Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813000731/wm2715sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813000731/wm2715Isup2.hkl |
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (Mo-O) = 0.001 Å
- Disorder in main residue
- R factor = 0.016
- wR factor = 0.032
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.2
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level B PLAT774_ALERT_1_B Suspect X-Y Bond in CIF: LA -- LA .. 4.01 Ang. PLAT774_ALERT_1_B Suspect X-Y Bond in CIF: LA -- LA .. 4.01 Ang. PLAT774_ALERT_1_B Suspect X-Y Bond in CIF: LA -- LA .. 4.01 Ang. PLAT774_ALERT_1_B Suspect X-Y Bond in CIF: LA -- LA .. 4.01 Ang.
Alert level C PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported SumFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ? PLAT077_ALERT_4_C Unitcell contains non-integer number of atoms .. ? PLAT906_ALERT_3_C Large K value in the Analysis of Variance ...... 6.690 PLAT906_ALERT_3_C Large K value in the Analysis of Variance ...... 3.420
Alert level G PLAT004_ALERT_5_G Info: Polymeric Structure Found with Dimension . 3 PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in the CIF ? PLAT045_ALERT_1_G Calculated and Reported Z Differ by ............ 0.25 Ratio PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature 293 K PLAT232_ALERT_2_G Hirshfeld Test Diff (M-X) Mo -- O .. 7.0 su PLAT301_ALERT_3_G Note: Main Residue Disorder ................... 20 Perc. PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Note: Tentative Bond Valency for Mo (VI) 5.94 PLAT811_ALERT_5_G No ADDSYM Analysis: Too Many Excluded Atoms .... !
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 4 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 5 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 9 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 9 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 4 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Colourless, irregular-shaped single crystals of scheelite-type La0.667[MoO4] were obtained as a by-product in an unsuccessful attempt to synthesize LaF[MoO4] according to the Pecchini method (Liu et al., 2012). Aqueous solutions with stoichiometric amounts of La(NO3)3 and (NH4)6Mo7O24 (molar ratio 7 : 1) were prepared for each compound and HF was added to the latter (molar ratio HF : (NH4)6Mo7O24 = 7 : 1). As chelating agent, citric acid (CA) was dissolved in both solutions with a molar ratio of CA : La3+ = 1 : 1 and CA : Mo6+ = 2 : 1. The pH value of the La3+-containing solution was adjusted to 3 – 4 with an aqueous ammonia solution as well as the pH value of the CA/HF/(NH4)6Mo7O24 mixture, in this case to a value of 7 – 8. The two solutions were combined, stirred, and heated for about 30 minutes to obtain a transparent solution, which was then dried at 473 K for 5 hours. The residual product was thermally treated in air at 1123 K for 12 hours.
The site occupation factor of the La3+ site was refined freely to a value of 0.6676 (10).
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: SCALEPACK and DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).
La0.667[MoO4] | Dx = 4.890 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 252.59 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, I41/a | Cell parameters from 1769 reflections |
Hall symbol: -I 4ad | θ = 0.4–30.5° |
a = 5.3599 (3) Å | µ = 11.74 mm−1 |
c = 11.9425 (7) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 343.09 (3) Å3 | Irregular, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.11 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm |
F(000) = 448 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 260 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 174 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.046 |
ω and ϕ scans | θmax = 30.4°, θmin = 4.2° |
Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE; Stoe & Cie, 1995) | h = −7→7 |
Tmin = 0.291, Tmax = 0.480 | k = −7→7 |
2577 measured reflections | l = −16→16 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.016 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0079P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.032 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 0.98 | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
260 reflections | Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 |
16 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.0082 (5) |
La0.667[MoO4] | Z = 4 |
Mr = 252.59 | Mo Kα radiation |
Tetragonal, I41/a | µ = 11.74 mm−1 |
a = 5.3599 (3) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 11.9425 (7) Å | 0.11 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm |
V = 343.09 (3) Å3 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 260 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE; Stoe & Cie, 1995) | 174 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.291, Tmax = 0.480 | Rint = 0.046 |
2577 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.016 | 16 parameters |
wR(F2) = 0.032 | 0 restraints |
S = 0.98 | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
260 reflections | Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
La | 0.0000 | 0.2500 | 0.6250 | 0.01492 (18) | 0.6676 (10) |
Mo | 0.0000 | 0.2500 | 0.1250 | 0.01706 (15) | |
O | 0.1374 (3) | 0.0106 (2) | 0.20490 (13) | 0.0313 (5) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
La | 0.0171 (2) | 0.0171 (2) | 0.0107 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Mo | 0.01534 (18) | 0.01534 (18) | 0.0205 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O | 0.0209 (8) | 0.0329 (9) | 0.0403 (9) | 0.0048 (6) | 0.0031 (9) | 0.0105 (7) |
La—Oi | 2.5728 (14) | La—Lax | 4.0120 (2) |
La—Oii | 2.5728 (14) | La—Laxi | 4.0120 (2) |
La—Oiii | 2.5728 (14) | La—Laiv | 4.0120 (2) |
La—Oiv | 2.5728 (14) | Mo—Oxii | 1.7605 (14) |
La—Ov | 2.5766 (14) | Mo—Oxiii | 1.7605 (14) |
La—Ovi | 2.5766 (14) | Mo—Oxiv | 1.7605 (14) |
La—Ovii | 2.5766 (14) | Mo—O | 1.7606 (14) |
La—Oviii | 2.5766 (14) | O—Laiv | 2.5728 (14) |
La—Laix | 4.0120 (2) | O—Laxv | 2.5766 (14) |
Oi—La—Oii | 128.57 (4) | Oiii—La—Lax | 161.84 (3) |
Oi—La—Oiii | 75.70 (7) | Oiv—La—Lax | 66.64 (3) |
Oii—La—Oiii | 128.57 (4) | Ov—La—Lax | 103.20 (4) |
Oi—La—Oiv | 128.57 (4) | Ovi—La—Lax | 38.79 (3) |
Oii—La—Oiv | 75.70 (7) | Ovii—La—Lax | 129.62 (3) |
Oiii—La—Oiv | 128.57 (4) | Oviii—La—Lax | 85.04 (3) |
Oi—La—Ov | 148.98 (6) | Laix—La—Lax | 123.628 (3) |
Oii—La—Ov | 68.24 (3) | Oi—La—Laxi | 161.84 (3) |
Oiii—La—Ov | 74.21 (2) | Oii—La—Laxi | 66.64 (3) |
Oiv—La—Ov | 77.64 (5) | Oiii—La—Laxi | 103.00 (3) |
Oi—La—Ovi | 74.21 (2) | Oiv—La—Laxi | 38.85 (3) |
Oii—La—Ovi | 77.64 (5) | Ov—La—Laxi | 38.79 (3) |
Oiii—La—Ovi | 148.98 (6) | Ovi—La—Laxi | 103.20 (4) |
Oiv—La—Ovi | 68.24 (3) | Ovii—La—Laxi | 85.04 (3) |
Ov—La—Ovi | 136.53 (7) | Oviii—La—Laxi | 129.62 (3) |
Oi—La—Ovii | 77.64 (5) | Laix—La—Laxi | 123.628 (3) |
Oii—La—Ovii | 148.98 (6) | Lax—La—Laxi | 83.823 (4) |
Oiii—La—Ovii | 68.24 (3) | Oi—La—Laiv | 38.85 (3) |
Oiv—La—Ovii | 74.20 (2) | Oii—La—Laiv | 161.84 (3) |
Ov—La—Ovii | 97.88 (2) | Oiii—La—Laiv | 66.64 (3) |
Ovi—La—Ovii | 97.88 (2) | Oiv—La—Laiv | 103.00 (3) |
Oi—La—Oviii | 68.24 (3) | Ov—La—Laiv | 129.62 (3) |
Oii—La—Oviii | 74.20 (2) | Ovi—La—Laiv | 85.04 (3) |
Oiii—La—Oviii | 77.64 (5) | Ovii—La—Laiv | 38.79 (3) |
Oiv—La—Oviii | 148.98 (6) | Oviii—La—Laiv | 103.20 (4) |
Ov—La—Oviii | 97.88 (2) | Laix—La—Laiv | 83.823 (4) |
Ovi—La—Oviii | 97.88 (2) | Lax—La—Laiv | 123.628 (3) |
Ovii—La—Oviii | 136.53 (7) | Laxi—La—Laiv | 123.628 (3) |
Oi—La—Laix | 66.64 (3) | Oxii—Mo—Oxiii | 107.08 (5) |
Oii—La—Laix | 103.00 (3) | Oxii—Mo—Oxiv | 114.36 (10) |
Oiii—La—Laix | 38.85 (3) | Oxiii—Mo—Oxiv | 107.08 (5) |
Oiv—La—Laix | 161.84 (3) | Oxii—Mo—O | 107.08 (5) |
Ov—La—Laix | 85.04 (3) | Oxiii—Mo—O | 114.36 (10) |
Ovi—La—Laix | 129.62 (3) | Oxiv—Mo—O | 107.08 (5) |
Ovii—La—Laix | 103.20 (4) | Mo—O—Laiv | 134.75 (7) |
Oviii—La—Laix | 38.79 (3) | Mo—O—Laxv | 120.66 (7) |
Oi—La—Lax | 103.00 (3) | Laiv—O—Laxv | 102.36 (5) |
Oii—La—Lax | 38.85 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) y+1/4, −x+1/4, z+1/4; (ii) x, y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −y−1/4, x+1/4, z+1/4; (iv) −x, −y, −z+1; (v) x−1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (vi) −x+1/2, −y, z+1/2; (vii) −y−1/4, x−1/4, −z+3/4; (viii) y+1/4, −x+3/4, −z+3/4; (ix) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (x) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+3/2; (xi) −x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+3/2; (xii) y−1/4, −x+1/4, −z+1/4; (xiii) −x, −y+1/2, z; (xiv) −y+1/4, x+1/4, −z+1/4; (xv) x+1/2, y−1/2, z−1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | La0.667[MoO4] |
Mr | 252.59 |
Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, I41/a |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, c (Å) | 5.3599 (3), 11.9425 (7) |
V (Å3) | 343.09 (3) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 11.74 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.11 × 0.08 × 0.06 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Numerical (X-SHAPE; Stoe & Cie, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.291, 0.480 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2577, 260, 174 |
Rint | 0.046 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.712 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.016, 0.032, 0.98 |
No. of reflections | 260 |
No. of parameters | 16 |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.41, −0.37 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SCALEPACK and DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006).
La—Oi | 2.5728 (14) | Mo—O | 1.7606 (14) |
La—Oii | 2.5766 (14) |
Symmetry codes: (i) y+1/4, −x+1/4, z+1/4; (ii) −x+1/2, −y, z+1/2. |
The title compound crystallizes isotypically with the already known defect scheelite-type lanthanide ortho-oxidomolybdates(VI) with general formula Ln0.667[MoO4] (Ln = Ce, Pr, Nd, and Sm; Schustereit et al., 2011). The crystallographically unique La3+ cation at Wyckoff position 4b is surrounded by eight oxide anions in the shape of a trigonal dodecahedron (Fig. 1). Besides the lanthanum cation, the structure also contains an isolated and bisphenoidally distorted tetrahedral ortho-oxidomolybdate(VI) unit [MoO4]2–. Its central Mo6+ cation at Wyckoff position 4a exhibits the same site symmetry (4..) as the La3+ cation. Hence, in order to maintain electroneutrality, the latter shows a statistically under-occupation of 2/3 on its atomic position. The [MoO4]2– tetrahedra share common vertices with eight [LaO8]13– dodecahedra to build up the scheelite-type crystal structure (Fig. 2). The cations at the sites 4a (La3+) and 4b (Mo6+) are thereby arranged in two interpenetrating diamond-like lattices (Schustereit et al., 2011).