view article
Figure 8
Simulations of two-dimensional intensity maps obtained with model 1 for various values of the disorder parameters. The results for the [\bot] geometry [the probing beam perpendicular to the in-plane component of the basis vector [{\bf a}^{(3)}]] are shown. We assumed [\sigma^{(1)}_{x} = \sigma^{(1)}_{y} = \sigma^{(2)}_{x} = \sigma^{(2)}_{y}] and [\sigma^{(1)}_{z} = \sigma^{(2)}_{z}]. (a)–(c) Influence of [\sigma^{(1,2)}_{x,y}]. The dashed lines parallel to the Qz axis indicate the sheets caused by the in-plane correlation of the QD positions. The correlation of the dot position in different layers gives rise to tilted sheets indicated by dash–dotted lines. (d)–(f) Influence of [\sigma^{(1,2)}_{z}]. (g)–(i) Influence of [\sigma^{(3)}_{x,y}]. (j)–(l) Influence of [\sigma^{(3)}_z]. The symbols P1–P12 denote the sets of disorder parameters given in Table 1[link]. The QDs are assumed to be spherical.

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Volume 68| Part 1| November 2012| Pages 124-138
doi:10.1107/S0108767311040104
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS