Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810017265/pv2279sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810017265/pv2279Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 781343
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.050
- wR factor = 0.162
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.0
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT230_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff for C1 -- C2 .. 5.64 su PLAT912_ALERT_4_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 3
Alert level G PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature 293 K
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
A solution of sodium nitrite (2.3 g, 33 mmoles) in water (10 ml) was added at 291–293 K to a solution of 2,2'-azanediyldiacetonitrile hydrochloride (1.7 g, 28 mmoles) in water (30 ml). The mixture was heated for 1.5 h at 313–323 K and allowed to stand for 12 h at 293 K. The title compound as nitroso derivative, was extracted with ether, the ether solution was evaporated. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained from slow evaporation of an ethyl acetate solution of the title compound.
H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.97 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
At present, much attention in the field of ferroelectric materials is focused on developing ferroelectric organic or inorganic compounds (Haertling et al., 1999; Homes et al., 2001). It has been reported that N,N-bis(cyanomethyl)nitramide crystallizes in space group (C 2) at room temperature (Adolf et al., 1996), a noncentrosymmetric space group is required for ferroelectric behavior. Its ferroelectric property still needs to be further confirmed by many experiments, such as dielectric measurements and DSC to varify the permittivity anomaly, phase transition, etc. For this reason, we have synthesized the title compound to investigate its physical properties. The dielectric constant of the title compound as a function of temperature indicates that the permittivity is basically temperature-independent (dielectric constant = 3.2 to 5.6), suggesting that this compound should not be a real ferroelectric or there may be no distinct phase transition within the measured temperature range. Similarly, below the melting point (308 K) of the compound, the dielectric constant as a function of temperature also goes smoothly, and there is no dielectric anomaly observed. Herein, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound.
The bond distances and bond angles in the title compound agree very well with the corresponding distances and angles reported for a closely related compound (Kaida et al., 1990); both cyanic groups are linear (Fig. 1). It is interesting to note that both H-atoms bonded to only one methylene carbon (C3) are involved in hydrogen bonding interactions of the type C—H···N, C3—H3B···N2 hydrogen bonds result in dimers of the title molecule lying about inversion centers in R22(12) motifs in graph set notation (Bernstein et al., 1994) while C3—H3C···N1 interactions result in chains of molecules lying along the c-axis (Tab. 1, Fig. 2). Dipole–dipole and van der Waals interactions are effective in the molecular packing.
For background to ferroelectric compounds, see: Haertling et al. (1999); Homes et al. (2001). For related structures, see: Adolf et al. (1996); Kaida et al. (1990). For graph-set notation, see: Bernstein et al. (1994).
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
C4H4N4O | F(000) = 256 |
Mr = 124.11 | Dx = 1.341 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1409 reflections |
a = 6.5622 (13) Å | θ = 2.3–27.5° |
b = 8.9765 (18) Å | µ = 0.10 mm−1 |
c = 11.008 (4) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 108.55 (3)° | Prism, colorless |
V = 614.7 (3) Å3 | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm |
Z = 4 |
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer | 1408 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1094 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.059 |
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0° |
CCD_Profile_fitting scans | h = −8→8 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | k = −11→11 |
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 1.000 | l = −14→14 |
6154 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.162 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.05 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1408 reflections | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
83 parameters | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.15 (2) |
C4H4N4O | V = 614.7 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 124.11 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 6.5622 (13) Å | µ = 0.10 mm−1 |
b = 8.9765 (18) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 11.008 (4) Å | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm |
β = 108.55 (3)° |
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer | 1408 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | 1094 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 1.000 | Rint = 0.059 |
6154 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.162 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.05 | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
1408 reflections | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
83 parameters |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.1721 (2) | −0.00421 (14) | 0.24979 (14) | 0.0738 (5) | |
N1 | 0.1213 (3) | 0.3227 (2) | 0.03826 (14) | 0.0730 (6) | |
N2 | 0.6354 (3) | 0.36079 (17) | 0.61699 (14) | 0.0593 (5) | |
N3 | 0.3553 (2) | 0.02971 (15) | 0.31634 (14) | 0.0537 (5) | |
N4 | 0.38510 (18) | 0.17474 (12) | 0.33544 (10) | 0.0345 (4) | |
C2 | 0.6201 (2) | 0.29919 (17) | 0.52436 (14) | 0.0411 (4) | |
C1 | 0.6039 (2) | 0.22069 (18) | 0.40327 (13) | 0.0419 (4) | |
H1A | 0.6543 | 0.2860 | 0.3487 | 0.050* | |
H1B | 0.6962 | 0.1336 | 0.4222 | 0.050* | |
C4 | 0.1609 (2) | 0.30241 (19) | 0.14509 (15) | 0.0439 (4) | |
C3 | 0.2111 (2) | 0.28025 (16) | 0.28328 (13) | 0.0405 (4) | |
H3B | 0.2504 | 0.3752 | 0.3264 | 0.049* | |
H3C | 0.0835 | 0.2446 | 0.3006 | 0.049* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0564 (9) | 0.0523 (9) | 0.0991 (11) | −0.0192 (6) | 0.0056 (7) | −0.0124 (6) |
N1 | 0.0569 (11) | 0.1157 (16) | 0.0448 (9) | 0.0196 (9) | 0.0140 (7) | 0.0171 (8) |
N2 | 0.0655 (11) | 0.0593 (10) | 0.0484 (8) | −0.0107 (8) | 0.0113 (7) | −0.0105 (7) |
N3 | 0.0509 (9) | 0.0336 (8) | 0.0697 (10) | −0.0029 (6) | 0.0094 (7) | −0.0008 (6) |
N4 | 0.0342 (7) | 0.0298 (7) | 0.0356 (7) | 0.0010 (5) | 0.0056 (5) | 0.0001 (4) |
C2 | 0.0369 (8) | 0.0392 (8) | 0.0407 (8) | −0.0047 (6) | 0.0032 (6) | 0.0029 (6) |
C1 | 0.0357 (9) | 0.0485 (9) | 0.0387 (8) | −0.0044 (7) | 0.0076 (6) | −0.0030 (6) |
C4 | 0.0339 (8) | 0.0545 (9) | 0.0390 (9) | 0.0035 (7) | 0.0058 (6) | 0.0048 (6) |
C3 | 0.0449 (9) | 0.0372 (8) | 0.0352 (8) | 0.0099 (6) | 0.0067 (6) | −0.0017 (6) |
O1—N3 | 1.2305 (18) | C2—C1 | 1.481 (2) |
N1—C4 | 1.135 (2) | C1—H1A | 0.9700 |
N2—C2 | 1.136 (2) | C1—H1B | 0.9700 |
N3—N4 | 1.3233 (18) | C4—C3 | 1.464 (2) |
N4—C1 | 1.4516 (18) | C3—H3B | 0.9700 |
N4—C3 | 1.4539 (17) | C3—H3C | 0.9700 |
O1—N3—N4 | 113.89 (13) | C2—C1—H1B | 109.2 |
N3—N4—C1 | 115.67 (12) | H1A—C1—H1B | 107.9 |
N3—N4—C3 | 121.36 (12) | N1—C4—C3 | 178.53 (19) |
C1—N4—C3 | 122.83 (12) | N4—C3—C4 | 112.80 (12) |
N2—C2—C1 | 178.83 (17) | N4—C3—H3B | 109.0 |
N4—C1—C2 | 111.97 (13) | C4—C3—H3B | 109.0 |
N4—C1—H1A | 109.2 | N4—C3—H3C | 109.0 |
C2—C1—H1A | 109.2 | C4—C3—H3C | 109.0 |
N4—C1—H1B | 109.2 | H3B—C3—H3C | 107.8 |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C3—H3B···N2i | 0.97 | 2.50 | 3.450 (2) | 165 |
C3—H3C···N1ii | 0.97 | 2.62 | 3.183 (2) | 117 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H4N4O |
Mr | 124.11 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.5622 (13), 8.9765 (18), 11.008 (4) |
β (°) | 108.55 (3) |
V (Å3) | 614.7 (3) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.10 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku Mercury2 |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.742, 1.000 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 6154, 1408, 1094 |
Rint | 0.059 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.050, 0.162, 1.05 |
No. of reflections | 1408 |
No. of parameters | 83 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.20, −0.20 |
Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C3—H3B···N2i | 0.97 | 2.50 | 3.450 (2) | 165 |
C3—H3C···N1ii | 0.97 | 2.62 | 3.183 (2) | 117 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2. |
At present, much attention in the field of ferroelectric materials is focused on developing ferroelectric organic or inorganic compounds (Haertling et al., 1999; Homes et al., 2001). It has been reported that N,N-bis(cyanomethyl)nitramide crystallizes in space group (C 2) at room temperature (Adolf et al., 1996), a noncentrosymmetric space group is required for ferroelectric behavior. Its ferroelectric property still needs to be further confirmed by many experiments, such as dielectric measurements and DSC to varify the permittivity anomaly, phase transition, etc. For this reason, we have synthesized the title compound to investigate its physical properties. The dielectric constant of the title compound as a function of temperature indicates that the permittivity is basically temperature-independent (dielectric constant = 3.2 to 5.6), suggesting that this compound should not be a real ferroelectric or there may be no distinct phase transition within the measured temperature range. Similarly, below the melting point (308 K) of the compound, the dielectric constant as a function of temperature also goes smoothly, and there is no dielectric anomaly observed. Herein, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound.
The bond distances and bond angles in the title compound agree very well with the corresponding distances and angles reported for a closely related compound (Kaida et al., 1990); both cyanic groups are linear (Fig. 1). It is interesting to note that both H-atoms bonded to only one methylene carbon (C3) are involved in hydrogen bonding interactions of the type C—H···N, C3—H3B···N2 hydrogen bonds result in dimers of the title molecule lying about inversion centers in R22(12) motifs in graph set notation (Bernstein et al., 1994) while C3—H3C···N1 interactions result in chains of molecules lying along the c-axis (Tab. 1, Fig. 2). Dipole–dipole and van der Waals interactions are effective in the molecular packing.