view article
Figure 4
Schematic representation of the relation between the configurational complexity [H_{{\rm conf}}], calculated for M+A degrees of freedom, and the combinatorial and coordinational complexities, [H_{{\rm comb}}] and [H_{{\rm coor}}], calculated for M and A degrees of freedom, respectively. Shown also are the weighting factors M/(M+A) and A/(M+A) as well as the unit weight contribution of the invariant subdivision complexity [H_{{\rm subdiv}}(M,A)] which taken all together sum to the configurational complexity [H_{{\rm conf}}]. For a given choice of M and A the subdivision complexity [H_{{\rm subdiv}}(M,A)] is a constant, while the combinatorial and coordinational complexities, [H_{{\rm comb}}] and [H_{{\rm coor}}], depend on the respective partitions of M and A possible for a given space-group type.

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Volume 79| Part 3| May 2023| Pages 280-294
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273323002437
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS