|
Figure 7
Timing comparison of methods. (a) Timing for sample `M'. (b) Timing for sample `T'. (c) Timing for sample `mammoth'. Note the logarithmic y axis. In all cases, SIGTT is the fastest method, followed by IR, with ZH being the slowest by a considerable margin. |
Open
access
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10bbc/10bbc550e2a2c1d10022d48582388a49e2160748" alt="Open Access"