view article
Figure 2
Observed (dots), calculated (continuous line) and difference (bottom line) profiles of 110, 111 and 200 pseudocubic reflections of Pb(Zr0.525Ti0.475)O3 using (a) coexistence of rhombohedral and tetragonal and (b) pure monoclinic (Cm) structural models. The vertical tick marks above the difference profiles give the positions of the Bragg reflections (after Singh et al., 2007aBB54).

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Volume 64| Part 1| January 2008| Pages 192-203
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767307055511
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS