ALERT_2_B Hirshfeld Test Diff for C1 -- C8 .. 9.8 su
Alert level C PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.600 2 PLAT912_ALERT_4_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 7
Alert level G PLAT128_ALERT_4_G Alternate Setting of Space-group P21/c ....... P21/n PLAT710_ALERT_4_G Delete 1-2-3 or 2-3-4 Linear Torsion Angle ... # 11 C8 -C1 -C7 -N1 -161.00 3.00 1.555 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT710_ALERT_4_G Delete 1-2-3 or 2-3-4 Linear Torsion Angle ... # 12 C6 -C1 -C7 -N1 -42.00 3.00 1.555 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT710_ALERT_4_G Delete 1-2-3 or 2-3-4 Linear Torsion Angle ... # 13 C2 -C1 -C7 -N1 80.00 3.00 1.555 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT710_ALERT_4_G Delete 1-2-3 or 2-3-4 Linear Torsion Angle ... # 14 C7 -C1 -C8 -N2 18.00 0.00 1.555 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT710_ALERT_4_G Delete 1-2-3 or 2-3-4 Linear Torsion Angle ... # 15 C6 -C1 -C8 -N2 62.00 4.00 1.555 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT710_ALERT_4_G Delete 1-2-3 or 2-3-4 Linear Torsion Angle ... # 16 C2 -C1 -C8 -N2 -60.00 4.00 1.555 1.555 1.555 1.555
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 2 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 2 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 7 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 8 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Fig.1 shows the structure of title compound, (I), which is a positional isomer of a previously reported by (Echeverria et al., 1995), (II). The bond distances and the six C—C—C bond angles in (I) are slightly longer than (II). The crystal structure of (II) have intermolecular CN···CN and C—H···N interactions, whereas this kind of interactions are not present in (I). The values of the ring puckering parameters: QT = 0.5665 Å, θ =0.72° and ϕ=107.4° (Cremer & Pople, 1975), indicate that the cyclohexane has a chair conformation. The C1—C2 and C1—C6 bond distances are more longer than the other C—C distances in the cyclohexyl ring. The lengthening of these bonds with increasing ring size may be attributed to steric crowding about C1 atom. The cyano groups are essentially collinear with C1 and the N—C—C1 angles is 178.55 (10)° (mean). A σh plane passing through the CN groups and the C1 atom which bisects the cyclohexyl ring.

Related literature top

For the reported monoclinic modification, see: Echeverria et al. (1995). For synthetic methods, see: Tsai et al. (2003); Suissa et al. (1977); Julia & Maumy (1969). For puckering parameters see: Cremer & Pople (1975).

Experimental top

A mixture of malonodinitrile (0.1 mol, 6.6 g), 23 gr 1,5-dibromopentane (0.1 mol, 23 g) and 46 gr K2CO3 in dry DMSO (50 ml), was stirred for 12 h at 70 °C. After cooling down, the reaction mixture was poured into water and extracted with ether. The organic layer was washed several times with water, dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent evaporated. The crude product was purified by vacuum distillation yielding 10.5 gr (87%) of a solid compound which after recrystallization in hexane gave white crystals: mp 65 °C.; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCI3) δ 1.52 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.72 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 2.12 (t, 4H,2CH2); 13CNMR (75 MHz, CDCI3) δ 22.3, 23.8, 34.7, 41.2, 117.3. Analysis, found, %: C: 71.42, H: 7.78, N: 20.63 (C8H10N2); calculated, %: C: 71.61, H: 7.51, N: 20.88

Refinement top

One reflection (-7 1 3) was omitted of the refinement due to to bad agreement between observed and calculated factors. All H-atoms were placed in calculated positions [C—H = 0.99 Å, Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C)] and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are plotted at the 30% probability level.
cyclohexane-1,1-dicarbonitrile top
Crystal data top
C8H10N2F(000) = 288
Mr = 134.18Dx = 1.210 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2571 reflections
a = 8.9300 (5) Åθ = 3.0–33.1°
b = 8.3656 (5) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 9.8725 (6) ÅT = 100 K
β = 92.662 (1)°Prism, colourless
V = 736.73 (8) Å30.30 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2794 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2236 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.033
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 33.2°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)
h = 1313
Tmin = 0.978, Tmax = 0.978k = 1212
9584 measured reflectionsl = 1514
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.105H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0492P)2 + 0.1357P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2794 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
Crystal data top
C8H10N2V = 736.73 (8) Å3
Mr = 134.18Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 8.9300 (5) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
b = 8.3656 (5) ÅT = 100 K
c = 9.8725 (6) Å0.30 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm
β = 92.662 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2794 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)
2236 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.978, Tmax = 0.978Rint = 0.033
9584 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0400 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.105H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.31 e Å3
2794 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
91 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.36573 (9)0.12113 (9)0.57950 (8)0.02114 (17)
N20.02890 (8)0.15605 (9)0.63201 (8)0.01948 (16)
C10.24232 (8)0.16105 (9)0.53895 (8)0.01226 (14)
C20.23203 (9)0.19844 (9)0.38467 (8)0.01370 (15)
H2A0.33270.18880.34760.016*
H2B0.16520.11970.33760.016*
C30.17144 (9)0.36675 (10)0.35831 (9)0.01563 (16)
H3A0.06720.37340.38780.019*
H3B0.17010.38950.25980.019*
C40.26762 (9)0.49156 (9)0.43440 (9)0.01663 (16)
H4A0.22370.59900.41850.020*
H4B0.36970.49150.39920.020*
C50.27741 (9)0.45676 (10)0.58644 (8)0.01565 (16)
H5A0.34370.53670.63260.019*
H5B0.17650.46710.62300.019*
C60.33813 (9)0.28925 (9)0.61680 (8)0.01401 (15)
H6A0.33670.26850.71550.017*
H6B0.44330.28230.58980.017*
C70.30994 (9)0.00103 (10)0.56201 (8)0.01494 (15)
C80.08948 (9)0.15673 (9)0.59186 (8)0.01406 (15)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0225 (3)0.0166 (3)0.0245 (4)0.0026 (3)0.0035 (3)0.0023 (3)
N20.0181 (3)0.0193 (3)0.0213 (4)0.0012 (3)0.0039 (3)0.0003 (3)
C10.0127 (3)0.0109 (3)0.0134 (3)0.0006 (2)0.0021 (2)0.0006 (2)
C20.0170 (3)0.0128 (3)0.0115 (3)0.0012 (3)0.0017 (3)0.0003 (3)
C30.0179 (3)0.0144 (3)0.0145 (3)0.0001 (3)0.0010 (3)0.0019 (3)
C40.0214 (4)0.0116 (3)0.0169 (4)0.0007 (3)0.0006 (3)0.0011 (3)
C50.0188 (3)0.0124 (3)0.0157 (4)0.0003 (3)0.0003 (3)0.0021 (3)
C60.0141 (3)0.0136 (3)0.0141 (3)0.0002 (2)0.0007 (3)0.0009 (3)
C70.0156 (3)0.0143 (3)0.0152 (4)0.0005 (3)0.0032 (3)0.0007 (3)
C80.0161 (3)0.0125 (3)0.0136 (3)0.0002 (3)0.0009 (3)0.0004 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C71.1465 (11)C3—H3A0.9900
N2—C81.1462 (11)C3—H3B0.9900
C1—C71.4818 (11)C4—C51.5275 (12)
C1—C81.4843 (11)C4—H4A0.9900
C1—C61.5530 (11)C4—H4B0.9900
C1—C21.5535 (11)C5—C61.5272 (11)
C2—C31.5265 (11)C5—H5A0.9900
C2—H2A0.9900C5—H5B0.9900
C2—H2B0.9900C6—H6A0.9900
C3—C41.5272 (11)C6—H6B0.9900
C7—C1—C8107.39 (6)C3—C4—H4A109.4
C7—C1—C6109.67 (6)C5—C4—H4A109.4
C8—C1—C6109.70 (6)C3—C4—H4B109.4
C7—C1—C2109.73 (6)C5—C4—H4B109.4
C8—C1—C2109.66 (6)H4A—C4—H4B108.0
C6—C1—C2110.63 (6)C6—C5—C4111.80 (7)
C3—C2—C1110.93 (6)C6—C5—H5A109.3
C3—C2—H2A109.5C4—C5—H5A109.3
C1—C2—H2A109.5C6—C5—H5B109.3
C3—C2—H2B109.5C4—C5—H5B109.3
C1—C2—H2B109.5H5A—C5—H5B107.9
H2A—C2—H2B108.0C5—C6—C1110.74 (6)
C2—C3—C4111.10 (6)C5—C6—H6A109.5
C2—C3—H3A109.4C1—C6—H6A109.5
C4—C3—H3A109.4C5—C6—H6B109.5
C2—C3—H3B109.4C1—C6—H6B109.5
C4—C3—H3B109.4H6A—C6—H6B108.1
H3A—C3—H3B108.0N1—C7—C1178.29 (8)
C3—C4—C5110.99 (7)N2—C8—C1178.83 (8)
C7—C1—C2—C3176.59 (6)C8—C1—C6—C566.44 (8)
C8—C1—C2—C365.69 (8)C2—C1—C6—C554.66 (8)
C6—C1—C2—C355.45 (8)C8—C1—C7—N1161 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C456.61 (9)C6—C1—C7—N142 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C556.87 (9)C2—C1—C7—N180 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C656.58 (9)C7—C1—C8—N2179 (100)
C4—C5—C6—C155.55 (9)C6—C1—C8—N262 (4)
C7—C1—C6—C5175.84 (7)C2—C1—C8—N260 (4)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H10N2
Mr134.18
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)8.9300 (5), 8.3656 (5), 9.8725 (6)
β (°) 92.662 (1)
V3)736.73 (8)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.30 × 0.30
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)
Tmin, Tmax0.978, 0.978
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9584, 2794, 2236
Rint0.033
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.770
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.040, 0.105, 1.03
No. of reflections2794
No. of parameters91
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.31, 0.21

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005), SAINT (Bruker, 2005), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds