Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean
(Mn-O) = 0.006 Å
- R factor = 0.024
- wR factor = 0.048
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.8
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level A
PLAT113_ALERT_2_A ADDSYM Suggests Possible Pseudo/New Space-group. P63/mmc
| Author Response: Have checked and our space group is correct.
|
PLAT731_ALERT_1_A Bond Calc 1.470(9), Rep 1.4697(11) ...... 8 su-Ra
S -O2 1.555 3.565 # 15
| Author Response: Our data come directly from SHELX97, which is the most commonly used.
|
PLAT923_ALERT_1_A S values in the CIF and FCF Differ by ....... -0.071
| Author Response: a different weighting scheme definituion as used by SHELX and PLATON
could be responsible for the difference
|
Alert level B
PLAT111_ALERT_2_B ADDSYM Detects (Pseudo) Centre of Symmetry ..... 100 PerFi
PLAT112_ALERT_2_B ADDSYM Detects Additional (Pseudo) Symm. Elem... 6
PLAT112_ALERT_2_B ADDSYM Detects Additional (Pseudo) Symm. Elem... m
PLAT112_ALERT_2_B ADDSYM Detects Additional (Pseudo) Symm. Elem... m
PLAT112_ALERT_2_B ADDSYM Detects Additional (Pseudo) Symm. Elem... m
PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 1.915(7), Rep 1.9149(11) ...... 6 su-Ra
MN -OH3 1.555 3.665 # 1
| Author Response: Our data come directly from SHELX97, which is the most commonly used.
|
PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 1.915(7), Rep 1.9149(11) ...... 6 su-Ra
MN -OH3 1.555 8.455 # 2
| Author Response: Our data come directly from SHELX97, which is the most commonly used.
|
PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 1.915(6), Rep 1.9149(11) ...... 6 su-Ra
MN -OH3 1.555 7.545 # 5
| Author Response: Our data come directly from SHELX97, which is the most commonly used.
|
PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 1.915(7), Rep 1.9149(11) ...... 6 su-Ra
MN -OH3 1.555 9.665 # 6
| Author Response: Our data come directly from SHELX97, which is the most commonly used.
|
PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 1.470(5), Rep 1.4697(11) ...... 5 su-Ra
S -O2 1.555 2.665 # 16
| Author Response: Our data come directly from SHELX97, which is the most commonly used.
|
PLAT737_ALERT_1_B D...A Calc 2.819(8), Rep 2.8193(16) ...... 5.0 su-Ra
OH3 -O2 1.555 9.655 # 18
PLAT737_ALERT_1_B D...A Calc 2.789(9), Rep 2.7892(18) ...... 5.0 su-Ra
OW4 -O1 1.555 7.555 # 18
Alert level C
STRVA01_ALERT_4_C Flack test results are meaningless.
From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack 0.000
From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack_su 0.900
PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported MoietyFormula Strings Differ ?
PLAT735_ALERT_1_C D-H Calc 0.76(5), Rep 0.75(2) ...... 3 su-Ra
OH3 -H1 1.555 1.555 # 18
PLAT735_ALERT_1_C D-H Calc 0.77(5), Rep 0.77(2) ...... 3 su-Ra
OW4 -H2 1.555 1.555 # 18
PLAT736_ALERT_1_C H...A Calc 2.10(8), Rep 2.10(2) ...... 4.0 su-Ra
H2 -O1 1.555 7.555 # 18
PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.600 2
PLAT912_ALERT_4_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 4
PLAT922_ALERT_1_C wR2 in the CIF and FCF Differ by ............... 0.0038
PLAT927_ALERT_1_C Reported and Calculated wR2 Differ by ......... 0.0033
Alert level G
REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is
correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the
_publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF.
From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 32.63
From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 871
Count of symmetry unique reflns 515
Completeness (_total/calc) 169.13%
TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure
Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 356
Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.691
Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
PLAT004_ALERT_5_G Info: Polymeric Structure Found with Dimension . 1
PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in CIF .... ?
PLAT032_ALERT_4_G Std. Uncertainty on Flack Parameter Value High . 0.900
PLAT152_ALERT_1_G The Supplied and Calc. Volume s.u. Differ by ... 3 Units
PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K
PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature 293 K
PLAT720_ALERT_4_G Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Labels .......... 2
PLAT850_ALERT_4_G Check Flack Parameter Exact Value 0.00 and su .. 0.90
PLAT916_ALERT_2_G Hooft y and Flack x Parameter values differ by . 0.51
3 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain
12 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully
9 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight
10 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected
18 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
7 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
6 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
2 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
The despujolsite specimen used in this study is from N'Chwaning III mine,
Kalahari Manganese field, Northern Cape Province, South Africa and is in the
collection of the RRUFF project (deposition No. R100208; http://rruff.info).
The composition was determined with a CAMECA SX100 electron microprobe
(http://rruff.info) on a single-crystal from the same parent sample as the
crystal used for the collection of X-ray diffraction intensity data. Electron
microprobe analysis (15 points) with a 15 K eV accelerating voltage, 20 nA
beam current, and a 5 µm beam size yielded an empirical chemical formula
Ca3.45Mn4+0.86(S0.96O4)2(OH)6.3H2O (based on 11 O atoms).
Because despujolsite crystals are not stable under the electron beam, which
has also been observed by Gaudefroy et al. (1968), the electron
microprobe data were used only for the estimation of cation ratios. The actual
composition was determined by a combination of microprobe and X-ray structural
analyses. Details of the sample chemistry and structural formula calculations
can be found on the RRUFF Project website (http://rruff.info/R100208).
The H atoms were located from difference Fourier maps and their positions were
refined with isotropic displacement parameters. The final refinement assumed
an ideal chemistry, as the overall effects of the trace amount of Fe and Si on
the final structure results are negligible. The highest residual peak in the
difference Fourier maps was located 0.66 Å from O1, and the deepest hole was
located 0.40 Å from Mn.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008b); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008b); molecular graphics: XtalDraw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b).
tricalcium manganese bis(sulfate) hexahydroxide trihydrate
top
Crystal data top
Ca3Mn(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O | Dx = 2.546 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 523.40 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hexagonal, P62c | Cell parameters from 1145 reflections |
Hall symbol: P -6c -2c | θ = 2.8–32.0° |
a = 8.5405 (5) Å | µ = 2.49 mm−1 |
c = 10.8094 (9) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 682.81 (8) Å3 | Euhedral, yellow |
Z = 2 | 0.07 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm |
F(000) = 530 | |
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 871 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 758 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.051 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 32.6°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a) | h = −12→11 |
Tmin = 0.845, Tmax = 0.907 | k = −12→12 |
6018 measured reflections | l = −16→15 |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | All H-atom parameters refined |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0113P)2 + 0.2266P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.048 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
871 reflections | Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3 |
49 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.0142 (11) |
0 constraints | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 305 Friedel pairs |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.0 (9) |
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map | |
Crystal data top
Ca3Mn(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O | Z = 2 |
Mr = 523.40 | Mo Kα radiation |
Hexagonal, P62c | µ = 2.49 mm−1 |
a = 8.5405 (5) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 10.8094 (9) Å | 0.07 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm |
V = 682.81 (8) Å3 | |
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 871 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a) | 758 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.845, Tmax = 0.907 | Rint = 0.051 |
6018 measured reflections | |
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.048 | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
S = 1.06 | Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3 |
871 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 305 Friedel pairs |
49 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.0 (9) |
0 restraints | |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
Mn | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.00846 (12) | |
Ca | 0.1521 (3) | 0.30348 (5) | 0.2500 | 0.01085 (10) | |
S | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 0.02544 (5) | 0.00936 (12) | |
O1 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | −0.11153 (15) | 0.0167 (4) | |
O2 | 0.2419 (10) | 0.47842 (15) | 0.06891 (10) | 0.0188 (3) | |
OH3 | 0.8945 (8) | 0.0966 (8) | 0.11070 (10) | 0.0109 (3) | |
OW4 | 0.5006 (12) | 0.4853 (12) | 0.2500 | 0.0171 (5) | |
H1 | 0.836 (6) | 0.125 (6) | 0.076 (2) | 0.026 (8)* | |
H2 | 0.521 (9) | 0.445 (9) | 0.193 (2) | 0.046 (10)* | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
Mn | 0.00919 (15) | 0.00919 (15) | 0.0070 (2) | 0.00460 (8) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Ca | 0.0137 (10) | 0.00918 (19) | 0.00980 (16) | 0.0058 (10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
S | 0.01001 (16) | 0.01001 (16) | 0.0081 (2) | 0.00501 (8) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0213 (6) | 0.0213 (6) | 0.0075 (7) | 0.0107 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.027 (3) | 0.0106 (5) | 0.0170 (5) | 0.008 (2) | 0.004 (3) | 0.0033 (4) |
OH3 | 0.0084 (15) | 0.0148 (19) | 0.0107 (4) | 0.0067 (6) | −0.0006 (16) | −0.0004 (16) |
OW4 | 0.019 (2) | 0.023 (2) | 0.0136 (6) | 0.0138 (12) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mn—OH3i | 1.9149 (11) | Ca—OH3viii | 2.456 (5) |
Mn—OH3ii | 1.9149 (11) | Ca—OH3iii | 2.518 (5) |
Mn—OH3iii | 1.9149 (11) | Ca—OH3ix | 2.518 (5) |
Mn—OH3iv | 1.9149 (11) | Ca—OW4 | 2.578 (9) |
Mn—OH3v | 1.9149 (11) | Ca—OW4x | 2.690 (9) |
Mn—OH3vi | 1.9149 (11) | S—O2x | 1.4697 (11) |
Ca—O2vii | 2.3465 (11) | S—O2xi | 1.4697 (11) |
Ca—O2 | 2.3465 (11) | S—O2 | 1.4697 (11) |
Ca—OH3i | 2.456 (5) | S—O1 | 1.4806 (18) |
| | | |
OH3i—Mn—OH3ii | 177.7 (4) | OH3ii—Mn—OH3vi | 85.08 (5) |
OH3i—Mn—OH3iii | 85.08 (5) | OH3iii—Mn—OH3vi | 96.5 (3) |
OH3ii—Mn—OH3iii | 93.4 (3) | OH3iv—Mn—OH3vi | 177.7 (4) |
OH3i—Mn—OH3iv | 85.08 (5) | OH3v—Mn—OH3vi | 85.08 (5) |
OH3ii—Mn—OH3iv | 96.5 (3) | O2x—S—O2xi | 110.28 (5) |
OH3iii—Mn—OH3iv | 85.08 (5) | O2x—S—O2 | 110.28 (5) |
OH3i—Mn—OH3v | 96.5 (3) | O2xi—S—O2 | 110.28 (5) |
OH3ii—Mn—OH3v | 85.08 (5) | O2x—S—O1 | 108.65 (5) |
OH3iii—Mn—OH3v | 177.7 (4) | O2xi—S—O1 | 108.65 (5) |
OH3iv—Mn—OH3v | 93.4 (3) | O2—S—O1 | 108.65 (5) |
OH3i—Mn—OH3vi | 93.4 (3) | | |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y+1, −x+1, z; (ii) x−y−1, −y, −z; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) −y, x−y−1, z; (v) y, x−1, −z; (vi) −x+1, −x+y+1, −z; (vii) x, y, −z+1/2; (viii) −x+y+1, −x+1, −z+1/2; (ix) x−1, y, −z+1/2; (x) −x+y, −x+1, z; (xi) −y+1, x−y+1, z. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
OH3—H1···O2xii | 0.75 (2) | 2.11 (2) | 2.8193 (16) | 158 (3) |
OW4—H2···O1xiii | 0.77 (2) | 2.10 (2) | 2.7892 (18) | 150 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (xii) −x+1, −x+y, −z; (xiii) y, x, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data |
Chemical formula | Ca3Mn(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O |
Mr | 523.40 |
Crystal system, space group | Hexagonal, P62c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, c (Å) | 8.5405 (5), 10.8094 (9) |
V (Å3) | 682.81 (8) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.49 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.07 × 0.06 × 0.04 |
|
Data collection |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.845, 0.907 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 6018, 871, 758 |
Rint | 0.051 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.759 |
|
Refinement |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.024, 0.048, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 871 |
No. of parameters | 49 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.45, −0.30 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 305 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.0 (9) |
Selected bond lengths (Å) topMn—OH3i | 1.9149 (11) | Ca—OW4 | 2.578 (9) |
Ca—O2ii | 2.3465 (11) | Ca—OW4iv | 2.690 (9) |
Ca—OH3i | 2.456 (5) | S—O2 | 1.4697 (11) |
Ca—OH3iii | 2.518 (5) | S—O1 | 1.4806 (18) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y+1, −x+1, z; (ii) x, y, −z+1/2; (iii) x−1, y, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+y, −x+1, z. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
OH3—H1···O2v | 0.75 (2) | 2.11 (2) | 2.8193 (16) | 158 (3) |
OW4—H2···O1vi | 0.77 (2) | 2.10 (2) | 2.7892 (18) | 150 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (v) −x+1, −x+y, −z; (vi) y, x, −z. |
Despujolsite, ideally Ca3Mn4+(SO4)2(OH)6.3H2O, is a member of the fleischerite group of minerals, which includes fleischerite, Pb3Ge(SO4)2(OH)6.3H2O, mallestigite, Pb3Sb(SO4)(AsO4)(OH)6.3H2O, and schauerteite, Ca3Ge4+(SO4)2(OH)6.3H2O. Thus far, only the structures of despujolsite and fleischerite (from a synthetic sample with the O1 site split) in this group have been determined (Gaudefroy et al., 1968; Otto, 1975), both of which were based on X-ray diffraction intensity data measured from photographs, without H atom positions located. An R-factor of 0.162 was obtained for the structure model of despujolsite (Gaudefroy et al., 1968). In our efforts to understand hydrogen bonding environments in general and the relationships in the hydrogen bonding schemes in the minerals of the fleischerite group in particular, we noted that the structural information of despujolsite needed to be improved.
The structure of despujolsite consists of layers of CaO8 polyhedra (m.. symmetry), interconnected by Mn(OH)6 octahedra (32. symmetry) and SO4 tetrahedra (3.. symmetry). The average Mn—O bond length is 1.915 Å (Table 1). Calculations of bond-valence sums using the parameters from Brese & O'Keeffe (1991) yield 3.86 (v.u.) for Mn, indicating that the assigned valence of 4+ for Mn is consistent with the structure. The average S—O bond length is 1.472 Å. Ca atoms are eight coordinated with 4 (OH)- ions, 2 H2O molecules, and 2 O atoms. The average Ca—O bond length is 2.489 Å. There are two distinct hydrogen bonds: OH3—H1···O2 and OW4—H2··· O1 (Table 2).
The isostructural mineral fleischerite was previously modeled (Otto, 1975) with a split site for the O1 position. Similarly, studies of the sulfate mineral, barite BaSO4, refined the O atoms that lie on special positions with a split atom model (Hill, 1977). However, Hill notes that there are no significant improvements in the refinement with a split-site model over the symmetry-constrained model. Further structure refinement with significantly better data by Jacobsen et al. (1998) led to a TLS (translation, libration, and screw motions) rigid body analysis (Downs, 2000) of the sulfate group. The results indicated that the SO4 group behaves as a rigid body with significant translational and librational motions, demonstrating that the O atom sites are not split and that the large sizes of the displacement parameters are due entirely to thermal motion.
In contrast to the fleischerite study, our refinement of despujolsite did not indicate a split site. A TLS analysis of the displacement parameters indicate that the SO4 group in despujolsite behaves likewise as a rigid body with a translational amplitude of 0.72 Å and a large libration angle of 7.95°. The libration angle for the SO4 group in despujolsite, which is consistent with the 7°-8° range found in celestine, anglesite, and barite, indicates that the S–O bond lengths are ~0.009Å longer than their apparent values. If the libration angle is also large in fleischerite, then this may account for the effectiveness of splitting the O1 site, but our study indicates that the O1 site in fleischerite may not actually split.