metal-organic compounds
Dipotassium rhodizonate
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, England
*Correspondence e-mail: jacowan@anl.gov
Dipotassium rhodizonate, 2K+·C6O62−, crystallizes in Fddd. The rhodizonate anions lie in hexagonal layers connected by the potassium ions, which lie between the planes and connect adjacent layers. The conformation of the rhodizonate ion is distinct from previous observations. The of the potassium ions is 2 and the of the centroid of the rhodizonate ions is 222.
Comment
The crystal structures of potassium and rubidium rhodizonates were determined by Neumann (1965); however, the coordinates were unavailable in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.25, update of January 2004; Allen, 2002). Rubidium rhodizonate has recently been re-reported by Braga et al. (2001). We wished to compare the cocrystallization behaviour of rhodizonic acid (C6O6H2) with 2,6-dihydroxybenzoquinone (C6O4H4) and tetrahydroxybenzoquinone (C6O6H4). While we have produced crystals containing these molecules (Cowan et al., 2001a,b), so far we have been unable to produce a cocrystal containing rhodizonic acid. We have obtained the potassium salt, (I), as a by-product of this project and redetermined its structure.
Rhodizonic acid is an intriguing molecule used by crime fighters to detect traces of lead produced by gunfire (Bartsch et al., 1996). It is a weak organic acid, which should participate in a variety of different hydrogen bonds, and upon deprotonation to rhodizonate its shape and properties change significantly.
Potassium rhodizonate (Fig. 1) crystallizes in Fddd. The metal ion lies between four rhodizonate anions, bonding with eight O atoms (Fig. 2). The rhodizonate anions lie in hexagonal layers connected by the potassium ions, which lie between the planes and connect adjacent layers (Fig. 3). The of the potassium ions is 2 and the of the centroid of the rhodizonate ions is 222. This structure is incompatable with the cell dimensions and which are availiable in the CSD, of the original structure (Neumann, 1965) and may be a polymorph or a low-temperature phase.
There are four previously published structures containing the rhodizonate ion, in which there are two distinct conformations; the conformation in the present structure is distinct from either of those previously determined. The C—O bond lengths in the rhodizonate ion [1.254 (5) and 1.255 (3) Å] are essentially the same as those observed in the rubidium salt [1.252 (9) and 1.248 (6) Å] ; however, the C—C bond lengths [1.480 (5) and 1.479 (3) Å] are slightly longer than those in the rubidium salt [1.468 (6) and 1.469 (6) Å]. The rhodizonate ion, in contrast with the situation observed in the rubidium salt, is not planar but has a twisted-boat form (r.m.s. deviation from the plane = 0.108 Å); consequently, the molecular symmetry is not D6h but D2. It is worth noting that the rubidium salt is not isostructural with the potassium salt (Braga et al., 2001). Lam & Mak (2001a,b) have produced organic cocrystals containing the rhodizonate ion acting as a multi-hydrogen-bond acceptor, in which the rhodizonate ion is smaller with a greater variation in its internal bond lengths; for example, a range of 1.421 (5)–1.458 (5) Å is found in the C—C bonds and 1.234 (4)–1.258 (4) Å in the C=O bonds in bis(tetra-n-butylammonium) rhodizonate tetrakis(phenylurea) clathrate (Lam & Mak, 2001b).
Experimental
Rhodizonic acid dihydrate (approximately 0.5 g), purchased from Aldrich Chemicals, was dissolved in 0.1 M potassium hydroxide, producing an intense deep-red solution. Crystals suitable for X-ray were prepared by slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature.
Crystal data
|
Data collection
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: SMART-NT (Bruker, 1998); cell SMART-NT; data reduction: SAINT-NT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680400529X/fl6088sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680400529X/fl6088Isup2.hkl
Data collection: SMART-NT (Bruker, 1998); cell
SMART-NT; data reduction: SAINT-NT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).2K+·C6O62− | Dx = 2.063 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 246.26 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Orthorhombic, Fddd | Cell parameters from 982 reflections |
a = 8.426 (2) Å | θ = 12.4–22.1° |
b = 12.011 (3) Å | µ = 1.19 mm−1 |
c = 15.671 (3) Å | T = 100 K |
V = 1586.0 (6) Å3 | Block, dark red |
Z = 8 | 0.2 × 0.15 × 0.1 mm |
F(000) = 976 |
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer | 392 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.049 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.2° |
ω scans | h = −10→10 |
3525 measured reflections | k = −15→15 |
462 independent reflections | l = −20→20 |
Refinement on F2 | 0 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
wR(F2) = 0.093 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.034P)2 + 24.4908P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.06 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
462 reflections | Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 |
34 parameters | Δρmin = −0.47 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
K1 | 0.3750 | 0.52405 (7) | 0.3750 | 0.0107 (3) | |
C1 | 0.6250 | 0.6250 | 0.2194 (2) | 0.0115 (8) | |
O1 | 0.6250 | 0.6250 | 0.29940 (18) | 0.0159 (6) | |
O2 | 0.3441 (2) | 0.61034 (17) | 0.21116 (12) | 0.0129 (5) | |
C2 | 0.4733 (3) | 0.6199 (2) | 0.17206 (16) | 0.0114 (6) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
K1 | 0.0099 (4) | 0.0144 (4) | 0.0078 (4) | 0.000 | 0.0011 (4) | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.0129 (18) | 0.0103 (17) | 0.0113 (18) | −0.0009 (16) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0160 (14) | 0.0204 (15) | 0.0113 (13) | −0.0020 (13) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.0100 (10) | 0.0161 (10) | 0.0126 (9) | 0.0021 (8) | 0.0026 (8) | 0.0005 (8) |
C2 | 0.0130 (13) | 0.0090 (12) | 0.0124 (13) | −0.0003 (11) | 0.0008 (11) | 0.0021 (11) |
K1—O1 | 2.7038 (13) | C1—O1 | 1.254 (5) |
K1—O2 | 2.781 (2) | C1—C2 | 1.479 (3) |
K1—O2i | 2.799 (2) | O2—C2 | 1.255 (3) |
K1—O2ii | 3.016 (2) | C2—C2iii | 1.480 (5) |
O1—K1—O1iv | 126.72 (4) | O1iv—K1—O2ii | 164.86 (5) |
O1—K1—O2v | 99.46 (7) | O2v—K1—O2ii | 126.79 (5) |
O1iv—K1—O2v | 60.09 (6) | O2—K1—O2ii | 83.51 (3) |
O1—K1—O2 | 60.09 (6) | O2i—K1—O2ii | 79.15 (7) |
O1iv—K1—O2 | 99.47 (7) | O2vi—K1—O2ii | 55.69 (7) |
O2v—K1—O2 | 136.24 (9) | O2vii—K1—O2ii | 98.63 (8) |
O1—K1—O2i | 124.12 (6) | O1—C1—C2 | 120.11 (16) |
O1iv—K1—O2i | 87.49 (5) | O1—C1—C2viii | 120.11 (16) |
O2v—K1—O2i | 136.21 (7) | C2—C1—C2viii | 119.8 (3) |
O2—K1—O2i | 73.01 (7) | C1—O1—K1viii | 115.99 (5) |
O1—K1—O2vi | 87.49 (5) | C1—O1—K1 | 115.99 (5) |
O1iv—K1—O2vi | 124.12 (6) | K1viii—O1—K1 | 128.03 (11) |
O2v—K1—O2vi | 73.01 (7) | C2—O2—K1 | 113.82 (16) |
O2—K1—O2vi | 136.21 (7) | C2—O2—K1i | 112.93 (17) |
O2i—K1—O2vi | 109.58 (9) | K1—O2—K1i | 106.99 (7) |
O1—K1—O2vii | 164.86 (5) | C2—O2—K1ix | 104.64 (16) |
O1iv—K1—O2vii | 67.63 (4) | K1—O2—K1ix | 135.52 (7) |
O2v—K1—O2vii | 83.51 (3) | K1i—O2—K1ix | 75.90 (6) |
O2—K1—O2vii | 126.79 (5) | O2—C2—C1 | 120.6 (2) |
O2i—K1—O2vii | 55.69 (7) | O2—C2—C2iii | 119.63 (15) |
O2vi—K1—O2vii | 79.15 (7) | C1—C2—C2iii | 119.77 (16) |
O1—K1—O2ii | 67.63 (4) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1, −z+1/2; (ii) x+1/4, y−1/4, −z+1/2; (iii) x, −y+5/4, −z+1/4; (iv) x−1/2, −y+5/4, −z+3/4; (v) −x+3/4, y, −z+3/4; (vi) x+1/4, −y+1, z+1/4; (vii) −x+1/2, y−1/4, z+1/4; (viii) −x+5/4, −y+5/4, z; (ix) x−1/4, y+1/4, −z+1/2. |
References
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bartsch, M. R., Kobus, H. J. & Wainwright, K. P. (1996). J. Forensic Sci. 41, 1046–1051. CAS Google Scholar
Braga, D., Cojazzi, G., Maini, L. & Grepioni, F. (2001). New J. Chem. 25, 1221–1223. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bruker. (1998). SAINT-NT and SMART-NT. Versions 5.0. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Cowan, J. A., Howard, J. A. K. & Leech, M. A. (2001a). Acta Cryst. C57, 302–303. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Cowan, J. A., Howard, J. A. K. & Leech, M. A. (2001b). Acta Cryst. C57, 1196–1198. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lam, C.-K. & Mak, T. C. W. (2001a). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 3453–3455. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lam, C.-K. & Mak, T. C. W. (2001b). Chem. Commun. pp. 1568–1569. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Neumann, M. A. (1965). PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, 467–473. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1999). SHELXTL/PC. Version 5.10 for Windows-NT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.