view article

Figure 2
(a) Comparison between the I(Q) profiles computed with the corrected MDSE [equation (7)[link], blue curve] and the original MDSE [(Cervellino et al., 2010BB7), black curve] against the expected [\langle{I_k}(Q)\rangle] obtained by averaging the intensity profiles of many defective NCs in the case of a f.c.c. Au NC (a = 4.08 Å) made of 6 × 6 × 6 unit cells (side L = 2.45 nm) with an average occupancy factor o = 0.5; in the inset the same (rescaled) data are shown on a (reduced range) linear plot. (b) Relative deviations ɛ between the corrected and the original MDSE against the expected [\langle{I_k}(Q)\rangle] profiles, ɛ = [I(Q) − 〈Ik(Q)〉]/〈Ik(Q)〉. The factors appearing in the legend indicate the absolute scales of the y-axis values.

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds