research papers
Room-temperature of a metal-dependent W-formate dehydrogenase by serial synchrotron crystallography
aAssociate Laboratory i4HB – Institute for Health and Bioeconomy and UCIBIO, Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal, bInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal, cEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hamburg Unit c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany, and dInstitute for Nanostructure and Solid-State Physics, Universität Hamburg, HARBOR, Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Metal-dependent formate dehydrogenases (Fdhs) are a promising research target in efforts to mitigate climate change by developing active, efficient, selective and safe industrial catalysts for CO2 reduction. Here, we report the room-temperature (RT) serial synchrotron X-ray crystallography (SSX) structure of Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris formate dehydrogenase AB and compare this structure with previously reported cryogenic structures. The comparison reveals structural differences likely arising from the absence of cryoprotectants, differences in data-collection temperature and the much lower radiation dose accumulated by each crystal during the SSX experiments. The RT-SSX structure provides the first step towards time-resolved serial crystallography experiments targeting possible catalytic intermediates in order to fully understand the catalytic mechanism of metal-dependent Fdhs.
Keywords: CO2 reduction; metal-dependent formate dehydrogenases; Mo/W enzymes; serial synchrotron X-ray crystallography; room-temperature X-ray crystallography.
PDB references: W-formate dehydrogenase from Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris, 30gj; 30gk
1. Introduction
Efficient strategies for converting carbon dioxide (CO2) into value-added products are in high demand to mitigate climate change but remain limited due to the thermodynamically stable nature of CO2, which makes these reactions chemically challenging and difficult to implement industrially (Appel et al., 2013
; Calzadiaz-Ramirez & Meyer, 2022
; Aresta et al., 2013
). However, nature has evolved a highly efficient and selective solution in formate dehydrogenases, and there is significant interest in developing optimized enzymes and bio-inspired synthetic catalysts for large-scale industrial use (Szczesny et al., 2020
; Lodh & Roy, 2022
; Kanega et al., 2020
). Metal-dependent (molybdenum/tungsten) formate dehydrogenases (Fdhs) are a structurally modular family of enzymes. They contain a common conserved catalytic subunit and diverse additional subunits (containing different cofactors ranging from iron–sulfur clusters to haem groups and flavins). This allows cells to integrate these enzymes into multiple metabolic pathways (da Silva et al., 2013
) where they can interface with different intracellular electron carriers (Boyington et al., 1997
; Jormakka et al., 2002
; Radon et al., 2020
; Young et al., 2020
; Oliveira et al., 2020
; Raaijmakers et al., 2002
). The conserved catalytic subunit catalyses the reversible conversion of CO2 to formate and features a Mo/W active site that is responsible for its significantly higher turnover rates compared with the structurally distinct metal-independent Fdhs (Maia et al., 2015
; Nielsen et al., 2019
). The active site presents a distorted trigonal prismatic geometry, in which the metal ion (Mo or W) is hexacoordinated to a (Se)Cys residue from the peptide chain, a terminal sulfido (–SH/=S) ligand and two dithiolene groups from two molybdopterin guanine dinucleotides (MGDs) (Romão, 2009
; Hille et al., 2014
; Grimaldi et al., 2013
), one of which is responsible for electron transfer (MGD1; Oliveira et al., 2025
; Raaijmakers et al., 2002
). The catalytic site is completed in the second coordination sphere by a highly conserved histidine residue with an assigned putative proton-transfer role, and a conserved arginine residue, likely involved in substrate and catalytic intermediate orientation (Oliveira et al., 2020
; Siegbahn, 2022
; Hartmann et al., 2016
; Dong & Ryde, 2018
; Axley et al., 1990
). The heterodimeric W-FdhAB from Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris (Nv), a SeCys-containing enzyme with four [4Fe–4S] clusters (Oliveira et al., 2020
), has been extensively studied due to its high activity and oxygen tolerance (Oliveira et al., 2024
). However, to date all structural studies reported were conducted under cryo conditions (100 K; Oliveira et al., 2020
; Vilela-Alves et al., 2023
).
Previous studies have shown that upon reduction (with formate or dithionite) the catalytic amino acids Arg441 and His193 adopt different conformations, along with structural changes in the Sec192–Thr196 helix, the MGD2 cofactor and the neighbouring residues Glu443 and Gln890 (Oliveira et al., 2020
). Additionally, a disulfide bond-based activation mechanism was also uncovered, using the C872A variant as a proxy for the open conformation of the surface-exposed Cys845–Cys872 disulfide (S—S) bond. The activation/deactivation stimulus was found to be conveyed from the surface to the buried active site (25 Å away) through a complex allosteric mechanism featuring, in the vicinity of the active site, the residues Gln409 and Met405, which in turn impact the MGD2 and the W site (Oliveira et al., 2024
). Lastly, a substrate-retention site, comprising His193, Val197, Arg441, Gln447 and Thr450, was identified in the main substrate tunnel of NvFdhAB, very close to the active site. This retention site plays a synergistic role by increasing substrate concentration near the W site, thereby enhancing CO2 reduction and improving catalytic efficiency (Vilela-Alves et al., 2026
).
Here, we report the crystal structure of the N. vulgaris metal-dependent formate dehydrogenase AB (NvFdhAB) obtained by room-temperature (RT) serial synchrotron X-ray crystallography (SSX). A comparison with the previous cryo crystallographic structures reveals conformational changes in key residues and in the hydration water network that likely arise from the difference in data-collection temperature and the absence of cryoprotectant molecules. Leveraging the low radiation dose achievable in SSX, the geometry of the W active site could be used to ascertain the impact of the putative photoreduction of the W ion on the active-site structure in previous high-dose structures (for example PDB entry 6sdr; Oliveira et al., 2025
). Given the successful optimization of NvFdhAB microcrystals and of SSX data collection, our results pave the way for future time-resolved SSX experiments, aiming to better probe the still intriguing catalytic mechanism for CO2 reduction.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Expression and purification of N. vulgaris FdhAB
NvFdhAB was overexpressed and affinity-purified from N. vulgaris Hildenborough as described previously (Oliveira et al., 2020
; Supplementary Table S1). Protein concentration was determined using ɛ410 nm = 43.45 mM−1 cm−1. To verify batch quality, denaturing acrylamide gel electrophoresis and kinetic assays were performed as reported in Oliveira et al. (2020
).
2.2. Crystallization, data collection, structure solution and refinement
NvFdhAB at 10 mg ml−1 was used to produce microcrystals through batch crystallization in 500 µl microtubes at 20°C in 30 µl batches containing precipitant solution consisting of 32%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 M LiCl (Oliveira et al., 2020
) and microseeds of wild-type (WT) NvFdhAB, with a ratio of 15:10.5:4.5 µl protein:precipitant:microseeds (Supplementary Table S2). Microseeds were obtained by harvesting macrocrystals of WT NvFdhAB into 50 µl reservoir solution and vortexing them with a plastic bead ten times for 30 s on and 30 s off. To obtain NvFdhAB macrocrystals, the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method was used at 20°C in 24-well plates (24-well XRL plate, Molecular Dimensions) containing 2 µl drops (1:1 protein:precipitant ratio). WT NvFdhAB (10 mg ml−1) was crystallized using precipitant solutions consisting of 22–26%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 M LiCl (Oliveira et al., 2020
) supplemented with 0.2 µl of a 1:500 dilution from a stock of microseeds of WT NvFdhAB. Both macro and micro crystals first appeared after 24 h and were harvested after 72 h.
The microcrystal slurry was then loaded onto previously glow-discharged HARE chips (featuring inverted frustum-shaped crystal cavities with a base edge of 10 µm, a top edge of 82 µm and a height of 50 µm; manufactured by the Max Planck Semiconductor Laboratory, Garching, Germany), following the protocol developed by Mehrabi et al. (2020
). Briefly, 90 µl of microcrystal slurry was loaded onto a HARE chip inside a humidity-controlled hood (relative humidity 95%), followed by the application of a gentle vacuum to the back of the chip to remove excess mother liquor before the HARE chip was mounted in a specialized chip holder. Data collection was conducted on EMBL beamline P14-2 (T-REXX; Horrell et al., 2019
) at the PETRA III synchrotron, DESY, Hamburg, Germany with the HARE chip placed inside a temperature- and humidity-controlled chamber (temperature 20°C, relative humidity 95%), using the previously described translation-stage holders (Mehrabi et al., 2020
; Schulz et al., 2025
). The exposure time per crystal was 5 ms, and the beam flux apertured to 10 × 7 µm (horizontal × vertical) was 1.1 × 1012 photons s−1 in a 30 × 7 µm (horizontal × vertical) Gaussian beam. Three full HARE chips were measured and the data obtained from the three chips were merged into a single dataset, with a moderately low average hit rate of 18% and a total of 11 144 indexed lattices.
Macrocrystals (thin plates of approximately 300 × 200 × 30 µm) were harvested and then flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen using the precipitant solution supplemented with 20%(v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant. X-ray diffraction experiments on the macrocrystals under cryogenic conditions (100 K) were performed on EMBL beamline P14 at the PETRA III synchrotron, DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
SSX data were processed with CrystFEL v0.10.2 (White et al., 2012
) using the XGANDALF indexer (Gevorkov et al., 2019
) and partialator for scaling and merging with the unity partiality model, while macrocrystal cryo data were processed with autoPROC (Vonrhein et al., 2011
). For both datasets, Phaser 2.8.3 (McCoy et al., 2007
) from the CCP4 suite 7.1.018 (Agirre et al., 2023
) was used to solve the structure by molecular replacement, using the WT NvFdhAB oxidized structure (PDB entry 6sdr; Oliveira et al., 2025
) as a search model. Cycles of automatic restrained refinement using REFMAC 5.8.0267 (Murshudov et al., 2011
) and manual model building using Coot 0.8.9.1 (Emsley et al., 2010
) were conducted to iteratively refine the model. After initial refinement, the online PDB-REDO server (Joosten et al., 2014
) was used to rebuild the model. Publication images were generated in PyMOL 4.6.0 (Schrödinger). Statistics on data collection and processing and on model are presented in Table 1
. Average dose for each dataset was estimated using the RADDOSE-3D online server (input data available in Supplementary Data S1; Dickerson et al., 2024
).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Room-temperature synchrotron serial crystallographic structure of NvFdhAB
NvFdhAB in the aerobically as-isolated state (Oliveira et al., 2020
) yielded microcrystals as moderately homogeneous thin plates of approximately 30 × 20 × 5 µm (Fig. 1
a) belonging to space group P212121 that diffracted to 1.93 Å resolution (Table 1
). It is interesting to note a slight increase in unit-cell dimensions between the room-temperature and cryo structures, with the maximum difference (2.5 Å, approximately 1.6%) in the c axis (the unit-cell histogram for the serial dataset is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1), which is an expected temperature effect. Data-processing statistics indicate 100% completeness and the model was refined with good geometry indicators (MolProbity score of 1.17), with Rwork and Rfree values of 0.185 and 0.222, respectively (Table 1
). As expected, the overall RT-SSX NvFdhAB structure is similar to the cryo structure (Fig. 1
b). Superposition of the SSX structure with the cryo structure (PDB entry 6sdr) yields an overall r.m.s.d. of 0.39 Å for 1178 Cα atoms and r.m.s.d.s of 0.35 Å for 963 Cα atoms and 0.31 Å for 215 Cα atoms for chains A and B, respectively. A higher overall r.m.s.d. value reflects a slight change in the relative orientation of the two subunits. However, this variation falls within the range observed among previously reported cryo structures. Nonetheless, the room-temperature data revealed subtle structural changes in side-chain positioning and hydration water location (examples are shown in Figs. 1
c, 1
d and 1
e). To ensure that enough diffraction patterns were collected to yield good-quality data, we deleted Trp728 from the model and the structure was re-refined. The fact that the proper tryptophan-shaped electron density remains in the omit map (Supplementary Fig. S2) confirms that data of sufficient quality have been collected (von Stetten & Pearson, 2026
).
| Figure 1 (a) Microphotograph of NvFdhAB microcrystals, approximately 30 × 20 × 5 µm in size, in suspension in mother liquor. (b) Superposition of the RT-SSX and cryo NvFdhAB (PDB entry 6sdr) structures in violet and black, respectively. The W site with the two MGD cofactors and the four [4Fe–4S] clusters shown in ball-and-stick representation. (c, d, e) Examples of the differences in side-chain positioning and hydration water location between the superimposed SSX and cryo NvFdhAB (PDB entry 6sdr) structures in violet and black, respectively, around residues Tyr185 and Arg263, Phe160 and Trp533 and, lastly, Met209. In (c) the absent water molecule is shown as a burgundy sphere. Hydrogen bonds are shown as teal dashes and distances are in Å. RT-SSX 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps are shown as a blue mesh at 1.0 r.m.s.d. |
3.2. Structural comparison of NvFdhAB from serial and cryo crystallography
Since SSX data collection was performed at room temperature, one of the most obvious differences in the structure refined from the SSX dataset compared with the structure determined at 100 K (PDB entry 6sdr) is that no cryoprotectant was required and thus the structurally conserved glycerol molecule, originating from the cryoprotectant and located at the proposed retention site (Vilela-Alves et al., 2026
), was absent. Despite the lack of glycerol binding, only small changes in the positioning of side chains forming this pocket were observed, likely because the site is now occupied by two water molecules, WG1 and WG2 (Fig. 2
). The guanidinium group of the catalytic Arg441 moves 1.0 Å towards the position usually occupied by the glycerol molecule (Fig. 2
a) and concomitantly Thr196 and Val197 slightly rearrange. This limited mobility of the residues lining the retention site supports its assignment as a pre-binding site, acting to concentrate substrates, particularly CO2, near the W site to enhance catalysis (Vilela-Alves et al., 2026
). This flexibility likely enables optimal transient interactions with the different substrates as they diffuse into the active site (Vilela-Alves et al., 2023
, 2026
).
| Figure 2 Differences in the vicinity of the retention site (Vilela-Alves et al., 2026 |
Moreover, in the cryo structure (PDB entry 6sdr) water W1 is stabilized by hydrogen bonds to the Nδ atom of His193 (at 2.9 Å), the carbonyl groups of Ala404 (at 2.9 Å) and Sec192 (at 2.8 Å), the Oγ atom of Thr196 (at 3.2 Å) and another water, W2 (at 2.8 Å) (Fig. 2
b). W2 is coordinated by the backbone carbonyl of Ala404, the side chain of Arg441, the backbone carbonyl of Leu440 and by W1. In the SSX structure (Fig. 2
c), three water molecules are observed in this pocket. W1 is missing and W2a is very close to the position of W2 in the cryo structure but is no longer coordinated by Arg441. Two new water molecules, W3 and W4, are found towards the `top' of this pocket. W3 is hydrogen-bonded to the Oγ atom of Thr196 (at 2.7 Å) and the Oη atom of Tyr403 (at 3.2 Å). W4 interacts with the carbonyl group of Sec192 (at 2.6 Å), the Oγ atom of Thr196 (at 2.7 Å) and Thr408 (at 2.7 Å). Despite the water rearrangements in the SSX structure, all interactions between water molecules and the peptide chain in this pocket observed in the cryo structure are retained, except for the carbonyl group of Ala404, which now only interacts with one water (W2a at 2.9 Å) instead of two. In a broader analysis, it is interesting to note a decrease in the total number of modelled waters in the SSX structure when compared with the cryogenic structures (Fdh_CryoSamePrep and PDB entry 6sdr). A comparison of the two structures shows that most of the missing water molecules are those at the surface of the cryo structure, which indicates that solvent-exposed water molecules are significantly more mobile at room temperature than at 100 K, the latter resulting in a more ordered water network that can be seen in the electron-density maps.
Gln409 and Met405 are key residues in the cascade of conformational changes that convey the activation/O2-protection signal from the solvent-exposed redox switch (Cys845–Cys872 disulfide bond; Oliveira et al., 2024
) to the buried W active site. In the SSX structure, Gln409 adopts a new rotamer, facing away from the MGD2 pterin moiety of the active site. This conformation displaces a water molecule present in the cryo structure (PDB entry 6sdr) and is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between Gln409 Oɛ and the backbone amine of Thr408 (at 2.9 Å), between Gln409 Nɛ and Thr408 Oγ (at 3.0 Å), and a weaker hydrogen bond (at 3.4 Å) between Gln409 Nɛ and the carbonyl group of Ile191 (Fig. 3
). The positioning of Gln409 is closely related to the change in conformation of Met405 (Oliveira et al., 2024
, 2025
; Vilela-Alves, Manuel, Pedrosa et al., 2024
; Vilela-Alves, Manuel, Viegas et al., 2024
), and in the SSX structure Met405 also adopts a different rotamer at the terminal methyl group, facing the vacant position of Gln409 in the cryo structure. These rearrangements are notable as the Cys845–Cys872 disulfide bond is clearly intact in the SSX structure (Supplementary Fig. S3). However, these new conformations do not reflect the Gln409/Met405 conformations observed in the cryo structure of the activated form of the enzyme (open disulfide bond; PDB entry 8cm6; Oliveira et al., 2024
), where Gln409 has undergone a considerable shift to hydrogen-bond to the N5 of MGD2 (Fig. 3
a).
| Figure 3 The differences in the vicinity of the MGD2 cofactor between the SSX, cryo (PDB entry 6sdr) and C872A variant (PDB entry 8cm6) NvFdhAB structures in violet, black and orange, respectively, focusing on the key Gln409 and Met405 residues in the cascade of conformational changes that convey the activation/O2-protection signal from the surface redox switch to the buried W active site. In all representations, the W active site is shown in ball-and-stick representation; the W ion, sulfido group and Sec192 Se atom are shown as spheres (light blue, yellow and orange. respectively). Hydrogen bonds are shown as teal dashed lines. Distances are in Å. (a) Superposition of the SSX, cryo (PDB entry 6sdr) and C872A (PDB entry 8cm6) NvFdhAB structures. The water molecule in the cryo structure is shown as a burgundy sphere. (b) Reoriented view of the SSX NvFdhAB structure, highlighting the hydrogen-bonding interactions of Gln409. 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps are shown as a blue mesh at 1.0 r.m.s.d. |
Lastly, conformational changes could also be observed for residues Phe160/Trp533 and for Met209 (Figs. 1
d and 1
e). These are currently not believed to play any specific role in catalysis. However, Trp533 becomes markedly disordered, with clear density only visible for the imidazole ring of the side chain (Fig. 4
a). This is surprising, as the tryptophan is embedded in a hydrophobic pocket that includes the pyranopterin ring of MGD2. To exclude the possibility of an unexpected Trp→His or Trp→Phe mutation, large single crystals from the same protein-preparation batch were grown and a single-crystal dataset was recorded to 1.95 Å resolution at 100 K (Fdh_CryoSamePrep). Here, well defined electron density is observed for Trp533, indicating that no mutation has occurred (Fig. 4
b). However, also in this structure the density of the benzene ring of the tryptophan is weaker than for the imidazole ring (to a lesser degree than in the room-temperature structure), which clearly provides further evidence that the side chain is mobile. This unusual behaviour of a buried tryptophan suggests that it may play a previously unsuspected functional role and this will be explored in future studies. Furthermore, comparing the substrate pocket of CryoSamePrep with Fdh_Cryo (PDB entry 6sdr) we notice that some features were not modelled in the CryoSamePrep structure (e.g. W1 and a second glycerol molecule close to His193) due to a less clear electron density for these data (Supplementary Figs. S4 and S5).
| Figure 4 Effect of the data-collection temperature on the B factors of Trp533 and surrounding residues in NvFdhAB. In all segments, the W active site is shown as sticks and spheres. The peptide chain is coloured by B factor (B factors were normalized for each structure independently), and 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps, at 1.0 r.m.s.d., are shown as a violet mesh. (a) The SSX_FdhAB structure. (b) The Fdh_CryoSamePrep FdhAB structure. |
3.3. Radiation damage in the W active site and geometry comparison
The serial synchrotron data collection allowed us to obtain a low radiation-dose structure of NvFdhAB with an average dose (exposed region) of 30 kGy, as estimated using the RADDOSE-3D online server (input data available in Supplementary Data S1; Dickerson et al., 2024
). Comparison of the W active site observed in the SSX structure with both the putative oxidized-state cryo structure (PDB entry 6sdr; average diffraction-weighted dose 2.2 MGy) and the cryo structure reported here (average diffraction-weighted dose 1.4 MGy; Zeldin et al., 2013
) shows that they are highly similar (Fig. 5
), with closely matched bond distances, twisting and folding angles defined by the two pterin dithiolenes (Table 2
), as proposed by Liu et al. (2021
). In contrast, the previously published formate-reduced structure (PDB entry 6sdv; Oliveira et al., 2020
) shows an altered active-site geometry. The match between the active-site geometry observed in the low-dose serial data set and the putative oxidized-state cryo structures supports their assignment as the oxidized state, based on the structural data obtained. To fully ascertain this issue additional experiments, namely leveraging spectroscopic techniques, will be required.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Figure 5 Superposition of the SSX (violet), the cryo NvFdhAB (black; PDB entry 6sdr) and cryo formate-reduced NvFdhAB (green; PDB entry 6sdv) active sites, aligned based on MGD1. The W site with the two MGD cofactors, the sulfido ligand and Sec192 is shown as sticks; the W ion, sulfido group and Sec192 Se atom are shown as spheres (light blue, yellow and orange, respectively). |
4. Conclusion
NvFdhAB microcrystals were produced and optimized for SSX data collection, yielding a low-dose, room-temperature SSX structure of the as-isolated protein at 1.93 Å resolution. Comparison with the published cryo as-isolated structure NvFdhAB (PDB entry 6sdr) and the additional cryo structure reported here reveals a high degree of structural similarity. Notable is the conservation of the overall structural details of the recently reported retention site, despite the absence of the cryoprotectant glycerol that has been observed in this pocket in all cryo structures (Vilela-Alves et al., 2026
). Conformational changes in several residues that have been linked to the enzyme mechanism were observed, including Arg441, Thr196-Val197 and Gln409, as well as changes in water structure. Interestingly, a buried tryptophan residue (Trp533) close to the active site exhibited high mobility, suggesting that it may also have a functional role. Comparison of the geometry of the W active site in the low-dose serial structure with previously published cryo structures supports their assignment to the oxidized state, while further spectroscopic studies will be needed to fully clarify this question.
Overall, the new conformations of residues known to be involved in catalysis and regulation observed in this room-temperature structure highlight the importance of multi-temperature studies for understanding enzyme mechanism. The high-quality serial structure that is reported here enables future time-resolved mechanistic studies targeting possible catalytic intermediates in order to fully understand the catalytic mechanism of this biotechnologically relevant protein.
Supporting information
PDB references: W-formate dehydrogenase from Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris, 30gj; 30gk
Supplementary Data, Supplementary Tables and Supplementary Figures. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798326006923/ai5019sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We thank Daniele de Sanctis from the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France for his help in testing NvFdhAB microcrystals during optimization, and the ESRF for provision of synchrotron-radiation facilities through beamline ID-29, which was used for these tests during the `Advanced methods for ambient temperature crystallography at ESRF–EBS' workshop in 2023. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Funding information
This work is financed by national funds from FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I. P. through fellowship 2023.00286.BD (to GV-A) with DOI identifier https://doi.org/10.54499/2023.00286.BD, project PTDC/BII-BBF/2050/2020, project DAAD 2022.15290.CBM, Research Units Applied Molecular Biosciences – https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04378/2025 and https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/PRR/04378/2025, and MOSTMICRO-ITQB (https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04612/2025) and Associate Laboratories Institute for Health and Bioeconomy – i4HB (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0140/2020) and LS4FUTURE (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0087/2020). We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) unit at Hamburg for the provision of beamtime at the PETRA III beamlines P14 and P14-2 (T-REXX). Beamtime was allocated through the T-REXX BAG (TREXX-2). Funding for development and the construction of the T-REXX endstation was received from the BMBF (Verbundforschung, 05K16GU1, 05K19GU1 and 05K22GU6).
References
Agirre, J., Atanasova, M., Bagdonas, H., Ballard, C. B., Baslé, A., Beilsten-Edmands, J., Borges, R. J., Brown, D. G., Burgos-Mármol, J. J., Berrisford, J. M., Bond, P. S., Caballero, I., Catapano, L., Chojnowski, G., Cook, A. G., Cowtan, K. D., Croll, T. I., Debreczeni, J. É., Devenish, N. E., Dodson, E. J., Drevon, T. R., Emsley, P., Evans, G., Evans, P. R., Fando, M., Foadi, J., Fuentes-Montero, L., Garman, E. F., Gerstel, M., Gildea, R. J., Hatti, K., Hekkelman, M. L., Heuser, P., Hoh, S. W., Hough, M. A., Jenkins, H. T., Jiménez, E., Joosten, R. P., Keegan, R. M., Keep, N., Krissinel, E. B., Kolenko, P., Kovalevskiy, O., Lamzin, V. S., Lawson, D. M., Lebedev, A. A., Leslie, A. G. W., Lohkamp, B., Long, F., Malý, M., McCoy, A. J., McNicholas, S. J., Medina, A., Millán, C., Murray, J. W., Murshudov, G. N., Nicholls, R. A., Noble, M. E. M., Oeffner, R., Pannu, N. S., Parkhurst, J. M., Pearce, N., Pereira, J., Perrakis, A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Rigden, D. J., Rochira, W., Sammito, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Sheldrick, G. M., Shelley, K. L., Simkovic, F., Simpkin, A. J., Skubak, P., Sobolev, E., Steiner, R. A., Stevenson, K., Tews, I., Thomas, J. M. H., Thorn, A., Valls, J. T., Uski, V., Usón, I., Vagin, A., Velankar, S., Vollmar, M., Walden, H., Waterman, D., Wilson, K. S., Winn, M. D., Winter, G., Wojdyr, M. & Yamashita, K. (2023). Acta Cryst. D79, 449–461. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., Kerfeld, C. A., Morris, R. H., Peden, C. H. F., Portis, A. R., Ragsdale, S. W., Rauchfuss, T. B., Reek, J. N. H., Seefeldt, L. C., Thauer, R. K. & Waldrop, G. L. (2013). Chem. Rev. 113, 6621–6658. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A. & Angelini, A. (2013). J. CO2 Util. 3–4, 65–73. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Axley, M. J., Grahame, D. A. & Stadtman, T. C. (1990). J. Biol. Chem. 265, 18213–18218. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Boyington, J. C., Gladyshev, V. N., Khangulov, S. V., Stadtman, T. C. & Sun, P. D. (1997). Science, 275, 1305–1308. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Calzadiaz-Ramirez, L. & Meyer, A. S. (2022). Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 73, 95–100. Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
da Silva, S. M., Voordouw, J., Leitão, C., Martins, M., Voordouw, G. & Pereira, I. A. C. (2013). Microbiology, 159, 1760–1769. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dickerson, J. L., McCubbin, P. T. N., Brooks–Bartlett, J. C. & Garman, E. F. (2024). Protein Sci. 33, e5005. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Dong, G. & Ryde, U. (2018). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 23, 1243–1254. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gevorkov, Y., Yefanov, O., Barty, A., White, T. A., Mariani, V., Brehm, W., Tolstikova, A., Grigat, R.-R. & Chapman, H. N. (2019). Acta Cryst. A75, 694–704. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Grimaldi, S., Schoepp-Cothenet, B., Ceccaldi, P., Guigliarelli, B. & Magalon, A. (2013). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1827, 1048–1085. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hartmann, T., Schrapers, P., Utesch, T., Nimtz, M., Rippers, Y., Dau, H., Mroginski, M. A., Haumann, M. & Leimkühler, S. (2016). Biochemistry, 55, 2381–2389. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hille, R., Hall, J. & Basu, P. (2014). Chem. Rev. 114, 3963–4038. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Horrell, S., Agthe, M., von Stetten, D., Mehrabi, P., Schulz, E.-C., Bourenkov, G., Nikolova, M., Karpics, I., Fiedler, S., Tellkamp, F., Miller, R. D., Huse, N., Pearson, A. R. & Schneider, T. R. (2019). Acta Cryst. A75, e35. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Joosten, R. P., Long, F., Murshudov, G. N. & Perrakis, A. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 213–220. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jormakka, M., Törnroth, S., Byrne, B. & Iwata, S. (2002). Science, 295, 1863–1868. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kanega, R., Ertem, M. Z., Onishi, N., Szalda, D. J., Fujita, E. & Himeda, Y. (2020). Organometallics, 39, 1519–1531. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, M., Nazemi, A., Taylor, M. G., Nandy, A., Duan, C., Steeves, A. H. & Kulik, H. J. (2021). ACS Catal. 12, 383–396. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lodh, J. & Roy, S. (2022). J. Inorg. Biochem. 234, 111903. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Maia, L. B., Moura, J. J. G. & Moura, I. (2015). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 20, 287–309. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mehrabi, P., Müller-Werkmeister, H. M., Leimkohl, J.-P., Schikora, H., Ninkovic, J., Krivokuca, S., Andriček, L., Epp, S. W., Sherrell, D., Owen, R. L., Pearson, A. R., Tellkamp, F., Schulz, E. C. & Miller, R. J. D. (2020). J. Synchrotron Rad. 27, 360–370. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nielsen, C. F., Lange, L. & Meyer, A. S. (2019). Biotechnol. Adv. 37, 107408. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. R., Mota, C., Mourato, C., Domingos, R. M., Santos, M. F. A., Gesto, D., Guigliarelli, B., Santos-Silva, T., Romão, M. J. & Cardoso Pereira, I. A. (2020). ACS Catal. 10, 3844–3856. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. R., Mota, C., Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Pedrosa, N., Fourmond, V., Klymanska, K., Léger, C., Guigliarelli, B., Romão, M. J. & Cardoso Pereira, I. A. (2024). Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 111–119. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. R., Vilela-Alves, G., Mota, C., Léger, C., Fourmond, V., Biaso, F., Guigliarelli, B., Romão, M. J. & Pereira, I. A. C. (2025). ACS Catal. 15, 12627–12639. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, H., Macieira, S., Dias, J. M., Teixeira, S., Bursakov, S., Huber, R., Moura, J. J. G., Moura, I. & Romão, M. J. (2002). Structure, 10, 1261–1272. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Radon, C., Mittelstädt, G., Duffus, B. R., Bürger, J., Hartmann, T., Mielke, T., Teutloff, C., Leimkühler, S. & Wendler, P. (2020). Nat. Commun. 11, 1912. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Romão, M. J. (2009). Dalton Trans. 38, 4053–4068. Google Scholar
Schulz, E. C., Prester, A., von Stetten, D., Gore, G., Hatton, C. E., Bartels, K., Leimkohl, J.-P., Schikora, H., Ginn, H. M., Tellkamp, F. & Mehrabi, P. (2025). Nat. Commun. 16, 6553. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Siegbahn, P. E. M. (2022). J. Phys. Chem. B, 126, 1728–1733. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Szczesny, J., Ruff, A., Oliveira, A. R., Pita, M., Pereira, I. A. C., De Lacey, A. L. & Schuhmann, W. (2020). ACS Energy Lett. 5, 321–327. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Martins, G., Carpentier, P., Raczyńska, A., Szaleniec, M., Pereira, I. A. C., Romão, M. J. & Mota, C. (2026). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 65, e26133. Google Scholar
Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Oliveira, A. R., Pereira, I. C., Romão, M. J. & Mota, C. (2023). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 476. Google Scholar
Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Pedrosa, N., Cardoso Pereira, I. A., Romão, M. J. & Mota, C. (2024). Acta Cryst. F80, 98–106. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Viegas, A., Carpentier, P., Biaso, F., Guigliarelli, B., Pereira, I. A. C., Romão, M. J. & Mota, C. (2024). Chem. Sci. 15, 13090–13101. Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Sharff, A., Smart, O., Paciorek, W., Womack, T. & Bricogne, G. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 293–302. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
von Stetten, D. & Pearson, A. R. (2026). Acta Cryst. D82, 227–236. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
White, T. A., Kirian, R. A., Martin, A. V., Aquila, A., Nass, K., Barty, A. & Chapman, H. N. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 335–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Young, T., Niks, D., Hakopian, S., Tam, T. K., Yu, X., Hille, R. & Blaha, G. M. (2020). J. Biol. Chem. 295, 6570–6585. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zeldin, O. B., Gerstel, M. & Garman, E. F. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 1225–1230. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



