journal menu
addenda and errata
 | STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY |
The X-ray crystallography solved thanks to AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models: a case-study report. Corrigendum
aLaboratoire de Biologie Structurale de la Cellule (BIOC), CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
*Correspondence e-mail: marc.graille@polytechnique.edu
A figure in the article by Barbarin-Bocahu & Graille [(2022), Acta Cryst. D78, 517–531] is corrected.
Keywords: structural biology; phase problem; AlphaFold; molecular replacement; machine-learning 3D models; corrigendum.
In the article by Barbarin-Bocahu & Graille (2022![[Barbarin-Bocahu, I. & Graille, M. (2022). Acta Cryst. D78, 517-531.]](../../../../../../logos/arrows/d_arr.gif "Barbarin-Bocahu, I. & Graille, M. (2022). Acta Cryst. D78, 517-531."){kind=small}
) the labels in Fig. 5(b) are incorrect. The corrected Fig. 5 is given below.
![[Figure 5]](jc9047fig5thm.gif) | Figure 5 Comparison of the crystal structure of KlNmd4 with the various models. (a) Graph depicting the r.m.s.d. values between the Cα atoms of the KlNmd4 and of the different models, either truncated (identified as `structural core of the PIN domain') or intact (`entire model'). (b) Superposition of the full-length KlNmd4 AlphaFold model onto the KlNmd4 (beige). The full-length KlNmd4 AlphaFold model is colored according to the pLDDT values. The region 81–114 of the KlNmd4 is highlighted in pink. (c) Superposition of the KlNmd4 (beige) and the truncated KlNmd4 RoseTTAFold-e model (dark green). |
References
Barbarin-Bocahu, I. & Graille, M. (2022). Acta Cryst. D78, 517–531. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.
| STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY |
