view article

Figure 2
(a) Schematic diagram of the experimental configuration. The dimensions shown on the diagram are estimated values derived by a combination of measurement and extracting figures from engineering drawings and may have errors of a few mm. The normal to the SDD surface is inclined relative to the sample–detector vector by ∼28°, giving rise to a reduction in the SDD effective area of 12%. (b) Annotated photograph of the experimental configuration, roughly corresponding to the diagram in part (a). Inset: a photograph looking into the sample chamber, showing a rock sample attached to the kinematic mount.

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds