view article

Figure 4
(a) Comparison between the expected [\langle{I_k}(Q)\rangle] (red symbols) obtained by averaging the intensity profiles of many defective cubic CsPbBr3 perovskite NCs where the Br atoms were randomly displaced crosswise (see text) and the I(Q) computed via equation (12)[link] (blue curve). For completeness, the I(Q) relative to an ideal CsPbBr3 NC (unsplit) is also reported (black curve); in the inset the same (rescaled) data are shown on a (reduced range) linear plot. (b) Relative deviations ɛ between [\langle{I_k}(Q)\rangle] and the two I(Q) curves of panel (a). The factors appearing in the legend indicate the absolute scales of the y-axis values.

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds