« Back to Summary
Do you have any suggestions for improvements to the online journals?
#Response DateResponse Text
1Mar 17, 2011 1:13 PMNone at this time
2Mar 16, 2011 12:53 PMWorks fine.
3Mar 15, 2011 2:45 PMno
4Mar 15, 2011 8:58 AMNo
5Mar 15, 2011 1:45 AMmore clear graphical index page
6Mar 14, 2011 11:26 PMNot right away - they are in pretty good shape.
7Mar 14, 2011 7:03 PMIt is probably not feasible given the volume of submissions, but I continue to be bothered by the drastic variation in the quality of the Comments that accompany Section E papers. Some authors make a genuine attempt to add value, while others submit material that is at worst inaccurate and ungrammatical.
8Mar 14, 2011 7:01 PMNo
9Mar 14, 2011 6:09 PMI am not sure if I understood the question well. Nevertheless, I make use of the opportunity to suggest a search that would use logical operators in the IUCr journals.
10Mar 14, 2011 3:58 PMIt is usually hard to find the supplementary information. The link should be at the top of the main article HTML page.
11Mar 14, 2011 3:54 PMno
12Mar 14, 2011 3:25 PMRedesign home pages for CJO and each journal to make them more attractive and highlight recent top papers. cf. other journal websites.
13Mar 14, 2011 3:20 PMNo
14Mar 14, 2011 2:27 PMno
15Mar 14, 2011 2:07 PMWith exception of Acta E that is open, access to Acta B and Acta C (these are the most usefuln in my case) is very difficult.I have access to hunderds of publications via library university facilities, but not to Acta B or A or C.
16Mar 14, 2011 1:59 PMNo for the moment
17Mar 14, 2011 1:53 PMAnyone who does not have online access to journals would be at a great disadvantage. The IUCr should give online access to their journals to all co-editors
18Mar 14, 2011 1:46 PMAs a co-editor, I should have open access to all IUCr journals (our university e.g. has no access anymore to IUCr journals).
19Mar 14, 2011 1:41 PMPersonal Copy: Acta Cryst B only.
20Mar 14, 2011 1:40 PMNo
21Mar 14, 2011 1:36 PMActa E could feature better element/formula searches