Applying 3D ED/MicroED workflows toward the next frontiers

Aragon, M.; Bowman, S.E.J.; Chen, C.-H.; de la Cruz, M.J.; Decato, D.A.; Eng, E.T.; Flatt, K.M.; Gulati, S.; Li, Y.; Lomba, C.J.; Mercado, B.; Miller, J.; Palatinus, L.; Rice, W.J.; Waterman, D.; Zimanyi, C.M.

doi:10.1107/S2053229624004078

Acta Crystallographica Section C
Acta Crystallographica
Section C STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY

IUCr IT WDC

home archive editors for authors for readers submit subscribe open access

view article

Figure 3
3D ED/MicroED decision tree. Just because you can use electron diffraction, doesn't mean you must. Here we present a process to decide if 3D ED/MicroED is the most appropriate method for a structure elucidation project. Given the current state of the field, the use of more established X-ray techniques or alternative structure solution methods, when available, should be strongly considered as faster paths to useful data.

STRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY

ISSN: 2053-2296

Volume 80| Part 6| June 2024| Pages 179-189

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229624004078

Open

access

Follow Acta Cryst. C

Search IUCr Journals		doi		Advanced search
Author		volume	page