Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure of (H3O)2Cr4O13 is isotypic with K2Cr4O13. The finite tetra­chromate anion in the title structure consists of four vertex-sharing CrO4 tetra­hedra and exhibits a typical zigzag arrangement. The crystal packing is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between these anions and hydro­nium cations. The two different hydro­nium cations are surrounded by nine O atoms of tetra­chromate anions, with O...O distances ranging between 2.866 (8) and 3.282 (7) Å.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813001608/wm2714sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813001608/wm2714Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](Cr-O) = 0.005 Å
  • H-atom completeness 1%
  • R factor = 0.040
  • wR factor = 0.110
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B PLAT029_ALERT_3_B _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.946 PLAT306_ALERT_2_B Isolated Oxygen Atom (H-atoms Missing ?) ....... O1W PLAT306_ALERT_2_B Isolated Oxygen Atom (H-atoms Missing ?) ....... O2W PLAT934_ALERT_3_B Number of (Iobs-Icalc)/SigmaW .gt. 10 Outliers . 1
Alert level C CHEMW03_ALERT_2_C The ratio of given/expected molecular weight as calculated from the _atom_site* data lies outside the range 0.99 <> 1.01 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 2 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_weight 454.05 TEST: Calculate formula weight from _atom_site_* atom mass num sum O 16.00 15.00 239.99 H 1.01 0.00 0.00 Cr 52.00 4.00 207.98 Calculated formula weight 447.97 STRVA01_ALERT_4_C Flack test results are ambiguous. From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack 0.530 From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack_su 0.040 PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported SumFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT043_ALERT_1_C Check Reported Molecular Weight ................ 454.05 PLAT044_ALERT_1_C Calculated and Reported Dx Differ .............. ? PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ? PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for Cr1 PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for Cr4 PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 1 Cr4 O13 PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.600 39 PLAT915_ALERT_3_C Low Friedel Pair Coverage ...................... 78 Perc. PLAT975_ALERT_2_C Positive Residual Density at 0.97A from O1W . 0.42 eA-3 PLAT976_ALERT_2_C Negative Residual Density at 0.99A from O13 . -0.49 eA-3 PLAT976_ALERT_2_C Negative Residual Density at 0.90A from O13 . -0.48 eA-3 PLAT976_ALERT_2_C Negative Residual Density at 0.93A from O32 . -0.42 eA-3
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_1_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: H6 Cr4 O15 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:H9 Cr4 O16 FORMU01_ALERT_2_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:H6 Cr4 O15 Atom count from the _atom_site data: Cr4 O15 CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional? From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 2 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum Cr4 H6 O15 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff Cr 8.00 8.00 0.00 H 12.00 0.00 12.00 O 30.00 30.00 0.00 PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in the CIF ? PLAT042_ALERT_1_G Calc. and Reported MoietyFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT063_ALERT_4_G Crystal Size Likely too Large for Beam Size .... 1.00 mm PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature 293 K PLAT912_ALERT_4_G Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 40
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 4 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 15 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 11 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 11 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 10 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 4 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 4 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

One of the characteristic properties of the elements of group 6 of the periodic table is their ability to build anionic polyoxo compounds with the corresponding elements in high oxidation states - the so called polyoxometalates. This property is profoundly exhibited by the oxoanions of the heavier elements Mo(VI) and W(VI), whereas the respective compounds of Cr(VI), i.e. polyoxochromates, are not built readily. Despite of this fact, polyoxochromates are of chemical and industrial importance due to their high oxidation potential. Accordingly, they are used as oxidants of organic compounds (Cainelli & Cardillo, 1984) and in hexavalent chromium plating (Çengeloǧlu et al., 2003).

The title compound, (H3O)2Cr4O13, is only the fourth tetrachromate(VI) described and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction so far. The first three are salts of alkali metals, viz. the potassium (Casari & Langer, 2005), the rubidium (Löfgren, 1973), and the caesium salt (Kolitsch, 2004). (H3O)2Cr4O13 was isolated from a reaction mixture containing Na2Cr2O7, nitric acid and a large excess of CrO3 along with several possibly unrelated species.

The crystal structure of (H3O)2Cr4O13 is isotypic with that of K2Cr4O13 (Casari & Langer, 2005) and accordingly exhibits the space group Pc. The cell volume of (H3O)2(Cr4O13) is 640.80 (15) Å3 at room temperature. It exceeds the cell volume of the potassium analogue measured at 173 K by roughly 44 Å3. The finite tetrachromate anion is composed of four condensed CrO4 tetrahedra and exhibits the typical zigzag arrangement (Figs. 1,2) described by Casari & Langer (2005). The two hydronium ions have two crystallographically different positions. They interact with nine oxygen atoms of the tetrachromate anions through hydrogen bonds. Although the H atoms of the hydronium cations could not be located, the distances between the hydronium O atoms and the surrounding tetrachromate O atoms between 2.866 (8) and 3.282 (7) Å point to moderate to weak O—H···O hydrogen bonds. These distances are quite similar to the distances between O atoms of water molecules and dichromate ions in Na2Cr2O7.H2O (Casari et al., 2007) which indicates hydrogen bonds of typical strength for this class of compounds.

Related literature top

The title chromate is isotypic with its potassium analogue (Casari & Langer, 2005). Löfgren (1973) and Kolitsch (2004) determined the structures of the corresponding Rb and Cs salts, respectively. For industrial applications of tetrachromates, see: Cainelli & Cardillo (1984); Çengeloǧlu et al. (2003). For related bond-length data, see: Casari et al. (2007). For cell parameters of further isolated compounds stated in the experimental procedure, see: Durif & Averbuch-Pouchot (1978) and Rahman et al. (2003).

Experimental top

Na2Cr2O7 (26 mg, 0.1 mmol) and CrO3 (1.600 g, 16 mmol) were dissolved in 0.5 ml H2O. This solution was added to a solution of AgClO4 (22.5 mg, 0.1 mmol) and theobromine (18 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 16.5 ml of nitric acid. After 2.5 months crystals of (H3O)(ClO4) (Rahman et al., 2003) and Ag2(Cr2O7) (Durif & Averbuch-Pouchot, 1978) were isolated and characterized by X-ray difractometric unit-cell determinations. Orange-red crystals of the title compound were obtained from the mother liquor after another half year.

Refinement top

The investigated crystal was racemically twinned, similarly to the potassium compound (Casari & Langer, 2005). The refined Flack paramter indicates a twin component ratio of 53 (4):47 (4). It was not possible to unambiguously locate the H atoms of the hydronium cations. They were therefore omitted from the refinement.

Computing details top

Data collection: IPDS (Stoe & Cie, 1997); cell refinement: IPDS (Stoe & Cie, 1997); data reduction: IPDS (Stoe & Cie, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Hydrogen bonds between the hydronium ion (O1W) and the surrounding tetrachromate anions. The oxygen atom of the hydronium ion is shown with anisotropic displacement parameters at the 50% probability level. Chromate anions are shown as green-blue tetrahedra. Dashed lines denote O···O contacts between the cation and the anions.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Hydrogen bonding framework within the unit cell of the compound. See Fig. 1 for legend.
Dihydronium tetrachromate(VI) top
Crystal data top
(H3O)2Cr4O13F(000) = 444
Mr = 454.05Dx = 2.353 Mg m3
Monoclinic, PcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P -2ycCell parameters from 1754 reflections
a = 8.9765 (13) Åθ = 1.9–28.2°
b = 7.6431 (8) ŵ = 3.37 mm1
c = 9.3451 (14) ÅT = 293 K
β = 91.888 (18)°Block, orange-red
V = 640.80 (15) Å31.0 × 0.4 × 0.2 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS I
diffractometer
2696 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2497 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.040
ϕ scansθmax = 28.1°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: numerical
[X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001) and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1999)]
h = 1111
Tmin = 0.121, Tmax = 0.314k = 99
5900 measured reflectionsl = 1212
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0842P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.110Δρmax = 0.69 e Å3
S = 1.06Δρmin = 0.58 e Å3
2696 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
174 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.083 (5)
2 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1212 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.53 (4)
Crystal data top
(H3O)2Cr4O13V = 640.80 (15) Å3
Mr = 454.05Z = 2
Monoclinic, PcMo Kα radiation
a = 8.9765 (13) ŵ = 3.37 mm1
b = 7.6431 (8) ÅT = 293 K
c = 9.3451 (14) Å1.0 × 0.4 × 0.2 mm
β = 91.888 (18)°
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS I
diffractometer
2696 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
[X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001) and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1999)]
2497 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.121, Tmax = 0.314Rint = 0.040
5900 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0402 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.110Δρmax = 0.69 e Å3
S = 1.06Δρmin = 0.58 e Å3
2696 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1212 Friedel pairs
174 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.53 (4)
Special details top

Experimental. A suitable single-crystal was carefully selected under a microscope and mounted in a glass capillary. The scattering intensities were collected on an imaging plate diffractometer (IPDS I, Stoe & Cie) equipped with a fine focus sealed tube X-ray source (Mo Kα, λ = 0.71073 Å) operating at 50 kV and 40 mA. Intensity data for the title compound were collected at room temperature by ϕ-scans in 100 frames (0 < ϕ < 200°, Δϕ = 2°, exposure time of 7 min) in the 2 Θ range 3.8 to 56.3°. Structure solution and refinement were carried out using the programs SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993) and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997) embedded into WinGX program package (Farrugia, 1999). A numerical absorption correction (X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001) was applied after optimization of the crystal shape (X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1999)). The last cycles of refinement included atomic positions and anisotropic parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms. Positions of hydrogen atoms were not determined. The final difference maps were free of any chemically significant features. The refinement was based on F2 for ALL reflections.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cr20.44108 (9)1.10692 (11)1.05710 (8)0.0219 (2)
Cr10.12169 (8)0.92974 (12)1.17627 (8)0.0242 (2)
Cr30.44219 (9)1.44260 (12)0.83187 (8)0.0263 (2)
Cr40.78483 (9)1.42919 (12)0.79827 (9)0.0283 (2)
O210.4560 (6)0.9751 (8)0.9295 (4)0.0437 (12)
O310.4312 (7)1.3165 (9)0.7003 (5)0.0542 (13)
O140.2882 (5)1.0642 (5)1.1542 (4)0.0324 (9)
O330.6117 (5)1.5476 (5)0.8324 (4)0.0296 (8)
O120.1024 (6)0.7916 (8)1.0473 (6)0.0497 (12)
O220.5891 (5)1.0957 (7)1.1545 (4)0.0401 (11)
O230.4224 (5)1.3239 (6)0.9907 (4)0.0334 (9)
O430.9211 (5)1.5638 (6)0.8196 (5)0.0360 (10)
O110.0193 (5)1.0612 (6)1.1705 (5)0.0395 (11)
O130.1342 (5)0.8307 (8)1.3278 (6)0.0522 (14)
O420.7792 (7)1.3587 (12)0.6374 (7)0.074 (2)
O320.3119 (5)1.5822 (7)0.8197 (6)0.0477 (13)
O410.8015 (6)1.2744 (8)0.9121 (7)0.0595 (16)
O1W0.0967 (6)0.4158 (8)1.0652 (6)0.0469 (12)
O2W0.7959 (6)0.9005 (7)0.9169 (5)0.0456 (12)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cr20.0205 (3)0.0256 (4)0.0197 (3)0.0006 (3)0.0010 (2)0.0020 (3)
Cr10.0221 (4)0.0208 (5)0.0296 (4)0.0019 (3)0.0017 (3)0.0052 (3)
Cr30.0235 (4)0.0274 (5)0.0278 (4)0.0021 (3)0.0004 (3)0.0068 (3)
Cr40.0255 (4)0.0222 (5)0.0374 (4)0.0005 (3)0.0057 (3)0.0052 (3)
O210.047 (3)0.060 (4)0.0242 (18)0.010 (2)0.0025 (17)0.0114 (18)
O310.063 (3)0.062 (4)0.038 (2)0.024 (3)0.0033 (19)0.008 (2)
O140.034 (2)0.029 (3)0.0349 (19)0.0062 (15)0.0083 (16)0.0006 (13)
O330.0289 (19)0.024 (2)0.036 (2)0.0003 (16)0.0045 (15)0.0024 (14)
O120.048 (3)0.035 (3)0.065 (3)0.003 (2)0.004 (2)0.017 (2)
O220.027 (2)0.058 (3)0.035 (2)0.0030 (18)0.0041 (16)0.0082 (17)
O230.038 (2)0.028 (2)0.0344 (19)0.0032 (18)0.0057 (15)0.0107 (14)
O430.026 (2)0.036 (3)0.046 (2)0.0044 (15)0.0092 (17)0.0016 (16)
O110.030 (2)0.040 (3)0.049 (2)0.0044 (16)0.0039 (18)0.0018 (17)
O130.038 (2)0.061 (4)0.057 (3)0.010 (2)0.002 (2)0.034 (3)
O420.059 (4)0.092 (5)0.071 (4)0.006 (3)0.007 (3)0.047 (4)
O320.029 (3)0.057 (4)0.057 (3)0.006 (2)0.0039 (19)0.022 (2)
O410.048 (3)0.034 (3)0.097 (4)0.002 (2)0.010 (3)0.026 (3)
O1W0.044 (3)0.051 (3)0.046 (2)0.007 (2)0.0014 (19)0.0030 (19)
O2W0.043 (3)0.049 (4)0.044 (2)0.009 (2)0.0039 (19)0.0003 (19)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cr2—O211.570 (4)Cr3—O311.563 (6)
Cr2—O221.588 (4)Cr3—O321.584 (5)
Cr2—O141.701 (4)Cr3—O331.720 (5)
Cr2—O231.776 (4)Cr3—O231.754 (4)
Cr1—O131.606 (4)Cr4—O411.595 (5)
Cr1—O121.607 (5)Cr4—O421.596 (6)
Cr1—O111.615 (5)Cr4—O431.606 (5)
Cr1—O141.831 (4)Cr4—O331.836 (5)
O21—Cr2—O22108.1 (3)O32—Cr3—O33109.7 (3)
O21—Cr2—O14111.9 (2)O31—Cr3—O23110.0 (3)
O22—Cr2—O14111.0 (2)O32—Cr3—O23108.3 (2)
O21—Cr2—O23110.1 (3)O33—Cr3—O23110.7 (2)
O22—Cr2—O23108.5 (2)O41—Cr4—O42112.2 (4)
O14—Cr2—O23107.3 (2)O41—Cr4—O43109.7 (3)
O13—Cr1—O12110.7 (3)O42—Cr4—O43109.5 (4)
O13—Cr1—O11110.8 (3)O41—Cr4—O33108.1 (2)
O12—Cr1—O11108.6 (3)O42—Cr4—O33109.3 (3)
O13—Cr1—O14109.3 (2)O43—Cr4—O33108.0 (2)
O12—Cr1—O14110.6 (2)Cr2—O14—Cr1147.5 (3)
O11—Cr1—O14106.8 (2)Cr3—O33—Cr4121.6 (2)
O31—Cr3—O32109.3 (3)Cr3—O23—Cr2140.1 (3)
O31—Cr3—O33108.9 (3)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula(H3O)2Cr4O13
Mr454.05
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, Pc
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)8.9765 (13), 7.6431 (8), 9.3451 (14)
β (°) 91.888 (18)
V3)640.80 (15)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)3.37
Crystal size (mm)1.0 × 0.4 × 0.2
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe IPDS I
diffractometer
Absorption correctionNumerical
[X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001) and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1999)]
Tmin, Tmax0.121, 0.314
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5900, 2696, 2497
Rint0.040
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.663
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.040, 0.110, 1.06
No. of reflections2696
No. of parameters174
No. of restraints2
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.69, 0.58
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 1212 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.53 (4)

Computer programs: IPDS (Stoe & Cie, 1997), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2012).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds