New insights into the magnetism and magnetic structure of LuCrO₃ perovskite

This article is part of a focused issue on Magnetic Structures.

A polycrystalline sample LuCrO₃ has been characterized by neutron powder diffraction (NPD) and magnetization measurements. Its crystal structure has been Rietveld refined from NPD data in space group Pnma; this perovskite contains strongly tilted CrO₆ octahedra with extremely bent Cr—O—Cr superexchange angles of ∼142°. The NPD data show that below Néel temperature (T_N ≃ 131 K), the magnetic structure can be defined as an A-type antiferromagnetic arrangement of Cr³⁺ magnetic moments, aligned along the b axis, with a canting along the c axis. A noticeable magneto­strictive effect is observed in the unit-cell parameters and volume upon cooling down across T_N. The AC magnetic susceptibility indicates the onset of magnetic ordering below 112.6 K; the magnetization isotherms below T_N show a nonlinear behaviour that is associated with the described canting of the Cr³⁺ magnetic moments. From the Curie–Weiss law, the effective moment of the Cr³⁺ sublattice is found to be μ_eff = 3.55 μ_B (calculated 3.7 μ_B) while the Θ_CW parameter yields a value of −155 K, indicating antiferromagnetic interactions. There is a conspicuous increase of T_N upon the application of external pressure, which must be due to shortening of the Cr—O bond length under compression that increases the orbital overlap integral.

1. Introduction

The magnetic properties of RCrO₃ (R = rare-earth element) (also known as orthochromites) have been thoroughly documented in three successive reviews of perovskite oxides, which collectively encompass a vast array of studies spanning over half a century (Goodenough & Longo, 1970; Enke et al., 1978; Endoh et al., 1994), and have been the topic for many subsequent studies (Bertaut, Bassi et al., 1966; Belov et al., 1976; Hornreich et al., 1976; Ullrich et al., 1977; Toyokawa et al., 1979; Sayetat, 1986; Courths et al., 1972; Shamir et al., 1981; Belik et al., 2012; Moure et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2022). Additionally, the magnetic structure of orthochromites underwent extensive examination during the growth of neutron diffraction during the 1960s and 1970s. Various magnetic arrangements within the orthorhombic perovskites can be effectively elucidated by referencing the crystal symmetry using the notation pioneered by Bertaut (1963). Typically, in most cases, the spins are collinearly ordered along the c axis of the Pbnm cell in orthochromites. However, below the Néel temperature (T_N), the spin structure is influenced by the coupling between the magnetic moment of the rare earth and the spins on Cr³⁺ in certain orthochromites (Hornreich, 1978).

Even with T_N of RCrO₃ changing monotonically from Lu to La, irrespective of the rare-earth moment, it appears that the exchange coupling between magnetic R and the moment of Cr³⁺ has minimal impact on the Cr—O—Cr coupling. This assumption has been shown to work properly in RFeO₃ (Zhou & Goodenough, 2008). As in RFeO₃, RCrO₃ oxides are Jahn–Teller inactive, and both families exhibit G-type spin ordering in space group Pbnm. Despite sharing the same superexchange coupling parameter J in the formula k_BT_N = 4S(S+1)J, a significant difference between the Néel temperatures of LaFeO₃ (760 K) and LaCrO₃ (298 K) can be attributed to the total spin, with S = 5/2 for Fe³⁺: t³e² and S = 3/2 for Cr³⁺: t³e⁰. However, the dramatic change in T_N from LaCrO₃ (320 K) to LuCrO₃ (140 K) presents challenges in applying the same overlap integral reduction as in RFeO₃. From high-resolution neutron diffraction on all RCrO₃ members, by comparison with structural work on the RFeO₃ family in the literature, some local structural distortions intrinsic to orthorhombic perovskites were identified. The observed variation in T_N across the RCrO₃ family was well explained only when considering the effect of t–e hybridization within Cr atoms due to local site distortion and cooperative octahedral-site rotation (Zhou et al., 2010).

Particularly interesting is the last member of the series, LuCrO₃, characterized by the most distorted perovskite structure, containing the smallest Cr—O—Cr superexchange angles. Recent studies on the evolution of the unit-cell volume of RCrO₃ oxides unveiled an anomaly occurring for the LuCrO₃ compound, which has been attributed to the disappearance of the magnetostriction resulting from 3d–4f couplings (Zhu et al., 2022). A weak ferromagnetism effect has been described in LuCrO₃ (Durán et al., 2014). The magnetic response displays thermal irreversibility between zero-field-cooling and field-cooling conditions which is due to spin canted antiferromagnetic (AF) switching at 116 K. Moreover, a ferroelectric state and multiferroicity has been described in LuCrO₃ samples below T_N (Durán et al., 2014; Preethi Meher et al., 2014; Alvarez et al., 2014; Sahu et al., 2008).

In this paper we give new insights into the magnetic properties and magnetic structure with respect to those described (Bertaut, Bassi et al., 1966; Durán et al., 2014; Shamir et al., 1981). In particular, a spin canting of Cr³⁺ magnetic moments within the considered A-type magnetic arrangement and its thermal evolution below T_N are described from an NPD experiment, and the evolution of the Néel temperature under pressure (P < 1.5 GPa) is reported.

2. Experimental

Polycrystalline samples of LuCrO₃ were prepared by standard solid-state reactions. Mixtures of Lu₂O₃ and Cr₂O₃ in a stoichiometric ratio were sintered in air at 1253–1723 K with several intermediate grindings. These materials were checked to be single phase using X-ray powder diffraction. NPD patterns were collected at the high-resolution powder diffractometer for thermal neutrons (HRPT) (Fischer et al., 2000) of the SINQ spallation source at the Paul Scherrer Institute (Villigen, Switzerland). The sample was packed in a cylindrical vanadium holder of 6 mm diameter. A pattern was collected at room temperature using a wavelength of 1.494 Å in a high-intensity mode; the collection time was about 4 h. Low-temperature NPD patterns were sequentially collected at the D20 instrument, a high-flux diffractometer in the ILL (Institut Laue–Langevin, Grenoble, France) reactor with a wavelength of 2.41 Å, in the 1.5–166.2 K temperature interval, with a 5 K step and 15 min collection time for each pattern. The refinement of the crystal and magnetic structures was carried out by the Rietveld method with the FullProf software (Rodríguez-Carvajal, 1993). A pseudo-Voigt function was used to generate the shape of the diffraction peaks. The background was interpolated between areas devoid of reflections. Ultimately, the parameters refined were: scale factor, background coefficients, zero-point error, pseudo-Voigt corrected for asymmetry parameters, positional coordinates, anisotropic displacement factors and occupancy factors. The coherent scattering lengths for Lu, Cr and O, were 7.21, 3.635 and 5.803 fm, respectively.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Crystal structure characterization

The crystallographic structure of LuCrO₃ has been refined from a high-resolution powder neutron diffraction pattern collected at room temperature with a wavelength λ = 1.494 Å. The crystal structure was defined in the standard ortho­rhombic space group Pnma. The unit-cell parameters, together with the rest of the structural parameters and the conventional discrepancy factors obtained after the refinement are listed in Table 1. The excellent agreement between the observed and calculated neutron diffraction patterns is shown in Fig. 1, indicating the quality of the sample; all the Bragg peaks have been indexed and the presence of impurities has not been detected. The most characteristic Cr—O—Cr angles and Cr—O and Lu⋯O distances have also been determined and they are included in Table 2. LuCrO₃ is a distorted perovskite with an ortho­rhombic superstructure characterized by c < < a.

Table 1
Structural parameters after the Rietveld refinement from NPD data

Space group	Pnma
Unit-cell parameters (Å)	a = 5.50160 (3), b = 7.48093 (3), c = 5.17886 (2)
Volume (Å^3)	213.147 (2)
Wavelength (Å)	1.494
Temperature (K)	295
Discrepancy factors Rp, Rwp, RBragg (%)	2.54, 3.26, 2.30
χ^2	1.93

Atom (site)	x	y	z	B (Å^2)
Lu (4c)	0.07092 (11)	0.25	−0.01937 (13)	0.184 (10)
Cr (4b)	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.09 (2)
O1 (4c)	0.45860 (14)	0.25	0.11541 (15)	0.173 (13)
O2 (8d)	0.30471 (11)	0.05804 (6)	−0.30993 (10)	0.220 (9)

Table 2
Atomic distances (Å) and Cr—O—Cr angles (°) for the closest neighbours obtained after the Rietveld refinement from NPD data at 295 K

Cr—O1 (×2)	1.9766 (3)	Lu⋯O1	2.1814 (11)
Cr—O2 (×2)	1.9799 (6)	Lu⋯O1	2.2442 (10)
Cr—O2 (×2)	1.9919 (6)	Lu⋯O2 (×2)	2.2335 (8)
〈Cr—O〉	1.9827 (2)	Lu⋯O2 (×2)	2.4456 (8)
		Lu⋯O2 (×2)	2.6372 (6)
		〈Lu⋯O〉	2.3823 (3)
Cr—O1—Cr	142.239 (11)	Cr—O2—Cr (×2)	144.06 (2)

Figure 1 Observed (solid circles), calculated (solid line) and difference (bottom line) NPD patterns after the Rietveld refinement of the crystal structure of LuCrO3. The positions of Bragg reflections are represented by a row of vertical lines.

A schematic view of the crystallographic structure is displayed in Fig. 2. The crystallographic structure is described by a corner-sharing network of CrO₆ octahedra with Cr ions at their centre. In the standard Pnma setting, the octahedra form chains along the b axis linked by the apical O1 (4c) oxygen atoms and the equatorial plane of each octahedron lies in the (010) plane. The Cr—O1—Cr and Cr—O2—Cr chains are tilted with respect to the b and c, respectively. The octahedron rotation can be described by the Glazer notation a⁺b⁻b⁻; as shown in Fig. 2, the consecutive layers of octahedra are in phase along the a direction, whereas along b and c the layers of octahedra are tilted out of phase. On the other hand, the Cr—O distances in CrO₆ octahedra span from 1.9766 (3) Å for Cr—O1 to 1.9919 (6) Å for Cr—O2, exhibiting a subtle distortion characteristic of the perovskite superstructures defined in space group Pnma. The Lu atom is in eightfold coordination, with distances spanning from 2.1814 (11) Å to 2.6372 (6) Å.

Figure 2 Schematic view of the crystallographic structure of LuCrO3 perovskite along a (a) and c (b), defined in space group Pnma. Green, blue and red spheres represent Lu, Cr and O, respectively.

3.2. Magnetic characterization

The temperature dependence of the AC magnetic susceptibility (real and imaginary part) is presented in Fig. 3(a). The magnetic susceptibility presents a clear anomaly (cusp like) at T_N = 112.6 K, that we associate with the antiferromagnetic ordering of the Cr³⁺ ions in LuCrO₃. This value of T_N = 112.6 K is lower than that observed by neutron diffraction techniques, probably due to the narrower interval used in the susceptibility measurements (1 K) with respect to neutron data collection (5 K). The imaginary part of the AC magnetic susceptibility also presents a very clear absorption peak at the same temperature (T_N), especially at low frequencies (0.1 Hz). On the other hand, the real part of the AC magnetic susceptibility does not show a significant variation with the applied frequency, at least in the range from 0.1 Hz to 1 kHz.

Figure 3 (a) AC magnetic susceptibility variation as function of temperature for two different frequencies (0.1 Hz and 1 kHz) for LuCrO3. The upper panel shows the imaginary part of χ′′ and the lower panel the real part of χ′. (b) The hysteresis cycles for LuCrO3 at two different temperatures (1.8 K and 300 K), the inset includes the fitting of the inverse magnetic susceptibility to Curie–Weiss law.

In a pure antiferromagnetic ordering, we expect a linear behaviour of the ordered magnetic moment in relation to the magnetic field. However, the field dependence of the ordered magnetic moment (below T_N), shows a clear nonlinear behaviour as displayed in Fig. 3(b). This nonlinear behaviour could be associated with a canting of the magnetic moments of the antiferromagnetic structure, as indicated below in the determination of the magnetic structure. This canting moment is ferromagnetic and could be aligned with the external magnetic field applied to the hysteresis loop measurements. This canting moment (ferromagnetic component) is weak, but very clearly observed at low temperature from the extrapolation of the high magnetic field part (4–7 T) giving a value of 0.05 μ_B/Cr atom at 1.8 K.

Clearly, above T_N the LuCrO₃ perovskite behaves as a paramagnetic linear system as indicated in Fig. 3(b) for 300 K. Moreover, from the temperature dependence of the inverse of the AC magnetic susceptibility in the range from 125 K to 200 K, we observed a clear linear behaviour, the slope of which gives rise to a calculated value of the paramagnetic moment of the Cr³⁺ sublattice of 3.55 μ_B and Θ_CW = −155 K. These data are presented as an inset in Fig. 3(b). The negative sign of Θ_CW indicates antiferromagnetic interactions, and the value of 155 K is in the same order of T_N = 112.6 K. Also, the experimental effective moment of Cr³⁺ (3.55 μ_B) is close to the spin-only value of Cr³⁺ (3.7 μ_B) in an octahedral environment.

As indicated in the description of the magnetic (see below) and crystallographic structure, the exchange angles Cr—O1—Cr and Cr—O2—Cr involved in the magnetic superexchange are of the order of 142°, which suggest antiferromagnetic interactions, but still are far from the expected values (180°) for a formal antiferromagnetic interaction. In that case, we could expect that the fairly distorted CrO₆ octahedra could be very sensitive to the application of an external hydro­static pressure. As a consequence, LuCrO₃ could have a significant variation of the magnetic properties by the application of moderate hydro­static pressure. Certainly, the bulk magnetizations measurements are not a direct measurement of the change in the exchange angle, but a change in the ordering temperature could be related to the variation of the above-mentioned superexchange paths. Based on this hypothesis, we performed magnetic measurements for LuCrO₃ in a piston-and cylinder cell, which fits inside the SQUID magnetometer, with a hydro­static pressure range from 0 to 1.4 GPa. The variation of the derivative of the magnetic susceptibility, in a temperature range around T_N, is illustrated in Fig. 4(a) for 0 and 1.04 GPa. The peak in the derivative, associated with the ordering temperature (T_N), changes very significantly in this pressure range. There is an increase of T_N to higher temperatures, from 112.6 K to 116.0 K, with a total increment of T_N of 3.4 K at 1.1 GPa.

Figure 4 (a) Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility for LuCrO3 at two hydro­static pressures (0.0 GPa and 1.04 GPa). (b) Variation on the antiferromagnetic ordering temperature (TN) for LuCrO3 upon the hydro­static pressure. (c) Variation on the remnant magnetization for LuCrO3 under hydro­static pressure at a temperature of 5 K.

As a summary, in Fig. 4(b) we present a positive variation of T_N (defined as a peak in the derivative of the magnetic susceptibility) at two hydro­static pressures. Clearly, the pressure-affected geometry of the CrO₆ octahedra significantly changes the ordering temperature (T_N). The pressure-induced shortening of the Cr—O bonds leads to an improvement of the orbital overlap and thus the increment of the superexchange interactions and T_N. Zhou et al. (2020) deduced from the unit-cell compression that Cr—O—Cr angles decrease and the tilts of octahedra increase under pressure. The present result suggests that the shortening of Cr—O bond lengths is predominant, with the final effect of increasing the strength of the exchange interactions, giving rise to an increase of the ordering temperature, T_N. A detailed structural/study of fine structure under pressure, involving the determination of the oxygen structural parameters, would be essential to confirm this point.

From the low-temperature (5 K) field-dependence magnetization at different hydro­static pressures, we observe a small variation of the magnetization at high magnetic field (4 T to 7 T), when extrapolated to zero field [see Fig. 4(c)]. This remnant magnetization (MR) varies around 0.25 × 10⁻² μ_B at the maximum pressure of 1.1 GPa. This small variation is inaccurate, as it was extrapolated from a weak pressure dependence.

The external hydro­static pressure clearly modifies the overall magnetic behaviour in LuCrO₃. Initially the ordering temperature (T_N) increases in a significant way from 112.6 K at atmospheric pressure to 116 K at 1.4 GPa. This overall increase in T_N is also related to a decrease in the remnant magnetization at 5 K. At 1.4 GPa, the compression of perovskites affects the Cr—O—Cr tilt angles of the octahedra (CrO₆) and distorts their structure (Xiang et al., 2017). These data demonstrate the effect of moderate pressure on the bulk magnetic behaviour. However, a more detailed microscopic analysis, from sensitive structural techniques (X-ray or neutrons) will be necessary to determine the details of the different structural parameters under pressure.

3.2.1. Magnetic structure

In order to determine the magnetic structure and analyse its evolution with temperature a set of NPD patterns were recorded from 1.5 K up to 166.2 K in steps of 5 K, with a wavelength λ = 2.41 Å. The thermal evolution of the neutron diffraction patterns is shown in Fig. 5. Upon cooling down below 126 K new peaks, such as (110), forbidden in space group Pnma, are observed. This indicates the appearance of a magnetic order, characterized by propagation vector k = 0. So, the magnetic unit cell coincides with the chemical one. Let us point out that the observed magnetic reflections (hkl) seem to accomplish the condition h + l = 2n + 1 and k = 2n + 1. The magnetic peaks, except for the variation in the intensity, remain stable down to 1.5 K, indicating that no other magnetic transitions occur.

Figure 5 Thermal evolution of the NPD patterns from 1.5 K up to 166.2 K for LuCrO3.

The possible magnetic structures compatible with the crystal symmetry of LuCrO₃ have been obtained by using the group theory according to the description given by Bertaut (1963). The basis vectors of the different magnetic structure models have been determined with the GBasIrep software integrated in the FullProf suite (Rodríguez-Carvajal, 1993). For the propagation vector k = 0, the little group, , coincides with space group Pnma. The different irreducible representations of , using the Kovalev notation (Kovalev, 1993) for the symmetry elements, are shown in Table 3. The basis vectors are given in Table 4, together with their magnetic space group (Perez-Mato et al., 2015).

Table 3
Irreducible representation of the little group = Pnma, with p = (½, 0, ½), q = (0, ½, 0) and t = (½, ½, ½)

The notation given by the Bilbao Crystallographic server has been used for the irreducible representations (Aroyo et al., 2006). h are symmetry elements given in Kovalev (1993) notation.

	h1	h4/p	h3/q	h2/t	h25	h28/p	h27/q	h26/t
	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
	1	1	1	1	−1	−1	−1	−1
	1	1	−1	−1	1	1	−1	−1
	1	1	−1	−1	−1	−1	1	1
	1	−1	−1	1	1	−1	−1	1
	1	−1	−1	1	−1	1	1	−1
	1	−1	1	−1	1	−1	1	−1
	1	−1	1	−1	−1	1	−1	1

Table 4
Basis vectors for the Cr atoms, with Cr(1) = (0, 0, ½), Cr(2) = (½, 0, 0), Cr(3) = (0, ½, ½), Cr(4) = (½, ½, 0)

For space group Pnma and with the atom notation considered before, the basis vectors notations are: A = m₁−m₂−m₃+m₄; C = m₁+m₂−m₃−m₄; G = m₁−m₂+m₃−m₄; F = m₁+m₂+m₃+m₄.

	Cr(1)	Cr(2)	Cr(3)	Cr(4)	Magnetic space group
	mx	−mx	−mx	mx	Pnma, No. 62.441
	my	−my	my	−my
	mz	mz	−mz	−mz
	mx	−mx	mx	−mx	Pn′m′a, No. 62.446
	my	−my	−my	my
	mz	mz	mz	mz
	mx	mx	mx	mx	Pnm′a′, No. 62.447
	my	my	−my	−my
	mz	−mz	mz	−mz
	mx	mx	−mx	−mx	Pn′ma′, No. 62.448
	my	my	my	my
	mz	−mz	−mz	mz

After checking the different solutions, the best one corresponds to the irreducible representation , (G_x,A_y,F_z). The description of the magnetic structure, carried out from the NPD pattern at T = 1.5 K, are included in Tables 5 and 6. The component for m_x was determined to be zero, which is coherent with the extinction rules for the magnetic mode G_x, that only contributes to the magnetic reflections if k = 2n and h+ l = 2n+1. The reflections (001), (120) and (021) are not observed and only the G_x mode can contribute to them.

Table 5
Description of the magnetic structure of LuCrO₃ under its magnetic space group

The discrepancy factors after the refinement of the magnetic structure from NPD data acquired at T = 1.5 K with λ = 2.41 Å, are: R_Bragg = 1.9%, R_{Bragg Mag} = 3.5%, χ² = 14.4.

MSG symbol	UNI: Pn′m′a
MSG number	62.446
Transformation to standard setting of MSG	(a, b, c; 0, 0, 0)
Magnetic point group	m′m′m (a, b, c)
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °)	a = 5.4724 (2), b = 7.4342 (4), c = 5.1462 (2)
	α = β = γ = 90
MSG symmetry operations
MSG magnetic symmetry centering operations
Positions of magnetic atoms	Cr1 Cr 0.00 0.00 0.500
Positions of non-magnetic atoms	Lu1 Lu 0.07135 0.25000 −0.01928
	O1 O 0.45780 0.25000 0.11431
	O2 O 0.30408 0.05801 −0.31035
Magnetic atom, moment components, symmetry constraints and moment amplitude (μB)	Cr1 0.0 2.74 (1) 0.20 (5) (mx, my, mz) 2.76 (5)

Table 6
Complementary information about the magnetic structure of LuCrO₃

The magnetic structure is given by only one irrep of the parent space group.

Parent space group	Pnma (No. 62)
Transformation from parent basis to the one used for the magnetic structure	(a, b, c; 0, 0, 0)
Propagation vector(s)	k1 = (0, 0, 0)
Primary irrep(s) label(s) with dimension	(1)
Description of primary irrep(s)	{1 | 0}: 1
	{2001 | ½, 0, ½}: 1
	{2010 | 0, ½, 0}: −1
	{2100 | ½, ½, ½}: −1
	{−1 | 0}: 1
	{m001 | ½, 0, ½}: 1
	{m010 | 0, ½, 0}: −1
	{m100 | ½, ½, ½}: −1
Secondary irrep(s) label(s)	Not allowed

The good agreement between the observed and calculated patterns is shown in Fig. 6. A view of the magnetic structure is displayed in Fig. 7. The magnetic moments have a strong component along b and a small component along c, which can be described as an A-type antiferromagnetic ordering (Pnma setting) with a canting of the moments along the c axis. Let us point out that the A-type magnetic structure implies that the magnetic moments coupling is antiferromagnetic both in the (010) plane and between two adjacent planes along c. This canting had not been reported before, but it explains the weak ferromagnetism observed in the literature (Hornreich et al., 1976). The magnetic structure displayed in Fig. 7 is in contrast with that described before (Shamir et al., 1981), also obtained by neutron scattering; it is defined as [G_xz63°;—] and this notation implies a G-type coupling with the magnetic moment in the (xz) plane (in space group Pbnm), but no canting is determined. The work by Hornreich et al. (1976) is in agreement with the pioneering reports by Bertaut, Bassi et al. (1966).

Figure 6 Observed (solid circles), calculated (solid line) and difference (bottom line) NPD patterns at T = 1.5 K after the fitting by using the Rietveld profile method. The first row of sticks corresponds to the Bragg nuclear reflections and the second one to the magnetic reflections.

Figure 7 Schematic view of the magnetic structure. The green, blue and pink spheres are the Lu^3+, Cr^3+, O^2− ions, respectively. The figure highlights the A-type antiferromagnetic arrangement with a subtle canting along the c axis.

The thermal evolution of the unit-cell parameters and Cr³⁺ ordered magnetic moments are represented in Fig. 8. There is a conspicuous magnetostrictive effect that is manifested in an anomaly in the unit-cell parameters and volume upon entering the magnetically ordered phase, just below T_N ≃ 131 K.

Figure 8 Thermal evolution of (a) a and c unit-cell parameters, (b) b unit-cell parameter and volume and (c) Cr^3+ ordered magnetic moment.

The mechanism that explains the anisotropy in the ACrO₃ perovskites is not clear (Ding et al., 2017; Bousquet & Cano, 2016), although it seems to be linked to the size of the A cation and also, in the case A when is a rare-earth ion with a magnetic moment, to the f–d exchange between the A and Cr sublattices. For the smaller Dy–Lu cations the magnetic moments of the Cr³⁺ cations tend to be orientated towards the b axis (Bertaut, Bassi et al., 1966). The electronic configuration for Cr³⁺ (d³) is t_2g³e_g⁰, with the two e_g⁰ orbitals, and , empty. According to the Goodenough–Kanamori rules, in both cases for a 180° A—O—A bonding the coupling would be antiferromagnetic. In this case the bonding angle for Cr—O1—Cr and Cr—O2—Cr is well below 180°, specifically they are around 142–144° (see Table 2). The canting along the c axis may be related to these significantly bent Cr—O—Cr angles.

4. Conclusions

LuCrO₃ exhibits the well known GdFeO₃ perovskite superstructure, defined in orthorhombic space group Pnma, with narrow Cr—O—Cr superexchange angles due to the small size of Lu³⁺ ions, and stable in the 1.5–300 K temperature range. The magnetic structure, established below T_N = 126 K from NPD data and 112.6 K from AC susceptibility measurements, is characterized by an A-type antiferromagnetic ordering, with the Cr³⁺ moments approximately aligned along the b axis, and a subtle canting along c. This canting accounts for the weak ferromagnetism observed in the magnetization isotherms at 1.5 K. T_N exhibits a clear increase upon the application of an external pressure up to 1.45 GPa, from 112.6 K to 116.0 K. This arises from the shortening of the Cr—O bonds under compression, since previous studies suggest that the tilt angles are enhanced under pressure (Xiang et al., 2017).