Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810030308/tk2694sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810030308/tk2694Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 792379
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 150 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.025
- wR factor = 0.070
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 32.9
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT910_ALERT_3_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Below Th(Min) ..... 1
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 36.29 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 2535 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1486 Completeness (_total/calc) 170.59% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1049 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.706 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
Author Response: A total number of 1051 estimated Friedel pairs have not been merged and were used as independent data for the overall structure refinement. |
PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 7
Author Response: Please see the dedicated experimental section in the main paper for further details on the structure solution and refinement. |
PLAT791_ALERT_4_G Note: The Model has Chirality at C1 (Verify) R
Author Response: The chirality of the indicated carbon atoms is correct. |
PLAT850_ALERT_4_G Check Flack Parameter Exact Value 0.00 and su .. 0.08
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
checkCIF publication errors
Alert level A PUBL024_ALERT_1_A The number of authors is greater than 5. Please specify the role of each of the co-authors for your paper.
Author Response: This crystallographic communication results from a research effort which involves three distinct research groups from two Research Units. Thus, all researchers contribute either with their work and/or financial support, hence the presence of more than five authors, of which four are supervisors. All authors contributed actively in the exchange of ideas and in the writing up of this short crystallographic communication. |
1 ALERT level A = Data missing that is essential or data in wrong format 0 ALERT level G = General alerts. Data that may be required is missing
The title compound was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (>97.0%, Fluka) and was used as received without purification. Suitable single crystals were grown from an aqueous solution over a period of two weeks.
1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, D2O) δ: 1.27 (dd, 3H, J(1H-1H) = 7.3 Hz and J(1H-31P)= 14.8 Hz, CH3) and 3.19 (dq, 1H, J(1H-1H)= 7.3 Hz and J(1H-31P) = 12.7 Hz, CH).
13C-NMR (75.47 MHz, D2O) δ: 16.4 (d, J(13C-31P) = 2.6 Hz,CH3) and 47.6 (d, J(13C-31P) = 145.1 Hz,CH).
31P-NMR (121.49 MHz, D2O) δ: 14.8 (dq, J(31P-1H) = 13.8 and 14.6 Hz).
Hydrogen atoms bound to carbon were located at their idealized positions and were included in the final model in the riding-motion approximation with C—H = 1.00 Å (tertiary C—H) or 0.98 Å (–CH3). The isotropic thermal displacement parameters for these atoms were fixed at 1.2 (for methine-H) or 1.5 (methyl-H) times Ueq of the respective parent atom.
Hydrogen atoms associated with the protonated —NH3+ group or the pendant —OH moiety were located from difference Fourier maps and were included in the final model with the distances restrained to 0.95 (1) Å and Uiso=1.5×Ueq of the respective parent atom. The H···H distances of the —NH3+ terminal group were further restrained to 1.55 (1) Å in order to ensure a chemically reasonable geometry for this moiety.
The title compound, R-1-aminoethylphosphonic acid (C2H8NO3P), is the phosphonic analogue of the amino acid alanine and, therefore, it is commonly represented as L-Ala-P (Au et al., 2008). It presents antibacterial activity (Allen et al., 1979) and it has been employed as inhibitor in the crystallization of the enzyme alanine racemase from Bacillus anthracis (Au et al., 2008). Remarkably, only two coordination compounds containing L-Ala-P as ligand are known, namely a racemic coordination polymer of zinc (Cui et al., 2006) and a chiral molybdenum cluster (Carraro et al., 2008). Following our interest in the use of phosphonic acid molecules in the construction of multi-dimensional coordination polymers (Cunha-Silva, Ananias et al., 2009; Cunha-Silva, Lima et al., 2009; Shi, Cunha-Silva et al., 2008; Shi, Trindade et al., 2008), herein we wish to describe the crystal structure of the title compound.
The title compound crystallises in its zwitterionic form in which the acidic phosphonate moiety donates one proton to the amino group (Fig. 1). Individual molecular units are disposed in a zigzag fashion along the [100] direction of the unit cell, leading to the formation of a supramolecular chain held together by a combination of the inner ···O1···H1—N1+—H3··· hydrogen bonds [graph set motif C12(4), Grell et al. (1999) - green dashed bonds in Fig. 2], and the outer isolated O2—H4···O3 interactions (violet dashed bonds in Fig. 2). Supramolecular chains are in turn interconnected in the bc plane via the remnant N1+—H2···O2 hydrogen bonds as depicted in Fig. 3 (orange dashed lines). It is noteworthy that all hydrogen bonding interactions are rather strong and directional: while the internuclear D···A distances range from 2.5484 (10) to 2.8369 (12) Å, the 〈(DHA) are all greater than 157°. As depicted in Fig. 3, the crystal packing promotes a close proximity between the substituent —CH3 groups which point toward each other.
For the antibacterial activity of the title compound, see: Allen et al. (1979). For the use of the title compound as a co-crystallizing inhibitor on the X-ray structure of the alanine racemase from Bacillus anthracis, a potential anti-anthrax drug target, see: Au et al. (2008). For examples of coordination compounds of the title compound, see: Cui et al. (2006); Carraro et al. (2008). For a description of the graph-set notation for hydrogen-bonded aggregates, see: Grell et al. (1999). For previous work from our research group on the assembly of coordination polymers using phosphonic-based molecules, see: Cunha-Silva, Ananias et al. (2009); Cunha-Silva, Lima et al. (2009); Shi, Cunha-Silva et al. (2008); Shi, Trindade et al. (2008).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
C2H8NO3P | F(000) = 264 |
Mr = 125.06 | Dx = 1.583 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 3869 reflections |
a = 4.8256 (1) Å | θ = 2.8–35.9° |
b = 10.3928 (3) Å | µ = 0.42 mm−1 |
c = 10.4668 (3) Å | T = 150 K |
V = 524.93 (2) Å3 | Prism, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.12 × 0.08 × 0.04 mm |
Bruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII diffractometer | 2535 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 2362 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.027 |
ω and phi scans | θmax = 36.3°, θmin = 3.9° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997) | h = −7→8 |
Tmin = 0.951, Tmax = 0.983 | k = −16→17 |
7972 measured reflections | l = −17→16 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.070 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0415P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
2535 reflections | Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 |
77 parameters | Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 |
7 restraints | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1051 Friedel pairs |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.00 (8) |
C2H8NO3P | V = 524.93 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 125.06 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 4.8256 (1) Å | µ = 0.42 mm−1 |
b = 10.3928 (3) Å | T = 150 K |
c = 10.4668 (3) Å | 0.12 × 0.08 × 0.04 mm |
Bruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII diffractometer | 2535 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997) | 2362 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.951, Tmax = 0.983 | Rint = 0.027 |
7972 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.070 | Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 |
S = 1.07 | Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 |
2535 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1051 Friedel pairs |
77 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.00 (8) |
7 restraints |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
P1 | 0.12299 (5) | 0.08570 (2) | 0.11153 (2) | 0.01023 (6) | |
O1 | 0.15178 (17) | 0.13133 (7) | −0.02404 (7) | 0.01436 (13) | |
O2 | 0.33072 (15) | −0.02579 (7) | 0.14607 (8) | 0.01551 (14) | |
H4 | 0.512 (2) | 0.0009 (18) | 0.1437 (15) | 0.023* | |
O3 | −0.16015 (15) | 0.03922 (8) | 0.15035 (8) | 0.01671 (15) | |
N1 | 0.15332 (19) | 0.34471 (8) | 0.15951 (8) | 0.01264 (14) | |
H1 | 0.290 (2) | 0.3648 (15) | 0.0983 (11) | 0.019* | |
H2 | 0.152 (3) | 0.4080 (12) | 0.2239 (10) | 0.019* | |
H3 | −0.0211 (19) | 0.3439 (15) | 0.1171 (13) | 0.019* | |
C1 | 0.2286 (2) | 0.21731 (10) | 0.21766 (9) | 0.01326 (17) | |
H1A | 0.4352 | 0.2143 | 0.2248 | 0.016* | |
C2 | 0.1111 (4) | 0.20387 (11) | 0.35212 (10) | 0.0253 (2) | |
H2A | 0.1924 | 0.2698 | 0.4075 | 0.038* | |
H2B | 0.1557 | 0.1184 | 0.3858 | 0.038* | |
H2C | −0.0906 | 0.2148 | 0.3495 | 0.038* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
P1 | 0.00725 (9) | 0.01088 (9) | 0.01254 (9) | −0.00054 (8) | −0.00037 (8) | 0.00118 (8) |
O1 | 0.0141 (3) | 0.0168 (3) | 0.0121 (3) | −0.0005 (3) | −0.0003 (3) | 0.0012 (2) |
O2 | 0.0087 (3) | 0.0130 (3) | 0.0248 (4) | 0.0004 (2) | −0.0024 (2) | 0.0025 (3) |
O3 | 0.0076 (3) | 0.0195 (3) | 0.0229 (3) | −0.0017 (2) | 0.0002 (3) | 0.0051 (3) |
N1 | 0.0126 (3) | 0.0122 (3) | 0.0132 (3) | 0.0000 (3) | 0.0000 (3) | −0.0004 (3) |
C1 | 0.0134 (4) | 0.0137 (4) | 0.0126 (4) | −0.0001 (3) | −0.0025 (3) | 0.0011 (3) |
C2 | 0.0425 (7) | 0.0216 (5) | 0.0118 (4) | 0.0001 (5) | 0.0004 (5) | 0.0019 (4) |
P1—O1 | 1.5025 (8) | N1—H2 | 0.942 (7) |
P1—O3 | 1.5051 (8) | N1—H3 | 0.951 (7) |
P1—O2 | 1.5742 (8) | C1—C2 | 1.5238 (16) |
P1—C1 | 1.8344 (10) | C1—H1A | 1.0000 |
O2—H4 | 0.918 (9) | C2—H2A | 0.9800 |
N1—C1 | 1.5018 (13) | C2—H2B | 0.9800 |
N1—H1 | 0.943 (8) | C2—H2C | 0.9800 |
O1—P1—O3 | 116.12 (4) | N1—C1—C2 | 111.41 (9) |
O1—P1—O2 | 112.98 (4) | N1—C1—P1 | 110.17 (6) |
O3—P1—O2 | 106.25 (4) | C2—C1—P1 | 112.80 (8) |
O1—P1—C1 | 108.11 (5) | N1—C1—H1A | 107.4 |
O3—P1—C1 | 109.15 (5) | C2—C1—H1A | 107.4 |
O2—P1—C1 | 103.46 (4) | P1—C1—H1A | 107.4 |
P1—O2—H4 | 112.2 (12) | C1—C2—H2A | 109.5 |
C1—N1—H1 | 107.5 (10) | C1—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
C1—N1—H2 | 109.1 (9) | H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
H1—N1—H2 | 109.6 (9) | C1—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
C1—N1—H3 | 113.3 (10) | H2A—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
H1—N1—H3 | 107.7 (9) | H2B—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
H2—N1—H3 | 109.5 (10) | ||
O1—P1—C1—N1 | 33.30 (8) | O1—P1—C1—C2 | 158.48 (8) |
O3—P1—C1—N1 | −93.86 (7) | O3—P1—C1—C2 | 31.32 (10) |
O2—P1—C1—N1 | 153.33 (7) | O2—P1—C1—C2 | −81.49 (9) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H4···O3i | 0.92 (1) | 1.63 (1) | 2.5484 (10) | 175 (2) |
N1—H1···O1ii | 0.94 (1) | 1.91 (1) | 2.8033 (11) | 157 (1) |
N1—H2···O3iii | 0.94 (1) | 1.90 (1) | 2.8369 (12) | 178 (1) |
N1—H3···O1iv | 0.95 (1) | 1.87 (1) | 2.8160 (12) | 171 (1) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C2H8NO3P |
Mr | 125.06 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, P212121 |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, b, c (Å) | 4.8256 (1), 10.3928 (3), 10.4668 (3) |
V (Å3) | 524.93 (2) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.42 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.12 × 0.08 × 0.04 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.951, 0.983 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 7972, 2535, 2362 |
Rint | 0.027 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.833 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.025, 0.070, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 2535 |
No. of parameters | 77 |
No. of restraints | 7 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.50, −0.26 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 1051 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.00 (8) |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2006), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H4···O3i | 0.918 (9) | 1.633 (9) | 2.5484 (10) | 174.7 (17) |
N1—H1···O1ii | 0.943 (8) | 1.911 (8) | 2.8033 (11) | 157.0 (14) |
N1—H2···O3iii | 0.942 (7) | 1.895 (8) | 2.8369 (12) | 177.6 (14) |
N1—H3···O1iv | 0.951 (7) | 1.873 (8) | 2.8160 (12) | 170.7 (14) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z. |
The title compound, R-1-aminoethylphosphonic acid (C2H8NO3P), is the phosphonic analogue of the amino acid alanine and, therefore, it is commonly represented as L-Ala-P (Au et al., 2008). It presents antibacterial activity (Allen et al., 1979) and it has been employed as inhibitor in the crystallization of the enzyme alanine racemase from Bacillus anthracis (Au et al., 2008). Remarkably, only two coordination compounds containing L-Ala-P as ligand are known, namely a racemic coordination polymer of zinc (Cui et al., 2006) and a chiral molybdenum cluster (Carraro et al., 2008). Following our interest in the use of phosphonic acid molecules in the construction of multi-dimensional coordination polymers (Cunha-Silva, Ananias et al., 2009; Cunha-Silva, Lima et al., 2009; Shi, Cunha-Silva et al., 2008; Shi, Trindade et al., 2008), herein we wish to describe the crystal structure of the title compound.
The title compound crystallises in its zwitterionic form in which the acidic phosphonate moiety donates one proton to the amino group (Fig. 1). Individual molecular units are disposed in a zigzag fashion along the [100] direction of the unit cell, leading to the formation of a supramolecular chain held together by a combination of the inner ···O1···H1—N1+—H3··· hydrogen bonds [graph set motif C12(4), Grell et al. (1999) - green dashed bonds in Fig. 2], and the outer isolated O2—H4···O3 interactions (violet dashed bonds in Fig. 2). Supramolecular chains are in turn interconnected in the bc plane via the remnant N1+—H2···O2 hydrogen bonds as depicted in Fig. 3 (orange dashed lines). It is noteworthy that all hydrogen bonding interactions are rather strong and directional: while the internuclear D···A distances range from 2.5484 (10) to 2.8369 (12) Å, the 〈(DHA) are all greater than 157°. As depicted in Fig. 3, the crystal packing promotes a close proximity between the substituent —CH3 groups which point toward each other.