Crystal structure of magnesium selenate hepta­hydrate, MgSeO₄·7H₂O, from neutron time-of-flight data

The structure of MgSeO₄·7H₂O has been determined by single-crystal Laue diffraction methods using pulsed neutron radiation. The compound is isostructural with the sulfate analogue, MgSO₄·7H₂O.

Key indicators

• Single-crystal neutron study
• T = 10 K
• Mean [sigma](Mg-O) = 0.008 Å
• R factor = 0.072
• wR factor = 0.197
• Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.2

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level A
TYPE031_ALERT_1_A  _diffrn_radiation_wavelength is not of type numb.

Author Response: test not relevant - radiation source is not monochromatic

CELL004_ALERT_1_A  _cell_measurement_theta_min is missing
            Minimum theta of reflections used to measure unit cell.
            The following tests will not be performed.
            CELLT_01

Author Response: test not relevant for TOF neutrons - see _refine_special_details

CELL005_ALERT_1_A  _cell_measurement_theta_max is missing
            Maximum theta of reflections used to measure unit cell.
            The following tests will not be performed.
            CELLT_01

Author Response: test not relevant for TOF neutrons - see _refine_special_details

TYPE036_ALERT_1_A  _exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu is not of type numb.

Author Response: test not relevant - mu is given as wavelength-dependent expression

PLAT211_ALERT_2_A ADP of Atom Se1     is N.P.D. or (nearly) 2D ...     Please Check

Author Response: The Uij of Se are very small due to the low measurement temperature

PLAT922_ALERT_1_A wR2 in the CIF and FCF Differ by ...............     0.1021 Check

Author Response: test not relevant - based on assumption of monochromatic radiation

PLAT923_ALERT_1_A S    values in the CIF and FCF Differ by .......     -1.783 Check

Author Response: test not relevant - based on assumption of monochromatic radiation

PLAT934_ALERT_3_A Number of (Iobs-Icalc)/SigmaW > 10 Outliers ....         13 Check

Author Response: test not relevant - based on assumption of monochromatic radiation SHELX LST file shows number of (Iobs-Icalc)/SigmaW > 10 is zero

PLAT998_ALERT_1_A SHELXL LIST 3 Fo/Fc Unsuitable for FCF-Validation .       ! Error

Author Response: test not relevant - HKLF 2 used

Alert level C
CELLK01_ALERT_1_C  Check that the cell measurement temperature is in Kelvin.
            Value of measurement temperature given =    10.000
PLAT090_ALERT_3_C Poor Data / Parameter Ratio (Zmax > 18) ........       6.37 Note
PLAT213_ALERT_2_C Atom O2              has ADP max/min Ratio .....        3.4 prolat
PLAT213_ALERT_2_C Atom O3              has ADP max/min Ratio .....        4.0 oblate

Alert level G
ABSMU01_ALERT_1_G  Calculation of _exptl_absorpt_correction_mu
                not performed for this radiation type.
PLAT072_ALERT_2_G SHELXL First  Parameter in WGHT Unusually Large.       0.14 Report
PLAT083_ALERT_2_G SHELXL Second Parameter in WGHT Unusually Large.      21.29 Report
PLAT720_ALERT_4_G Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Labels ..........          7 Note
PLAT871_ALERT_4_G Laue technique Related ALERTS are Suppressed ...          ! Info
PLAT912_ALERT_4_G Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L=  0.600       7470 Note
PLAT956_ALERT_1_G Calculated (ThMax) and Actual (FCF) Hmax Differ           2 Units
PLAT957_ALERT_1_G Calculated (ThMax) and Actual (FCF) Kmax Differ           2 Units
PLAT958_ALERT_1_G Calculated (ThMax) and Actual (FCF) Lmax Differ           8 Units
PLAT961_ALERT_5_G Dataset Contains no Negative Intensities .......     Please Check

   9 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain
   0 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully
   4 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight
  10 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected

  12 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
   5 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
   2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
   3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
   1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

---

S1. Chemical context

Since their discovery almost two hundred years ago, the heptahydrates of divalent metal selenates have received scant attention. This is in stark contrast with the M²⁺SeO₄ hexahydrates, which have been extensively characterized, including studies of their morphology and optical properties (Topsøe & Christiansen, 1874), their crystal structures (Stadnicka et al., 1988; Kolitsch, 2002), their formation of isomorphous solution series (e.g., Ojkova et al., 1990: Stoilova et al., 1995) and their dehydration properties (Nabar & Paralkar, 1975: Stoilova & Koleva, 1995). In part this may be due to the fact that the heptahydrates must be prepared at lower temperatures. Nevertheless, it is striking that the only information concerning their crystal structures, namely their apparent isomorphism with the M²⁺SO₄ heptahydrates, has remained largely unaltered since the observations made prior to 1830 by Berzelius and his student Mitscherlich, which is that MgSeO₄·7H₂O forms deliquescent four-sided prismatic crystals below 288 K (e.g., Berzelius, 1818,1829). The only known goniometric data relates to FeSeO₄·7H₂O and CoSeO₄·7H₂O (Wohlwill, 1860: Topsøe, 1870: Tutton, 1918), which are isomorphous with the monoclinic series of M²⁺SO₄ heptahydrates. It is worth stating that MgMoO₄·5H₂O is isomorphous with both the sulfate, chromate and selenate analogues but is not isostructural with them [Bars et al., 1977; see also Lima-de-Faria et al. (1990) for further discussion of these nomenclature], so the occurrence of MgSeO₄·7H₂O as acicular rhombic prisms is no guarantee that it is isostructural with the sulfate salt. Additional confusion arises from conflicting observations of the MgSeO₄–H₂O binary phase diagram (Meyer & Aulich, 1928: Klein, 1940), including our own recent discovery of hitherto unknown hydrates (containing 9H₂O and 11H₂O) below 273 K (Fortes, 2014).

As part of a wider study into low-temperature crystal hydrates of MgSeO₄ and related compounds (Fortes et al., 2013) we synthesised the title compound and carried out a single-crystal neutron diffraction experiment in order to determine its structure.

S2. Structural commentary

The crystal structure (Fig. 1) is isostructural to that of the sulfate, having isolated [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ o­cta­hedra and [SeO₄]^2- tetra­hedra linked by a framework of moderately strong hydrogen bonds (H···O from 1.692 to 1.946 Å; Table 1). The seventh water molecule is coordinated to neither Mg nor Se, occupying a `void' between the polyhedral ions and donating comparatively weak (i.e., long and non-linear) hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2, Table 2). The [Mg(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> o­cta­hedron is slightly elongated along the OW2 – Mg – OW5 axis, the respective Mg—O distances being 2.101 Å (average) compared with 2.046 Å (average) for the other four `equatorial' water molecules (Table 2). This distortion was also noted in the sulfate by Baur (1964) and is manifested in subsequent neutron single-crystal and powder diffraction studies (Ferraris et al., 1973: Fortes et al., 2006). The difference is due to the tetra­hedral coordination of OW2 and OW5; both of these water molecules (in addition to being Mg-coordinated) donate two hydrogen bonds and accept one hydrogen bond, from OW7 and OW6 respectively. The four `equatorial' water molecules donate but do not accept any hydrogen bonds. In the sulfate at 2 K (Fortes et al., 2006), the average equatorial Mg—O distances were found to be 2.029 Å and the average axial Mg—O distances to be 2.100 Å (2.056 and 2.102 Å at room temperature; Ferraris et al., 1973; Calleri et al., 1984).

The [SeO₄]^2- tetra­hedron exhibits a similar property in that the bond lengths are influenced by the hydrogen-bond coordination. Two of the oxygen atoms (O1 and O3) accept two hydrogen bonds and have mean Se—O bond lengths of 1.631 Å, whereas the other two oxygen atoms (O2 and O4) accept three hydrogen bonds and have a mean Se—O bond length of 1.652 Å. This distinction is not readily apparent in any of the data pertaining to the sulfate, but it is worth observing that the neutron scattering cross-section of selenium is almost three times greater than that of sulfur so our result should be considered more accurate. The mean Se—O bond length of 1.641 Å is in excellent agreement with other similar high-precision analyses of selenate crystals (Kolitsch, 2001,2002; Weil & Bonneau, 2014).

Overall, the unit-cell volume of the selenate at 10 K is 4.1% larger than the sulfate analogue (deuterated) at 2 K. This expansion is not isotropic, however, with the greatest proportion being along the b axis of the crystal. We find that the a axis is 2.7% longer, the b axis 1.0% longer, and the c axis 0.3% longer in the selenate than the sulfate. It is not readily apparent from examination of the structure why this should be so. The magnitude of the volumetric strain is virtually identical to that found in MgSeO₄·11H₂O (4.1% larger than the sulfate analogue; Fortes, 2014) and somewhat less than is observed in, for example, CuSeO₄·5H₂O (5.1% larger than the equivalent sulfate; Kolitsch, 2001) and MgSeO₄·6H₂O (5.2%; Kolitsch, 2002).

S3. Synthesis and crystallization

In our initial attempts to make MgSeO₄ we employed the widely cited method of reacting basic Mg-carbonate with aqueous selenic acid (e.g., Stoilova & Koleva, 1995), but this was found to leave a substantial amount of acid in solution, giving a pink-coloured viscous liquid with a sour odour, which yielded an intimate mixture of MgSeO₄·6H₂O and Mg(HSeO₃)·4H₂O crystals (cf., Kolitsch, 2002; Mička et al., 1996) even after repeated re-crystallization and treatment with aqueous H₂O₂. Consequently, we prepared an aqueous solution of magnesium selenate by stirring MgO into a solution of H₂SeO₄ (Sigma–Aldrich 481513, 40%_wt diluted further in its own weight of distilled water) heated to ~340 K. This reaction is much less dramatic than is the case when Mg-carbonate is used and the only clear indication that it has run to completion is the pH of the solution, which changed from 0.11 to 8.80. After a period of evaporation in the open air, the solution precipitates cm-sized crystals of MgSeO₄·6H₂O. After a further round of re-crystallization from distilled water the phase purity of the hexahydrate was verified both by X-ray powder diffraction and Raman spectroscopy.

Finally, crystalline MgSeO₄·6H₂O was dissolved in distilled water to a concentration of ~35%_wt MgSeO₄ at 333 K, and this liquid was left to evaporate in a refrigerated workshop at 269 K. After two days, slender prismatic crystals indistinguishable in habit from MgSO₄·7H₂O, appeared. One of these was removed from the liquid, dried on filter paper and cut into a pair of fragments each with dimensions 1 x 1 x 4 mm. The two fragments were placed side-by-side in an aluminium foil pouch suspended inside a standard thin-walled vanadium sample can (6 mm inner diameter). The lid of the can was sealed with indium wire and was then transported to the ISIS neutron source immersed in liquid nitro­gen.

The sample can was screwed onto a standard centre stick and inserted into a pre-cooled Closed-Cycle Refrigerator (CCR) already mounted on the SXD beam-line (Keen et al., 2006). Initial data collection as the sample was cooled from ~200 K down to 10 K revealed strong reflections from both crystals that could be indexed with an orthorhombic unit cell of similar shape but roughly 4% larger than that of MgSO₄·7H₂O. After cooling to 10 K data were collected with the crystals in four discrete orientations with respect to the incident beam, optimizing the coverage of reciprocal space, with integration times of ~1600 µA hr each (roughly 10 hours per frame at typical ISIS beam intensity). The peaks were indexed and integrated using the instrument software, SXD2001 (Gutmann, 2005) and exported in a format suitable for analysis using SHELX2014 (Sheldrick, 2008; Gruene et al., 2014).

Upon completion of the experiment, crystals of the title compound that had been stored in a glass vial at 253 K for ten days were analysed by means of X-ray powder diffraction. This measurement, carried out on a custom Peltier cold stage (Wood et al., 2012) at 253 K revealed that the heptahydrate had transformed completely to the newly reported MgSeO₄·9H₂O (Fortes, 2014), thus providing some initial insight into the relative stability of the two compounds.

S4. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. Structure refinement with SHELXL using the model obtained at 2 K for the deuterated MgSO₄ analogue (Fortes et al., 2006) based on earlier work (Baur, 1964: Ferraris et al., 1973: Calleri et al., 1984) yielded a good fit with no density residuals larger than 4.5% of the nuclear scattering density due to a hydrogen atom. No restraints were used and all anisotropic temperature factors were refined independently.

Related literature

For related literature, see: Bars et al. (1977); Baur (1964); Berzelius (1818, 1829); Calleri et al. (1984); Ferraris et al. (1973); Fortes (2014); Fortes et al. (2006, 2013); Gruene et al. (2014); Gutmann (2005); Keen et al. (2006); Klein (1940); Kolitsch (2001, 2002); Lima-de-Faria, Hellner, Liebau, Makovicky & Parthé (1990); Meyer & Aulich (1928); Mička et al. (1996); Nabar & Paralkar (1975); Ojkova et al. (1990); Sheldrick (2008); Stadnicka et al. (1988); Stoilova & Koleva (1995); Stoilova, Ojkova & Staneva (1995); Topsøe (1870); Topsøe & Christiansen (1874); Tutton (1918); Weil & Bonneau (2014); Wohlwill (1860); Wood et al. (2012).

Computing details

Data collection: SXD2001 (Gutmann, 2005); cell refinement: SXD2001 (Gutmann, 2005); data reduction: SXD2001 (Gutmann, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2014 (Gruene et al., 2014); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Gruene et al., 2014); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Putz & Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures

	Fig. 1. Asymmetric unit of MgSeO4·7H2O with anisotropic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level (75% for Mg and the selenate O atoms to aid visibility). Dashed rods indicate hydrogen bonds. The superscripts (i) and (ii) denote, respectively, the symmetry operations [1 - x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 - z] and [3/2 - x, 1 - y, 1/2 + z].
	Fig. 2. Packing of the polyhedra and interstitial water in MgSeO4·7H2O viewed down the c-axis. The polyhedral ions have been blurred in order to emphasize the location of the interstitial water molecules.

Hexaaquamagnesium(II) selenate monohydrate

Crystal data

[Mg(H2O)6](SeO4)(H2O)	F(000) = 592
Mr = 293.38	Dx = 1.946 Mg m^−3
Orthorhombic, P212121	Neutron radiation, λ = 0.48–7.0 Å
a = 12.234 (4) Å	Cell parameters from 550 reflections
b = 12.020 (4) Å	µ = 0.48 + 0.0036 * λ mm^−1
c = 6.809 (3) Å	T = 10 K
V = 1001.3 (6) Å^3	Rhomboid, colourless
Z = 4	4.00 × 1.00 × 1.00 mm

Data collection

SXD diffractometer	4337 independent reflections
Radiation source: ISIS neutron spallation source	4337 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
time–of–flight LAUE diffraction scans	θmax = 84.5°, θmin = 0.001°
Absorption correction: numerical The linear absorption coefficient is wavelength dependent and is calculated as: µ = 0.4823 + 0.0036 * λ [mm^-1] as determined by Gaussian integration in SXD2001 (Gutmann, 2005)	h = −32→30
Tmin = ?, Tmax = ?	k = −31→20
4337 measured reflections	l = −11→6

Refinement

Refinement on F^2	Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full	All H-atom parameters refined
R[F^2 > 2σ(F^2)] = 0.072	w = 1/[σ^2(Fo^2) + (0.1399P)^2 + 21.2928P] where P = (Fo^2 + 2Fc^2)/3
wR(F^2) = 0.197	(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.08	Δρmax = 2.06 e Å^−3
4337 reflections	Δρmin = −1.72 e Å^−3
252 parameters	Extinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Gruene et al., 2014), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc^2λ^3/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
0 restraints	Extinction coefficient: 0.0026 (3)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods	Absolute structure: All f" are zero, so absolute structure could not be determined

Special details

Experimental. For peak integration a local UB matrix refined for each frame, using approximately 50 reflections from each of the 11 detectors. Hence _cell_measurement_reflns_used 550 For final cell dimensions a weighted average of all local cells was calculated Because of the nature of the experiment, it is not possible to give values of theta_min and theta_max for the cell determination. The same applies for the wavelength used for the experiment. The range of wavelengths used was 0.48–7.0 Angstroms, BUT the bulk of the diffraction information is obtained from wavelengths in the range 0.7–2.5 Angstroms. The data collection procedures on the SXD instrument used for the single-crystal neutron data collection are most recently summarized in the Appendix to the following paper Wilson, C. C. (1997). J. Mol. Struct. 405, 207–217

Geometry. All e.s.d.s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.s is used for estimating e.s.d.s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. The variable wavelength nature of the data collection procedure means that sensible values of _diffrn_reflns_theta_min & _diffrn_reflns_theta_max cannot be given instead the following limits are given _diffrn_reflns_sin(theta)/lambda_min 0.06 _diffrn_reflns_sin(theta)/lambda_max 1.38 _refine_diff_density_max/min is given in Fermi per angstrom cubed not electons per angstrom cubed. Another way to consider the _refine_diff_density_ is as a percentage of the scattering density of a given atom: _refine_diff_density_max = 4.5% of hydrogen _refine_diff_density_min = -3.8% of hydrogen Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. For comparison, the calculated R-factor based on F is 0.0578 for the 1606 unique reflections obtained after merging to generate the Fourier map.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Ų)

	x	y	z	Uiso*/Ueq
Se1	0.72001 (19)	0.1764 (3)	0.4966 (7)	0.0005 (6)
O1	0.6727 (3)	0.0565 (4)	0.4240 (10)	0.0045 (10)
O2	0.8540 (3)	0.1781 (4)	0.4840 (10)	0.0039 (10)
O3	0.6788 (3)	0.2016 (4)	0.7201 (10)	0.0032 (9)
O4	0.6714 (3)	0.2769 (4)	0.3540 (10)	0.0037 (10)
Mg1	0.5841 (3)	0.6050 (4)	0.4601 (11)	0.0028 (11)
OW1	0.7361 (3)	0.6719 (5)	0.5016 (11)	0.0053 (10)
OW2	0.5312 (3)	0.7470 (4)	0.3064 (10)	0.0046 (10)
OW3	0.5370 (3)	0.6718 (5)	0.7231 (10)	0.0052 (10)
OW4	0.4319 (3)	0.5399 (4)	0.4219 (10)	0.0049 (11)
OW5	0.6304 (3)	0.4595 (4)	0.6082 (10)	0.0042 (10)
OW6	0.6434 (3)	0.5384 (4)	0.2028 (11)	0.0059 (11)
OW7	0.5042 (3)	0.4328 (4)	0.9377 (11)	0.0048 (10)
H1A	0.7663 (8)	0.7214 (10)	0.403 (2)	0.019 (2)
H1B	0.7660 (8)	0.6934 (9)	0.628 (2)	0.017 (3)
H2A	0.5789 (8)	0.7721 (9)	0.199 (2)	0.017 (2)
H2B	0.4571 (7)	0.7511 (9)	0.251 (2)	0.016 (2)
H3A	0.5772 (7)	0.7242 (9)	0.805 (2)	0.018 (3)
H3B	0.4584 (7)	0.6826 (10)	0.748 (2)	0.018 (2)
H4A	0.3879 (7)	0.5493 (9)	0.304 (2)	0.017 (2)
H4B	0.4068 (8)	0.4717 (9)	0.481 (2)	0.020 (3)
H5A	0.6362 (7)	0.3931 (9)	0.526 (2)	0.019 (3)
H5B	0.5863 (8)	0.4406 (9)	0.721 (2)	0.018 (2)
H6A	0.7205 (7)	0.5302 (10)	0.170 (3)	0.026 (3)
H6B	0.5992 (8)	0.4994 (10)	0.104 (2)	0.019 (3)
H7A	0.4395 (7)	0.4789 (9)	0.953 (2)	0.021 (3)
H7B	0.4843 (8)	0.3642 (9)	0.998 (3)	0.023 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Ų)

	U^11	U^22	U^33	U^12	U^13	U^23
Se1	0.0004 (7)	0.0005 (10)	0.0006 (18)	−0.0001 (7)	−0.0003 (10)	−0.0002 (15)
O1	0.0057 (12)	0.0042 (19)	0.004 (3)	−0.0009 (12)	−0.0004 (16)	−0.0005 (19)
O2	0.0013 (10)	0.0051 (18)	0.005 (3)	−0.0001 (11)	0.0015 (14)	0.002 (2)
O3	0.0041 (13)	0.0042 (19)	0.001 (3)	−0.0006 (11)	0.0013 (15)	−0.0011 (19)
O4	0.0046 (13)	0.0025 (18)	0.004 (3)	0.0004 (12)	0.0005 (15)	0.0016 (19)
Mg1	0.0027 (12)	0.0021 (17)	0.003 (3)	0.0008 (11)	−0.0005 (14)	−0.0019 (19)
OW1	0.0046 (12)	0.008 (2)	0.003 (3)	−0.0021 (12)	0.0007 (17)	−0.001 (3)
OW2	0.0038 (12)	0.0028 (19)	0.007 (3)	0.0004 (11)	−0.0016 (16)	0.000 (2)
OW3	0.0038 (11)	0.007 (2)	0.005 (3)	−0.0004 (13)	0.0005 (15)	−0.001 (2)
OW4	0.0042 (13)	0.006 (2)	0.005 (3)	−0.0011 (13)	−0.0017 (14)	0.000 (2)
OW5	0.0057 (13)	0.0010 (19)	0.006 (3)	0.0000 (12)	0.0002 (14)	0.001 (2)
OW6	0.0046 (13)	0.006 (2)	0.007 (3)	−0.0001 (13)	0.0006 (16)	−0.002 (2)
OW7	0.0064 (14)	0.0040 (19)	0.004 (3)	0.0009 (12)	0.0009 (15)	0.000 (2)
H1A	0.022 (4)	0.020 (5)	0.016 (7)	−0.005 (3)	−0.004 (4)	−0.002 (5)
H1B	0.020 (4)	0.019 (5)	0.013 (8)	−0.006 (3)	−0.004 (4)	−0.002 (5)
H2A	0.019 (4)	0.014 (4)	0.018 (7)	−0.002 (3)	0.007 (4)	0.004 (5)
H2B	0.013 (3)	0.017 (4)	0.018 (7)	0.001 (3)	0.000 (3)	−0.003 (5)
H3A	0.015 (3)	0.019 (5)	0.019 (7)	−0.003 (3)	0.001 (4)	−0.012 (5)
H3B	0.009 (3)	0.024 (5)	0.021 (7)	0.001 (3)	0.005 (3)	−0.002 (5)
H4A	0.016 (3)	0.021 (5)	0.013 (7)	0.001 (3)	−0.006 (3)	−0.002 (5)
H4B	0.022 (4)	0.016 (4)	0.021 (8)	−0.007 (3)	−0.001 (4)	0.005 (5)
H5A	0.021 (3)	0.014 (4)	0.021 (8)	0.002 (3)	0.003 (4)	−0.004 (5)
H5B	0.020 (4)	0.022 (5)	0.011 (7)	−0.001 (3)	0.002 (4)	0.001 (5)
H6A	0.009 (3)	0.030 (6)	0.039 (10)	0.002 (3)	0.004 (4)	0.001 (6)
H6B	0.018 (3)	0.023 (5)	0.015 (8)	−0.005 (3)	−0.002 (4)	−0.004 (5)
H7A	0.015 (3)	0.018 (5)	0.030 (9)	0.007 (3)	0.001 (4)	0.007 (5)
H7B	0.026 (4)	0.016 (5)	0.028 (9)	−0.003 (3)	−0.002 (5)	0.013 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Se1—O1	1.630 (6)	OW2—H2A	0.983 (14)
Se1—O3	1.631 (8)	OW2—H2B	0.984 (11)
Se1—O2	1.642 (4)	OW3—H3A	0.976 (13)
Se1—O4	1.661 (7)	OW3—H3B	0.985 (9)
Mg1—OW4	2.037 (6)	OW4—H4B	0.964 (13)
Mg1—OW1	2.045 (6)	OW4—H4A	0.976 (14)
Mg1—OW3	2.046 (10)	OW5—H5B	0.967 (15)
Mg1—OW6	2.058 (9)	OW5—H5A	0.976 (14)
Mg1—OW5	2.097 (8)	OW6—H6A	0.976 (10)
Mg1—OW2	2.104 (8)	OW6—H6B	0.982 (14)
OW1—H1B	0.968 (16)	OW7—H7B	0.955 (13)
OW1—H1A	0.969 (16)	OW7—H7A	0.973 (10)
O1—Se1—O3	109.7 (3)	OW5—Mg1—OW2	177.3 (3)
O1—Se1—O2	110.5 (3)	H1B—OW1—H1A	107.8 (12)
O3—Se1—O2	110.8 (4)	H1B—OW1—Mg1	124.8 (9)
O1—Se1—O4	109.8 (4)	H1A—OW1—Mg1	119.5 (9)
O3—Se1—O4	107.4 (3)	H2A—OW2—H2B	104.2 (12)
O2—Se1—O4	108.6 (3)	H2A—OW2—Mg1	115.9 (7)
OW4—Mg1—OW1	179.2 (5)	H2B—OW2—Mg1	121.0 (7)
OW4—Mg1—OW3	90.3 (3)	H3A—OW3—H3B	108.0 (11)
OW1—Mg1—OW3	88.9 (4)	H3A—OW3—Mg1	127.8 (8)
OW4—Mg1—OW6	93.7 (3)	H3B—OW3—Mg1	118.5 (10)
OW1—Mg1—OW6	87.2 (3)	H4B—OW4—H4A	105.5 (11)
OW3—Mg1—OW6	175.7 (3)	H4B—OW4—Mg1	124.4 (8)
OW4—Mg1—OW5	89.3 (3)	H4A—OW4—Mg1	124.5 (8)
OW1—Mg1—OW5	90.9 (3)	H5B—OW5—H5A	107.7 (11)
OW3—Mg1—OW5	89.0 (4)	H5B—OW5—Mg1	115.3 (7)
OW6—Mg1—OW5	89.4 (3)	H5A—OW5—Mg1	115.3 (10)
OW4—Mg1—OW2	88.1 (3)	H6A—OW6—H6B	109.0 (13)
OW1—Mg1—OW2	91.7 (3)	H6A—OW6—Mg1	125.2 (11)
OW3—Mg1—OW2	91.7 (3)	H6B—OW6—Mg1	125.1 (8)
OW6—Mg1—OW2	90.0 (4)	H7B—OW7—H7A	103.7 (11)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
OW1—H1A···O3^i	0.969 (16)	1.692 (16)	2.659 (9)	175.4 (13)
OW1—H1B···O4^ii	0.968 (16)	1.757 (15)	2.724 (9)	175.1 (11)
OW2—H2A···O2^i	0.983 (14)	1.781 (15)	2.757 (9)	171.0 (11)
OW2—H2B···O4^iii	0.984 (11)	1.753 (11)	2.732 (7)	172.4 (10)
OW3—H3A···O2^ii	0.976 (13)	1.889 (13)	2.861 (8)	174.5 (12)
OW3—H3B···O3^iv	0.985 (9)	1.708 (9)	2.692 (6)	177.4 (14)
OW4—H4A···O1^iii	0.976 (14)	1.720 (15)	2.688 (9)	170.9 (11)
OW4—H4B···O2^v	0.964 (13)	1.927 (11)	2.861 (7)	162.3 (15)
OW5—H5A···O4	0.976 (14)	1.874 (14)	2.839 (8)	169.6 (10)
OW5—H5B···OW7	0.967 (15)	1.786 (14)	2.742 (9)	169.4 (10)
OW6—H6A···OW5^i	0.976 (10)	1.875 (10)	2.841 (6)	170.3 (12)
OW6—H6B···OW7^vi	0.982 (14)	1.809 (13)	2.787 (8)	173.4 (11)
OW7—H7A···O1^iv	0.973 (10)	1.858 (12)	2.790 (7)	159.5 (14)
OW7—H7B···OW2^vii	0.955 (13)	1.946 (16)	2.866 (8)	161.2 (15)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+1, z−1/2; (ii) −x+3/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (v) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (vi) x, y, z−1; (vii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2.