scientific commentaries\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
BIOLOGY
ISSN: 2059-7983

Perspective on structure predictions of disorder

crossmark logo

aSchool of Molecular Sciences, University of Western Australia, M310, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

The revolutionary impact of AlphaFold2 (Jumper et al., 2021View full citation), RoseTTAfold (Baek et al., 2021View full citation) and ESMFold (Lin et al., 2023View full citation) on structural biology is undeniable, and their outputs are widely used across all of biochemistry and molecular biology. Indeed, most presentations at conferences attended by biochemists, cell and molecular biologists now include an image of a computational model of a protein where once they may have included an experimental structure, if it existed. These images are commonly shown in the cartoon ribbon format championed by Jane Richardson (described in Richardson, 2000View full citation).

For many proteins, especially eukaryotic proteins, the dominating feature of these cartoons is the unstructured region of the protein. This is where the current article by Williams and coworkers in this issue (Williams et al., 2025View full citation) begins to shed some new light. One of the features of AlphaFold predictions that have contributed to their success is the internal evaluation of the reliability of prediction, presented as a per-residue confidence score (pLDDT). Somewhat ironically, as well as helping biologists understand how reliable a structured region of a protein is (for example where the pLDDT score is ≥70), the inverse observation of which parts of the protein are unstructured has been very successful, and highly complementary with the best protein-disorder predictors, for example MobiDB (Piovesan et al., 2023View full citation).

The low-confidence regions suffer a diversity of fates. They are either overinterpreted as somehow being a realistic biophysical representation of the protein, or they are completely dismissed as `spaghetti' and ignored. Williams and coworkers have identified that they represent a largely untapped resource that may contain valuable structural information, and have gone ahead with analysis and classification of the different classes of sub-70 pLDDT types.

The classifications of barbed wire, near-predictive and pseudostructure described in the paper offer a tractable framework for biologists interested in protein disorder, bio­molecular condensation and disorder-to-order transitions to begin to use large-scale databases of predictive 3D models in their research.

References

Return to citationBaek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., Millán, C., Park, H., Adams, C., Glassman, C. R., DeGiovanni, A., Pereira, J. H., Rodrigues, A. V., van Dijk, A. A., Ebrecht, A. C., Opperman, D. J., Sagmeister, T., Buhlheller, C., Pavkov-Keller, T., Rathinaswamy, M. K., Dalwadi, U., Yip, C. K., Burke, J. E., Garcia, K. C., Grishin, N. V., Adams, P. D., Read, R. J. & Baker, D. (2021). Science, 373, 871–876.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationJumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S. A. A., Ballard, A. J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., Back, T., Petersen, S., Reiman, D., Clancy, E., Zielinski, M., Steinegger, M., Pacholska, M., Berghammer, T., Bodenstein, S., Silver, D., Vinyals, O., Senior, A. W., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kohli, P. & Hassabis, D. (2021). Nature, 596, 583–589.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationLin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., dos Santos Costa, A., Fazel-Zarandi, M., Sercu, T., Candido, S. & Rives, A. (2023). Science, 379, 1123–1130.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationPiovesan, D., Del Conte, A., Clementel, D., Monzon, A. M., Bevilacqua, M., Aspromonte, M. C., Iserte, J. A., Orti, F. E., Marino-Buslje, C. & Tosatto, S. C. E. (2023). Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D438–D444.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationRichardson, J. S. (2000). Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 624–625.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWilliams, C. J., Chen, V. B., Richardson, D. C. & Richardson, J. S. (2025). Acta Cryst. D81, 558–572.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
BIOLOGY
ISSN: 2059-7983
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds