

Supporting information
![]() | Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803000989/ob6207sup1.cif |
![]() | Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803000989/ob6207Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 204695
The title complex, (I), was synthesized by three layered-solution approach in a tube of ca 0.8 cm diameter with a 20 cm length. The top layer was 10 ml of methanol solution of 4,4'-bipyridine (0.2 mol l−1) and 4-cyanobenzoic acid (0.05 mol l−1). The middle layer was 3 ml of mixed solvents of methanol and water with volume ratio 1:1. The bottom layer was 5 ml of water solution of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.5 mol l−1). After 3 d, crystals of (I) were obtained and filtered out.
The completeness was relatively low (90.1%) although all parameters were set according to the suggestions of SMART. The H atoms were refined isotropically. C—H bond lengths are 0.89 (4)–0.92 (2) Å. Atom displacement parameters of N2, C8 and C9 are abnormal. Their displacement ellipsoids are much elongated, suggesting some disorder.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
![]() | Fig. 1. ORTEP diagram of (I) showing atom labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids represent 50% probability. |
![]() | Fig. 2. The packing view of the title complex (I). |
[Cu(C8H4NO2)2(C10H8N2)] | Z = 1 |
Mr = 511.97 | F(000) = 261 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.507 Mg m−3 |
a = 5.3279 (10) Å | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
b = 8.9739 (17) Å | Cell parameters from 978 reflections |
c = 12.195 (2) Å | θ = 5.3–48.0° |
α = 99.734 (3)° | µ = 1.01 mm−1 |
β = 92.495 (4)° | T = 293 K |
γ = 100.190 (4)° | Plate, blue |
V = 563.99 (18) Å3 | 0.31 × 0.11 × 0.04 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2504 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 2053 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.035 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 1.7° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −7→6 |
Tmin = 0.820, Tmax = 0.965 | k = −11→8 |
3490 measured reflections | l = −15→15 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.096 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 0.95 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0303P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2504 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.042 |
192 parameters | Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 |
4 restraints | Δρmin = −0.36 e Å−3 |
[Cu(C8H4NO2)2(C10H8N2)] | γ = 100.190 (4)° |
Mr = 511.97 | V = 563.99 (18) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 5.3279 (10) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 8.9739 (17) Å | µ = 1.01 mm−1 |
c = 12.195 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
α = 99.734 (3)° | 0.31 × 0.11 × 0.04 mm |
β = 92.495 (4)° |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2504 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 2053 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.820, Tmax = 0.965 | Rint = 0.035 |
3490 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | 4 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.096 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 0.95 | Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 |
2504 reflections | Δρmin = −0.36 e Å−3 |
192 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cu | 0.5000 | 1.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.03066 (19) | |
O1 | 0.3001 (4) | 0.8941 (2) | 0.36588 (17) | 0.0399 (6) | |
O2 | 0.5852 (5) | 1.0203 (3) | 0.2725 (2) | 0.0742 (9) | |
N1 | 0.6939 (4) | 0.8213 (3) | 0.49639 (18) | 0.0308 (6) | |
N2 | −0.3402 (9) | 0.5813 (6) | −0.2040 (3) | 0.146 (2) | |
C1 | 0.8993 (6) | 0.8275 (4) | 0.5667 (2) | 0.0352 (8) | |
C2 | 1.0204 (5) | 0.7063 (3) | 0.5704 (2) | 0.0346 (7) | |
C3 | 0.9394 (5) | 0.5677 (3) | 0.4988 (2) | 0.0283 (6) | |
C4 | 0.7315 (6) | 0.5622 (4) | 0.4239 (3) | 0.0364 (8) | |
C5 | 0.6167 (6) | 0.6875 (3) | 0.4257 (2) | 0.0362 (8) | |
C6 | 0.3881 (6) | 0.9305 (4) | 0.2763 (3) | 0.0414 (8) | |
C7 | 0.2254 (6) | 0.8525 (4) | 0.1706 (3) | 0.0417 (8) | |
C8 | 0.2956 (10) | 0.8816 (7) | 0.0725 (4) | 0.120 (2) | |
C9 | 0.1526 (11) | 0.8136 (8) | −0.0273 (4) | 0.136 (3) | |
C10 | −0.0661 (8) | 0.7126 (5) | −0.0238 (3) | 0.0664 (12) | |
C11 | −0.1403 (8) | 0.6822 (5) | 0.0747 (4) | 0.0822 (15) | |
C12 | 0.0071 (8) | 0.7531 (5) | 0.1726 (3) | 0.0686 (13) | |
C13 | −0.2206 (9) | 0.6389 (6) | −0.1251 (3) | 0.0930 (16) | |
H1 | 0.958 (5) | 0.922 (3) | 0.608 (2) | 0.031 (8)* | |
H2 | 1.152 (4) | 0.717 (3) | 0.621 (2) | 0.046 (9)* | |
H3 | 0.664 (5) | 0.478 (3) | 0.375 (2) | 0.026 (7)* | |
H4 | 0.475 (5) | 0.687 (3) | 0.381 (2) | 0.032 (8)* | |
H5 | 0.445 (5) | 0.936 (5) | 0.060 (4) | 0.107 (16)* | |
H6 | 0.212 (8) | 0.833 (5) | −0.094 (2) | 0.122 (18)* | |
H7 | −0.299 (5) | 0.621 (4) | 0.075 (3) | 0.116 (17)* | |
H8 | −0.056 (7) | 0.727 (4) | 0.235 (3) | 0.080 (14)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu | 0.0388 (3) | 0.0289 (3) | 0.0229 (3) | 0.0133 (2) | −0.0112 (2) | −0.0031 (2) |
O1 | 0.0500 (13) | 0.0380 (13) | 0.0294 (11) | 0.0175 (10) | −0.0156 (10) | −0.0053 (10) |
O2 | 0.0598 (17) | 0.088 (2) | 0.0538 (17) | −0.0191 (16) | −0.0205 (14) | −0.0063 (15) |
N1 | 0.0327 (13) | 0.0277 (13) | 0.0305 (13) | 0.0094 (11) | −0.0072 (11) | −0.0002 (11) |
N2 | 0.152 (4) | 0.176 (5) | 0.065 (3) | −0.041 (4) | −0.064 (3) | −0.016 (3) |
C1 | 0.0375 (17) | 0.0291 (17) | 0.0340 (17) | 0.0070 (14) | −0.0132 (14) | −0.0055 (14) |
C2 | 0.0308 (16) | 0.0315 (17) | 0.0376 (17) | 0.0081 (14) | −0.0160 (14) | −0.0023 (14) |
C3 | 0.0291 (15) | 0.0265 (16) | 0.0286 (14) | 0.0075 (12) | −0.0028 (12) | 0.0021 (12) |
C4 | 0.0422 (18) | 0.0257 (17) | 0.0358 (17) | 0.0067 (14) | −0.0165 (15) | −0.0056 (14) |
C5 | 0.0376 (18) | 0.0315 (17) | 0.0366 (17) | 0.0112 (14) | −0.0162 (15) | −0.0020 (14) |
C6 | 0.044 (2) | 0.038 (2) | 0.0362 (19) | 0.0100 (16) | −0.0149 (16) | −0.0063 (15) |
C7 | 0.0432 (19) | 0.044 (2) | 0.0306 (17) | −0.0002 (16) | −0.0118 (15) | −0.0006 (15) |
C8 | 0.104 (4) | 0.171 (6) | 0.043 (3) | −0.086 (4) | −0.024 (3) | 0.023 (3) |
C9 | 0.130 (5) | 0.204 (7) | 0.027 (2) | −0.085 (4) | −0.022 (3) | 0.020 (3) |
C10 | 0.069 (3) | 0.080 (3) | 0.033 (2) | −0.007 (2) | −0.022 (2) | −0.006 (2) |
C11 | 0.073 (3) | 0.101 (4) | 0.045 (2) | −0.041 (3) | −0.017 (2) | 0.002 (2) |
C12 | 0.069 (3) | 0.089 (3) | 0.032 (2) | −0.018 (2) | −0.011 (2) | 0.006 (2) |
C13 | 0.099 (3) | 0.109 (4) | 0.047 (3) | −0.021 (3) | −0.029 (2) | −0.002 (3) |
Cu—O1 | 1.9176 (18) | C4—C5 | 1.369 (4) |
Cu—O1i | 1.9176 (18) | C4—H3 | 0.89 (2) |
Cu—N1i | 2.051 (2) | C5—H4 | 0.92 (2) |
Cu—N1 | 2.051 (2) | C6—C7 | 1.511 (4) |
O1—C6 | 1.277 (4) | C7—C8 | 1.323 (6) |
O2—C6 | 1.214 (4) | C7—C12 | 1.339 (5) |
N1—C5 | 1.341 (3) | C8—C9 | 1.392 (6) |
N1—C1 | 1.347 (3) | C8—H5 | 0.891 (19) |
N2—C13 | 1.123 (4) | C9—C10 | 1.350 (6) |
C1—C2 | 1.365 (4) | C9—H6 | 0.911 (19) |
C1—H1 | 0.90 (3) | C10—C11 | 1.337 (6) |
C2—C3 | 1.380 (4) | C10—C13 | 1.443 (4) |
C2—H2 | 0.895 (16) | C11—C12 | 1.390 (5) |
C3—C4 | 1.393 (3) | C11—H7 | 0.922 (19) |
C3—C3ii | 1.478 (5) | C12—H8 | 0.89 (4) |
O1—Cu—O1i | 180.000 (1) | C4—C5—H4 | 123.5 (17) |
O1—Cu—N1i | 89.83 (8) | O2—C6—O1 | 124.6 (3) |
O1i—Cu—N1i | 90.17 (8) | O2—C6—C7 | 120.6 (3) |
O1—Cu—N1 | 90.17 (8) | O1—C6—C7 | 114.8 (3) |
O1i—Cu—N1 | 89.83 (8) | C8—C7—C12 | 117.8 (3) |
N1i—Cu—N1 | 180.000 (1) | C8—C7—C6 | 120.4 (3) |
C6—O1—Cu | 114.5 (2) | C12—C7—C6 | 121.8 (3) |
C5—N1—C1 | 115.6 (2) | C7—C8—C9 | 122.8 (5) |
C5—N1—Cu | 121.49 (17) | C7—C8—H5 | 126 (3) |
C1—N1—Cu | 122.85 (19) | C9—C8—H5 | 111 (3) |
N1—C1—C2 | 123.6 (3) | C10—C9—C8 | 118.6 (5) |
N1—C1—H1 | 113.5 (16) | C10—C9—H6 | 121 (3) |
C2—C1—H1 | 122.7 (16) | C8—C9—H6 | 120 (3) |
C1—C2—C3 | 120.9 (2) | C11—C10—C9 | 119.4 (4) |
C1—C2—H2 | 118.8 (19) | C11—C10—C13 | 120.0 (4) |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.3 (19) | C9—C10—C13 | 120.6 (4) |
C2—C3—C4 | 115.6 (3) | C10—C11—C12 | 120.3 (4) |
C2—C3—C3ii | 122.9 (3) | C10—C11—H7 | 117 (3) |
C4—C3—C3ii | 121.4 (3) | C12—C11—H7 | 122 (3) |
C5—C4—C3 | 120.4 (3) | C7—C12—C11 | 121.1 (4) |
C5—C4—H3 | 117.3 (16) | C7—C12—H8 | 124 (2) |
C3—C4—H3 | 122.2 (16) | C11—C12—H8 | 115 (2) |
N1—C5—C4 | 123.8 (2) | N2—C13—C10 | 179.7 (6) |
N1—C5—H4 | 112.7 (16) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Cu(C8H4NO2)2(C10H8N2)] |
Mr | 511.97 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.3279 (10), 8.9739 (17), 12.195 (2) |
α, β, γ (°) | 99.734 (3), 92.495 (4), 100.190 (4) |
V (Å3) | 563.99 (18) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.01 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.31 × 0.11 × 0.04 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.820, 0.965 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3490, 2504, 2053 |
Rint | 0.035 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.666 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.051, 0.096, 0.95 |
No. of reflections | 2504 |
No. of parameters | 192 |
No. of restraints | 4 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.43, −0.36 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1997), SMART, SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL.
Cu—O1 | 1.9176 (18) | C1—C2 | 1.365 (4) |
Cu—N1 | 2.051 (2) | C2—C3 | 1.380 (4) |
O1—C6 | 1.277 (4) | C3—C4 | 1.393 (3) |
O2—C6 | 1.214 (4) | C3—C3i | 1.478 (5) |
N1—C5 | 1.341 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.369 (4) |
N1—C1 | 1.347 (3) | ||
O1—Cu—N1 | 90.17 (8) | O2—C6—O1 | 124.6 (3) |
C6—O1—Cu | 114.5 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
In recent years, much attention has been paid to in the field of coordination polymers and especially focused on the ligands of 4,4'-bipyridne, terethphate and their derivatives due to their potential applications in gas adsorption, ion exchange and heterogeneous catalysis (Eddaoudi et al., 2002; Moulton & Zaworotko, 2001; Seo et al., 2000). Complexes with 4-cyanobenzoic acid were sparse and recent one suggests that this kind of complexes has strong blue fluorescent emission (Yuan et al., 2001). Moreover complex with the combination of 4-cyanobenzoic acid and 4,4'-bipyridine has not been reported so far. Here, we present the crystal structure of the CuII one-dimensional complex, the title compound, (I).
Compound (I) consists of one-dimensional CuII complex in which the geometry around the CuII ion, located on an inversion center, is best described as a square planar, as can be seen in Fig. 1. The geometry of Cu atom is completed by two O atoms from two 4-cyanobenzoato ligands and two N atoms from two 4,4'-bipyridine. Two benzoate groups and two pyridine rings of 4,4'-bipyridine ligands are respectively located on the opposite sides to minimize repulsion between the ligands. The Cu—O1 bond length [1.9176 (18) Å] is shorter than those of the compounds such as [Cu(py)2(H2O)(C6H5COO)2] (Yang et al., 2001) and [Cu(C6H5COO)2(2,2'-bipy)] (Yang et al., 1994). The 4-cyanobenzoate is monodentately coordinated to copper center and the distance of Cu—O2 [2.861 (3) Å] is longer and is considered as non-bonding. This coordination mode of 4-cyanobenzoato ligand results in the four-coordinated copper geometry. The Cu—N1 bond length [2.051 (2) Å] is similar to those of [Cu(py)2(H2O)(C6H5COO)2] (Yang et al., 2001) and [Cu(C6H5COO)2(2,2'-bipy)] (Yang et al., 1994) or those of CuII complexes with 4,4'-bipyridine bridging linker (Xu et al., 2002; Zhu et al., 2002). The spacer ligand, 4,4'-bipyridine, located on an inversion center, links adjacent Cu atoms and extends the complex into one-dimensional chain along [110] (Fig. 2). The Cu···Cu separation of the network is 11.218 (2) Å, which is normal distance found in related to copper/4,4'-bipyridine complexes. As expected, all other bond distances and angles are within normal range, and in good agreement with those of other 4,4'-bipyridine and carboxyl-containing complexes.