Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, NH4+·C7H7O4S, is featureless [the methoxy C atom deviating 0.173 (6) Å from the phenyl mean plane] with inter­atomic distances and angles in the expected ranges. The main feature of inter­est is the packing mode. Hydro­philic (SO3 and NH4) and hydro­phobic (PhOCH3) parts in the structure segregate, the former inter­acting through a dense hydrogen-bonding scheme, leading to a well connected two-dimensional structure parallel to (100) and the latter hydro­phobic groups acting as spacers for an inter­planar separation of c/2 = 10.205 (2) Å. In spite of being aligned along [110], the benzene rings stack in a far from parallel fashion [viz. consecutive ring centers determine a broken line with a 164.72 (12)° zigzag angle], thus preventing any possible π–π inter­action.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812028103/qm2074sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812028103/qm2074Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

cml

Chemical Markup Language (CML) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812028103/qm2074Isup3.cml
Supplementary material

CCDC reference: 889869

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.042
  • wR factor = 0.119
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.8

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported MoietyFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds ............... 0.0042 Ang PLAT912_ALERT_4_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 2 PLAT915_ALERT_3_C Low Friedel Pair Coverage ...................... 87 Perc.
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 26.22 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1732 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1095 Completeness (_total/calc) 158.17% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 637 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.582 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT002_ALERT_2_G Number of Distance or Angle Restraints on AtSite 5 PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in CIF .... ? PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 21
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 0 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 4 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 4 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The study of supramolecular systems determined by weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking or dipole- dipole interactions have been, and currently are, active fields of structural research due to their implications in crystal engineering, self-assembly and, above all, biological systems (Desiraju, 2007). Derivatives of the benzenesulfonate anion are extremely suited to this end due to the possibility of π-interactions between arene rings, as well as hydrogen bonding between the sulphonate groups and any H donor eventualy available (Water, ammonium, etc). With this latter NH4 partner a number a structures of the sort have been published (among many others, ammonium p-toluenesulfonate, Fewings et al., 2001, (II); ammonium 4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate, Wang et al., 2007, (III), etc), the vast majority displaying, as expected, an extremely complex non-bonding interactions scheme. We present herein one further member in this family, ammonium 4-methoxybenzenesulfonate, C7H7O4S.H4N (I), which ended up being isotructural to (II) but different from (III), in spite of the very similar formulations.

The molecular structure in (I) (Fig 1) is featureless, with interatomic bond and angles in the expected ranges, and its main interest resides in the packing mode. Hydrophilic (SO3, NH4) and hydrophobic (PhOCH3) parts in the structure segregate, the former one interacting through a dense H-bonding scheme (Table 1) leading to a well connected two-dimensional structure, parallell to (100) (Fig 2a) and the latter hydrophobic groups acting as spacers (Figs 2 b, 2c), for an interplanar separation of C/2 = 10.205 (2) Å. In spite of the deceiving views in Figs 2 b/2c, Ph groups stack in a far from paralell fashion, defining dihedral angles of 37° and thus preventing any possible ππ interaction.

Related literature top

For literature on the role of weak interactions in supramolecular structures, see: Desiraju (2007). For related structures see: Fewings et al. (2001); Wang et al. (2007). For the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002). For the synthesis, see: Porcheddu et al. (2009).

Experimental top

The title compound was obtained as a byproduct in the synthesis of N-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide, following the procedure described in Porcheddu et al., 2009. A few light yellow crystals were obtained after evaporating an acetonitrile solution.

Refinement top

All H atoms were found in a difference map, though treated differently in refinement: C—H atoms were idealized and allowed to ride, with displacement parameters taken as Uiso(H) = X × Ueq(C) [(CH)methyl = 0.96 A°, X = 1.5; (C—H)arom = 0.93 A°, X = 1.2] (CH3 groups were also free to rotate as well). Ammonium H's were refined with restrained N—H = 0.85 (1) Å, H···H = 1.35 (2) Å distances and free isotropic displacement factors.

Structure description top

The study of supramolecular systems determined by weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking or dipole- dipole interactions have been, and currently are, active fields of structural research due to their implications in crystal engineering, self-assembly and, above all, biological systems (Desiraju, 2007). Derivatives of the benzenesulfonate anion are extremely suited to this end due to the possibility of π-interactions between arene rings, as well as hydrogen bonding between the sulphonate groups and any H donor eventualy available (Water, ammonium, etc). With this latter NH4 partner a number a structures of the sort have been published (among many others, ammonium p-toluenesulfonate, Fewings et al., 2001, (II); ammonium 4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate, Wang et al., 2007, (III), etc), the vast majority displaying, as expected, an extremely complex non-bonding interactions scheme. We present herein one further member in this family, ammonium 4-methoxybenzenesulfonate, C7H7O4S.H4N (I), which ended up being isotructural to (II) but different from (III), in spite of the very similar formulations.

The molecular structure in (I) (Fig 1) is featureless, with interatomic bond and angles in the expected ranges, and its main interest resides in the packing mode. Hydrophilic (SO3, NH4) and hydrophobic (PhOCH3) parts in the structure segregate, the former one interacting through a dense H-bonding scheme (Table 1) leading to a well connected two-dimensional structure, parallell to (100) (Fig 2a) and the latter hydrophobic groups acting as spacers (Figs 2 b, 2c), for an interplanar separation of C/2 = 10.205 (2) Å. In spite of the deceiving views in Figs 2 b/2c, Ph groups stack in a far from paralell fashion, defining dihedral angles of 37° and thus preventing any possible ππ interaction.

For literature on the role of weak interactions in supramolecular structures, see: Desiraju (2007). For related structures see: Fewings et al. (2001); Wang et al. (2007). For the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002). For the synthesis, see: Porcheddu et al. (2009).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Ellipsoid plot of (I), drawn with displacement factors at a 50% probability level. Symmetry codes: (i) x - 1, y, z; (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 1; (iii) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, -z + 1.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing views of (I). a) Projection paralell to (001) showing the hydrophilic part only and the H-bonding interactions taking place therein. Symmetry codes: as in Fig 1. b) A packing view with the whole structure, projected down [100]. Hydrophilic/hydrophobic parts (seen in projection) drawn in heavy/weak lining, respectively. c) Same as b) viewed along [010].
Ammonium 4-methoxybenzenesulfonate top
Crystal data top
NH4+·C7H7O4SF(000) = 432
Mr = 205.23Dx = 1.494 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2823 reflections
a = 6.2664 (12) Åθ = 2.1–25.9°
b = 7.1342 (12) ŵ = 0.34 mm1
c = 20.410 (2) ÅT = 298 K
V = 912.4 (2) Å3Blocks, yellow
Z = 40.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
diffractometer
1548 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.050
ω scans, thick slicesθmax = 26.2°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
h = 76
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.965k = 88
4265 measured reflectionsl = 2025
1732 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.119 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0842P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1732 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
135 parametersΔρmin = 0.36 e Å3
21 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 637 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.11 (14)
Crystal data top
NH4+·C7H7O4SV = 912.4 (2) Å3
Mr = 205.23Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 6.2664 (12) ŵ = 0.34 mm1
b = 7.1342 (12) ÅT = 298 K
c = 20.410 (2) Å0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
diffractometer
1732 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
1548 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.965Rint = 0.050
4265 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.119Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
S = 1.04Δρmin = 0.36 e Å3
1732 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 637 Friedel pairs
135 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.11 (14)
21 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.95549 (11)0.47643 (10)0.59811 (3)0.0305 (2)
O11.1864 (3)0.4832 (4)0.59781 (11)0.0483 (6)
O20.8694 (4)0.3085 (3)0.56840 (11)0.0422 (6)
O30.8578 (4)0.6413 (3)0.56824 (11)0.0379 (6)
O40.7122 (4)0.4778 (4)0.87726 (9)0.0426 (6)
C10.8765 (4)0.4753 (4)0.68155 (13)0.0295 (6)
C20.6702 (4)0.5282 (5)0.69849 (13)0.0324 (6)
H20.57340.56160.66600.039*
C30.6087 (4)0.5311 (5)0.76355 (13)0.0338 (6)
H30.47130.56770.77510.041*
C40.7550 (5)0.4783 (4)0.81175 (13)0.0324 (6)
C50.9583 (6)0.4232 (4)0.79423 (15)0.0375 (7)
H51.05440.38630.82650.045*
C61.0207 (5)0.4223 (4)0.72898 (14)0.0335 (6)
H61.15830.38640.71740.040*
C70.5125 (6)0.5513 (6)0.89746 (15)0.0498 (8)
H7A0.50910.55980.94440.075*
H7B0.40010.47000.88280.075*
H7C0.49310.67370.87890.075*
N10.4879 (3)0.5244 (3)0.49420 (10)0.0264 (5)
H1N0.391 (3)0.526 (4)0.5251 (9)0.034 (8)*
H2N0.463 (5)0.619 (3)0.4678 (12)0.068 (13)*
H3N0.612 (3)0.542 (5)0.5125 (10)0.039 (9)*
H4N0.484 (5)0.421 (3)0.4729 (13)0.069 (14)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0297 (3)0.0358 (3)0.0261 (3)0.0015 (3)0.0015 (3)0.0013 (3)
O10.0310 (11)0.0745 (17)0.0394 (12)0.0018 (12)0.0032 (9)0.0021 (15)
O20.0533 (16)0.0399 (12)0.0336 (12)0.0030 (10)0.0042 (12)0.0044 (10)
O30.0454 (13)0.0370 (11)0.0313 (12)0.0024 (10)0.0004 (11)0.0042 (10)
O40.0491 (12)0.0521 (13)0.0265 (10)0.0068 (12)0.0010 (9)0.0003 (11)
C10.0305 (12)0.0307 (13)0.0273 (13)0.0035 (12)0.0009 (11)0.0001 (12)
C20.0300 (13)0.0393 (14)0.0279 (13)0.0026 (13)0.0045 (11)0.0008 (14)
C30.0286 (13)0.0402 (15)0.0327 (14)0.0001 (12)0.0023 (11)0.0037 (14)
C40.0390 (14)0.0313 (13)0.0268 (13)0.0036 (13)0.0006 (11)0.0015 (13)
C50.0416 (16)0.0377 (15)0.0331 (15)0.0081 (14)0.0069 (14)0.0024 (12)
C60.0331 (15)0.0333 (13)0.0342 (14)0.0060 (12)0.0021 (12)0.0019 (11)
C70.0438 (17)0.076 (2)0.0292 (15)0.0005 (18)0.0048 (14)0.0050 (17)
N10.0247 (10)0.0303 (10)0.0241 (10)0.0038 (9)0.0026 (9)0.0019 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O21.447 (2)C4—C51.380 (4)
S1—O11.448 (2)C5—C61.388 (4)
S1—O31.459 (2)C5—H50.9300
S1—C11.773 (3)C6—H60.9300
O4—C41.364 (3)C7—H7A0.9600
O4—C71.418 (4)C7—H7B0.9600
C1—C61.377 (4)C7—H7C0.9600
C1—C21.390 (4)N1—H1N0.876 (15)
C2—C31.383 (4)N1—H2N0.877 (16)
C2—H20.9300N1—H3N0.873 (16)
C3—C41.396 (4)N1—H4N0.858 (16)
C3—H30.9300
O2—S1—O1113.48 (17)C4—C5—C6120.7 (3)
O2—S1—O3109.62 (13)C4—C5—H5119.7
O1—S1—O3112.99 (16)C6—C5—H5119.7
O2—S1—C1107.15 (14)C1—C6—C5119.2 (3)
O1—S1—C1106.45 (13)C1—C6—H6120.4
O3—S1—C1106.71 (14)C5—C6—H6120.4
C4—O4—C7117.2 (2)O4—C7—H7A109.5
C6—C1—C2120.6 (3)O4—C7—H7B109.5
C6—C1—S1119.6 (2)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C1—S1119.8 (2)O4—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C2—C1120.1 (3)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C2—H2119.9H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—H2119.9H1N—N1—H2N108 (3)
C2—C3—C4119.3 (3)H1N—N1—H3N108 (3)
C2—C3—H3120.4H2N—N1—H3N108 (3)
C4—C3—H3120.4H1N—N1—H4N111 (3)
O4—C4—C5115.8 (3)H2N—N1—H4N110 (3)
O4—C4—C3124.2 (3)H3N—N1—H4N111 (3)
C5—C4—C3120.0 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.88 (2)1.99 (2)2.851 (3)170 (3)
N1—H4N···O2ii0.86 (2)1.98 (2)2.797 (3)160 (3)
N1—H2N···O3iii0.88 (2)1.98 (2)2.824 (3)162 (3)
N1—H3N···O30.87 (2)2.04 (2)2.890 (3)164 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaNH4+·C7H7O4S
Mr205.23
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)6.2664 (12), 7.1342 (12), 20.410 (2)
V3)912.4 (2)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.34
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax0.958, 0.965
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4265, 1732, 1548
Rint0.050
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.622
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.119, 1.04
No. of reflections1732
No. of parameters135
No. of restraints21
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.47, 0.36
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 637 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.11 (14)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.876 (15)1.985 (17)2.851 (3)170 (3)
N1—H4N···O2ii0.858 (16)1.977 (18)2.797 (3)160 (3)
N1—H2N···O3iii0.877 (16)1.976 (18)2.824 (3)162 (3)
N1—H3N···O30.873 (16)2.040 (17)2.890 (3)164 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds