view article
Figure 9
Intensity distribution contribution from the (110) reflection for the cubic crystal, using (a) the NTXRD method and (b) the method of equation (19)[link]. Note that while the two methods produced broadly similar results for the (010) reflection in Fig. 2[link], for this reflection they produce very different results.

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Volume 74| Part 5| September 2018| Pages 447-456
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273318003959
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS