research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206

Spatial distribution of 6s2 lone electron pair in Pb4Na(PO4)3 and stereochemical activity of the 6s2 electron cloud in lead-bearing apatites

crossmark logo

aDivision of Geosciences and Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan, and bSchool of Geosciences and Civil Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by R. Černý, University of Geneva, Switzerland (Received 12 September 2025; accepted 3 December 2025)

Single crystals of lacunary apatite structure-type compound Pb4Na(PO4)3 were prepared with a flux/solid-state-reaction technique and consecutive melt-growth to examine spatial distribution and stereochemical activity of the 6s2 lone electron pair of Pb2+ using X-ray diffraction. The target compound crystallized in space group P63/m with unit-cell edge lengths a = 9.7345 (12) Å and c = 7.2130 (18) Å without any indication of configurational ordering of Pb2+ and Na+ at the crystallographic A1 site. The anion channel running through the structure was confirmed as vacant. Residual density attributable to the deformed 6s2 electron cloud was found 0.6 Å apart from the A2-site position on the A2 triangle normal to c. The lack of a channel-site anion induced shrinkage of the unit cell and the O3 trigonal antiprism in the xy plane, and an increase in the twist angle of the A1O6 trigonal metaprism compensated for the shrinkage of the latter to keep the volume of the A1O9 coordination polyhedron constant. Systematic comparison of the size of the A2 triangle in Pb4Na(PO4)3 and other apatite-type compounds indicates no contribution from the 6s2 electron orbital on the size of the A2 triangle and limited space-filling ability of the orbital. A2 cations are attached on the periphery of a large void formed by the in-plane distortion of the hexagonal close packed arrangement of (BO4)3− complex anions. In other words, a face-sharing array of A2 octahedra was inserted `as a tube' through the framework. The sizes of A1O9 and BO4 polyhedra and their framework define the maximum size of the A2 triangle, while the triangle can easily be shrunk by attraction from an anion, such as F, in the channel.

1. Introduction

After the first reports of the structure of Ca5(PO4)3F by Mehmel (1930View full citation) and Náray-Szabó (1930View full citation), there are numerous articles to date regarding the structure of apatite-type compounds (hereafter referred to as apatites) for their industrial applications, such as an oxide ion conductor for solid oxide fuel cells operated under moderate temperature (Nakayama et al., 1999View full citation; Okudera et al., 2005View full citation; Ali et al., 2009View full citation; Matsuura & Okudera, 2022View full citation). Their crystal chemistry, crystal structures with symmetry lowering (hettotypes), and their descriptions have been summarized in reviews (White & ZhiLi, 2003View full citation; Mercier et al., 2005View full citation; Pasero et al., 2010View full citation), and only a short description of the aristotype structure (space group P63/m) is given below. The generalized formula of apatites is written as [A12][A23](BO4)3X (Z = 2), here A1, A2, B and X are designated also as atomic sites. The aristotype of their host structure can be depicted as a hexagonal close packed (hcp) array of (BO4)3− complex anions with large in-plane distortion. This in-plane distortion forms four smaller and two larger octahedral voids (per unit cell). The smaller ones are arrayed parallel to c and filled by A1 cations at z ≃ 0 and 1/2 (Wyckoff position 4f). This site is coordinated by O1- and O2-site oxide anions to form an A1O6 trigonal prism with a metaprismatic twist angle φ and three more distant O3-site oxide anions which cap each of the square faces (Fig. 1[link]). White & ZhiLi (2003View full citation) and Dong & White (2004View full citation) pointed out that the A1O6 metaprism is a key structural unit along with the BO4 unit, and the twist angle φ is a useful measure to validate the structure. The larger ones are large enough to accommodate three A2 cations around c at z = 1/4 and 3/4. A regular triangle made of these three A2 cations will be referred to as an A2 triangle. Six A2 cations in adjacent nets form a nearly regular trigonal antiprism with A2 cations on its apices (A2 octahedron). The face-sharing array of this octahedron along c forms an anion channel with the X anion as a guest at (0, 0, z) [z = 0 (Wyckoff position 2b with symmetry 3..), 1/4 (Wyckoff position 2a with symmetry 6..) or somewhere in between (Wyckoff position 4e with symmetry 3.. with a half occupancy)]. Six O3-site oxide anions on the periphery of this large void also form a highly oblate trigonal antiprism by two staggered O3 regular triangles (O3 triangle) normal to c in the middle of each A2 octahedron. Repulsion from O3-site oxide anions affects displacements and even the position of the X anion (Okudera, 2013View full citation; Matsuura & Okudera, 2022View full citation). Mercier et al. (2005View full citation) reported that unit-cell edge length a is governed by constraints inherent to the (A1O6)–(BO4) polyhedral arrangement, however, there was no in-detail discussion on repulsive forces inside the channel such as repulsion between O3 and X anions and direct interference of 6s2 lone electron pairs at the A2-site Pb2+ in lead-bearing apatites.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Structure of Pb4Na(PO4)3. (a) Projection in [001] with atoms in the range −0.6 < x < 0.6, −0.6 < y < 0.6, 0 < z < 1. Symmetry codes on atomic sites are abridged. BO4 polyhedra are drawn in purple. A1O6 trigonal metaprisms are drawn in grey with the definition of angle φ indicated. Edges of the A2 octahedron are drawn with grey lines. (b) Orthogonal projection of the structure with atoms in the range −0.2 < x < 1.2, −0.2 < y < 1.2, 0 < z < 1. A1O9 and BO4 polyhedra are drawn in grey and purple, respectively, to show their edge-sharing manner. All displacement ellipsoids at the 70% probability level. Drawn with VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2011View full citation) software.

Contribution from the stereochemically active 6s2 lone electron pair on the stability of lacunary apatite structures has been mentioned by several authors (e.g. Mathew et al., 1980View full citation; Krivovichev et al., 2004View full citation; Kampf & Housley, 2011View full citation). They suggested the role of the space-filling 6s2 orbital as a substitute for the X anion to prevent the structure from collapse. Hirano & Okudera (2025View full citation) solved the structure of Pb10(PO4)6O and found commensurate modulation in sizes of A2 triangles in the manner `large-middle-small-middle(-large)', which caused a 2 × c superstructure. Investigation of the structure showed significant local shrinkage of the channel due to attraction on A2-site Pb2+ from X-site O2− in the channel and a simultaneous shift of O2− out from the centre of the A2 triangle. The latter was attributed to the 6s2 electron cloud that thrusted O2− out from its ideal position on the triangle plane. However, this structure also left some issues to be considered. First, the smallest A2 triangle [edge length d(A2cA2c) = 3.871 (3) Å] was highly shrunk, suggesting that repulsive force among 6s2 electron clouds was rather weak. Second, the size of the largest A2 triangle [d(A2aA2a) = 4.359 (3) Å] at the vacant part of the channel was comparable to that in Pb5(PO4)3Cl in which Cl and presumably space-filling 6s2 orbitals coexisted. Indeed, estimated bond valence sums (BVSs) for Cl in lead chlorapatites commonly exceeded its formal valence, in other words, the channel was tight even for Cl alone (Okudera, 2013View full citation). These observations might indicate rather limited ability of the 6s2 orbital to fill the space and also the highly subordinate nature of the size of the A2 octahedron.

Location, or deformation, of the 6s2 electron cloud and systematic variation in the sizes of the A2 triangle with- and without such a lone electron pair seem to be the keys to solve these questions. In spite of the long research history of apatite-type compounds, no accurate X-ray investigation of the 6s2 electron density had been reported to date. It is not surprising since Pb is a heavy X-ray absorber, and the presence of the X anion in the channel further hinders the precise investigation of electron density distribution inside the channel. Here, we report electron density distribution inside the vacant channel in one of the lacunary apatites, Pb4Na(PO4)3, after structure refinement with single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Stereochemical activity of the 6s2 lone electron pair at the A2 site will be briefly discussed based on relationships found among unit-cell edge length a, species of the X anion, and sizes of A2 and O3 triangles in the subjected compound and selected apatite-type compounds hitherto reported.

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample preparation

Pb4Na(PO4)3 (hereafter referred to as PNP) single crystals were prepared in two steps. A pre-grown powder of PNP was prepared by a flux/solid-state-reaction method. A mixture of PbO (99.5%; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Japan), Bi2O3 (98.0%; Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Japan), and NH4H2PO4 (99.0%; FUJIFILM Wako) reagents were mixed to attain Pb, Bi and P in a 9:1:6 molar ratio. Bi source was mixed in the starting material to check if we could incorporate Bi3+ in the apatite structure. Na2B4O7·10H2O (99.0%; FUJIFILM Wako) was added at 10 wt% of the mixture as a flux and also a Na source; the molar ratio of Pb and Na in the starting material was 4:0.74. The mixture was ground, charged into a porcelain crucible and heated in air. The temperature was raised from room temperature to 850°C over 1 h, held at this temperature for 24 h and slowly lowered to 600°C over 24 h. After holding the temperature for 2 h, the furnace was cooled down by turning the power off. This pre-grown powdery specimen was washed with water to remove the soluble component. All powder X-ray diffraction peaks from the specimen could be successfully indexed with a hexagonal apatite cell and a trace amount of cubic Pb3Bi(PO4)3 (Sahoo & Guru Row, 2010View full citation). A single-crystal specimen was grown from the melt of this pre-grown powdery specimen: the yielded powder was lightly ground, charged into a Pt capsule and heated in air. The temperature was raised from room temperature to 1100°C over 1 h and held at this temperature for 10 h. Then, the temperature was slowly lowered to 500°C over 120 h before turning the power off. Transparent crystals in euhedral shape (hexagonal prism with a hexagonal cap at one end) associated with a tiny amount of translucent white fragments were obtained. Weissenberg photographs of the transparent crystals indicated an aristotype apatite lattice of the crystal. The white fragments were confirmed as cubic Pb3Bi(PO4)3 with powder X-ray diffractometry.

In contrast to a recent report of Pb7.4Bi0.3Na2.3(PO4)6 (Hamdi et al., 2007View full citation), preliminary qualitative- and quantitative-chemical analyses (a JEOL JSM-6010LV scanning electron microscope with an integrated energy dispersive spectrometer) showed no sign of bis­muth nor boron in transparent crystals from the batch. The averaged atomic ratio of Pb:Na:P at four points on two crystals was 3.90 (15):1.08 (3):3.03 (6) with reference to 12 oxygen atoms. Non-occurrence of Na-deficiency in the crystal could be explained as the formation of Pb3Bi(PO4)3 removed equal amounts of Pb and (PO4) from the system and caused overabundance of Na and (PO4) with respect to Pb in the system. Since the P:O ratio matched with that in the target composition and no Na-excess structure was possible for charge neutrality, we concluded at this stage that the single crystals from the batch had the target composition with no X-site anion nor point defect at cation sites.

2.2. Data collection and structure analysis

A single-crystal specimen was ground into a sphere of d = 195 µm. The intensities of Bragg reflections and values of θ were measured at room temperature on a Rigaku AFC-5S automated four-circle diffractometer with graphite-monochromatized Mo Kα radiation. The ω–2θ scan method with scan width 1.5° + 0.35tanθ and scan speed of 4° min−1 was employed at the data collection. 19672 (19658 for space group P63/m) reflections in a full reciprocal sphere were measured up to 2θ = 90°. Space groups P31c and P3c1 were ruled out for violation of systematic absence of hh2hl for odd l and hh0l for odd l. Relationships found among Bragg positions and observed intensities suggested the Laue symmetry 6/m. There was no apparent scattering power at 000l with l ≠ 2n (n: integers) Bragg positions, which restricts the possible space group of the specimen to be P63/m or P63. Agreements among symmetry-equivalent reflections under 6/m (centrosymmetric) and 6 (noncentrosymmetric) point groups were virtually the same in spite of relatively large anomalous dispersion coefficients of Pb, and space group P63/m was employed in the following examinations. Thus, ordering of Na at the A1 site was ruled-out at this stage. The least-squares fitting of the peak positions of 11 intense reflections in the range 43.9° < 2θ < 47.9° resulted in the unit-cell edge lengths of a = 9.7345 (12) Å and c = 7.2130 (18) Å after calibration with Si (Okada & Tokumaru, 1984View full citation). See Table 1[link] for crystallographic details and further experimental conditions.

Table 1
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula Pb4Na(PO4)3
Mr 1136.70
Crystal system, space group Hexagonal, P63/m
Temperature (K) 294
a, c (Å) 9.7345 (12), 7.2130 (18)
V3) 591.93 (16)
Z 2
Dx (g cm−3) 6.38
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 57.316
Crystal shape Sphere
Crystal radius (mm) 0.095
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku AFC5S
Data collection method ω–2θ scan
 Scan speed (° min−1) 4
 Repeat scan Up to 3 times until |Fobs| > 10σ(Fobs)
Absorption correction Spherical
Tmin, Tmax 0.006, 0.009
No. of measured, independent and |Fobs| ≥ 3σ(Fobs) reflections 19658, 1729, 707
Rint for all reflections collected 0.101
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.995
 
Refinement
R(F), wR(F), S 0.017, 0.019, 1.56
No. of reflections 627
Rint for used reflections 0.033
No. of parameters 39
No. of restraints 3
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 2.64, −1.80
Computer programs: Rigaku control software, LSGCEX (Kihara, 1990View full citation), VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2011View full citation).

The intensity data were converted to |Fobs| and their standard uncertainties (s.u.s: σ), after applying Lorentz, polarization and spherical absorption corrections (μr = 5.56). Averages over equivalent reflections for the 6/m point group were taken, and the averages which obeyed conditions |Fobs| ≥ 3σ(Fobs) and |Fobs|max < 1.5|Fobs|min among equivalents were used in the structure refinements with weights of σ−2. The least-squares program LSGCEX (Kihara, 1990View full citation) was used for structure refinements with variables including one scale and one isotropic extinction factor [type I with the Lorentzian mosaic spread of Becker & Coppens (1974View full citation)]. Neutral form factors and a low-angle threshold for diffraction data (0.25 ≤ sinθ/λ) were employed after examinations noted in Okudera (2013View full citation). Neutral form factors for respective atoms and their anomalous dispersion terms were taken from International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C.

The refinements started from the atomic coordinates and anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) given for Pb5(PO4)3Cl [OP-4 in Okudera (2013View full citation)] but no X site. In the following calculations the ratio of Pb:Na was fixed as 4:1 and all atomic sites were assumed fully occupied based on the results of quantitative chemical analyses. As a first attempt, the A1 site was equi-partitioned by Pb and Na and the A2 site was assumed solely occupied by Pb as reported by Koumiri et al. (2000View full citation), and coordinates of atomic sites with ADPs were refined. The calculation converged at R(F), R(F2) and wR(F) = 0.024, 0.040, 0.028 for 627 independent reflections with 38 parameters. Next, occupation of the A2 site by Na was allowed under above-mentioned constraints and restraints. The calculation converged at R(F), R(F2) and wR(F) = 0.017, 0.030, 0.019 with 39 parameters, indicating that a certain amount of Na was located at the A2 site as was also reported by Toumi & Mhiri (2008View full citation). Minimum and maximum Δρ were −1.80 e Å−3 at (0.97, 0.69, 0.80) and 2.64 e Å−3 at (0.33, 0.66, 0.58), respectively. No particular positive residual density attributable to an X-site anion was found on the c axis. The ADPs at the A2 site were refined also with third-rank tensors after Gram–Charlier expansion formalism (Johnson & Levy, 1974View full citation) for a highly skewed coordination environment at the site. Absolute values of some of third-rank tensors exceeded three times of their s.u.s. The largest among their absolute values was −3.4 (4) × 10−5 for b222 as expected from its coordination environment, namely, the absence of the X anion (Kuhs, 2003View full citation). Their absolute values, however, were small, and indeed no clear difference was found on Δρ maps after the refinements with and without those third-rank tensors. Details of structure refinement and refined structural parameters after the refinement with harmonic ADPs are given in Tables 1[link] and 2[link], respectively. Selected interatomic distances, bond angles, polyhedral volumes and bond-valence sums are given in Table 3[link]. The residual density map after the refinement is shown in Fig. 2[link].

Table 2
Extinction factor, atomic coordinates, and anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

U22 = U11 and U12 = 1/2U11 at the A1 site, U13 = U23 = 0 at A1, A2, B, O1 and O2 sites.

Extinction factor 0.012 (6)
 
Site and site symmetry A1 and 4f 3..
Occupancy Pb 0.557 (2)
Occupancy Na 0.443
x 1/3
y 2/3
z 0.00877 (9)
U11 0.01344 (16)
U33 0.0166 (3)
 
Site and site symmetry A2 and 6h m..
Occupancy Pb 0.962
Occupancy Na 0.038
x 0.00130 (3)
y 0.25558 (3)
z 1/4
U11 0.01270 (11)
U22 0.01554 (12)
U33 0.01904 (12)
U12 0.00706 (9)
 
Site and site symmetry B and 6h m..
Occupancy P 1
x 0.3996 (2)
y 0.3785 (2)
z 1/4
U11 0.0099 (6)
U22 0.0088 (6)
U33 0.0100 (6)
U12 0.0049 (5)
 
Site and site symmetry O1 and 6h m..
Occupancy O 1
x 0.3232 (7)
y 0.4827 (7)
z 1/4
U11 0.025 (3)
U22 0.013 (2)
U33 0.017 (2)
U12 0.013 (2)
 
Site and site symmetry O2 and 6h m..
Occupancy O 1
x 0.5204 (8)
y 0.1019 (8)
z 1/4
U11 0.019 (3)
U22 0.019 (3)
U33 0.071 (6)
U12 0.015 (2)
 
Site and site symmetry O3 and 12i 1
Occupancy O 1
x 0.3479 (7)
y 0.2685 (6)
z 0.0808 (6)
U11 0.044 (3)
U22 0.0221 (18)
U33 0.0151 (17)
U12 0.023 (2)
U13 −0.0100 (17)
U23 −0.0072 (14)

Table 3
Selected interatomic distances (Å), bond angles (°), polyhedral volume (Å3) and bond-valence sums

Bond-valence parameters were taken from Brown & Altermatt (1985View full citation) (B&A), Krivovichev & Brown (2001View full citation) (K&B) and Gagné & Hawthorne (2015View full citation) (G&H).

A1 site  
A1–O1 (×3) 2.463 (6)
A1–O2 (×3) 2.717 (7)
A1–O3 (×3) 2.913 (7)
Mean value 2.696 (6)
BVS for Pb2+ 2.09 (B&A), 2.16 (K&B), 2.16 (G&H)
BVS for Na+ 0.91 (B&A), 0.91 (G&H)
   
A2 site  
A2–O1 2.790 (6)
A2–O2 2.262 (13)
A2–O3 (×2) 2.612 (5)
A2–O3 (×2) 2.529 (5)
Mean value 2.556 (6)
BVS for Pb2+ 1.99 (B&A), 1.89 (K&B), 1.95 (G&H)
BVS for Na+ 0.86 (B&A), 0.83 (G&H)
   
B site  
B–O1 1.528 (9)
B–O2 1.536 (10)
B–O3 (×2) 1.533 (5)
Mean value 1.533 (7)
BVS 5.03 (B&A)
O1–B–O2 111.2 (5)
O1–B–O3 (×2) 111.4 (3)
O2–B–O3 (×2) 108.5 (3)
O3–B–O3 105.4 (3)
Volume (Å3) 1.84 (1)
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Residual density, Δρ, map with atoms in the range −0.5 < x < 0.5, −0.5 < y < 0.5, −0.1 < z < 1.1. B and O1–O3 atoms are abridged for clarity. O3 triangles and A2 octahedra are drawn in red and grey, respectively. All displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 70% probability level. Purple and blue tetrahedra are (PO4)3− and (SiO4)4− complex anions, respectively. Isosurface: ± 1.5 e Å−3. Yellow: positive; pale blue: negative. (a) Pb4Na(PO4)3. (b) La9.33(SiO4)6O2 (Okudera et al., 2005View full citation). X-site oxide anions are shown in red. Drawn with VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2011View full citation).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Structure

The PNP specimen crystallized in an aristotype P63/m apatite host structure with a vacant channel. In contrast to the previously reported structure, 11.4% of total Na was located at the A2 site in the present specimen instead of only 2.1% in Toumi & Mhiri (2008View full citation). Calculated BVSs for Pb2+ and Na+ at the A2 site were 1.99 and 0.86 after Brown & Altermatt (1985View full citation), 1.95 and 0.83 after Gagné & Hawthorne (2015View full citation), and 1.89 for Pb2+ after Krivovichev & Brown (2001View full citation), indicating that the refined coordinates represented the position of Pb, and an actual position of Na would be a little closer to the O2-site position to use up its charge. The mean-square displacements (MSDs), 〈u2〉 (Å2), at the B site were nearly isotropic and the smallest among all atomic sites as in most of the structures hitherto reported. Refined ADP values at O sites were larger and more anisotropic than those in natural pyromorphite [Pb5(PO4)3Cl], and those were closer to the values in natural vanadinite [Pb5(VO4)3Cl] (Okudera, 2013View full citation) and artificial La9.33(SiO4)6O2 (Okudera et al., 2005View full citation). The libration mode of the (PO4)3− complex anion in PNP was an intermediate of roto-oscillation around the B—O1 bond in the above-mentioned natural lead chlorapatites and cradle-like motion with B–O2 as the unique axis in La9.33(SiO4)6O2. Since no particular mode was dominant, the refined shape of the BO4 tetrahedron in PNP was fairly regular with a quadratic elongation index of 1.0014 and bond-angle variance of 5.73° despite its large libration amplitude. Displacement ellipsoids at A sites were slightly elongated (23% at A1 and 35% at A2) in [001], while their anisotropy was small. Virtually isotropic atomic displacements at the A1 site ascertained full occupation of the site by cations, otherwise the MSDs reflect local displacement of the A1-site cation (at 1/3, 2/3, z) toward one of its neighbouring A1-site positions (at 1/3, 2/3, z ± 1/2) when such a position is vacant as in the case of Nd9.33(SiO4)6O2 (Okudera et al., 2004View full citation) and La9.33(SiO4)6O2.

3.2. Residual density

Residual density, Δρ, is shown in Fig. 2[link] with the isosurface of 1.5 e Å−3. The structure of La9.33(SiO4)6O2 (Okudera et al., 2005View full citation) was re-refined for comparison purpose with a low-angle threshold 0.25 ≤ sinθ/λ and the same extinction formalism employed in the present study. The |Fobs|max < 1.1|Fobs|min threshold on structure refinement was kept unchanged. No notable difference was found on convergence of the least-squares cycles, refined structure and residual density from previously reported ones. Residual density after the calculation is also shown in Fig. 2[link].

There were some characteristic positive and negative residues in the vicinity of the A2 site position. Two accumulations of positive residue, separated on the xz plane for a mirror at z = 1/4, and two accumulations of negative residue, also separated from z = 1/4 but slightly out from the xz plane, were commonly found on PNP and La9.33(SiO4)6O2 despite absence of 6s2 electrons at A2-site La3+ in the latter. The appearance of positive residues on the triad axis which run through the A1 site could not be ascribed to 6s2 electrons at the site for the same reason. On the other hand, accumulation of positive residue at z = 1/4 in the vicinity of the A2 site was unique in PNP. Its maximum (2.61 e Å−3) was located at (−0.01, 0.19, 1/4), which was separated 0.6 Å from the A2 site position on the line to the centre of the A2 triangle, in contrast to speculations on an appearance of 6s2 electrons at the position opposite to the A2—O2 bond (e.g. Mathew et al., 1980View full citation; Krivovichev et al., 2004View full citation). Indeed, the appearance of this accumulation had a striking resemblance to electron localization function in the vicinity of A2-site Pb2+ in hexagonal Pb5(AsO4)3Cl after density functional theory calculations (Cametti et al., 2022View full citation). The peak of observed accumulation was found on the opposite side with respect to the line, but spatial difference was small. So, the residue had attributes expected for the 6s2 electron cloud. More consideration, however, seemed necessary on its separation from the A2 site position. Similarly, prominent accumulation of positive residue was found at approximately 1.0 Å from the Bi core in Bi2WO6 (Okudera et al., 2018View full citation) despite expectedly close attractions on electrons from respective atom cores. Stereochemical activity of 6s2 electrons will be nonetheless discussed in the following sections.

3.3. Unit-cell edge lengths and some characteristic values in PNP and chemically similar apatites

Some geometric parameter values in the PNP structure were compared first with those in closely related compounds, namely, normal and lacunary lead phosphate apatites (Table 4[link]). Pb5(PO4)3Cl (Okudera, 2013View full citation) and Pb5(PO4)3Br (Liu et al., 2011View full citation) in Table 4[link] have the X anion at z ≃ 0 with BVS values of 1.25 and 1.50, respectively. Unit-cell edge lengths a and c of the present PNP specimen were the smallest among these compounds. Variations in c showed that the presence or absence, and even the size, of the X anion in the channel had little effect on unit-cell edge length c. Differences in volume of the A1O9 polyhedron could be ascribed to differences in the sizes of Na+, Pb2+ and K+ at the A1 site in an increasing order (Shannon, 1976View full citation). A high population (25%) of point defects at the A1 site had little effect on the volume of the polyhedron in Pb9(PO4)3, and the unit-cell edge length a followed the increasing order of the sizes of A1-site cations among these lacunary apatites.

Table 4
Unit-cell edge lengths (Å), polyhedron A1O9 volume (Å3), A2 and O3 triangle edge lengths (Å), and twist angle φ (°) of the A1O6 trigonal metaprism in selected lead phosphate apatites

  a c v(A1O9) d(A2–A2) d(O3–O3) φ Reference
Pb4Na(PO4)3 9.7345 (12) 7.1230 (18) 37.45 (10) 4.2982 (7) 5.324 (9) 24.2 (4) This study
Pb9(PO4)6 9.826 (4) 7.357 (3) 39.3 (3) 4.311 (3) 5.35 (3) 27.3 (12) Hata et al. (1980View full citation)
Pb4K(PO4)3 9.827 (1) 7.304 (1) 40.19 (18) 4.372 (2) 5.402 (14) 28.8 (5) Mathew et al. (1980View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Cl 9.983 (1) 7.341 (1) 38.41 (13) 4.3525 (11) 5.643 (10) 18.0 (4) Okudera (2013View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Br 10.0622 (5) 7.3575 (3) 39.70 (15) 4.5252 (16) 5.668 (14) 17.0 (4) Liu et al. (2011View full citation)
†Averages of two natural specimens.

In contrast to the volume of the A1O9 polyhedron, unit-cell edge length a, edge lengths of A2 and O3 triangles [d(A2–A2) and d(O3–O3)] in PNP and Pb9(PO4)6 (Hata et al., 1980View full citation) are virtually the same. These two edge lengths are a little larger in Pb9K(PO4)6, while differences were still small. d(A2–A2) in lacunary lead phosphate apatites are close also to that in Pb5(PO4)3Cl. O3 triangles are apparently larger in Pb5(PO4)3Cl and Pb5(PO4)3Br, validating the repulsion of O3-site O2− from the X anion at z ≃ 0. As twist angle φ of the A1O6 trigonal metaprism indicated, these expansions are compensated by shift/rotation of the BO4 unit and a cooperative untwist of the metaprism. Size relationships in a and d(O3–O3) are concordant with that in a and the radius of the X anions (e.g. Sudarsanan & Young, 1974View full citation). These two compounds, however, showed a contrast in expansion of the A2 triangle: increase in d(A2–A2) was 1% in Pb5(PO4)3Cl and 5% in Pb5(PO4)3Br with reference Pb9(PO4)6. Intuitive understanding is that Br is too large to settle in the A2 octahedron of the Pb5(PO4)3 host structure without expanding the channel whereas Cl fits in the A2 octahedron. However, the A2 octahedron in Pb5(PO4)3Cl is still small for Cl as its BVS value indicated. The A2 octahedron can be larger also in Pb5(PO4)3Cl to realize the ideal coordination environment for Cl, and a larger A2 octahedron would also be beneficial for 6s2 electrons. However, Cl is encapsulated in a small cavity in the Pb5(PO4)3Cl structure. Therefore, 6s2 electrons of Pb2+ at the A2 site should not be so active as to strongly affect the geometry of the host structure. Space-filling ability of those electrons would also be rather limited.

3.4. Stereochemical activity of 6s2 electrons at A2-site Pb2+

The above consideration on d(A2–A2) supports the idea that the size of the A2 triangle is primarily a subordinate of the sizes of A1O9 and BO4 polyhedra: the apatitic host structure is made of an hcp array of BO4 units with in-plane distortion primarily for the accommodation of the A1 cation in the smaller void, and face-sharing array of the A2 octahedron is inserted as a tube in resultant larger voids. To validate the idea, the sizes of A2 triangles were compared among chlor- and fluorapatites. Variation in size of the A1O9 polyhedron in mixed-cation cases will be reflected in unit-cell edge length a. The relationship between a and d(A2–A2) in lead apatites will differ from those in other apatites when interference from 6s2 electrons affects the structure.

Chlor- and fluorapatites (A2 = Ca, Pb, Sr and Ba, B = P, Mn, As and V) reported from 1971 onward were employed together with lacunary apatites and the 2 × c superstructure of Pb10(PO4)3O (Hirano & Okudera, 2025View full citation) for the following comparison. The 2 × c superstructure of Pb10(PO4)3O reported by Krivovichev & Engel (2023View full citation) was not used here for the reasons described in our previous study. When structures of solid-solution series were reported, only structures of end members were used for comparison. Up to 13% of heteroatom was allowed at the A2 site. Structures with multiple X sites are not used in this discussion. Unit-cell edge lengths, d(A2–A2) and the position of the X site in selected structures are listed in Table 5[link], together with the position and the BVS for the X anion after Brown & Altermatt (1985View full citation) for Ba2+—F and Ca2+—F, and Brese & O'Keeffe (1991View full citation) for the other combinations. Variations in d(A2–A2) with unit-cell edge length a are shown in Fig. 3[link] with guide for the eye for each combination of A2 and X ions. As can be seen in Fig. 3[link], reported dependences of unit-cell edge length a on sizes of the A1 cation (e.g. Badraoui et al., 2006View full citation), the B cation (e.g. Reinen et al., 1986View full citation; Flis et al., 2010View full citation) and the X anion (e.g. Sudarsanan & Young, 1974View full citation; Piotrowski et al., 2002View full citation) held among compounds listed in Tables 4[link] and 5[link]. BVS values for Cl exceeded its formal valence in all compounds and varied in the range 1.05∼1.40. Large d(A2–A2) values on calcium chlorapatites could be ascribed to the smaller size of Ca2+ under the inserted tube consideration. Despite large variations in BVS values, d(A2–A2) in all chlorapatites except A2 = Ca were found on single wide line. No characteristic feature was found on lead chlorapatites and the effect from the in-plane collision of 6s2 orbitals, if any, should be small. Sizes of A2 triangles in lacunary apatites including PNP were found on the extension of the line on the smaller a side as if the size of the triangle is a simple function of a. It is interesting to note that the largest one, d(A2aA2a), in Pb10(PO4)6O also fell on the extension of this wide line: the size of the largest A2 triangle was not expanded as a counteraction for shrinkage of the other two triangles. Change in the size of the A2 triangle with a different X anion will be examined below by comparing its size in chlor- and fluorapatites.

Table 5
Unit-cell edge lengths (Å), A2 triangle edge length (Å), z-coordinate of the X site and BVS for the X anion in hitherto reported chlorapatites, fluorapatites and selected related apatites

z-coordinate of X site was taken at 0 ≤ z < 1/2. z < 1/4 when possible.

Composition Method A1 a c d(A2–A2) z of X BVS for X Reference
Chlorapatites
A2 = Ca
Ca4.78Na0.22(PO4)3Cl0.78 Single Ca 9.5773 (13) 6.8033 (6) 4.3149 (10) 0.0527 (6) 1.13 Matsuura & Okudera (2022View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3Cl Single Ca 9.598 (2) 6.776 (4) 4.2736 (15) 0.0677 (4) 1.31 Hughes et al. (1989View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3Cl_U Single Ca 9.6233 (2) 6.7784 (3) 4.3229 (15) 0.060 (1)‡‡ 1.18 Luo et al. (2009View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3Cl Single Ca 9.628 (5) 6.764 (5) 4.2864 (19) 0.0562 (6) 1.23 Mackie et al. (1972View full citation) (averaged structure)
Ca5(PO4)3Cl_Th Single Ca 9.6330 (2) 6.7834 (2) 4.3229 (15) 0.059 (1) 1.20 Luo et al. (2009View full citation)
Ca5(AsO4)3Cl Single Ca 10.076 (1) 6.807 (1) 4.5446 (14) 0.1263 (5) 1.15 Wardojo & Hwu (1996View full citation)
Ca5(VO4)3Cl Single Ca 10.1490 (13) 6.7957 (18) 4.5865 (17) 0.1691 (6) 1.26 Matsuura & Okudera (2022View full citation)
 
A2 = Sr
Sr5(PO4)3Cl_Th§ Single Sr 9.8562 (3) 7.2095 (4) 4.3531 (8) 0 1.27 Luo et al. (2009View full citation)
Sr5(PO4)3Cl Single Sr 9.859 (1) 7.206 (2) 4.3401 (5) 0 1.26 Sudarsanan & Young (1974View full citation)
Sr5(AsO4)3Cl Rietveld Sr 10.1969 (1) 7.28108 (9) 4.466 (11) 0 1.05 Bell et al. (2009View full citation)
Sr5(VO4)3Cl Single Sr 10.2047 (11) 7.3040 (5) 4.4530 (10) 0 1.05 Matsuura & Okudera (unpublished)
Sr5(VO4)3Cl Rietveld Sr 10.2073 (1) 7.3067 (1) 4.417 (6) 0 1.07 Beck et al. (2006View full citation)
 
A2 = Pb
Ca2Pb3(PO4)3Cl Single Ca 9.857 (1) 7.130 (2) 4.325 (2) 0 1.40 Kampf et al. (2006View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Cl Single Pb 9.977 (1) 7.351 (2) 4.3487 (18) 0 1.10 Dai & Hughes (1989View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Cl (OP-4) Single Pb 9.9791 (14) 7.3439 (11) 4.3493 (11) 0 1.25 Okudera (2013View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Cl (OP-1) Single Pb 9.9856 (10) 7.3318 (11) 4.3557 (10) 0 1.24 Okudera (2013View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Cl Rietveld Pb 9.9938 (1) 7.3397 (1) 4.3595 (9) 0 1.24 Flis et al. (2010View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3Cl Single Pb 10.0017 (19) 7.3413 (16) 4.3620 (15) 0 1.23 Mills et al. (2012View full citation)
Ca2Pb3(AsO4)3Cl Single Ca 10.140 (3) 7.185 (4) 4.414 (5) 0 1.23 Rouse et al. (1984View full citation)
Pb5(AsO4)3Cl (OM-3) Single Pb 10.2382 (14) 7.4502 (12) 4.4154 (15) 0 1.10 Okudera (2013View full citation)
Pb5(AsO4)3Cl (OM-6) Single Pb 10.2396 (13) 7.4405 (24) 4.4358 (13) 0 1.11 Okudera (2013View full citation)
Pb5(VO4)3Cl Single Pb 10.250 (2) 7.454 (1) 4.426 (9) 0 1.08 Calos et al. (1990View full citation)
Pb5(AsO4)3Cl Rietveld Pb 10.2518 (2) 7.4482 (2) 4.4145 (11) 0 1.10 Flis et al. (2010View full citation)
Pb5(VO4)3Cl Single Pb 10.2990 (2) 7.3080 (1) 4.4347 (6) 0 1.14 Laufek et al. (2006View full citation)
Pb5(VO4)3Cl Single Pb 10.3090 (10) 7.3735 (17) 4.4675 (15) 0 1.06 Matsuura & Okudera (unpublished)
Pb5(VO4)3Cl Single Pb 10.315 (6) 7.337 (3) 4.3487 (18) 0 1.10 Dai & Hughes (1989View full citation)
Pb5(VO4)3Cl (OV-5) Single Pb 10.3217 (13) 7.3407 (13) 4.4530 (13) 0 1.10 Okudera (2013View full citation)
Pb5(VO4)3Cl (OV-1) Single Pb 10.3231 (9) 7.3399 (7) 4.4530 (13) 0 1.10 Okudera (2013View full citation)
 
A2 = Ba
Ba5(PO4)3Cl Single Ba 10.284 (2) 7.651 (3) 4.509 (3) 0 1.39 Hata et al. (1979View full citation)
Sr2Ba3(AsO4)3Cl Single Sr 10.390 (1) 7.575 (1) 4.5318 (12) 0 1.39 Đordevic et al. (2008View full citation)
Ba5(MnO4)3Cl Single Ba 10.469 (1) 7.760 (1) 4.571 (3) 0 1.23 Reinen et al. (1986View full citation)
Ba5(VO4)3Cl Rietveld Ba 10.5468 (1) 7.7437 (1) 4.591 (5) 0 1.22 Beck et al. (2006View full citation)
Ba5(VO4)3Cl Single Ba 10.5492 (13) 7.7534 (8) 4.5942 (7) 0 1.20 Matsuura & Okudera (unpublished)
Ba5(VO4)3Cl Single Ba 10.5565 (1) 7.7584 (1) 4.5982 (9) 0 1.19 Roh & Hong (2005View full citation)
Ba5(AsO4)3Cl Rietveld Ba 10.5570 (1) 7.73912 (8) 4.590 (10) 0 1.21 Bell et al. (2008View full citation)
 
Fluorapatites
A2 = Ca
(Ca0.879Mn0.121)5(PO4)3F0.74 Single Ca/Mn 9.343 (2) 6.8227 (10) 3.9677 (13) 0.25 0.89 Hughes et al. (1991View full citation)
(Ca0.9582Mn0.0422)5(PO4)3F0.93 Single Ca/Mn 9.3596 (10) 6.8603 (10) 3.9745 (11) 0.25 0.88 Hughes et al. (1991View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3F Single Ca 9.367 (1) 6.884 (1) 3.8634 (10) 0.25 1.05 Sudarsanan et al. (1972View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3F_U Single Ca 9.3709 (2) 6.8849 (2) 3.9625 (12) 0.25 0.90 Luo et al. (2009View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3F_Th Single Ca 9.375 (2) 6.883 (3) 3.9632 (10) 0.25 0.90 Luo et al. (2009View full citation)
(Ca0.9704Sr0.0296)5(PO4)3F0.89 Single Ca/Sr 9.379 (2) 6.8922 (7) 3.9827 (13) 0.25 0.87 Hughes et al. (1991View full citation)
(Ca0.9372Sr0.0628)5(PO4)3F Single Ca/Sr 9.390 (2) 6.9011 (8) 3.9822 (11) 0.25 0.87 Hughes et al. (1991View full citation)
Ca5(PO4)3F Single Ca 9.397 (3) 6.878 (4) 4.0025 (19) 0.25 0.84 Hughes et al. (1989View full citation)
Ca5(AsO4)3F Rietveld Ca 9.6873 (5) 6.9815 (3) 4.167 (3)§§ 0.245 (2) 0.83 Baikie et al. (2007View full citation)
Ca5(VO4)3F Rietveld Ca 9.6960 (3) 7.0170 (2) 4.03 (3) 0.252 (2) 0.80 Baikie et al. (2007View full citation)
Ca5(VO4)3F Rietveld Ca 9.7371 (1) 7.0063 (1) 4.096 (6) 0.25 0.73 Dong & White (2004View full citation)
 
A2 = Sr
(Na,Ce)2Sr3(PO4)3F# Single Na/Ce 9.659 (1) 7.182 (1) 4.1343 (12) 0.211 (1) 1.04 Rakovan & Hughes (2000View full citation)
Sr5(PO4)3F Single Sr 9.678 (3) 7.275 (5) 4.146 (3) 0.25 1.09 Swafford & Holt (2002View full citation)
Sr5(PO4)3F_Th†† Single Sr 9.7038 (4) 7.2723 (7) 4.1593 (8) 0.25 1.07 Luo et al. (2009View full citation)
(Sr0.992Nd0.005)5(PO4)3F Single Sr 9.7156 (4) 7.2810 (3) 4.1505 (15) 0.25 1.08 Corker et al. (1995View full citation)
Sr5(PO4)3F Rietveld Sr 9.7211 (2) 7.2869 (1) 4.160 (2) 0.2486 (3) 1.07 Aissa et al. (2004View full citation)
PbSr9(PO4)3F2 Rietveld Sr 9.7268 (3) 7.2871 (1) 4.167 (3) 0.226 (3) 1.04 Badraoui et al. (2006View full citation)
Sr5(PO4)3F Single Sr 9.845 (7) 7.383 (4) 4.211 (5) 0.25 0.98 Pekov et al. (2010View full citation)
Sr5(AsO4)3F Single Sr 9.990 (1) 7.395 (1) 4.2139 (11) 0.25 0.98 Đordevic et al. (2008View full citation)
(Sr0.982Nd0.012)5(VO4)3F Single Sr 10.0077 (6) 7.434 (4) 4.2349 (15) 0.25 0.95 Corker et al. (1995View full citation)
Sr5(VO4)3F Rietveld Sr 10.01267 (7) 7.43169 (4) 4.246 (3) 0.220 (3) 0.91 Oka et al. (2022View full citation)
 
A2 = Pb
Ca2Pb3(PO4)3F Single Ca 9.6402 (12) 7.0121 (8) 3.9298 (8) 0 0.62 Kampf & Housley (2011View full citation)
Pb5(PO4)3F Single Pb 9.7638 (6) 7.2866 (4) 3.9526 (19) 0.039 (4) 0.59 Fleet et al. (2010View full citation)
Pb9Sr(PO4)6F2 Rietveld Pb 9.7662 (4) 7.2929 (2) 3.987 (6) 0.051 (3) 0.60 Badraoui et al. (2006View full citation)
Pb3(VO4)3F Rietveld Pb 10.10647 (15) 7.35582 (8) 4.1000 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.90 Oka et al. (2022View full citation)
 
A2 = Ba
Ba5(PO4)3F Single Ba 10.153 (2) 7.733 (3) 4.383 (3) 0.219 (5) 1.16 Mathew et al. (1979View full citation)
Ba5(PO4)3F Rietveld Ba 10.1611 (2) 7.7322 (1) 4.389 (4) 0.2019 (7) 1.10 Aissa et al. (2004View full citation)
Ba5(VO4)3F Rietveld Ba 10.43080 (5) 7.86002 (4) 4.468 (3) 0.223 (3) 1.02 Oka et al. (2022View full citation)
 
Lacunary and superstructure apatites
Pb7.36Bi0.32Na2.08Li0.24(PO4)6 Rietveld Pb/Na 9.6916 (8) 7.1751 (7) 4.2639 (11)     Hamdi et al. (2007View full citation)
Pb7.4Bi0.3Na2.3(PO4)6 Rietveld Pb/Na 9.7065 (7) 7.1705 (6) 4.3026 (9)     Hamdi et al. (2007View full citation)
Pb10(PO4)6O Single Pb 9.8151 (15) 14.8458 (11) 4.359 (3)     Hirano & Okudera (2025View full citation); d(A2aA2a)
          4.128 (6)     Hirano & Okudera (2025View full citation); d(A2bA2b)
          3.781 (3)     Hirano & Okudera (2025View full citation); d(A2cA2c)
†(Ca0.994U0.006)2(Ca0.993U0.007)3(PO4)3Cl.
‡(Ca0.977Th0.023)2(Ca0.979Th0.021)3(PO4)3Cl.
§(Sr0.985Th0.015)2(Sr0.990Th0.010)3(PO4)3Cl.
¶Ca2(Ca0.986U0.014)3(PO4)3F.
∥(Ca0.999)2(Ca0.987Th0.013)3(PO4)3F.
#(Na2.12Ce1.18La0.64Nd0.34)(Sr5.74Ba0.22)(P6.06Si0.22)O24(F1.96OH0.02Cl0.02).
††(Sr0.993Th0.007)2(Sr0.993Th0.007)3(PO4)3F.
‡‡From CIF.
§§Averaged d(A2–A2) in P1 structure.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Variations in edge length of the A2 triangle with unit-cell edge length a in fluor-, chlor- and lacunary apatites together with those in Pb10(PO4)6O. Solid circles with solid lines: chlorapatites; solid triangles with dashed lines: fluorapatites; blue open squares: lacunarly apatites; black solid squares: three A2 triangles with different sizes in Pb10(PO4)6O. Purple: A2 = Ba; blue: A2 = Pb; green: A2 = Sr; red: A2 = Ca. Solid and dashed lines are drawn for guides for the eye after a least-squares fit for each combination of A2 and X ions.

The d(A2–A2) values in barium fluorapatites are also found on the wide line mentioned above. The unit-cell edge length a was reduced with change of X from Cl to F as it was expected from the reduction of the repulsion on O3-site O2− from the X anion. Reduction in the d(A2–A2) values with the exchange was small but common among barium apatites and was approximately 0.12 Å. As positions of F with BVS values close to 1.0 indicated, F anions were located at their ideal positions in barium fluorapatites. This small but noticeable difference on d(A2–A2) indicated forced expansion of the Ba2+ octahedron due to repulsion from Cl and in fact how small it was. This difference was doubled in strontium apatites with BVS values for F in the range 0.9∼1.1 at z = 1/4. A gap between guides for the eye (Fig. 3[link]) for barium and strontium fluorapatites indicated that the fluoride anion at the centre of the A2 triangle shrunk the triangle in the latter to make its coordination environment ideal as happened in the structures of Ca5(AsO4)3F and Ca5(VO4)3F (Baikie et al., 2007View full citation) and that this effect was larger on the larger d(A2–A2) side. This simple interpretation, however, did not apply to lead fluorapatites. As the residual density map for the PNP structure suggested, the 6s2 electron cloud could be directional and located inside the A2 triangle (Fig. 2[link]). The far smaller d(A2–A2) on lead fluorapatites than their strontium analogues with the out-of-plane position of the X anion indicated that attraction on Pb2+ from F shrunk the A2 triangle and that 6s2 electron clouds at A2-site Pb2+ repelled F from the centre of the triangle. The size of the smallest A2 triangle in the Pb10(PO4)6O structure indicated how much the Pb2+ triangle could shrink even with 6s2 electrons inside. However, the observed relationship between a and d(A2–A2) in lacunary apatites indicated that the triangle was not shrunk for lack of a large X anion. Simple and the same trends on lacunary apatites and chlorapatites indicated the subordinate nature on the size of the A2 octahedron to the (A1O9)—(BO4) framework which defines the maximum size of the A2 triangle. A2 cations stick on the periphery of the larger void as `decorations on the wall' with reference to Krivovichev et al. (2004View full citation) in the distorted hexagonal net of (BO4)3− complex anions, while they are easily pulled by the X anion for attraction.

In summary, the change in size of the A2 triangle was found primarily as a function of unit-cell edge length a. As BVS values for Cl indicated, the A2 octahedron was hard to expand by repulsion from the X anion, In other words, the anion channel was a face-sharing array of A2 octahedra inserted in the (A1O9)—(BO4) framework with geometric restraints, as suggested by Mercier et al. (2005View full citation). On the other hand, the triangle could be shrunk rather easily by attraction from the X anion. Repulsion among directional 6s2 electron orbitals might exist inside of the anion channel in lead-bearing apatites, but this repulsion had no effect on unit-cell edge length a nor the size of the A2 triangle. However, stereochemical activity of the A2-site 6s2 electrons was still potent enough to repel the X anion from the centre of the A2 triangle at z = 1/4. In this sense, directional X-anion conduction through the channel is hard to realize on lead apatites, irrespective of A1, B and X ions.

Supporting information


Computing details top

(I) top
Crystal data top
NaO12P3Pb4Dx = 6.378 Mg m3
Mr = 1136.70Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hexagonal, P63/mCell parameters from 11 reflections
Hall symbol: -P 6 cθ = 43.9–47.9°
a = 9.7345 (12) ŵ = 57.32 mm1
c = 7.2130 (18) ÅT = 294 K
V = 591.93 (16) Å3Sphere, colourless
Z = 20.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 (radius) mm
F(000) = 960
Data collection top
Rigaku AFC5S
diffractometer
707 reflections with F > 3σigma(F) & (|Fobs.max||Fobs.min|)/|Fobs.min| < 0.5 among equivalents
Radiation source: X-ray tube, 50kV 25mARint = 0.101
Graphite (002) monochromatorθmax = 45.0°, θmin = 3.7°
integrated with \v/2θ scansh = 1919
Absorption correction: for a sphere
spherical absorption correction
k = 1919
Tmin = 0.006, Tmax = 0.009l = 1414
19658 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 200 reflections
1729 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement top
Refinement on F9 constraints
Least-squares matrix: fullWeighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s weight proportional to sigma-2
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.019Δρmax = 2.64 e Å3
S = 1.56Δρmin = 1.80 e Å3
627 reflectionsExtinction correction: B-C type 1 Lorenzian isotropic
39 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.012 (6)
3 restraints
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Pb10.333330.666670.0088 (9)0.01450.56 (2)
Na10.333330.666670.00880.01450.44
Pb20.00130 (3)0.25558 (4)0.250000.01580.96
Na20.001300.255580.250000.01580.04
P0.3996 (2)0.3785 (2)0.250000.0095
O10.3232 (7)0.4827 (7)0.250000.017
O20.5204 (8)0.1018 (9)0.250000.034
O30.3479 (7)0.2685 (6)0.0808 (6)0.024
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pb10.01344 (16)0.013440.0166 (3)0.006750.000000.00000
Na10.013440.013440.01660.006750.000000.00000
Pb20.01270 (11)0.01554 (12)0.01904 (12)0.00706 (9)0.000000.00000
Na20.012700.015540.019130.007060.000000.00000
P0.0099 (6)0.0088 (6)0.0100 (6)0.0049 (5)0.000000.00000
O10.025 (2)0.014 (2)0.017 (2)0.013 (2)0.000000.00000
O20.019 (3)0.019 (3)0.071 (6)0.015 (2)0.000000.00000
O30.044 (3)0.0221 (18)0.0151 (17)0.023 (2)0.0100 (17)0.0072 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Pb1—O12.463 (6)Pb2—O3ii2.612 (5)
Pb1—O2i2.717 (7)Pb2—O3i2.529 (5)
Pb1—O3i2.913 (7)P—O11.528 (9)
Pb2—O12.790 (6)P—O2iii1.536 (10)
Pb2—O2ii2.262 (13)P—O31.533 (5)
O1—P—O2iii111.2 (5)O2iii—P—O3108.5 (3)
O1—P—O3111.4 (3)O3—P—O3105.5 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) xy, x, z; (ii) y, xy, z; (iii) x+y+1, x+1, z.
 

Footnotes

Present address: R&D centre, Noritake Co., Limited, Japan.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Nittetsu Mining Co., Japan for their financial support over the years.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to declare.

References

Return to citationAissa, A., Badraoui, B., Thouvenot, R. & Debbabi, M. (2004). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 3828–3836.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD Google Scholar
Return to citationAli, R., Yashima, M., Matsushita, Y., Yoshioka, H. & Izumi, F. (2009). J. Solid State Chem. 182, 2846–2851.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBadraoui, B., Aissa, A., Bigi, A., Debbabi, M. & Gazzano, M. (2006). J. Solid State Chem. 179, 3065–3072.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBaikie, T., Mercier, P. H. J., Elcombe, M. M., Kim, J. Y., Le Page, Y., Mitchell, L. D., White, T. J. & Whitfield, P. S. (2007). Acta Cryst. B63, 251–256.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBeck, H. P., Douiheche, M., Haberkorn, R. & Kohlmann, H. (2006). Solid State Sci. 8, 64–70.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBecker, P. J. & Coppens, P. (1974). Acta Cryst. A30, 129–147.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationBell, A. M. T., Henderson, C. M. B., Wendlandt, R. F. & Harrison, W. J. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, i63–i64.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBell, A. M. T., Henderson, C. M.B., Wendlandt, R. F. & Harrison, W. J. D. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, i16–i17.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBrese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBrown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationCalos, N. J., Kennard, C. H. L. & Davis, R. L. (1990). Z. Kristallogr. 191, 125–129.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationCametti, G., Nagashima, M. & Churakov, S. V. (2022). Acta Cryst. B78, 618–626.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationCorker, D. L., Chai, B. H. T., Nicholls, J. & Loutts, G. B. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 549–551.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDai, Y. & Hughes, J. M. (1989). Can. Mineral. 27, 189–192.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDong, Z.-L. & White, T. J. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 146–154.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationĐordevic, T., Sutovic, S., Stojanovic, J. & Karanovic, Lj. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, i82–i86.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationEl Koumiri, M., Oishi, S., Sato, S., El Ammari, L. & Elouadi, B. (2000). Mater. Res. Bull. 35, 503–513.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFleet, M. E., Liu, X. & Shieh, S. R. (2010). Phys. Chem. Miner. 37, 1–9.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFlis, J., Borkiewicz, O., Bajda, T., Manecki, M. & Klasa, J. (2010). J. Synchrotron Rad. 17, 207–214.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2015). Acta Cryst. B71, 562–578.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHamdi, B., Feki, H. E., Savariault, J.-M. & Salah, A. B. (2007). Mater. Res. Bull. 42, 299–311.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationHata, M., Marumo, F., Iwai, S.-I. & Aoki, H. (1980). Acta Cryst. B36, 2128–2130.  CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationHata, M., Marumo, F., Iwai, S. & Aoki, H. (1979). Acta Cryst. B35, 2382–2384.  CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationHirano, K. & Okudera, H. (2025). Z. Kristallogr. 240, 155–165.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationHughes, J. M., Cameron, M. & Crowley, K. D. (1989). Am. Mineral. 74, 870–876.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationHughes, J. M., Cameron, M. & Crowley, K. D. (1991). Am. Mineral. 76, 1857–1862.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationJohnson, C. & Levy, H. A. (1974). International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Vol. IV, pp. 311–336. Kynoch Press.  Google Scholar
Return to citationKampf, A. R. & Housley, R. M. (2011). Am. Mineral. 96, 423–429.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKampf, A. R., Steele, I. M. & Jenkins, R. A. (2006). Am. Mineral. 91, 1909–1917.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKihara, K. (1990). Eur. J. Mineral. 2, 63–78.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrivovichev, S. V., Armbruster, T. & Depmeier, W. (2004). Mater. Res. Bull. 39, 1717–1722.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrivovichev, S. V. & Brown, I. D. (2001). Z. Kristallogr. 216, 245–247.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrivovichev, S. V. & Engel, G. (2023). Crystals 13, 1371.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKuhs, W. F. (2003). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. D. pp. 228–242. Kluwer Academic Publishers.  Google Scholar
Return to citationLaufek, F., Skála, R., Haloda, J. & Císařová, I. (2006). J. Czech. Geol. Soc. 51, 271–275.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLiu, X., Fleet, M. E., Shieh, S. R. & He, Q. (2011). Phys. Chem. Miner. 38, 397–406.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLuo, Y., Hughes, J. M., Rakovan, J. & Pan, Y. (2009). Am. Mineral. 94, 345–351.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMackie, P. E., Elliot, J. C. & Young, R. A. (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 1840–1848.  CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationMathew, M., Brown, W. E., Austin, M. & Negas, T. (1980). J. Solid State Chem. 35, 69–76.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationMathew, M., Mayer, I., Dickens, B. & Schroeder, L. W. (1979). J. Solid State Chem. 28, 79–95.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationMatsuura, M. & Okudera, H. (2022). Acta Cryst. B78, 789–797.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMehmel, M. (1930). Z. Kristallogr. 75, 323–331.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMercier, P. H. J., Le Page, Y., Whitfield, P. S., Mitchell, L. D., Davidson, I. J. & White, T. J. (2005). Acta Cryst. B61, 635–655.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMills, S. J., Ferraris, G., Kampf, A. R. & Favreau, G. (2012). Am. Mineral. 97, 415–418.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMomma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationNakayama, S., Sakamoto, M., Higuchi, M., Kodaira, K., Sato, M., Kakita, S., Suzuki, T. & Itoh, K. (1999). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19, 507–510.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationNáray-Szabó, St. (1930). Z. Kristallogr. 75, 387–398.  Google Scholar
Return to citationOka, K., Nishiki, W., Takasu, M., Noma, N. & Iwasaki, M. (2022). J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn 130, 35–38.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationOkada, Y. & Tokumaru, Y. (1984). J. Appl. Phys. 56, 314–320.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationOkudera, H. (2013). Am. Mineral. 98, 1573–1579.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationOkudera, H., Masubuchi, Y., Kikkawa, S. & Yoshiasa, A. (2005). Solid State Ionics 176, 1473–1478.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationOkudera, H., Sakai, Y., Yamagata, K. & Takeda, H. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 295–303.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationOkudera, H., Yoshiasa, A., Masubuchi, Y., Higuchi, M. & Kikkawa, S. (2004). Z. Kristallogr. 219, 27–31.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPasero, M., Kampf, A. R., Ferraris, C., Pekov, I. V., Rakovan, J. & White, T. J. (2010). Eur. J. Mineral. 22, 163–179.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPekov, I., Britvin, S. N., Zubkova, N. V., Pushcharovsky, D. Y., Pasero, M. & Merlino, S. (2010). Eur. J. Mineral. 22, 869–874.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPiotrowski, A., Kahlenberg, V. & Fischer, R. X. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. 163, 398–405.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRakovan, J. F. & Hughes, J. M. (2000). Can. Mineral. 38, 839–845.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationReinen, D., Lachwa, H. & Allmann, R. (1986). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 542, 71–88.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationRoh, Y.-H. & Hong, S.-T. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, i140–i142.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationRouse, R. C., Dunn, P. J. & Peacor, D. R. (1984). Am. Mineral. 69, 920–927.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSahoo, P. P. & Guru Row, T. N. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 10013–10021.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationShannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751–767.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationSudarsanan, K., Mackie, P. E. & Young, R. A. (1972). Mater. Res. Bull. 7, 1331–1337.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationSudarsanan, K. & Young, R. A. (1974). Acta Cryst. B30, 1381–1386.  CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationSwafford, S. H. & Holt, E. M. (2002). Solid State Sci. 4, 807–812.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationToumi, M. & Mhiri, T. (2008). J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 116, 904–908.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWardojo, T. A. & Hwu, S.-J. (1996). Acta Cryst. C52, 2959–2960.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWhite, T. J. & ZhiLi, D. (2003). Acta Cryst. B59, 1–16.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206
Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds