view article
Figure 3
Structural comparison of CueP. (a) Stereo figures showing Cα superpositions of the CueP C-terminal domain (80–179) with transglutaminase (PDB entry 3e8v ; residues 289–366) and pyrogallol hydroxytransferase (PDB entry 1ti6 ; residues 194–294). CueP is displayed in green, transglutaminase in orange and pyrogallol hydroxytransferase in cyan. (b) Surface representation of CueP (left) and E. coli DsbC (right; PDB entry 1eej ; McCarthy et al., 2000BB16) in two different orientations (top and bottom). Each protomer is coloured differently (green and blue for CueP; yellow and cyan for DsbC). The cysteine-rich (putative) active sites are coloured red.

Journal logoBIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1399-0047
Volume 69| Part 10| September 2013| Pages 1867-1875
doi:10.1107/S090744491301531X
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS