research papers
Structures of the human Pals1 PDZ domain with and without ligand suggest gated access of Crb to the PDZ peptide-binding groove
aStructural Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, England, bEpithelial Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, England, cPeptide Chemistry Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, England, and dInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, England
*Correspondence e-mail: neil.mcdonald@cancer.org.uk
Many components of epithelial polarity protein complexes possess PDZ domains that are required for protein interaction and recruitment to the apical plasma membrane. Apical localization of the Crumbs (Crb) transmembrane protein requires a PDZ-mediated interaction with Pals1 (protein-associated with Lin7, Stardust, MPP5), a member of the p55 family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases (MAGUKs). This study describes the molecular interaction between the Crb carboxy-terminal motif (ERLI), which is required for Drosophila cell polarity, and the Pals1 PDZ domain using crystallography and fluorescence polarization. Only the last four Crb residues contribute to Pals1 PDZ-domain binding affinity, with specificity contributed by conserved charged interactions. Comparison of the Crb-bound Pals1 PDZ structure with an apo Pals1 structure reveals a key Phe side chain that gates access to the PDZ peptide-binding groove. Removal of this side chain enhances the binding affinity by more than fivefold, suggesting that access of Crb to Pals1 may be regulated by intradomain contacts or by protein–protein interaction.
Keywords: PDZ domains; Crb; cell polarity; epithelia; stardust.
3D view: 4uu5,4uu6
PDB references: PDZ–peptide complex, 4uu5; ligand-free PDZ domain, 4uu6
1. Introduction
Epithelial cell polarity is maintained by the asymmetric distribution of discrete protein complexes at either the apical or the baso-lateral membrane (Tepass, 2012). These two membrane domains are separated by tight junctions (TJs) in vertebrates or adherens junctions (AJs) in Drosophila. Two protein complexes called the Par complex and the Crb complex are implicated in apical polarity and contain components with multiple PDZ domains (Bilder et al., 2003). The Par complex consists of the PDZ-domain proteins Par3 (partitioning defective 3 homologue) and Par6 (partitioning defective 6 homologue), aPKC (atypical protein kinase C) and Cdc42 (cell division control protein 42 homologue). The Crb complex contains the transmembrane protein Crumbs (Crb), the scaffold proteins MALS (mammalian Lin-7 isoforms 1, 2 and 3), the PDZ-domain protein Pals1 (protein associated with Lin-7) and PATJ (Pals1-associated TJ protein) (Tepass, 2012).
Crb consists of a large extracellular domain (ECD), a transmembrane region (TM) and a 37-amino-acid intracellular domain (ICD). It has been shown that the Crb ECD (CrbECD) can oligomerize to mediate cell adhesion in the retina (Zhou & Hong, 2012; Fletcher et al., 2012). The CrbICD contains two protein-binding motifs: a juxtamembrane FERM (band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin)-binding motif (FBM) and a carboxy-terminal PDZ-binding motif. Crb recruits Pals1 to the apical membrane via an interaction between CrbICD and Pals1PDZ, and this interaction is required for Crb localization at the apical membrane (Bachmann et al., 2001; Fig. 1a). Pals1 belongs to the MPP family of proteins (membrane protein, palmitoylated), also known as the p55 subfamily of membrane-associated guanylate kinases (MAGUKs). Pals1 acts as a scaffold protein, recruiting other proteins to the apical domain of the cells: the L27 domains of Pals1 bind to Patj and Lin7, while the amino-terminal regions of Pals1 can interact with the PDZ domain of Par6, linking the Crb and Par complexes (Hurd et al., 2003). It has also been shown that the PDZ domain of Par6 can bind directly to the PDZ-binding motif (PBM) of Crb (Hurd et al., 2003; Kempkens et al., 2006).
PDZ domains form a large diverse family that were first described to selectively recognize carboxy-terminal et al., 2011). The α/β architecture of the PDZ domain defines a peptide-binding groove for the PBM and a key carboxylate-binding loop. PDZ domains are usually grouped into three classes based on the C-terminal PBM sequence that they recognize. These include type I PBMs (-X-S/T-X-ΦCOOH), type II PBMs (-X-Φ-X-ΦCOOH) and type III PBMs (-X-D/E-X-ΦCOOH), where X is any amino acid and Φ is any hydrophobic amino acid (Harris & Lim, 2001; Songyang et al., 1997). Recent studies have shown that adjacent regions to the peptide-binding groove of PDZ domains or even residues in domains flanking the PDZ domain can contribute towards the PBM binding the protein (Zhang, Dasgupta et al., 2007; Bhattacharya et al., 2013; Nomme et al., 2011; Pan et al., 2011). PDZ domains can also bind to internal PBMs (Lenfant et al., 2010; Penkert et al., 2004; Zhang, Appleton et al., 2007), other PDZ domains (van den Berk et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2011), phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PIP(2); Zimmermann et al., 2002] or even (Chen et al., 2012; Zimmermann et al., 2002). Several mechanisms have been described to regulate the PDZ–PBM interaction. of the PBM can increase affinity for the PDZ domain (Tyler et al., 2010), whilst of the carboxylate-binding loop can abolish PBM interaction altogether (Raghuram et al., 2003). Protein partners can switch PDZ ligand-recognition modes, for example, Cdc42 binding to Par6 switches its PDZ from binding an internal Pals1 peptide sequence to a carboxyl-terminal motif (Penkert et al., 2004; Whitney et al., 2011; Peterson et al., 2004).
(PDZ-binding motifs or PBMs) of their target proteins (SubbaiahThis study characterizes the carboxy-terminal (ERLI) motif of Crb, which is crucial in vivo for polarity and binds to Pals1/Stardust. The of a human Pals1PDZ–CrbPBM complex is described that explains the highly conserved nature of the ERLI motif and details the contacts. Biophysical characterization supports a essential role for just the four C-terminal residues. The structure of ligand-free Pals1PDZ reveals a sterically blocked peptide-binding groove, as confirmed by fluorescence polarization in vitro. Comparisons of liganded and apo Pals1PDZ reveals conformational rearrangements upon binding the Crb ERLI motif and suggest regulated access to the Pals1 PDZ peptide-binding pocket.
2. Experimental procedures
2.1. Fly strains and generation of clones
Mitotic clones were generated using the Flp-FRT method of recombination. Third-instar larvae of the following genotype were heat-shocked at 37°C for 1 h: hsflp;; frt82B crbΔPBM/frt82B ubiGFPnls (a kind gift from D. J. Pan).
2.2. Antibodies and immunohistochemistry
Ovaries were dissected in PBS, fixed for 20 min in 4% PFA, washed for 30 min in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 (PBST) and blocked for 15 min in 5% normal goat serum/PBST (PBST/NGS). The primary antibody was diluted in PBST/NGS and samples were incubated overnight at 4°C. We used rat anti-Crumbs (1:200; a kind gift from E. Knust). Secondary antibodies were used at 1:500 and DAPI at 1 µg ml−1 (all from Molecular Probes, Invitrogen). Images were taken with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope.
2.3. Protein-construct design, expression and purification
Plasmids encoding cDNAs for the human Pals1 PDZ domain (wild-type and F318A mutant) were transformed into Escherichia coli FB810 cells and grown in LB medium at 37°C in the presence of anitibiotics. After reaching a density of A600 = 0.6, the cells were induced with 20 µM IPTG (Sigma–Aldrich) and grown at 16°C for 18 h with agitation. The cells were harvested and resuspended in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5 (Sigma), 100 mM NaCl (Sigma), 10 mM Benzamidine, 0.2 mM AEBSF, 1 mM DTT. The cells were disrupted by sonication and spun down at 30 000g for 30 min. Pals1PDZ protein was extracted from the lysate using glutathione Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences) and washed in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, followed by removal of the GST affinity tag with GST-3C protease (PreScission Protease, Amersham Bioscience) overnight at 4°C. The was further purified by (Superdex S75). All purification steps were performed at 4°C or on ice. Protein purity was analysed using SDS–PAGE.
2.4. Fluorescence polarization assays to determine the dissociation constants (Kd)
Fluorescence polarization (Fp) assays were performed to determine the Kd for each peptide following a previously described protocol (Guettler et al., 2008). Binding assays were performed in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT. The reaction mixtures contained a fixed concentration of fluorescein-labelled peptide (50 nM) and a protein concentration ranging from 0 to 300 µM depending on the dissociation constant. The 20 µl reactions were carried out in a 384-well plate and measured after 5 min using a Tecan Safire2 plate reader with excitation at 470 nm and emission at 525 nm. The anisotropy values were normalized and the Kd values were determined using nonlinear regression with the graphics program Prism (Heyduk & Lee, 1990).
2.5. of ligand-free Pals1PDZ and Pals1PDZ bound to Crb1 residues 1390–1406 (Crb17) peptide
Pals1PDZ was incubated with a two-molar excess of human Crumbs peptide (homologue 1; residues 1390–1406, defined hereafter as Crb17; RVEMWNLMPPPAMERLI) for 30 min on ice. Crystals were grown at 20°C by vapour diffusion in sitting drops consisting of 0.15 µl protein stock solution (5 mg ml−1) mixed with 0.1 µl reservoir solution (0.1 M HEPES pH 7.29, 2.68 M NaCl). These crystals grew to maximum size in 4 d. Crystals were cryoprotected in 50% Paratone, flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen and an X-ray data set was collected on the I04-1 beamline at Diamond Light Source, Oxford, England. The data set was indexed and scaled using xia2 (Winter et al., 2013). The crystal belonged to P4122. Data-processing and are presented in Table 1. was carried out with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) using the model generated by the Phyre2 server (Kelley & Sternberg, 2009) based on sequence alignment of Pals1–PDZ against all structures in the PDB. One copy of Pals1PDZ bound to one copy of Crb17 was found in the Difference electron density corresponding to the Crb17 peptide was clearly visible after and after initial rounds of The structure was refined using PHENIX (Adams et al., 2010), with model building carried out in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010). The Crb17 peptide was built into electron density (with residues 1390–1392 disordered); Crb17 Met1402 was oxidized, most likely owing to radiation damage during data collection. The vector-derived residues Gly-Pro-Leu-Gly-Ser at the amino-terminus of Pals1PDZ had electron density and so were included in the refined model.
|
Crystals of the ligand-free form of Pals1PDZ were grown at 4°C by vapour diffusion in sitting drops consisting of 0.1 µl protein stock solution (6.5 mg ml−1) mixed with 0.15 µl reservoir solution (0.085 M Tris pH 8, 0.17 M sodium acetate, 19% glycerol, 25.9% PEG 4000). These crystals grew to maximum size in 24 h. The crystals were flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen without additional cryoprotection and an X-ray data set was collected on the I04-1 beamline at Diamond Light Source, Oxford, England. The data set was indexed and scaled using xia2 (Winter et al., 2013). The crystals belonged to P43212. was carried out in Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) using the atomic coordinates of the previously solved PDZ domain of Pals1 in complex with the Crb17 peptide as a search model. One copy of Pals1PDZ was found in the The structure was refined using PHENIX (Adams et al., 2010) and model building was carried out in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010). The coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 4uu5 (Pals1PDZ–Crb17 complex) and 4uu6 (ligand-free Pals1PDZ). Figures were prepared using the graphics program PyMOL (https:/www.pymol.org ).
3. Results
3.1. Apical localization of Crb requires Stardust interaction and is essential for polarity in vivo
Crumbs (Crb) is a large type I single membrane-spanning protein containing a short intracellular domain whose carboxyl-terminal residues ERLI can bind the PDZ domain of Stardust (the human orthologue is Pals1; Figs. 1a and 1b). Crb is localized to the apical membrane of epithelial cells such as the follicle cells of D. melanogaster egg chambers (Fig. 1c). This apical localization is dependent on its interaction with Stardust, as deleting the PDZ-binding ERLI motif disrupts Crb localization and polarity in a follicle-cells context (Fig. 1d).
3.2. Characterization of Pals1PDZ–Crb17 interaction by fluorescence polarization
To characterize the interaction between the PDZ domain of human Pals1 (Pals1PDZ; residues 251–335) and the intracellular segment of human Crb1 in vitro, we used fluorescence polarization (Fp) assays with a fluorescein-labelled peptide containing 17 carboxy-terminal residues 1390–1406 (defined hereafter as Crb17). A high-affinity site for Crb17 was measured for Pals1PDZ with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 9.2 ± 1.4 µM (Figs. 1e and 1f). The Pals1PDZ–Crb17 interaction was stable to as detected from the Crb17 intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence (data not shown). Alanine substitutions within the Crb17 ERLI motif resulted in a substantial weakening of the affinity for Pals1PDZ. Individual Crb17 substitutions E1403A, R1404A and L1405A gave similar detrimental impacts on Kd, reducing it to between 52 and 55 µM, independent of their position relative to the carboxy-terminus (Figs. 1e and 1g). Replacing the carboxy-terminal Ile1406 with alanine (I1406A) completely abolished detectable binding to Pals1PDZ. A shorter Crb1 peptide spanning residues 1401–1406 (defined hereafter as Crb6) showed an equivalent affinity for Pals1PDZ as Crb17 and a Crb17 M1402A mutant. These data demonstrate that the Pals1PDZ interaction is driven through the ERLI motif of Crb17, in particular the carboxy-terminal residue. This is consistent with the in vivo data showing the importance of the ERLI motif for the Pals1 interaction, as shown here and as described previously (Roh et al., 2002; Makarova et al., 2003; Bachmann et al., 2001).
3.3. The Pals1PDZ–Crb17 structure rationalizes ERLI motif conservation
To define the molecular interaction between human Pals1PDZ and Crb17, we successfully crystallized the complex and determined its structure at 1.23 Å resolution. Data-processing and for the structure are presented in Table 1. Electron density for residues 1393–1406 of Crb17 was observed, allowing the fitting of all but three residues of the Crb17 peptide (Figs. 2a and 2b). A single Pals1PDZ–Crb17 complex is present within the The Pals1PDZ adopts a canonical PDZ fold consisting of two β-sheets flanked by two α-helices. The carboxyl-terminus of the Crb17 peptide binds as an antiparallel β-strand extending the smaller PDZ β-sheet between strand β2 and helix α2 (Fig. 2c). The total buried surface area between Pals1PDZ and Crb17 is ∼500 Å2. The carboxy-terminal carboxylate group of Ile1406 in Crb17 forms hydrogen bonds to main-chain from the invariant Pals1 residues Leu267, Gly268 and Ala269 that define the canonical carboxylate-binding loop between strands β1 and β2 of Pals1PDZ (Fig. 2d). Leu321 of Pals1 adopts a strained side-chain rotamer on binding the ligand, allowing the side chain of Ile1406 from Crb17 to point into a deep hydrophobic pocket in Pals1PDZ. Van der Waals contacts between Crb17 Leu1405 and Pals1 Pro266 stabilize a closed carboxylate-binding loop enveloping the peptide ligand. Charged interactions with the ERLI motif are also found; Crb17 Glu1403 forms a salt bridge with Pals1PDZ Arg282 and also forms hydrogen bonds to the side chains of Thr270 and Ser281. The Crb17 Arg1404 side chain makes a cation–π interaction with Phe318 and also forms hydrogen bonds to the Asn315 side chain (Fig. 2d). Overall, the structure explains the tight conservation of each side chain of the Crb ERLI motif through selective interactions with the Pals1PDZ domain, consistent with the binding affinities measured in solution by fluorescence polarization.
3.4. Structure of the ligand-free PDZ domain of Pals1
In order to investigate the conformational changes that occur in Pals1PDZ upon binding Crb17 peptide, a ligand-free form of Pals1PDZ was crystallized and its structure was determined at 1.8 Å resolution. This crystal form has a single copy of Pals1PDZ in the Data-processing and for the structure are presented in Table 1. The ligand-free structure of Pals1PDZ closely resembles the ligand-bound form, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.607 Å over 60 Cα atoms, but with several important differences (Figs. 3a, 3b and 3c). Firstly, the carboxylate-binding β1–β2 loop (residues 260–268) adopts a more open configuration pivoting at Glu260 and Leu267, resulting in a Cα shift of over 6.2 Å away from the C-terminal end of helix α2. This exposes the side chain of Pals1 Lys261 and ensures that this part of the PBM-binding groove is solvent-accessible. A glycerol molecule occupies the PBM pocket, closely mimicking the carboxylate position of Crb17 (Fig. 3d). The Leu321 side chain adopts a favoured rotamer in the absence of a partner peptide. Another notable difference between ligand-free and ligand-bound Pals1PDZ is the side-chain rotamer of Phe318 from helix α2, as discussed below (Fig. 3c).
3.5. A gating mechanism for accessing the Pals1PDZ peptide groove
The Phe318 side-chain rotamer adopted in the apo Pals1PDZ results in a steric block to the central part of the PDZ peptide-binding groove. In contrast, in the presence of the Crb17 peptide Phe318 swings out of the pocket to pack against the Arg1404 side chain of Crb17, as described earlier. Comparison with the previously deposited NMR structure of ligand-free Pals1PDZ (PDB entry 1va8 ; RIKEN Structural Genomics/Proteomics Initiative, unpublished work) shows that in solution Phe318 also adopts the same rotamer as in the ligand-free X-ray structure, indicating that this is not a artefact (Supplementary Fig. S1a). From sequence comparisons, Pals1 Phe318 is conserved throughout vertebrate Pals1 sequences but is substituted by cysteine in invertebrate species (Fig. 3e). Searching the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with PDBeFold (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/ssm/ ) against all PDZ-domain structures indicates that a phenylalanine at this position is unique to Pals1. We therefore considered whether Phe318 could act as a potential gating mechanism restricting access of ligand to the PDZ peptide groove. In this case, removing the Phe318 side chain by substituting it with alanine should increase the affinity between Pals1 and Crb17 by removing the steric block. This was indeed the case, as a Pals1PDZ F318A mutation bound the Crb17 peptide fivefold more tightly than wild-type Pals1PDZ domain (Fig. 3f). Stardust/Pals1 homologues present in invertebrates have a cysteine at the equivalent position to Phe318. We therefore substituted Phe318 by cysteine and measured the effect on Crb interaction. This showed an intermediate affinity (5 µM) for the Crb17 peptide between that of Phe318 and an alanine substitution. This suggests that gating of the PDZ ligand pocket by Phe318 is a property of vertebrate Pals1 proteins.
3.6. Comparison of the Pals1PDZ and Par6PDZ structures defines the basis for Crb17 recognition
The Par6 PDZ domain has also been shown to bind the CrbICD peptide (Hurd et al., 2003; Kempkens et al., 2006). In order to characterize this interaction, we compared sequence and structural alignments of the Pals1PDZ and the Par6PDZ to identify critical residues in common between both PDZ domains involved in Crb17 peptide recognition (Figs. 4a, 4b and 4c). A number of Par6PDZ ligands have been identified apart from the ERLI C-terminal Crb motif. Those ligands include the ESLV C-terminal motif (PDB entry 1rzx ; Peterson et al., 2004) and the Pals1 EMAV internal motif (PDB entry 1x8s ; Penkert et al., 2004); therefore, we can conclude that the Par6PDZ binds to the C-terminal EXΦΦ motif or the EXAΦ internal motif. Superposition of the Par6PDZ structure bound to a C-terminal peptide with the Pals1PDZ–Crb17 structure gave an r.m.s. deviation of 1.315 Å over 63 Cα atoms (Fig. 4c). Both PDZ domains have an arginine side chain (Pals1 Arg282 and Par6 Arg199) to engage the glutamate of the Crb ERLI motif. Many apolar residues are conserved in the hydrophobic pocket that accommodates the carboxy-terminal side chain of Crb17 Ile1406 (see Fig. 4b). No equivalent contacts from Pals1 or Par6 are made with the Arg1404 side chain of Crb, consistent with Par6PDZ tolerating different side chains at this PDZ-ligand position. Residues Leu231 and Asp232 of Par6 are structurally equivalent to Val314 and Asn315 of Pals1 to engage this position of a PDZ ligand. Searching for this sequence signature through the human PDZome showed that only Par6 and members of the MPP (membrane protein, palmitoylated) family (MPP1, MPP3 and MPP5, also known as Pals1) have Arg, Asp/Asn and Leu/Val at these positions and therefore are potentially able to bind the Crb ERLI motif.
4. Discussion
The interaction of Crb with Stardust/Pals1 is conserved from humans to flies. We show that deleting the PDZ-binding ERLI motif from fly Crb results in disrupted Crb polarization in follicle cells of D. melanogaster egg chambers. Similarly, disruption of Crb1 localization by a somatic heterozygous mutation E1403Q was found in a retinitis pigmentosa syndrome when combined with a C1154S substitution (Yang et al., 2014). The invariant ERLI motif present in Crb deviates from a canonical PDZ-binding motif, requiring structural data to define the exact nature of this interaction. Our structure of a Crb17 peptide ligand bound to the Pals1 PDZ domain explains the basis for this conservation and presents detailed charged side-chain interactions, carboxylate-binding loop contacts and hydrophobic pockets for the penultimate two Crb residues.
Regulation of PDZ ligand binding is of considerable interest given the presence of single or multiple PDZ domains in many polarity proteins (Bilder et al., 2003). Many have been presumed to exclusively bind canonical PDZ-binding motifs within the C-terminal tails of target proteins with micromolar affinity. However, there is increasing evidence for PDZ–PDZ domain interactions and that PDZ domains can frequently bind internal peptide ligands, including, for example, the Par6PDZ and Pals1 internal ligand (Penkert et al., 2004). We note that the ligand-free Pals1 PDZ domain closely resembles that of Par6, which is known to bind both internal and C-terminal peptide ligands. This is not surprising given that they both bind Crb in vitro. Examination of the open carboxylate-binding loop of ligand-free Pals1 PDZ domain with Par6 bound to an internal peptide ligand suggests that Pals1 could also bind internal ligands. This is supported by evidence from genome-wide yeast two-hybrid screening for partners of the Caenorhabditis elegans Pals1 homologue tag-117 (Lenfant et al., 2010). This study identified many partners of tag-117 that bound independently of their C-terminal sequences, suggesting that tag-117 is able to recognize internal (noncanonical) peptide ligands in many cases. Interestingly, inspection of a superposition of the Pals1 PDZ domain with an internal peptide ligand for Par6 PDZ suggested that an E/D-X-small-Φ motif would permit the ligand main chain to exit the peptide groove with close contacts near the small side chain (Gly/Ser/Thr/Ala). Such a motif may define an appropriate sequence signature competent to bind Par6 and Pals1. Sequence searches with an E/D-(not P)-(SATGC)-(LIVMFA)-E/D-(SATGC)-P motif identified hits including the PDZ proteins MAGIX and MPDZ; the latter is a known partner of Pals1. This suggests future experiments to explore and confirm this prediction.
Our structural and biophysical data suggest steric regulation of access to the peptide-binding groove of the human Pals1 PDZ domain. We speculate that intradomain interactions outside the Pals1 PDZ domain may influence the Phe318 side-chain rotamer or, alternatively, binding of known partners to Pals could alter the side-chain conformer, triggering a conformation change within Pals1. There are many precedents for gated access to ligand pockets by bulky side chains such as phenylalanine (Koch et al., 2011; Dostál et al., 2005; Kaya et al., 2014). However, to our knowledge this is the first example of gated access to a PDZ-domain peptide-binding groove. Future experiments will elaborate the structural and functional consequences of Crb17 peptide binding to full-length Pals1.
Note added in proof. While this article was under review, Li et al. (2014) published the structure of the same portion of the Crumbs C-tail bound to a larger Pals1 fragment containing PDZ-Src homology 3 (SH3)-guanylate kinase (GK) tandem domains. They report a similar affinity of the PDZ domain for Crumbs C-tail as our study. They also observed Crumbs C-tail contacts with Phe318 from the PDZ domain as well as Glu368 from the SH3 domain. Both of these residues lie at the interface between the PDZ and SH3 domains.
Supporting information
3D view: 4uu5,4uu6
PDB references: PDZ–peptide complex, 4uu5; ligand-free PDZ domain, 4uu6
Supporting Information. DOI: 10.1107/S139900471402776X/mh5164sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the McDonald laboratory for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the expert assistance of Phillip Knowles and Svend Kjaer. MEI was funded by both a Cancer Research UK Fellowship and a University College Overseas Research Scholarship. Research in the NQM laboratory is supported by CR-UK core funding to the London Research Institute. MEI made all of the constructs and purified all proteins and performed all aspects of the biophysical analyses and structure determinations. GCF and BJT prepared the wild-type and ΔERLI motif Drosophila follicle cells and performed the imaging analysis, NO'R synthesized all AGP helped with X-ray data collection and MEI and NQM planned the project and designed experiments and MEI and NQM prepared the figures and wrote the paper. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
Adams, P. D. et al. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 213–221. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bachmann, A., Schneider, M., Theilenberg, E., Grawe, F. & Knust, E. (2001). Nature (London), 414, 638–643. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Berk, L. C. J. van den, Landi, E., Walma, T., Vuister, G. W., Dente, L. & Hendriks, W. J. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 13629–13637. PubMed Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S., Ju, J. H., Orlova, N., Khajeh, J. A., Cowburn, D. & Bu, Z. (2013). J. Mol. Biol. 425, 2509–2528. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bilder, D., Schober, M. & Perrimon, N. (2003). Nature Cell Biol. 5, 53–58. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chang, B. H., Gujral, T. S., Karp, E. S., BuKhalid, R., Grantcharova, V. P. & MacBeath, G. (2011). Chem. Biol. 18, 1143–1152. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Sheng, R., Källberg, M., Silkov, A., Tun, M. P., Bhardwaj, N., Kurilova, S., Hall, R. A., Honig, B., Lu, H. & Cho, W. (2012). Mol. Cell, 46, 226–237. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dostál, L., Misselwitz, R. & Welfle, H. (2005). Biochemistry, 44, 8387–8396. PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. C., Lucas, E. P., Brain, R., Tournier, A. & Thompson, B. J. (2012). Curr. Biol. 221116–1122. Google Scholar
Guettler, S., Vartiainen, M. K., Miralles, F., Larijani, B. & Treisman, R. (2008). Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 732–742. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Harris, B. Z. & Lim, W. A. (2001). J. Cell Sci. 114, 3219–3231. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Heyduk, T. & Lee, J. C. (1990). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 1744–1748. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hurd, T. W., Gao, L., Roh, M. H., Macara, I. G. & Margolis, B. (2003). Nature Cell Biol. 5, 137–142. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kaya, A. I., Lokits, A. D., Gilbert, J. A., Iverson, T. M., Meiler, J. & Hamm, H. E. (2014). J. Biol. Chem. 289, 24475–24487. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kelley, L. A. & Sternberg, M. J. (2009). Nature Protoc. 4, 363–371. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kempkens, O., Médina, E., Fernandez-Ballester, G., Ozüyaman, S., Le Bivic, A., Serrano, L. & Knust, E. (2006). Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85, 753–767. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Koch, C., Heine, A. & Klebe, G. (2011). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1810, 879–887. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lenfant, N., Polanowska, J., Bamps, S., Omi, S., Borg, J.-P. & Reboul, J. (2010). BMC Genomics, 11, 671. Google Scholar
Li, Y., Wei, Z., Yan, Y., Wan, Q., Du, Q. & Zhang, M. (2014). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17444–17449. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Makarova, O., Roh, M. H., Liu, C. J., Laurinec, S. & Margolis, B. (2003). Gene, 302, 21–29. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nomme, J., Fanning, A. S., Caffrey, M., Lye, M. F., Anderson, J. M. & Lavie, A. (2011). J. Biol. Chem. 286, 43352–43360. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pan, L., Chen, J., Yu, J., Yu, H. & Zhang, M. (2011). J. Biol. Chem. 286, 40069–40074. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Penkert, R. R., DiVittorio, H. M. & Prehoda, K. E. (2004). Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 1122–1127. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Peterson, F. C., Penkert, R. R., Volkman, B. F. & Prehoda, K. E. (2004). Mol. Cell, 13, 665–676. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Raghuram, V., Hormuth, H. & Foskett, J. K. (2003). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9620–9625. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Roh, M. H., Makarova, O., Liu, C.-J., Shin, K., Lee, S., Laurinec, S., Goyal, M., Wiggins, R. & Margolis, B. (2002). J. Cell Biol. 157, 161–172. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Songyang, Z., Fanning, A. S., Fu, C., Xu, J., Marfatia, S. M., Chishti, A. H., Crompton, A., Chan, A. C., Anderson, J. M. & Cantley, L. C. (1997). Science, 275, 73–77. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Subbaiah, V. K., Kranjec, C., Thomas, M. & Banks, L. (2011). Biochem. J. 439, 195–205. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tepass, U. (2012). Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 655–685. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tyler, R. C., Peterson, F. C. & Volkman, B. F. (2010). Biochemistry, 49, 951–957. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Whitney, D. S., Peterson, F. C. & Volkman, B. F. (2011). Structure, 19, 1711–1722. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Winter, G., Lobley, C. M. C. & Prince, S. M. (2013). Acta Cryst. D69, 1260–1273. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yang, L., Wu, L., Yin, X., Chen, N., Li, G. & Ma, Z. (2014). Mol. Vis. 20, 359–367. PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Appleton, B. A., Wu, P., Wiesmann, C. & Sidhu, S. S. (2007). Protein Sci. 16, 1738–1750. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Dasgupta, J., Ma, R. Z., Banks, L., Thomas, M. & Chen, X. S. (2007). J. Virol. 81, 3618–3626. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, W. & Hong, Y. (2012). Development, 139, 2891–2896. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zimmermann, P., Meerschaert, K., Reekmans, G., Leenaerts, I., Small, J. V., Vandekerckhove, J., David, G. & Gettemans, J. (2002). Mol. Cell, 9, 1215–1225. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.