research papers
The structure of the hexameric atrazine chlorohydrolase AtzA
aCSIRO Biomedical Manufacturing, Parkville, Australia, bResearch School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, cCSIRO Land and Water Flagship, Black Mountain, Canberra, Australia, and dDivision of Engineering and Physics, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barr, Pennsylvania, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: colin.scott@csiro.au
Atrazine chlorohydrolase (AtzA) was discovered and purified in the early 1990s from soil that had been exposed to the widely used herbicide atrazine. It was subsequently found that this enzyme catalyzes the first and necessary step in the breakdown of atrazine by the soil organism Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP. Although it has taken 20 years, a of the full hexameric form of AtzA has now been obtained. AtzA is less well adapted to its physiological role (i.e. atrazine dechlorination) than the alternative metal-dependent atrazine chlorohydrolase (TrzN), with a substrate-binding pocket that is under considerable strain and for which the substrate is a poor fit.
Keywords: atrazine chlorohydrolase.
3D view: 4v1x,4v1y
PDB references: AtzA, 4v1x; 4v1y
1. Introduction
The last century saw the introduction of a host of anthropogenic compounds, such as pesticides and antibiotics, into the environment (Russell et al., 2011; Copley, 2000). This influx of new compounds has introduced a range of new selection pressures through factors such as toxicity and the availability of abundant potential nutrient sources (Copley, 2000; Russell et al., 2011; Wackett, 2009). Nature has evolved mechanisms to cope with these new selection pressures, including the establishment of new metabolic pathways and enzymes. These new metabolic pathways and their associated enzymes are a tremendous resource for advancing our understanding of the mechanisms and constraints that underpin the evolutionary process, particularly with respect to the acquisition of new enzymatic functions.
The bacterial atrazine catabolism pathway from Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP is a particularly well studied example of a metabolic pathway that has evolved in response to human perturbations of the chemical composition of the environment. The pathway is comprised of six enzymatic steps (Fig. 1): the sequential hydrolysis of the chloride and two N-alkyl chains to produce cyanuric acid by AtzA (de Souza et al., 1996; Scott et al., 2009), AtzB (Boundy-Mills et al., 1997; Seffernick et al., 2007) and AtzC (Sadowsky et al., 1998; Shapir et al., 2002), followed by a ring-opening hydrolysis (AtzD; Fruchey et al., 2003; Seffernick et al., 2012; Peat et al., 2013) and two deamination steps (AtzE and AtzF; Balotra et al., 2014, 2015; Shapir, Sadowsky et al., 2005; Cameron et al., 2011; Martinez et al., 2001). The catabolism of cyanuric acid possibly predates the introduction of anthropogenic herbicides, as cyanuric acid is a naturally occurring compound (albeit not an abundant one; Wackett, 2009). However, the enzymes that catalyze the first three steps of the pathway (AtzA, AtzB and AtzC) are likely to have evolved recently in response to the presence of atrazine in the environment (Wackett, 2009; Udiković-Kolić et al., 2013).
The atrazine chlorohydrolase AtzA has attracted a great deal of attention as a model for studying the evolutionary process, not least because of its relationship to melamine deaminase (TriA). AtzA and TriA share 98% identity, differing by just nine amino acids over their ∼470-amino-acid length, and each difference is conferred by one of just nine point mutations (Seffernick et al., 2001; Noor et al., 2012). However, AtzA and TriA have quite distinct enzymatic functions, with AtzA only capable of hydrolytic dehalogenation (Fig. 1) and the deaminase TriA possessing only low levels of promiscuous dehalogenase activity (Seffernick et al., 2001). There have been studies that have used DNA shuffling (Raillard et al., 2001) and evolutionary trajectory reconstruction (Noor et al., 2012) to understand how these large functional differences could have evolved with so few genetic changes.
In other bacterial genera, particularly Gram-positive bacteria (e.g. Arthrobacter and Nocardioides), the role of AtzA is occupied by the alternative chlorohydrolase TrzN (Mulbry et al., 2002; Sajjaphan et al., 2004; Shapir et al., 2006; Seffernick et al., 2010). Both AtzA and TrzN belong to the same large family of amidohydrolases, although they are so different physically and phylogenetically that it is likely that atrazine chlorohydrolase activity evolved independently in each enzyme. While AtzA is a hexamer that contains one essential Fe2+ per monomer (de Souza et al., 1996; Scott et al., 2009), TrzN (which is ∼25% identical to AtzA) is a dimer that has a single Zn2+ bound in each active site (Shapir et al., 2006). Moreover, while AtzA can only hydrolyze triazine halides, TrzN can hydrolyze a broad range of substituents (including halide, –OCH3 and –SCH3 groups) from both triazines and pyrimidines (Shapir, Rosendahl et al., 2005; de Souza et al., 1996). TrzN is also an order of magnitude more efficient than AtzA, with a kcat/Km value of ∼105 s−1 M−1 compared with ∼1.5 × 104 s−1 M−1. This difference is in large part owing to the relatively high Km of AtzA, which is greater than the water solubility of atrazine (153 µM; Scott et al., 2009), compared with that of TrzN for atrazine (∼20 µM; Jackson et al., 2014). In contrast to most other known hydrolytic dehalogenases, which use an active-site carboxylic acid (Asp) to displace the halide ion (Verschueren et al., 1993; Newman et al., 1999), the metal-dependent reaction mechanisms of AtzA and TrzN make these two enzyme lineages somewhat unusual in nature.
Despite intensive genetic and biochemical study of AtzA, the lack of an experimentally derived structural model has hampered efforts to understand the details of the sequence–function relationship. Here, we present the first X-ray structure of AtzA, upon which we have based a reinterpretation of the genetic and biochemical analyses of this model chlorohydrolase.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Protein expression and purification
The construction of the pCS150 expression vector containing the wild-type atzA gene has been described elsewhere (Scott et al., 2009). The mutant atzA gene encoding the AtzA Ala170Thr, Met256Ile, Pro258Thr, Tyr261Ser variant was obtained from Life Technologies (Australia) and provided in pMK-RQ with NdeI and BamHI sites placed for subcloning into the pCS150 vector. pCS150 plasmids containing either the wild-type or mutant atzA genes were used to transform electrocompetent Escherichia coli BL21 λDE3 cells (Invitrogen) and were grown at 310 K on Luria–Bertani (LB; Lennox, 1955) agar [1.5%(w/v)] plates supplemented with 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin. Overnight starter cultures of 50 ml were inoculated with a single colony. The overnight cultures were diluted 1:20 into 950 ml LB medium and were shaken at 310 K and 200 rev min−1 until an OD600 of 0.6–0.8 was obtained. Protein expression was initiated by the addition of 100 µM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The induced cultures were kept at 310 K overnight whilst shaking at 200 rev min−1.
The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 4000g for 10 min in an Avanti J-E centrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, USA), resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl) and lysed by passage through an Avestin C3 homogenizer three times at 124 MPa. Insoluble cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 21 000g using an Avanti J-E centrifuge.
AtzA and the AtzA variant were purified from lysed cells in three steps: His-tag M imidazole in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl and using a 130 ml column packed with Superdex 200 prep-grade resin (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Australia) with a buffer composed of 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl. The His tag was removed by thrombin proteolysis and the protein was then purified by with a Superdex 200 column. The protein was concentrated in an Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit with an Ultracel-30 membrane (Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) to 11.6 mg ml−1 and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen in 100 µl aliquots. The final purity was estimated to be 98% from a Coomassie-stained gel and typical yields were 5–7 mg purified protein from 1 l of LB medium.
using an Ni–NTA Superflow Cartridge (Qiagen, Maryland, USA) with a gradient of 0–300 m2.2. Crystallization and structure solution
All crystallization experiments were performed in 96-well SD-2 plates (IDEX, USA) against a 50 µl reservoir. Initial crystals were obtained using droplets consisting of 150 nl concentrated protein solution (∼11 mg ml−1) combined with 150 nl reservoir solution and these were used in seeding experiments. The final crystals were obtained using droplets consisting of 150 nl concentrated protein solution combined with 120 nl reservoir solution and 30 nl seed stock. Either a Phoenix (ARI, USA) or a Mosquito (TTP Labtech, UK) robot was used to place the crystallization drops. Crystals (Supplementary Fig. S1) grew unreliably from a reservoir consisting of 5.5%(w/v) PEG 8000, 2.7%(v/v) diethylene glycol, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.1 at 281 K and were used to collect X-ray data on the MX-2 beamline of the Australian Synchrotron at a wavelength of 0.9537 Å (13 000 eV). The crystals were cryoprotected by the addition of reservoir solution supplemented with a further 20% diethylene glycol prior to cryocooling in liquid N2. Data were indexed with XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and scaled using AIMLESS (Evans, 2011). The structure was solved using (Phaser; McCoy et al., 2007) with PDB entry 3hpa (32% sequence identity, 15 gaps; Hall et al., 2010). A clear solution was only found when a dimer of 3hpa was used, with six dimers placed in the The was found to be P22121 and the resolution of the data extended to 2.8 Å (see Table 1). The model was initially built using Buccaneer (Cowtan, 2006) and was then rebuilt by hand using Coot (Emsley et al., 2010) and refined using REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011). Two full hexamers were found to be present in the each being a trimer of dimers. The model refined to Rwork and Rfree values of 19.3 and 22.2%, respectively (Table 1). The Ramachandran plot (from Coot) shows 94.9% of the residues in the most favourable region, 3.9% in the allowed region and 1.1% in the outlier region. After this original structure was built, a second set of crystals were obtained under similar conditions [50 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 4.6%(w/v) PEG 10 000] and another data set was obtained on the MX-2 beamline with data that extended to 2.2 Å resolution. This crystal was determined to belong to P212121 and a single hexamer was found in the The model and structure factors for both structures have been deposited in the PDB as entries 4v1x (2.2 Å resolution) and 4v1y (2.8 Å resolution).
|
2.3. Molecular modelling
The gas-phase equilibrium conformation of the AtzA metal-coordination site was calculated using density functional theory with the B3LYP functional and the 6-31+G* basis set (with the LANL2DZ pseudopotential used for iron core electrons) as implemented in Gaussian 09 (Frisch et al., 2009).
Atrazine was docked into a flexible AtzA binding pocket using the RosettaLigand docking protocol with the coordinates from PDB entry 4v1x . Partial atomic charges were calculated for the ligands using the AM1BCC Hamiltonian as implemented in QuacPac (v.1.6.3.1; OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA) and conformers were enumerated using Omega (v.2.5.1.4; OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA). 10 000 docking trajectories were performed using the RosettaLigand docking protocol (Davis et al., 2009). The output ensembles were culled to retain the top 5% of structures according to the total energy (computed from the Rosetta energy function). From this smaller ensemble, the top 20 protein–ligand complexes (according to protein–ligand interaction energy) were considered for final examination.
2.4. Dynamic light scattering
Concentrated AtzA (11.6 mg ml−1) was diluted by 50% in a serial fashion with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl to obtain a range of concentrations from 11.6 to 0.09 mg ml−1. 20 µl volumes of each sample, in duplicate, were placed in a 384-well plate with blanks consisting of just buffer alone. The plate was placed in a DynaPro plate reader DLS machine (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, California, USA) and 50 spectra were obtained at 297 K for each sample and averaged. The top three concentrations gave a of 5.9 nm, whereas the lowest concentration (0.09 mg ml−1) gave an average radius of 5.2–5.3 nm. Measuring the hexamer always gave a diameter of greater than 10 nm (10.5 to 13.0 mm, depending on the points chosen), whereas the longest dimension seen for a dimer was 8.3 nm.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The structure of hexameric AtzA
Analysis with PDBeFold revealed that the closest structure in the PDB to AtzA was that used for PDB entry 3hpa (r.m.s.d. of 1.6 Å; Hall et al., 2010), which was also the structure with the greatest amino-acid sequence identity (32% over 411 residues). Another structural genomics target, PDB entry 3lnp (Kube et al., 2013), is the next closest by structural homology, followed by two adenosine deaminases from Xanthomonas campestris (PDB entry 4dzh ; New York Structural Genomics Research Consortium, unpublished work) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PDB entry 3pao ; New York Structural Genomics Research Consortium, unpublished work). The TrzN structure (Seffernick et al., 2010; PDB entry 3lsb ), which has 26% sequence identity over 414 residues and an r.m.s.d. of 1.8 Å, is the fifth most similar structure to AtzA in the PDB. All of these molecules are classified as amidohydrolases, with 3hpa proposed to be an 8-oxoguanine deaminase. Although 3lnp has a highly homologous active site (four histidine residues and an aspartic acid residue), a calcium ion was modelled into the density instead of either Fe2+ or Zn2+; all of the other top hits on the list have either Fe2+ or (more commonly) Zn2+ in their active sites.
The AtzA hexamer (about 315 kDa in molecular weight) is a trimer of dimers (Fig. 2a), with the dimer interface being significantly larger than the individual protomer interfaces used to make up the hexamer (Figs. 2a and 2b): 3295 Å2 compared with 585 Å2. The hexamer was confirmed by DLS and (SEC; Supplementary Fig. S2), consistent with previous reports for the solution state of the protein (de Souza et al., 1996; Scott et al., 2009). The dimer surface covers 17–18% of the monomer (a single monomer has a surface area of ∼18 600 Å2; Fig. 2c). The dimer interface is similar to that found in the other amidohydrolases and the dimer is similar enough in overall structure that the search model used for (PDB entry 3hpa ) gave a significantly more robust solution when the dimer was used instead of the monomer. Two full hexamers (over 600 kDa) were found in the of the in P22121, whereas a single hexamer was found in P212121. The two structures are essentially identical (r.m.s.d. of 0.3 Å), with the higher resolution data giving greater clarity in amino-acid positions and having significantly more water molecules added to the model. The most obvious interaction seen when looking down the threefold axis of the hexamer is the 11-amino-acid insertion (relative to PDB entry 3hpa ) that forms the loop and helix encompassing residues 160–183 that has not been seen in the other amidohydrolase structures to date. The `cavity' in the hexamer is approximately 14 Å across at the entrance, with one residue in particular, Arg163, forming much of the surface of this entrance (Fig. 3).
The atzA genes from Aminobacter aminovorans isolates recently collected from vineyards in France (Noor et al., 2014) have accumulated a variety of mutations that have been demonstrated to confer changes in substrate specificity and alter the Kd of the enzyme for Fe2+. Interestingly, four of the amino-acid changes conferred by these mutations (Ala170Thr, Met256Ile, Pro258Thr and Tyr261Ser) are located in the interface responsible for coordinating the AtzA hexamer (Fig. 3). AtzA variants carrying all four amino-acid substitutions were observed in the A. aminovorans isolates in the study by Noor et al. (2014). As these amino acids could effect a change in hexamer formation, the AtzA Ala170Thr, Met256Ile, Pro258Thr, Tyr261Ser variant was expressed and purified and its size was determined by SEC. Unlike the wild-type protein, which eluted from SEC with an estimated molecular weight of ∼300 kDa, the variant eluted with an estimated molecular weight of ∼100 kDa (i.e. a dimer; data not shown). This suggests that there is some factor that has selected dimeric AtzA in the more recent French isolates when compared with the AtzA from the original Pseudomonas isolate obtained from the USA, although it is uncertain whether the dimeric AtzA variants predate the hexameric form or vice versa.
3.2. Analysis of the AtzA active site
The substrate-binding pocket and catalytic centre of each monomer is accessible via a long hydrophobic channel. The channel, substrate-binding pocket and active site are comprised of His66, His68, Gln71, Phe84, Tyr85, Trp87, Leu88, Phe89, Val92, Tyr93, Asp128, Met155, Phe157, Met160, Asp161, Ile164, Gln165, Val168, Leu180, Ser182, Ile183, Met184, Ala216, Thr217, Thr219, Ala220, His243, Glu246, Asp250, His276, Leu305, Asp327, Asn328 and Ser331 (Fig. 4). The identities of these residues are in good agreement with a homology model used to successfully predict sites for mutagenesis to substantially reduce the Km for atrazine (i.e. Ala216, Thr217, Thr218, Ala219 and Asp250; Scott et al., 2009).
The mononuclear active-site metal is coordinated by His66, His68, His243, His276 and Asp327 (Fig. 2d); it is a subtype III amidohydrolase metal-binding motif similar to that found in E. coli adenine deaminase (Seibert & Raushel, 2005). The bond lengths between the bound cation and ligating amino-acid side chains are longer than would be expected for a metal centre of this type, with lengths in the following ranges: Fe–His66, 2.68–2.88 Å; Fe–His68, 2.76–2.96 Å; Fe–His243, 3.01–3.14 Å; Fe–His276, 2.76–2.99 Å; Fe–Asp327, 2.41–2.49 Å. Although the conformations of the metal-coordinating side chains found in the active site are indicative of an octahedral complex (as would be expected for Fe2+ binding), the geometry is distorted from that predicted by gas-phase electronic structure calculations (Supplementary Fig. S3). Iron-coordinating histidine residues at these distances are observed in other structures in the PDB, although they are far less frequent than those with shorter bond lengths (the mean His–Fe bond length is 2.2 Å, with a standard deviation of ∼0.2 Å; Supplementary Fig. S4). Although no negative density was seen when the Fe atoms were set to 100% occupancy, the resulting B factors were over double those for the nearby residues. As a result, we have set the occupancies of the Fe atoms to 50%, which gives much more reasonable B factors. These results imply that the Fe atom is bound but not tightly coordinated in the active site, consistent with the unusually high observed Kd of AtzA for iron (∼5 µM; Noor et al., 2014). Interestingly, Fe2+ bound in related amidohydrolases (e.g. cytosine deaminases; PDB entries 1ra0 , 1k70 and 4r88 ; Ireton et al., 2001; Mahan et al., 2004) is also found to be less tightly coordinated than Zn2+ cations, despite Fe2+ being the physiologically relevant cation.
There are a number of Ramachandran outliers associated with the active site, His66, His276, Glu298, Asp327 and Asn332, which all have good electron density (Fig. 5) and are unambiguously placed. His66, His276 and Asp327 bind the Fe2+ in the active site directly and introduce strain into the active site. Most of the other Ramachandran outliers are also in good electron density. The one exception is Glu251, which is in a region of weak electron density and is likely to be mobile in the protein. This mobile region sits over the substrate and may be mobile in order to allow substrate entry or exit. One other Ramachandran outlier, Thr368, is interesting as it is in the middle of a helix; the preceding residue, Ala367, which is also part of the helical structure, has its carbonyl hydrogen-bonded to another residue (Ile63) instead of being in line with the other carbonyls in the helix.
Examination of the binding pocket indicated that it might be difficult for atrazine to bind in an orientation that would permit nucleophilic substitution by an activated water (as is the case in TrzN). Atrazine was both soaked into crystals and co-crystallized with the protein, with the co-crystallization experiment resulting in crystals that diffracted to 2.2 Å resolution. However, only a small amount of broken density was found in the active site in some of the monomers of the co-crystals (Fig. 5). The density in the active site was insufficient to unambiguously place atrazine. For this reason, atrazine docking was investigated using extensive molecular-docking calculations with the RosettaLigand docking protocol (Davis et al., 2009). The results of these calculations suggest that nonproductive binding modes are common for atrazine.
A high-scoring pose was produced that positioned the appropriate C atom of atrazine for nucleophilic attack by the metal-bound water. In contrast to our previously proposed mechanism based upon homology modelling (Scott et al., 2009), the N-ethyl and N-isopropyl moieties of the substrate are oriented away from the metal centre, making hydrophobic contacts with Val92, Trp87, Leu88, Tyr85 and Phe84 (Fig. 6). Phe84 presents a different rotamer to that found in the substrate-free The Cl atom and a ring N atom of atrazine are coordinated to the Fe2+, which positions the substrate ideally for nucleophilic attack by the coordinated nucleophile.
To determine whether the bidentate coordination mode is likely or whether there is monodentate coordination through the Cl atom, not requiring rotation of His243 but requiring a slight outwards movement of the hydrophobic pocket described above, would involve further investigation that is beyond the scope of the current work. Regardless, the lateral shift to form the monodentate coordination mode would be less than 1 Å and would be able to be accommodated without major reorganization of the active site.
There are two hydrogen-bonding interactions from the N-ethyl and N-isopropyl substituents to the side-chain O atom of Asn328 and the side chain of the new rotamer of Glu246, respectively. The latter of these residues may play a role in stabilizing the negative charge on a ring N atom during the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate. The symmetry of the triazine ring of the subunit could make it possible for the N-alkyl side chains of atrazine to bind in the opposite orientation to that presented here; however, the additional volume required to accommodate the N-isopropyl side chain compared with the N-ethyl side chain makes this alternate binding mode unlikely from a steric perspective.
The substrate-binding pocket of AtzA appears to be ill-adapted for binding atrazine, with strained conformers of key amino residues, a low-affinity metal-binding site and a high probability of unproductive substrate binding. These observations are consistent with the high Km of wild-type AtzA for atrazine, which exceeds the aqueous solubility of the substrate (i.e. >159 µM; Scott et al., 2009), and may explain why we have been unable to capture clear X-ray structures of the AtzA–atrazine complex.
3.3. Location of the nine amino acids that distinguish AtzA and the melamine deaminase TriA
The melamine deaminase TriA differs from AtzA in the identities of just nine amino-acid residues: Leu84 (Phe), Leu92 (Val), Asp125 (Glu), Ile217 (Thr), Pro219 (Thr), Leu253 (Ile), Trp255 (Gly), Asp328 (Asn) and Cys331 (Ser) (AtzA residues shown in parentheses; Seffernick et al., 2001). Of these nine amino-acid residues, six are part of the substrate-binding pocket/access channel in AtzA: Phe84, Val92, Thr217, Thr219, Asn328 and Ser331 (Fig. 7).
The presence of Phe84, Asn328 and Ser331 in the substrate-binding pocket is unsurprising, as these three amino acids had previously been shown to be the major determinants of atrazine/melamine specificity in AtzA and TriA, respectively (Noor et al., 2012; Scott et al., 2009; Raillard et al., 2001). In particular, Ser331 and Asn328 are located within the vicinity of the active-site metal, which is consistent with their previously proposed role in catalysis in TriA-mediated melamine deamination and passive promotion of atrazine-mediated atrazine dechlorination (Noor et al., 2012; Scott et al., 2009).
In laboratory evolution experiments, altering Thr217 and Thr219 has been demonstrated to lead to substantial improvements in the Km and kcat/Km values of AtzA for atrazine (Scott et al., 2009). Thr217 and Thr219 were targeted for mutagenesis as homology modelling had predicted their presence in the substrate-binding pocket, and the AtzA structure presented here confirms this (Fig. 7). Ile253 and Gly255 are not located in the substrate-binding pocket. Interestingly, however, Ile253 and Gly255 do cluster close to Thr219 (Fig. 7), with Ile253 within 4 Å of Thr219. Changes to the residues at positions 253 and 255 may therefore influence the packing of the residues of the substrate-binding pocket (i.e. positions 217 and 219), which is consistent with their relatively minor role in `tuning' the specificity of the enzyme for melamine or atrazine (Noor et al., 2012; Raillard et al., 2001). The remaining difference between AtzA and TriA is at position 125 (Glu in AtzA and Asp in TriA) and has been shown to contribute substantially to the specificity of AtzA and TriA for dechlorination or deamination (Noor et al., 2012). Although Glu125 is buried (Fig. 7), it does contribute to the active-site geometry via a hydrogen-bonding interaction between the Glu125 side chain and the backbone N atom of Val69, next to His68 which is bound to the Fe2+.
3.4. The catalytic mechanism of AtzA
We present two alternative potential catalytic mechanisms for the hydrolytic dechlorination of atrazine by AtzA that are constant with the in silico docking presented here, notwithstanding that empirical data will be required to test these and previously proposed reaction mechanisms. The first is based directly upon the interactions shown in the only docking pose that oriented atrazine appropriately for nucleophilic attack and the second is based upon the abovementioned monodentate coordination mode for atrazine (Figs. 8a and 8b, respectively) that better enables Glu246 to stabilize negative charge on another of the ring N atoms. In both of these mechanisms, coordination of the Cl atom to Fe2+ draws electron density from the C—Cl bond, increasing the susceptibility of the C atom to nucleophilic attack. In the first mechanism, the coordinated water is deprotonated by Asp327 followed by nucleophilic attack of the resulting activated hydroxide at the chlorine-bearing ring C atom. The negative charge of the tetrahedral intermediate is stabilized on the Fe2+-coordinated aromatic N atom, after which chloride is released and aromaticity is re-established in the hydroxylated product.
The second mechanism with monodentate atrazine coordination to Fe2+ involves deprotonation of the coordinated water by Glu246, which then rotates to donate a hydrogen bond to a ring N atom of atrazine upon substrate binding. This N atom then gains the negative charge of the tetrahedral intermediate, stabilized by the hydrogen bond from the protonated Glu246, followed by generation of the products as per the first mechanism.
It is possible that the `loose' coordination geometry of the Fe2+ has evolved to facilitate the bidentate coordination of atrazine, which would not be possible with four ideally coordinating residues and a coordinated water. His243 in particular, at over 3 Å from the Fe2+, provides sufficient space for bidentate coordination, albeit by adopting a higher energy conformation. We note, however, that such a binding mode is unprecedented, and without a of the AtzA–atrazine complex there is no empirical evidence to support it.
While the mechanisms for atrazine dechlorination that we have proposed, in light of the et al., 1996; Raillard et al., 2001; Scott et al., 2009; Noor et al., 2012). The sequential mutations reported earlier (Scott et al., 2009) that reduce the atrazine dechlorination activity and increase the deaminase activity may do so through combinations of adjusted positioning of the metal-bound water through shifted hydrogen-bond networks, altering its pKa, and a changed steric factor in substrate binding and product release.
and docking, differ from those that we have previously reported based upon homology modelling and manual placement of the substrate, the newly proposed mechanisms remain consistent with the empirically determined biochemical and mutagenesis data reported elsewhere (de Souza3.5. A comparison of the two metal-dependent atrazine chlorohydrolases AtzA and TrzN
The et al., 2010). The monomers of AtzA and TrzN superpose with a root-mean-square difference of 1.8 Å on Cα atoms over 414 residues (Fig. 9a). The metal-binding histidine side chains and metal overlay (Fig. 9b), with the major differences being the longer metal–histidine distances (His66, His68 and His243 in AtzA at 2.7–3.1 Å instead of 2.0–2.1 Å in TrzN; Fig. 9b), Fe2+ instead of Zn2+ as the metal, the additional His276 interaction with Fe2+ and the additional Fe–Asp327 interaction (at 2.4–2.5 Å). In the TrzN structure, the histidine equivalent to His276 (His274) makes a 2.7 Å hydrogen bond to the water coordinated to the Zn ion. Uniquely among the amidohydrolase family, the TrzN structure has a threonine residue at position 325, making it the first member of the ninth of metal-coordination sites of the amidohydrolase family (Seibert & Raushel, 2005; Jackson et al., 2014; Khurana et al., 2009).
of AtzA is similar to that of TrzN (SeffernickUnlike the active site of AtzA, the TrzN active site has excellent complementarity for its substrate, which almost certainly accounts for the lower Km of TrzN for atrazine (∼20 µM; Shapir et al., 2002) when compared with that of AtzA for the same substrate (>159 µM). The mechanism of TrzN differs from any proposed for AtzA, in which a zinc-activated water forms the tetrahedral intermediate and highly activated leaving groups (such as halides) depart readily. Leaving groups with higher pKa values (such as amines) can be hydrolyzed by TrzN as they are protonated; Glu241 first donates a proton to the triazine ring, which then protonates the Thus, TrzN is an efficient hydrolase with a broad substrate range, while AtzA is a less active enzyme that can perform either deamination or dehalogenation reactions depending on the identities of the amino-acid residues at positions 328 and 331. AtzA variants that are effectively intermediates between AtzA and TriA possess both of these activities at the same time, but with a lower specificity than either AtzA or TriA (Noor et al., 2012).
4. Concluding remarks
For the first time since its discovery ∼20 years ago, we have been able to determine the structure of AtzA, the `archetypal' atrazine chlorohydrolase. AtzA appears to be structurally ill-adapted to perform its physiological function, with a metal-coordination geometry that leads to a low affinity for its metal cofactor and a substrate-binding pocket that appears to be unable to accept its physiological substrate without substantial reorganization. In addition, four of the active-site amino-acid residues appear to be held in strained conformations, suggesting that the active site is far from optimized, which is consistent with the relatively poor kinetic performance of AtzA (kcat/Km of ∼1 × 104 M−1 s−1 and a Km in excess of the substrate's solubility limit of 153 µM; Scott et al., 2009; Noor et al., 2012). AtzA is certainly less well adapted to its physiological function than the alternative atrazine chlorohydrolase TrzN (kcat/Km of ∼1 × 105 M−1 s−1 and a Km value of ∼20 µM; Jackson et al., 2014), which has good complementarity for its substrate and a catalytic mechanism that permits a broader substrate range than AtzA. Both atzA and trzN are prone to horizontal gene transfer, as they are located on transmissible plasmids (de Souza et al., 1998; Sajjaphan et al., 2004), and it will be interesting to see whether the catalytically superior TrzN begins to outcompete and replace AtzA in the environment.
Supporting information
3D view: 4v1x,4v1y
PDB references: AtzA, 4v1x; 4v1y
Supplementary Figures S1-S5. DOI: 10.1107/S1399004715000619/rr5091sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Drs Tara Sutherland and Judith Scoble (CSIRO) for their constructive comments during the preparation of this manuscript. We thank the beamline scientists of the Australian Synchrotron and the CSIRO Collaborative Crystallization Centre (https://www.csiro.au/C3 ), Melbourne, Australia. We also thank OpenEye Scientific Software for a license for Afitt, QuacPac and Omega.
References
Balotra, S., Newman, J., Cowieson, N., French, N. G., Campbell, P. M., Briggs, L. J., Warden, A. C., Easton, C. J., Peat, T. S. & Scott, C. (2015). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 470–480. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Balotra, S., Newman, J., French, N. G., Briggs, L. J., Peat, T. S. & Scott, C. (2014). Acta Cryst. F70, 310–315. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Boundy-Mills, K. L., de Souza, M. L., Mandelbaum, R. T., Wackett, L. P. & Sadowsky, M. J. (1997). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 916–923. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cameron, S. M., Durchschein, K., Richman, J. E., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2011). ACS Catal. 1, 1075–1082. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Copley, S. D. (2000). Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 261–265. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cowtan, K. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 1002–1011. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Davis, I. W., Raha, K., Head, M. S. & Baker, D. (2009). Protein Sci. 18, 1998–2002. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Evans, P. R. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 282–292. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Frisch, M. J. et al. (2009). Gaussian 09. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut, USA. Google Scholar
Fruchey, I., Shapir, N., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2003). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3653–3657. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hall, R. S., Fedorov, A. A., Marti-Arbona, R., Fedorov, E. V., Kolb, P., Sauder, J. M., Burley, S. K., Shoichet, B. K., Almo, S. C. & Raushel, F. M. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1762–1763. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ireton, G. C., McDermott, G., Black, M. E. & Stoddard, B. L. (2001). J. Mol. Biol. 315, 687–697. CrossRef Google Scholar
Jackson, C. J., Coppin, C. W., Carr, P. D., Aleksandrov, A., Wilding, M., Sugrue, E., Ubels, J., Paks, M., Newman, J., Peat, T. S., Russell, R. J., Field, M., Weik, M., Oakeshott, J. G. & Scott, C. (2014). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 4003–4011. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Khurana, J. L., Jackson, C. J., Scott, C., Pandey, G., Horne, I., Russell, R. J., Herlt, A., Easton, C. J. & Oakeshott, J. G. (2009). Biochem. J. 418, 431–441. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kube, M. et al. (2013). Nature Commun. 4, 2156–2159. CrossRef Google Scholar
Lennox, E. S. (1955). Virology, 1, 190–206. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Mahan, S. D., Ireton, G. C., Knoeber, C., Stoddard, B. L. & Black, M. E. (2004). Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 17, 625–633. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Martinez, B., Tomkins, J., Wackett, L. P., Wing, R. & Sadowsky, M. J. (2001). J. Bacteriol. 183, 5684–5697. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mulbry, W. W., Zhu, H., Nour, S. M. & Topp, E. (2002). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 206, 75–79. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Newman, J., Peat, T. S., Richard, R., Kan, L., Swanson, P. E., Affholter, J. A., Holmes, I. H., Schindler, J. F., Unkefer, C. J. & Terwilliger, T. C. (1999). Biochemistry, 38, 16105–16114. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Noor, S., Changey, F., Oakeshott, J. G., Scott, C. & Martin-Laurent, F. (2014). Biodegradation, 25, 21–30. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Noor, S., Taylor, M. C., Russell, R. J., Jermiin, L. S., Jackson, C. J., Oakeshott, J. G. & Scott, C. (2012). PLoS One, 7, e39822. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Peat, T. S., Balotra, S., Wilding, M., French, N. G., Briggs, L. J., Panjikar, S., Cowieson, N., Newman, J. & Scott, C. (2013). Mol. Microbiol. 88, 1149–1163. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raillard, S., Krebber, A., Chen, Y., Ness, J. E., Bermudez, E., Trinidad, R., Fullem, R., Davis, C., Welch, M., Seffernick, J., Wackett, L. P., Stemmer, W. P. C. & Minshull, J. (2001). Chem. Biol. 8, 891–898. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Russell, R. J., Scott, C., Jackson, C. J., Pandey, R., Pandey, G., Taylor, M. C., Coppin, C. W., Liu, J. W. & Oakeshott, J. G. (2011). Evol. Appl. 4, 225–248. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sadowsky, M. J., Tong, Z., de Souza, M. & Wackett, L. P. (1998). J. Bacteriol. 180, 152–158. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sajjaphan, K., Shapir, N., Wackett, L. P., Palmer, M., Blackmon, B., Tomkins, J. & Sadowsky, M. J. (2004). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 4402–4407. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Scott, C., Jackson, C. J., Coppin, C. W., Mourant, R. G., Hilton, M. E., Sutherland, T. D., Russell, R. J. & Oakeshott, J. G. (2009). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2184–2191. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Seffernick, J. L., Aleem, A., Osborne, J. P., Johnson, G., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2007). J. Bacteriol. 189, 6989–6997. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Seffernick, J. L., de Souza, M. L., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2001). J. Bacteriol. 183, 2405–2410. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Seffernick, J. L., Erickson, J. S., Cameron, S. M., Cho, S., Dodge, A. G., Richman, J. E., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2012). J. Bacteriol. 194, 4579–4588. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seffernick, J. L., Reynolds, E., Fedorov, A. A., Fedorov, E., Almo, S. C., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2010). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 30606–30614. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seibert, C. M. & Raushel, F. M. (2005). Biochemistry, 44, 6383–6391. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Shapir, N., Osborne, J. P., Johnson, G., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2002). J. Bacteriol. 184, 5376–5384. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Shapir, N., Pedersen, C., Gil, O., Strong, L., Seffernick, J., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2006). J. Bacteriol. 188, 5859–5864. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Shapir, N., Rosendahl, C., Johnson, G., Andreina, M., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2005). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2214–2220. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Shapir, N., Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (2005). J. Bacteriol. 187, 3731–3738. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Souza, M. L. de, Sadowsky, M. J. & Wackett, L. P. (1996). J. Bacteriol. 178, 4894–4900. PubMed Google Scholar
Souza, M. L. de, Wackett, L. P. & Sadowsky, M. J. (1998). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 2323–2326. PubMed Google Scholar
Udiković-Kolić, N., Scott, C. & Martin-Laurent, F. (2013). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 1175–1189. Google Scholar
Verschueren, K. H. G., Seljée, F., Rozeboom, H. J., Kalk, K. H. & Dijkstra, B. W. (1993). Nature (London), 363, 693–698. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Wackett, L. P. (2009). Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 244–251. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.